1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> ?
CURTSY OF THE ARTIST
Capital of India belongs to Nehru and thereby Nehruvians
14th November is Bal Din (बाल-दिन). But why? Because it is the Birth Day of Jawaharlal Motilal – Gangadhar- laxminarayan – Raj Kaul-Nehru. There are rumors that Gangadhar was a Muslim and his name was Gyasuddin. He was Kotwal in Delhi. But Nehru in his autobiography writes that Gangadhar was son of Laxminarayan. Who was the father of Raj Kaul? Nehru has not clarified. Generally among Hindus and that too among Brahmins, it was a practice to orate and keep record of at least 12 generations. Further Kashmir was not a least significant region for Brahmins. In fact Kashmir provides a big source to provide Indian cultural history.
But leave this aside. Because so far dynasty is a personal matter of Nehru. If Nehru wanted to hide it, he should have said so. He could have to opted to at least clarify for giving true and complete information of his dynasty.
It should not be much relevant to us as to he was Muslim or had he any link with Muslims or not.
Once JL Nehru had said that he is Hindu by Birth, Muslim by mind and Christian by brain. That is, according to JL Nehru himself, he had nothing to do with Hinduism other than his birth.
We do not know as to how JL Nehru defines Hinduism, Islam and Christianity.
As for JL Nehru’s daughter Indira, it had been stated by Jai Prakash Narayan, that Indira had her own definition for words, just like Humty Dumpty. This “Humpty Dumpty” character of Indira was proved during the period of “Emergency”.
Posters were pasted on the wall “Our motto to behave gently with all.”
But what was the meaning of this “Gentle”?
The meaning of “Gentle” was “to arrest and put them behind the bar”.
We cannot ruled out the similar mindset of Nehru. Nehru was also in habit of making meaningless statements. e.g. “Line of Control has no definition”
I AM HINDU BY BIRTH
What is the meaning of “I am Hindu by birth” if the succeeding statements are I am Muslim by mind and I am Christian by brain.
Birth is not identity itself. Your identity is you mind and brain.
We can derive this meaning from the statement of Nehru. “I am not Hindu by my mind and brain.”
WHAT IS THE BASE OF HINDUISM?
Philosophy of Vedas and Geeta. (i.e Ishavasya-Vritti ईशावास्यवृत्ति).
Some social rituals which are changeable and optional.
Liberty to believe as to what may convince yourself.
Mindset for non-violence unless the opposite person says, “I do not believe in non-violence.”
[(I know my duty, I know what I ought not to do) (But I will not do what I ought to do, I will do what I ought not to do). If you perform violence on such person or institution, you still considered you have performed non-violence. Because minimum violence is non-violence. Refer dialogue between Lord Krishna and Duryodhana, before fighting the Maha Bharata War]
YOU ARE NOT HINDU
If your mind does not accept above four parameters, you are not Hindu by your mind and brain. We do not know as to what was in the mind and the brain of Nehru. But because Nehru had written “Discovery of India, (where he had discovered nothing), he has simply re-written the history written by European historians. Despite of this he says he has DISCOVERED. Again it is the Humpty-Dumpty terminological dictionary used. Somebody should decide or define what is meant by DISCOVERY.
MUSLIMS SAY, THEY BELIEVE IN IMAAN. (HONESTY).
Was JL Nehru honest?
Leave the matter of defeat of India in China War 1962, where India had lost 91000 square mile land. At that time China was marching ahead, just like a victory as a cake walk, somebody asked Nehru, where and when the army of Chines would stop? Nehru replied “the place where we will stop them”. That is Nehru wanted to give a message that unless we would not stop Chinese, they would continue to capture more and more Indian land.
But Chinese had acquired 20000 square miles more land of India than what it had claimed. Hence China started leaving the additional land and went back. Vinoba Bhave appreciated China with a statement, that “This Is The First Time In History where a victorious army surrendering the additional land to a defeated country.
After the shameful defeat, JL Nehru and his party took an oath before the parliament, that
“We will not take rest till we re-capture the lost land”.
This was a fraudulent oath. Nehru never tried to recapture the lost land. Though JL Nehru, conspired a foolproof scheme to see her daughter Indira becomes his successor. Indira, though ready to accept the inherited PM-ship happily, never tried to pay heed to her duty on inherited debt of her father, though she was a party in taking that oath.
