Shaheen bag area is a privet property?

Is it that the Shaheen bag area is a privet property?

Can the protesters and their supporters reply to the point?

Is it that the Shaheen bag area or a single property?

(1) What is Shaheen Bag?

(2) Is there any public road in Shaheen Bag?

(3) Who are the protesters?

(4) Do the protesters have any leader or representative?

(5) If there is a leader or a representative/s what is his name?

(6) If the protesters have a representative/s then how he/she has been selected? What is his/her duty?

(7) If the protest is for the awareness of public on any issue, then why the protesters are not making it open to the public and media?

(8) If the protesters have leader, then who is he/she?

(9) Why is he/she not coming forward to explain his/her demand and the justification?

(10) Is it that the leader and the protesters have right of way in that property?

(11) Who has given the right to the leader and the protesters, to prevent other citizens from entering into Shaheen Bag?

(12) Has the leader taken necessary permission to demonstrate their protest?

(13) If yes, then what are the details? Put them to public.

Media should ask above questions to the protesters? Why the media does not ask such questions?

What is the duty of the SC/HC?

(1) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have unlimited right to protest without knowing the issue?

(2) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have unlimited rights to protest against any issue anywhere?

(3) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have unlimited rights to protest against any government institution at any place?

(4) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have unlimited rights to protest against any government institution for unlimited time?

(5) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have every right to encroach any property of public use, and to prevent others to use it?

(6) Does the HC/SC understand that the protesters have every right to put the public to a continuous loss of time and money?

(7) Does the HC/SC understand that HC/SC should hesitate to issue an order to immediately vacate the road and open it for public?

(8) Does the HC/SC understand that HC/SC agrees that the protesters have absolute right to fully occupy public road and public property and also to deny others to use it as if the property is their own private property?

(9) Does the HC/SC understand that to vacate the said public property, which is fully occupied by the protesters since several months and they have prevented others from the usage, should not be got vacated for public use? Has the HC/SC any justification which has convinced the HC/SC from giving an interim order of vacation of the road to enable the public to use it?

(10) Does the HC/SC want to allow the protesters to use it for protests and to allow to play the kids, the kid brought to protest by the women protesters, and to sell eatables by hawkers to feed protesters?

(11) Does the HC/SC is of the opinion that even the case of the issue is sub judicial, the protesters’ protest should not be stopped?

(12) Does the HC/SC is of the opinion that the protesters are not supposed to make their opinion to public with justification, because the public has no right to know the justification of their protests?

(13) Is it that the HC/SC has been convinced to the priority to try out the suggestion to allow mediators to talk to the protesters, instead of calling the protesters to present themselves before court or asking the protesters to vacate the space for public usage immediately?

(14) Is it that the HC/SC is of the of the opinion that now on wards, any lot, can protest, against any act of the Government, with an absolute right for selecting public place with unlimited period of time including the place the Airports  air strips and runways?    

If the practical action of the HC/SC till date is affirmative, then

Is there not any scope to receive a message by the public that the integrity of SC/HC is not beyond doubt?

Shirish Mohanlal Dave