Nehruvians intolerance and disrespect – 2
HOW MUCH A POLITICAL PARTY SHOULD BE CURSED?
How much an intolerant political party’s recognition should be allowed when it murders the sense and spirit of constitutional provisions?
Yes. This is a big issue for a democratic country.
INTOLERANCE TOWARDS ITS ODDS.
NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS MURDERS THE SPIRIT OF CONSTITUTION
It is the Nehruvian Congress that would not tolerate anything adverse, that can reduce the Vote Bank created by the Nehruvians and its party.
The Nehruvian Congress is in habit of murdering the spirit of constitutional provisions and it makes changes in the constitution.
The reservation for untouchable was made for a specified period. But the Nehruvian Government failed to uplift the status of the untouchables. Instead of submitting an apology and to get resigned from power it extended the provision for indefinite period. Off course it was a failure of its rule and governance. But thereafter it should have worked rigorously. But it failed miserably. Not only this, but it covered other communities under the reservation for an absolutely political benefit. It became a weapon to divide the mass by caste and create hatred among community. In fact it was the miserable failure of the Nehruvian Congress who had no sense to understand and to manage the resources and the manpower.
Similar are the cases of National language, non-violence and cow slaughtering. Leave all these cases aside, but can the Nehruvian Congress alter the effect of security provided by an order of SC on human rights?
This is about the Shah Bano case, where her human rights of a woman were ignored by the Nehruvian Congress to please the fundamentalists of a religion.
The name of the act itself is a fraud.
DOES THE PARLIAMENT PERMITS TO SPELL OUT LIES?
Nehru fraudulently denied the military infiltration of China and Indira spread absolute lies during emergency. How can a parliament function if the members are kept in jail without any existence of an offence on their part?
BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS IS NOT IN POWER?
NATIONAL HERALD IS NOT ONLY A SCAM BUT IT IS A FRAUD ALSO
BJP AND PRO-BJP MUST NOT MISS THE CHANCE TO DEROGATE
We need not go into the details of the full process as to how were the Nehruvians and the others associated with the Nehruvian Congress, involved in the fraud. This is because the details are already known to the people through media, though most media is very late in giving coverage to the full story of the fraud.
It must be noted that most media were not willing to provide the coverage to the fraud. The reason is not a secret. We know very well that most media falls under the category of presstitute. However those presstitute media had no option but to provide coverage at the stage of call of hearing of the case.
It is noticeable that the media falling under the category of presstitute had tried their best to mention the name of Swami Subrahmanian, that he is in habit of alleging Nehruvian Cong leaders and their associates. The whole fraud has been narrated as not a “fraud” but “allegation”. While terming the fraud as an allegation, they have not link the remarks of the HC as to how the HC has viewed the certain actions of Nehruvians and their associates, as extremely serious.
A vernacular news paper of Gujarat (Divya Bhaskar) has written an editorial on the case of National Herald. It has narrated right from the foundation made by J L Nehru with glorification. But the fraudulent acts have been indicated as the allegations of Swami Subrahmanian, though the events involved in the story are not even denied by any leader of the Nehruvian Congress.
To dilute the fraud, the DB has conclusively written as this one is a political vindictiveness. Off course to show its neutrality it has ended with an only negative statement at the end of the editorial, that the record of the Congress is not clean in this case. DB has surprisingly avoided the names of the existing Nehruvians who are biggest beneficiary in the case. In fact everybody knows that the monetary involvement of the existing Nehruvians is much more significant than the monetary involvement of Nehruvian Congress. There are many serious points raised by the HC and the applicant. The news paper has completely kept mum on those points. The properties are rented out. The rents are in lakhs of rupees per month. In whose account the rents are credited? None of the media has tried to corner the Nehruvians or their stooges on such points.
WHAT IS MEANT BY POLITICAL VINDICTIVITY?
Now look at the culture of the news paper. It has reported this case as politically vindictive. According to the newspaper, because Swami the applicant belongs to a political party the case has been termed as politically vindictive.
What is the meaning of political vindictiveness? There are no symptoms that can indicate that they are known to the editor.
EPISODE OF THE BABA RAMDEV
Recall the mid night episode of the Baba Ramdev in Ram Lila ground, and the action taken by Nehruvian Congress lead government.
Recall the statements of Manish Tiwari and other Nehruvian Cong leaders.
These leaders had said “Ramdev is a corrupt person right from his top of head to the bottom of the toe. We will initiate inquiry into his financial frauds. Then the Nehruvian Cong government had initiated inquiries. Neither this news paper nor many others had viewed that approach of the Nehruvian Cong lead government as a politically vindictive action. Contrary to this, they had said that Baba Ramdev should come out with clean hand if really had he been clean. He should not be scared of the inquiry. The media failed to mention the failure of Nehruvian Congress lead government to find out anything wrong with Baba Ramdev. Baba Ramdev is not alone to face such vindictive culture of Nehruvian Congress.
To be politically vindictive on opponent is the basic character of Nehruvians and Nehruvian Congress. Indira Gandhi was the best example. Since Jai Prakash Narain belonged to Sarvodaya organization, when Indira Gandhi came to power again in 1980, she had initiated inquiries against all NGOs run by Sarvodaya workers. The emergency itself was the unparallel example of political vindictiveness where the tens of thousands of opponents were sent to jail by Indira Gandhi even without any existence of offence.
Why do the media not link this political vindictiveness of Nehruvians when they provide coverage to the reaction of Nehruvian Congress leaders on National Herald, as the case is politically vindictive?
IS THE CASE POLITICALLY VINDICTIVE?