This indicates that neither Nehru nor Indira was honest.
ALWAYS BE THANKLESS
Recall, once upon a time, Shahbuddin Mohammed Ghori was defeated by Prithviraj Chauhan. Ghori was pardoned and released by Prithviraj Chauhan in the first battle.
Ghori attacked Prithviraj again. In this battle, Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated. But Shahbuddin Ghori did not spared Prithviraj, as Shahbuddin Ghori was thankless.
To become thankless is the character of many of the Muslim kings. Continue your fight with your opponents all the time irrespective of means. This character had been adopted by Nehruvians for dealing with their opponents. What is it? Minimize them if not finish them by every means whom you have recognized your opponents.
Yes. Nehru had tried his best to minimize his opponents. Jinna, Sardar Patel, Subhash Chandra Bose, Raj Gopalachari, Jai Prakash Narayan, Morarji Desai and many others… He had never tried to negotiate with them.
WHAT IS THE MOTO OF CHRISTIANITY?
Love thy neighbor?
Spread your ideology?
Yes. Be emotional on your ideology instead of applying and having clear concepts on your ideology.
SOCIALISM OF JL NEHRU
Mahatma Gandhi had once said, “I do not understand Jawahar’s Socialism. I also do not know as to what he himself understand about his socialism?”
Socialism is a vague term. Socialism has no clear definition. What is the line of demarcation among Autocracy-socialism-capitalism-democracy?
JL Nehru had no clear concepts on socialism.
In middle of nineteen fifties, Nehru redefined his Socialism.
He passed a resolution in his Congress working committee in this regards.
He introduced Democratic Socialism. This was with an intention to be more specific on socialism.
It is just like “Shuddhaadvait (शुद्धाद्वैत i.e. शुद्ध अद्वैत)”. My father made a fun of शुद्धाद्वैत in this way.
If you believe in “Shuddhaadvai ((शुद्धाद्वैत)” then it means, there exist two Advait-s (अद्वैत). One is shuddha advait (शुद्ध अद्वैत) and another is ashuddha advait (अ-शुद्ध अद्वैत). If there are two Advait-s, then how you can be called as advait-vaadi (अद्वैतवादी). (Take it as a fun).
NOW LET US EXAMINE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM.
We have two Socialism-s.
We have Undemocratic Socialism and Democratic Socialism.
Socialism is for Humanity.
If the Humanity has no space for democracy in “Socialism”, then there would be an Undemocratic Socialism despite of Socialism is for Humanity.
How funny it looks. Is it not contradictory?
We have heard of Benevolent Dictator. A Dictator can be a Benevolent, but Dictatorship cannot be benevolent. Dictatorship is a system process with continuity.
What is about Socialism?
Lord Rama could be termed a benevolent dictator. But the successors of Rama, all need not and could not be benevolent.
What was meant by JL Nehru on Democratic Socialism?
If the daughter of JL Nehru, becomes the successor of JL Nehru under JL Nehru’s plan, then would it be a Democratic Socialism? And if Mao’s daughter or wife could not or does not become successor of Mao, then would it be termed as Socialism?
What a hypocrisy!
What was the difference between JL Nehru and Indira NehruGhandi?
JL Nehru had his back ground of giving contribution in freedom struggle.
Indira NehruGhandi had nil contribution. She can betrayed openly. JL Nehru could not.
