WAS M. K. GANDHI RESPONSIBLE FOR DIVIDING INDIA? Part – 3
September 30, 2014 by smdave1940
WAS M. K. GANDHI RESPONSIBLE FOR DIVIDING INDIA? Part – 3
WHAT WAS THE DEPARTING KICK OF BRITISH?
Why MK Gandhi did not go on fast for pressurizing Congress to deny partition?
Gandhi has stipulated conditions for his every action. “Going on Fast” has certain pre-conditions. To understand Gandhi one must read Gandhi.
However the counter question is that as to why only Gandhi should go on fast?
One cannot shirk from their own responsibility by asking MK Gandhi as to why he did he not go on fast. Why did they themselves neither went on fast nor gave any call for Direct Action?
The leaders who were “Pro-United India” too could have gone on fast. Who had prevented them? Nobody had prevented them. They could have gone on fast onto the death. They too could have given a call for “Direct Action” to Hindus. Otherwise also Gandhi had to die as the result was to be the same.
In fact every leader wanted partition. The partition had become inevitable due to the Hindu-Muslim riots which was a result of the call of “Direct Action” given by Jinna to Muslims.
India was not in position to delay the independence.
It is also a matter to research that after the death of Sardar Patel why did the so called nationalists not forcibly drive out the Muslims from India?
Pakistans, Burma, Ceylon did such thing all the time? All of them have driven out others from their country in a big way. Omar and Farukh have driven out even 7 lakhs Hindus from their state in 1990 after executing a massacre of 3000+ Hindus, though Kashmir is an integral part of India.
DON’T MAKE NON-ISSUE AN ISSUE. THIS BECOMES TO HIDE THE REAL ISSUE
One has to forget MK Gandhi, if one does not want to follow him.
MK Gandhi had not held any power post.
Those who held powers and were entrusted with duties and we pay them against their duties, we can pass one or other blame for their failure. Gandhi had acted as an ordinary person. It is your choice to follow his ideas or not. Gandhi is insignificant.
Do not forget Nehruvian. They always held power posts.
Nehruvians have not become insignificant. They had constitutional power and constitutional responsibilities. To perform their constitutional duties they had been paid very heavily from public account. They made blunders, frauds and scandals. They are still significant.
Efforts are still required to eliminate Nehruvian Congress. Nehruvian Congress can very easily come to power again, if the learned and elite people would go on discussing irrelevant, least significant and dead issues or non-issues like passing blame on MK Gandhi.
Gandhi is dead. You are alive. Nehruvian Congress and antinational forces are alive. Concentrate on them. If you do not concentrate on them, then you would be not be less than JAICHAND.
INDIA COULD DEFEAT FASCISTS AND AUTOCRAT LIKE INDIRA GANDHI
Narendra Modi has great respect for Mahatma Gandhi. Mahatma Gandhi has inspired many great leaders in the world. Let us not pass blame on him. He was very much tactful and he did his best for the nation. The credit goes to MK Gandhi for having firm rooted democracy in India. Due to firm rooted democracy only, India could withstand against the fascist forces of Indira Gandhi. It is only India in the world who could uproot the fascist government of Indira Gandhi within 18 months. France had taken 18 years to uproot fascist government.
Now let us expect from Narendra Modi not to act like Prithviraj Chauhan, but to act like Chanakya, to take India towards development to regain its thousands of year old dignity.
Even if Narendra Modi could not act, to the extent to your satisfaction, there is nobody else who can do better. Be very clear to prevent Nehruvian Congress from regaining power again at any cost. Your any impatience with Narendra Modi, can create a negative atmosphere to confuse the mass opinion. This would simply help Nehruvian Congress.
WHAT IS NON-VIOLENCE (अहिंसा)?
Gandhi has made a definition of Non-Violence as minimum violence. If a work can got be done by hitting a stick once, then do not hit twice.
i.e Non-violence is a relative term.
There is nothing like absolute Non-Violence. If some says that Non-Violence is an absolute term, then take him as a fraud.
Gandhi’s non-violence has no relation with cowardice.
Gandhi has said that “If I have to choose between Cowardice and Violence, then I would choose Violence.” This is carved below a statue of Mahatma Gandhi at Jabalpur.
Why did Gandhi promoted Non-violence against British government?
British believed in non-violence by law.
Democracy can make changes in the government without bloodshed.
Transfer of power or reforms can be made without bloodshed.
Exchange of ideas can make the change of belief. If the laws are providing injustice, then the laws can be changed. Mass opinion can be built up.
If the human rights can be secured without bloodshed, then there is no need to avoid the democratic way of correcting the opponents.
By logical arguments the opponents can be cornered and exposed. This would build pressure on the opponent if he has been abide by the principals of democracy.
Any change if brought through non-violence, it brings public awareness and also educate people. This steps up the society.
WHAT ARE THE PRE-CONDITIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT AGAINST WHOM A PERSON CAN GO ON FAST.
The persons involved in governance have taken an oath, that they believe and they have faith in democratic values and humanity,
They are transparent,
They are ready to communicate with the opposition,
They are not prejudicial, but they are logical,
They are abide by the prevailing rules,
They do not have any ill will towards opposite party.
This indicates that they are ready to change the law if they are convinced.
WHAT ARE THE PRE-CONDITION OF THE PERSON WHO IS TO GO ON FAST?
The person has to issue a notice indicating the demand and the reason behind it.
The person should be ready for discussion all the time with anybody,
The person goes on fast on the principle of the public interest,
The person has no direct interest,
The person has love and faith in principle, for the other parts,
The person has no ill will towards opposite parts,
The person is ready to accept the punishment for his disobedience of law, under the prevailing law. The person is ready to undergo punishment.
WHY GANDHI DID NOT GO ON FAST?
The Congress leaders where willfully avoided the advice of MK Gandhi,
The public had no awareness and foresight on the consequences of the partition,
The public was not ready to support Gandhi and not ready to avoid the partition,
The British were determined for dividing India as Congress was ready to discuss with them on the terms of partition,
The delay in independence was likely to create more critical and serious problems under the control of British government,
The time to make public aware of the consequences and to create mutual love and faith between the two communities was very short,
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Non-issue, issue, human values, democracy, faith, love, ill will, grudge, non-violence, transparency, Gandhi, British, government, pro-united India