Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for March, 2018

किसी भी नगरको/ग्रामको बदसूरत और गंदा कैसे किया जाय ….

हमने समज़ लिया कि, शास्त्री नगर जो एक ठीक तरहके आयोजनसे बनाया हुआ टाउनशीप था उसको अहमदाबादकी म्युनीसीपल कमीश्नरकी गेंगने एक ही दशकमें कैसे बदसूरत कर दिया.

कौनसे परिबल है जो कोई भी नगरको या क्षेत्रको बदसूरत कर सकते है?

कमीश्नर और उसकी सेनामें निम्न लिखित गुण होते हैं

अभिनव विचारोंका अभाव (ईनोवेटीव आईडीया),

आर्षदृष्टिका अभाव,

कुछ नया करके दिखावेंवाली सोचका अभाव,

नगरके प्रति अपनापन रखनेका अभाव (बीलोंगींगनेसका अभाव),

भविष्यदृष्टिका अभाव,

कनिष्ठ और क्षतिपूर्ण आयोजन,

क्षतिपूर्ण विशेष विवरण और आकृति, (स्पेसीफीकेशन और डीज़ाईन), यानी कि डिज़ाईन ऐसी हो कि रखरखाव कमसे कम हो

काममें क्षतिपूर्ण गुणवत्ता,

मरम्मतमें विलंब, और मरम्मतकी गति, क्षतिग्रस्त बननेकी गति से कम होना,

स्वच्छताका निम्नस्तरवाली मानसिकता,

नीति नियमोंमे क्षतियां, और उनमे सुधार करनेकी मानसिकता अभाव,

संनिर्माणके और रखरखावके कर्मचारीमें प्रशिक्षणका अभाव,

संनिर्माण और रखरखावके अयोग्य उपकरण.

अब हमगोदरेज गार्डन सीटीकी चर्चा करेंगे.

यह एक ऐसा नगरक्षेत्र है जो गोदरेज प्रोपर्टीज़ नामकी कंपनीने आयोजन करके  संनिर्माण  किया है. बीएचके, बीएचके, . बीएचके, बीएचके, . बीएचके (२२ मंजिला) आदि के १२ मज़िला के भवनसमूह (ब्लोक क्लस्टर) है. ये सब मध्यम वर्गकी सुविधाओंके लिये उपयुक्त बनवाया है.

SAM_2385

इसमें सुव्यवस्थित आयोजन है. आंतरिक मार्ग, मुख्य मार्ग और राज मार्ग की रचना का आयोजन, अहमदाबादकी तुलनामें महानगर आयुक्त (म्युनीसीपल कमीश्नर)के आयोजनसे हजार गुना अधिक अच्छा है.

दो भवन समूहके बीच पर्याप्त अंतर है,

प्रत्येक खंडमेंसे आकाश दिखाई देता है,

प्रत्येक खंडमें सूर्यकी प्रकाश आती है,

विद्युतजलप्रबधन और आनुसंगी साधन और उपसाधनक़ी गुणवत्ता सही है और व्यवस्थित है,

हरेक भवनमें पेसेजकी चौडाई सही है,

SAM_2391

सुरक्षाका प्रबंध सुचारु रुपसे है.

सुचारु अग्निशामक व्यवस्था                                   

रखरखाव का कारोबार व्यवस्थित है,

वाहन पार्कींगकी व्यवस्था अव्यवस्थित नहीं है और अभी तो कोई क्षतियां दृष्टिगोचर नहीं होती है.

प्रत्येक प्रकारके भवनके जुथमें प्रर्यप्त वृक्ष और पुष्प पौधे है. उद्यानमें घांस भी है,

मार्गोंके दोनो दिशामें पर्याप्त वृक्ष और पौधे है.