In reality it is not at all a case of political vinductivity.
The case was filed in 2012 when the ruling party was Nehruvian Congress.
Those who are connected with social media know this case and its matter very well.
NEHRUVIAN CONG AND ITS PRESSTITUTE MEDIA
It is not the matter, that had been taken up, consequently to the formation of the BJP Government at the center. BJP had nothing to do with matter. Thereby the present government too has nothing to do with the matter. Otherwise also it is not the case filed by the BJP Government. The case had been filed in 2012, by a person who was a citizen of India.
Even if a person of BJP files a case against any doubtful activities of a person of other political party, the case does not become a case of political victimization. Every Member of Parliament is also a citizen of India. Every citizen of India has the right to approach a court of law against anybody. It is the court of law which has been vested with the authority and power to decide the merits of the case. Parliament has no jurisdiction.
PARLIAMENT CANNOT FUNCTION
Now if any case which has been filed against a member of a political party, which according to the Nehruvians and their stooges, termed as political victimization, and accordingly based on that the members have right to protest in parliament, then parliament cannot function at all. The most media should have given the priority to condemn such culture of Nehruvians and their party stooges.
Swami when he filed his application, he was not even the member of BJP. Swami was running his own party viz. Janata Party. Media knows this.
DB and other persons were not walking with perambulator in 2012.
(Even if media persons were walking with perambulator they are supposed to know the history). The media had kept total mum on this case though it was known to them.
The case was accepted by a court of law in 2012. The case was quite against a ruling party. This party was the Number One party in politics. The Top Most leaders of this party were involved. What was the reason for media to keep the public uninformed?
The meaning of the word Presstitute was made clear by the media, when the media kept willful mum on the matter of National Herald.
Swami Subrahmanian is quite a politically matured leader. He is expert in law and economics. But media did not like to provide coverage to Swami Subrahmanian, though the case had prima facie. The case did have its merits for the media coverage. But Swami Subrahmanian is not Rahul Gandhi. Rahul Gandhi may be “Buddhu”, but he is a Nehruvian progeny. Most media act as if they are totally survived through Nehruvians.
MEDIA LEFT WITH NO OPTION
When the matter had been highlighted by the government run TV channel s, e.g. Door Darshan, the rest media left with no option but to provide coverage to this case. The media did this in the form of protest conducted by Nehruvian Congress leaders inside and outside the parliament. Similar is the case with print media.
E.g. DB gave a very big head news line on the very front page of what has been spelled out by Sonia. Viz. “I am not scared of anything I am the wife of Indira”.
Does the statement “I am not scared of anything I am the wife of Indira” carry any sense? No. It is a senseless statement. Neither has it had any relevance with the parliament nor with the court case. This is the fact. Media could have cornered the Nehruvians and their noise making stooges. But as for the media, this cannot become the quality. To minimize the seriousness and the merits of the case, the DB and many others had maximized the statements made in protests and meaningless noise of Nehruvians and Nehruvian Congress leaders. The most time in the TV channels and most space in the print media was consumed on this. Most media avoided to condemn the irrelevancy of the protests and demonstration of Nehruvians and their stooges inside the parliament and outside the parliament.
THIS LOOKS RIDICULOUS
What is the meaning of “I am not scared of anything as I am the wife of Indira”
Is it that Sonia wants to give a message that Indira was lesbian?
In fact Sonia is wife of Indira’s son Rajiv.
But Sonia says she was wife of Indira Gandhi. This means that Sonia was not tuned with Rajiv Gandhi. Sonia has been tuned with Indira Gandhi. Sonia has inherited the braveness from her mother-in-law.
This is quite unscientific. It is the mother, from whom the tendency or quality could be inherited. The mother-in-law cannot be the source of inheritance of tendency and quality.
IS IT THAT INDIRA GANDHI WAS NOT SCARED OF ANYTHING?
No. This is not correct. Indira Gandhi was scared of many things.
(1) She was scared of logical arguments. That is why she avoided communication with Jai Prakash Narain.
(2) She was scared of agitations of her opponents. That is why she had imposed emergency and put all her opponents behind the bars.
(3) She was scared of imprisonment of herself, that is why she, when was declared defeated in the election of 1977, she withdrawn the emergency, because she thought the emergency provisions would be imposed upon her, and opponents’ government would arrest her and put her behind the bars without framing any charges.
(4) She was scared of criticism of foreign media that is why she declared elections. Off course she declared the elections keeping the emergency intact.
(5) She was scared of facing Shah Commission,
(6) She was scared of powerless position that is why she made alliance with Muslim League, Communists and terrorists like Bhindaranvale.
If at all, Sonia thinks that she has inherited something visible, it is the quality of Indira Gandhi. This quality was that no law should touch Nehruvians, that they have full liberty to execute any scam, scandal, fraud, spreading rumor, spreading lies, insult constitution, insult court of law, tear out draft resolution, bring down political values, to not attend court, and what not?
IT IS THE NORMAL CHARACTER OF NEHRUVIANS TO BRING ANARCHY BY WAY OF MURDERING THE SPIRIT OF CONSTITUTION
Unfortunately the media of India has become far more political than showing logical, constitutional maturity. It is not bothered at all on the blow of the spirit of the constitution.
It is not a matter of research, when the people say it presstitute?
Shirish M. Dave
Tags. National Herald, scam, scandal, fraud, Nehru, Nehruvian, Congress, media, presstitute, DB, HC, Court of law, Parliament, vindictive, political, Indira, Gandhi, Sonia, wife of, scared of, Ramdev, Sarvodaya, Jai Prakash Narain, inquiries