Nehru had disclosed his hypocrisy as under:
नहेरु की दृष्टिमें महात्मा गांधीः
गांधी जी के सर्वाधिक प्रिय व खण्डित भारत के प्रथम प्रधानमंत्री जवाहर लाल नेहरू ने कहा – ” ओह दैट आफुल ओल्ड हिपोक्रेट ” Oh, that awful old hypocrite – ओह ! वह ( गांधी ) भयंकर ढोंगी बुड्ढा । यह पढकर आप चकित होगे कि क्या यह कथन सत्य है – गांधी जी के अनन्य अनुयायी व दाहिना हाथ माने जाने वाले जवाहर लाल नेहरू ने ऐसा कहा होगा , कदापि नहीं । किन्तु यह मध्याह्न के सूर्य की भाँति देदीप्यमान सत्य है – नेहरू ने ऐसा ही कहा था । प्रसंग लीजिये – सन 1955 में कनाडा के प्रधानमंत्री लेस्टर पीयरसन भारत आये थे । भारत के प्रधानमंत्री जवाहर लाल नेहरू के साथ उनकी भेंट हुई थी । भेंट की चर्चा उन्होंने अपनी पुस्तक ” द इन्टरनेशनल हेयर्स ” में की है -
सन 1955 में दिल्ली यात्रा के दौरान मुझे नेहरू को ठीक – ठीक समझने का अवसर मिला था । मुझे वह रात याद है , जब गार्डन पार्टी में हम दोनों साथ बैठे थे , रात के सात बज रहे थे और चाँदनी छिटकी हुई थी । उस पार्टी में नाच गाने का कार्यक्रम था । नाच शुरू होने से पहले नृत्यकार दौडकर आये और उन्होंने नेहरू के पाँव छुए फिर हम बाते करने लगे । उन्होंने गांधी के बारे में चर्चा की , उसे सुनकर मैं स्तब्ध हो गया । उन्होंने बताया कि गांधी कैसे कुशल एक्टर थे ? उन्होंने अंग्रेजों को अपने व्यवहार में कैसी चालाकी दिखाई ? अपने इर्द – गिर्द ऐसा घेरा बुना , जो अंग्रेजों को अपील करे । गांधी के बारे में मेरे सवाल के जबाब में उन्होंने कहा – Oh, that awful old hypocrite । नेहरू के कथन का अभिप्राय हुआ – ” ओह ! वह भयंकर ढोंगी बुड्ढा ” ।( ग्रन्थ विकास , 37 – राजापार्क , आदर्शनगर , जयपुर द्वारा प्रकाशित सूर्यनारायण चौधरी की ‘ राजनीति के अधखुले गवाक्ष ‘ पुस्तक से उदधृत अंश )
नेहरू द्वारा गांधी के प्रति व्यक्त इस कथन से आप क्या समझते है – नेहरू ने गांधी को बहुत निकट एवं गहराई से देखा था । वह भी उनके विरोधी होकर नहीं अपितु कट्टर अनुयायी होकर । फिर क्या कारण रहा कि वे गांधी जी के बारे में अपने उन दमित निश्कर्षो को स्वार्थवश या जनभयवश अपने देशवासियों के सामने प्रकट न कर सके , एक विदेशी प्रधानमंत्री के सामने प्रकट कर दिया ?
गुजरातीमें पढो पूरी इमरजेन्सीकी बात
एक या दुसरे प्रकारकी इमरजेन्सी लादना, नहेरुवीयनोंकी आदत है.
Each Nehruvian progeny has always taken India as their own property. There are more than thousand Government Schemes on the name of Nehruvians.
There are numerous institutions having names right from Motilal to Rajiv. Bharat Ratna is freely available for them,
Cremation space and to make it a national memorial of the dead bodies of Nehruvians is reserved at Yamuna River.
Really, Narendra Modi is not comparable with JL Nehru or any of the Nehruvians.
Narendra Modi is the PM of our dream
Leave it aside that I am a Brahmin, but I was born during the Historical Period which starts from 500 BCE. I know the history of the community in which I was born.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Shirish(1940) – Mohanlal(1909) –Mahashankara(1869) -Harishankar-Lepjishankar-Tryambakeshvar-Vaijnath-Bhavanidatta-Hridayram-Daveshvar-Govardhan (1609) Dave,
Goverdhan Dave (Dwivedi) had come from Siddhapur of Patan in early seventeenth century in Lunavada. Audichya Brahmins came from Kashi (Banaras) as MulRaj Solanki took us with him to perform a Maha Rudra Yag in 1037AD.
We Audichya Brahmins, had come from Kashi (Banaras)to Gujarat. MulRaj Solanki the founder of Solanky Empire of Western India, had visited Kashi with his Minister. He took us with him to perform a Maha Rudra Yag in 1037AD in Patan.
We know our origin, though I have not made any discovery. Nehru, as reported by himself, he had discovered Indian History, how had he failed to discover his own family?