SAM_2382

महामार्ग पर सायकिलके लिये अतिरिक्त लेन है. चलनेके लिये भी पर्याप्त चौडी फुटपाथ है, गेस, विद्युत और पानीके लिये सुनिश्चित मार्ग (रुट) है,

छोटे बच्चोंके लिये क्रीडांगण है, युवाओंके लिये भी अतिरिक्त क्रीडांगण है,

SAM_2411

टहेलने के लिये और जॉगींग़के लिये पर्याप्त मार्ग है,

व्यायाम गृह (जीम) और स्नानागार है,

वाचनालय है,

आराम गृह है,

क्लब है,

कोम्युनीटी ईतर प्रवृत्तियोंके लिये गृह है,

कोम्युनीटी भोज गृह है,

शोपींग सेंटर और डीपार्टमेंटल स्टोर्स है,

SAM_2387

रखरखाव के लिये कार्यालय है जो शिकायतें लेते है और उसका निर्मूलन करते है,

सुव्यवस्थित कर्मचारीगण जो शिष्ट तरिके से संवाद करता है और शिघ्रतासे कार्य करते है.

विद्यालय है,

सीटी बसकी सुविधा है.

ऑटोरीक्षा स्टेंड है.

रास्ते पर दिशा सूचन करने वाले बॉर्ड है,

क्या क्या नहीं है यह बात नगरके आयुक्त (कमिश्नर) के दिमागके उपरकी बात है. यदि नगर आयुक्त (सीटी कमीश्नर) चाहता तो, जो अहमदाबादके जो क्षेत्र १९५२के बाद विकसित हुए, उनको गोदरेज गार्डन सीटी के समकक्ष कर सकता था. लेकिन ऐसी मानसिकता म्युनीसीपल कमीश्नरमे कहां हो सकती है.

स्थित तो ऐसी है कि सर्व प्रथम जनताको अनुभूति होती है किहमें फलाँ फलाँ समस्या है”. तत्पश्चात समाचार पत्रोंको अवगत होता है. ये समाचर पत्र अपने सीयासती एजंडाके आधार पर उसको प्रसिद्धि देते हैं. जब प्रश्न नगरसेवककी सभामें उठता है, तब कहीं नगरके आयुक्तको पता चलता है. कभी कभी तो नगरके आयुक्तको न्यायालय आदेश देता है तब नगर आयुक्त अपनी सेना को आदेश देता है. फिर काम होता है या तो नहीं होता है या तो आंशिक होता है या तो दोषपूर्ण काम होता है जो थोडे ही समयमें पूर्ववत स्थिति उत्पन्न करता है. फिर वही चक्र फिरसे चालु होता है.

तो क्या गोदरेज गार्डन सीटी गंदा और बदसुरत बन सकने के काबिल है?

क्रमशः

शिरीष मोहनलाल दवे

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

A zero in philosophy talks philosophical. How funny?

RaGa is talking emotional and tried to twist the matter.

He is a liar, like her forefathers and Grandmother.

RaGa said when we take strict decisions we are prone to be murdered.

2018 03 13 RaGa looks funny

This was a lie.

STRICT AND NEHRUVIAN? WOW!!!

Nehruvians have never taken strict decisions, barring to protect their own Chair. To protect their own chair they have acted extra constitutionally.

(1) Indira was not killed for her strict action. She was killed because she lifted Bhindaranvale who was a separatist and terrorist. This stepping up of Bhindaranvale by way of aligning with his party and declaring him a Saint by Indira. In doing so, she founded terrorism in India including cross border terrorism because Bhindaranvale had cross border contacts. This she had done for her own political benefit. She had no wisdom, that, after cold war, the terrorists would be free from NW and would target India.

(2) Indira neglected free and easy movement of weapons in Golden Temple for several years as if the entry of police and military is not allowed to catch hold of antisocial activists. No law can prevent the police to enter to catch hold an antisocial element. Indira mislead the people of India for her inaction for a long period. This caused to strengthen the terrorists.

(3) The willful negligence of Indira Gandhi was an offence. For that reason she was punished by the nature. Nobody should repent.

2018 03 13 A SAINT DESIGNATED

(4) Rajiv Gandhi was stupid and fool. He was morally corrupted and non-democratic. This is for the reasons that he accepted the PM-ship, when Zail Singh invited him to sworn in. Rajiv Gandhi was well aware of the facts, that he was not a senior leader, he was not an experienced leader, and he had not made any contribution in any field including politics. His selection had not undergone democratic process, as there were many leaders in Nehruvian Congress party who were much more qualified for PM-Ship. Rajiv Gandhi knew all these aspects. He could have asked Zail Singh to wait for the decision of the party. But instead of that, he accepted the invitation to sworn in.

(5) The acceptance of PM-ship happily, by Rajiv Gandhi was a clear exhibition of his immorality. It was the clear indication that he was very much prone to do financial scams.

(6) It was not Rajiv Gandhi who brought revolution in telecommunication. Read this point carefully.

(6.1) In 1977 Janata Party defeated Nehruvian Congress. Morarji Desai’s Government took charge. George Fernandez was the Telecommunication Minister. He took the decision to go for electronic system of telephone exchange system. Previously Indira Gandhi was importing Cross Bar type system of Telephone Exchanges. The Cross Bar telephone exchanges system was OUT OF DATE ELSEWHERE. There were lots of disadvantages in this system. Abroad,  this type of systems were being scrapped. George Fernandez, had common sense. His Ministry took the decision to go for advanced digital telephone exchange system. The global tender was prepared for digital electronic  type telephone exchanges with transfer of technology. The tender was floated.

(6.2) By that time Janata Party government was toppled by Charan Singh and Indira.

(6.3) In 1980 there was no scope for Indira to go back in the decision. Indira Gandhi finalized the tender in favor of Alcatel France. Orders were placed in 1981 for 40000 lines. As per the technology transfer conditions, four teams of Indian Engineers were sent for training in France.

(6.4) First digital electronic telephone exchange of 10000 line installation was commenced in 1982 Worli Mumbai. 10000 line exchange was also under installation at Railwaypura in Ahmedabad.

(6.5) The first exchange installation of 10000 lines at worli was commissioned in 1983 and a satellite (Remote Line Unit of 3000 lines at Cuff parade Mumbai South by a French team.

(6.6) Indian Telephone Industries was set up at Manakapur (Gonada District. U.P.) by 1983.

(6.7) When Indira died, installation of nearly 100000 lines telephone exchanges were in progress. E.g. Cooperage, Andheri, Ghatkoper, Khar, Bandra etc… in Mumbai and at several places at Calcutta, Chennai.

(6.8) All these telephone exchanges work on micro-processor system in each Rack of the Telephone Exchange.

(6.9) At this period of time, there was No Pitroda and No Rajiv Gandhi were available on the screen even at the Horizon.

For details one can visit my blog site, at treenetram of wordpress.

To give credit to Rajiv Gandhi and Pitroda is a blatant lie. Pitroda had no contribution in designing or manufacturing large telephone exchanges. Sam Pitroda’s contribution is in only 256 lines under Rajiv Gandhi’s rule.     

(7) Rajiv Gandhi had never taken any strict decision. He was fool and stupid. He interfered into internal problems of Srilanka and acted against the interest of Tamilians of Shrilanka. Rajiv Gandhi paid the price of his immorality, stupidity and immaturity.

(8) Sonia is not eligible for PM-ship. Further she is absolutely immoral. RaGa is also not eligible for PM-ship for the same reason. But both want to have Number One post. Sitaram Kesari was physically lifted from the presidential office when he refused to resign. Narasinha Rao was never honored for his contribution.

(9) Sonia had kept Number One position with herself. Number Two position was kept for RaGa. MMS was a Robot. They have never taken a strict decision. Even they have practically disobeyed SC instructions.

(10) When RaGa was asked as to why the GDP was low in the period of Nehruvian Rule and higher under Non-Nehruvian Rule? RaGa failed to give reply. Instead of giving reply, he asked a question viz. “Whether from 2004 to 2014 I had a role in politics or not? Reply me Yes or No.”

(11) In fact RaGa and Sonia had big role behind the curtain. All the important files were being routed to Nehruvian. RaGa had torn out the resolution passed by the Ministry of MMS. This was their extra constitutional power.

(12) RaGa was expecting Basu to say yes or no. RaGa was supposed to answer.

(13) The video Nehruvian Congress floated was doctored.                

SHIRISH MOHANLAL DAVE

चमत्कृतिः “वचनेषु किं दरिद्रता” रा.गा. उवाच

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: