ક્રીમીનલ કેસો પાછા ખેંચવા એ સિદ્ધાંત વિહોણી માનસિકતા છે.

માનનીય મુખ્ય મંત્રીશ્રી,

તેમજ

માનનીય ગુજરાત બીજેપી પક્ષ પ્રમુખશ્રી,

આપ સર્વે પુનર્વિચારણા કરો અને સુનિશ્ચિત કરો કે  ક્રીમીનલ કેસો પાછા ખેંચવા એ સિદ્ધાંત વિહોણી માનસિકતા છે.

એચ. પાટીદાર કોણ છે?

જેનું નામ પણ લેવું ન ગમે તે, જેનું નામ માત્ર લેવાથી આપણું મોઢું ગંધાય અને જેણે સરદાર પટેલની જાતિનું ઘોર અપમાન કર્યા કર્યું, એચ. પાટીદાર છે. આ સખ્સ, એચ. પાટીદારે  દેશની સંપત્તિને અબજો રુપીયાનું નુકશાન કરીને પોતાની ન્યૂસન્સ વેલ્યુ ઉભી કરીને ખ્યાતિ મેળવી હતી.

આ પાટીદારી ફરજંદે કરેલા/કરાવેલા  કરતૂતો બદલ, તેની ઉપર અપરાધના કેસ કરવામાં આવ્યા હતા. આઘાતની વાત એ છે કે તેની ઉપર કરવામાં આવેલા અપરાધના કોર્ટ કેસો પાછા ખેંચી લેવાના છે. અને તે માટે ગુજરાત સરકારે નીચલી કોર્ટમાં અરજી આપી હતી. સદભાગ્યે નીચલી કોર્ટે આ અરજીઓ અમાન્ય રાખી છે.

નીચલી અદાલતનો સંદેશ

અદાલતનો આ એક પ્રકારનો સંદેશ છે કે ગુજરાત સરકાર નીતિમત્તામાં પીછેહઠ ન કરે. પણ એવું લાગે છે કે બીજેપી ની ગુજરાત સરકાર આ સંદેશને સમજવા તૈયાર નથી. તે માને છે કે રાજકીય લાભ માટે રાજકારણમાં બધું ચાલે અને બધું ક્ષમ્ય છે. અને તેથી કરીને તો ગુજરાત સરકાર હવે અપીલમાં ગઈ છે.

ગુજરાત સરકારનો વહીવટ ભારતીય જનતા પક્ષ ચલાવે છે. એટલે એમજ કહેવાય કે સાધન શુદ્ધિમાં બીજેપીની ગુજરાત સરકારને વિશ્વાસ નથી. જો નરેંદ્ર મોદી, ગુજરાત સરકારને નીતિમત્તાના પાઠ ભણાવવામાં નિસ્ફળ જાય તો નરેંદ્ર મોદી દેશમાં નીતિમત્તા કેવીરીતે સ્થાપિત કરી શકશે?

જો ભારતીય જનતા પક્ષ એમ માનતો હોય તો કે ગુજરાતની પ્રજા માટે બીજેપીને મત આપવા સિવાય છૂટકો નથી. માટે તમતમારે દીધે રાખો.

બીજેપીની આ માન્યતા ભૂલ ભરેલી છે

એચ. પટેલ કયા કયા પક્ષોમાં જઈ આવેલો છે તે વાતથી બીજેપીના નેતાઓ અજાણ હોય તેવા મૂર્ખ નથી. આ પાટીદાર ફરજંદ, કોંગી અને સીવ (ગટર) સેના  જેવા વંશવાદી, કોમવાદી, જાતિવાદી, પ્રદેશવાદી દેશના ભાગલા વાદી પક્ષોમાં આંટો મારી આવેલો છે. ત્યાં તેની કેટલી દાળ ગળી  તે બીજેપીએ સમજવાની જરુર નથી. તેના ભૂતકાળના બીજેપીના નેતાઓ વિષેના ઉચ્ચારણો જો બીજેપી લક્ષ્યમાં લેશે તો તે પણ પૂરતું છે.

બીજેપીએ સમજવું જોઈએ કે જે વ્યક્તિએ તોફાનો દ્વારા ગુજરાતને અબજો રુપીયાનું  નુકશાન કર્યું હોય અને ગુજરાત સરકારે તેની ઉપર આવા કારણોસર ફોજદારી મુકદ્દમાઓ દાખલ કર્યા હોય , અને તે પછી તથા કથિત રાજકીય લાભની અપેક્ષાએ તે વ્યક્તિ ઉપરના મુકદ્દમાઓ પાછા ખેંચી લે. તો તે બીજેપી માટે  એ અક્ષમ્ય છે.

ગુજરાત બીજેપીએ વિચારવું જોઇએ કે ગુજરાત સરકારના આવા પગલાંથી ગુજરાતના સુજ્ઞમતદારોને શો સંદેશ મળશે? જો તમે સુજ્ઞ મતદારોને અવગણવા માગતા હો તો ક્યારેક તો તેઓ તમારા નામનું નાહી નાખશે.

શું એચ.પાટીદાર વગર, ગુજરાત બીજેપી પંગુ છે?

શું આ પાટીદાર ફરજંદના મુકદ્દમાઓ બોગસ હતા?

જો આમ હતું તો જાહેર કરો અને જાહેરમાં આ પાટીદાર ફરજંદની માફી માગો. એટલું જ નહીં પણ તેની બીજેપી અને તેના નેતાઓની વિરુદ્ધના ઉચ્ચારણોના સુરમ્ય અર્થઘટનો કરો. જો તમે બીજેપીમાં, આ પાટીદાર ફરજંદના અભાવે પંગુપણું અનુભવતા હો તો તેને ગુજરાત પ્રદેશ બીજેપીનો પક્ષ પ્રમુખ બનાવી દો.

ભૂતકાળમાં બીજેપીના મુખ્યમંત્રીઓ ઘણી નાની મોટી ભૂલો કરી છે.

કેશુભાઈના રેઢિયાળ શાસનમાં ભૂકંપ નીમિત્તે દાનમાં મળેલી ચીજ વસ્તુઓ ધોળે દિવસે ખૂલ્લે આમ વેચાતી હતી.  હાજી, આ સાચી વાત છે.

બીજેપીનો ગઢ ગણાતી અમદાવાદ મ્યુનીસીપલ કોર્પોરેશન, બીજેપીએ ગુમાવેલી. ન છૂટકે આવા મુખ્યમંત્રીઓને હટાવવા પડ્યા હતા. આ પછી પણ સત્તા વિહીન કેશુભાઈ પટેલ, નરેંદ્ર મોદી વિરુદ્ધ  ઘણું ઑક્યા હતા.

આનંદીબેન પટેલે પણ પોતાનું પાટીદારપણું એમ કહીને બતાવેલ; “પટેલ હોવાને નાતે, આપણો યુવાન, એચ. પટેલ, ભલે નેતા તરીકે તેના આંદોલન દ્વારા આગળ આવે”. આ ઉચ્ચારણ આનંદીબેન પટેલ વિષે અક્ષમ્ય ગણવું જોઇએ. એક મુખ્ય મંત્રીને આવા ઉચ્ચારણો શોભે નહીં. પણ નરેંદ્ર મોદીએ મોટું મન રાખી તેમને  સંઘર્યા હતા.

જાતિવાદી અને પ્રદેશવાદી વ્યક્તિઓની બીજેપીમાં જગા ન હોવી જોઇએ. આ બધા દુર્ગુણો વિપક્ષમાં પ્રચૂર માત્રામાં છે. અને તે ત્યાં શોભે છે.

બીજેપીમાં સમજ હોવી આવશ્યક છે.

બીજેપીમાં એ સમજ હોવી જોઇએ કે જો બીજેપીમાં થોડી પણ અનીતિમત્તા હશે તો, દેશદ્રોહી અને બીજેપી-વિરોધી તત્ત્વો, તેને વિશાળ કરીને બતાવે છે. રાઈનો પર્વત કરશે.

બીજેપીએ એ પણ સમજવું જોઇએ કે ફોજદારી કેસો પાછા ખેંચવા એ નાની અનીતિ નથી. એચ. પટેલ પાસેથી નુકશાની વસુલ કરવાને બદલે તેની સામેના મુકદ્દમાઓ પાછા ખેંચી લેવા એ નરી બેઈમાની છે.

સમાજવાદી પક્ષના શાસનમાં ઉત્તર પ્રદેશમાં  શું બન્યું હતું?

ઉત્તર પ્રદેશમાં સમાજવાદી પક્ષે રાજકીય લાભ માટે કેટલીક વ્યક્તિઓ સામેના ફોજદારી કેસો પાછા ખેંચી લેવાની ભલામણ કરેલી. ન્યાયાલયે માન્યતા આપી ન હતી. અને તેથી ગુનેગારો સામે કેસ ચાલ્યા હતા. ગુનેગારો દંડિત થયા હતા. નરેંદ્ર મોદીએ આ મુદ્દાને ઉજાગર કરીને બીજેપીને જીત અપાવી હતી.

શું ગુજરાત બીજેપી આ વાત સમજવાને સક્ષમ નથી?

ગુજરાત બીજેપીએ નીતિમત્તા અપનાવવામાં દેશની આગેવાની લેવાની છે. કેટલીક વાતો ગુજરાત બીજેપીના નેતાઓ સમજતા નથી કે સમજવા માગતા નથી. બીજેપી નેતાઓએ સમજવું જોઇએ કે બીજેપીની વિશ્વસનીયતાને આંચ ન આવવી જોઇએ.

જાતિવાદી, પ્રદેશવાદી તેમજ ભાગલાવાદી પરિબળો મજબુત ન જ થવા જોઇએ.

જેમ સરદાર વલ્લભભાઈ પટેલ, ભારતની એકતાના પ્રતિક હતા. તેમને અનુસરીને સર્વ જાતિઓએ એકતાના પ્રતિક તરીકે આચરણ કરવું જોઇએ.

એક પક્ષમાંથી બીજા પક્ષમાં જતા, કમસે કમ વામણા નેતાઓને તો, આવકારવા ન જ જોઇએ. કારણ કે આવા સ્વકેંદ્રી અને વાંઈદરાની (વાંદરાની) જેમ કૂદાકૂદ  નેતાઓ વિશ્વસનીય અને નીતિમાન હોઈ શકે જ નહીં. બીજેપીએ આ વાત ખાસ સમજવી જોઇએ.

૧૯૪૨માં કોંગ્રેસના આમ સદસ્યની વિશ્વસનીયતા કેવી હતી તે યાદ કરો.

એક બહેન કે જે બ્રીટીશ સરકાર સામે આંદોલન કરતા હતા, પોલીસે તેમની ધરપકડ કરી. ત્યારે તે બહેને પોતાના ઘરેણા ઉતારી એક ધોળી ટોપીવાળાને કહ્યું કે મારું આ સરનામું છે. તમે મારા ઘરે આ ઘરેણા પહોંચાડી દેજો. અને ઘરે સંદેશો આપજો કે મને પોલીસ,  જેલમાં લઈ ગયા છે. ચિંતા ન કરે.

પેલા ધોળી ટોપીવાળા ભાઈએ કહ્યું કે તમે મને ઓળખતા નથી. મારું નામ પણ જાણતા નથી. છતાં પણ તમે આ કિમતી ઘરેણા, હું તમારા ઘરે પહોંચાડીશ તેવો વિશ્વાસ કેવી રીતે  રાખી શકો છે?

પેલા સત્યાગ્રહી બહેને ઉત્તર આપ્યો. “તમે કોંગ્રેસી છોને એટલે?”

આવી હતી કોંગ્રેસ ૧૯૪૨માં.

આવી કોંગ્રેસને  તેના એક નેતાએ, ફક્ત પાંચ વર્ષમાં, હતી ન હતી કરી નાખી. એ નેતાને સીધા કરવા માટે મહાત્મા ગાંધીને, તે કોંગ્રેસને, વિખેરી નાખવાનું કહેવું પડ્યું. એ કોંગ્રેસ, ડીસેંબર ૧૯૫૦ થી કોંગી બની ગઈ. છતાં કેટલાક મૂર્ધન્યો હજી આ કોંગીને, 135 વર્ષ જુની કોંગ્રેસ માને છે. કારણ શું છે? કારણ ફક્ત એજ કે વંશવાદને મંજુરી. ભારતના કહેવાતા સુજ્ઞ જનો જ્યારે આ કક્ષાએ હોય ત્યારે ભારતની આમ જનતાને તો સહેલાઈથી ભોળવી શકાય છે.

જો બીજેપી નેતાઓ પણ અનીતિમત્તા રાખશે, અને એચ. પાટીદાર જેવા શખ્સોની ઉપરના મુકદ્દમાઓ પાછા ખેચશે તો તે શીઘ્ર ગતિએ નહીં તો ધીમી ગતિએ પણ આત્મઘાતી માર્ગે જશે જ. આ શક્યતા બીજેપી નેતાઓએ સમજવી જ પડશે.

ગામે ગામ નરેંદ્ર મોદીઓ પેદા કરી શકાતા નથી.

શિરીષ મોહનલાલ દવે

ચમત્કૃતિઃ

શતેષુ જાયતે શૂરઃ, સહસ્રેષુ ચ પંડિતઃ ।

વક્તા દશસહસ્રેષુ, દાતા ભવતિ વા ન વા ॥

[સોએ એક વીર પાકે છે, પંડિત જન્મે હજારે છે,

ભાષણકર્તા દશહજારે છે, ત્યાગી જન્મે, ન જન્મે પણ]

Read Full Post »

One “Kashmir File” movie is not enough

Those who have seen the Kashmir File movie and also those who have not seen the Kashmir File movie, know very well that Genocide of Hindus did occur in Kashmir.

Everybody knows;

• 10000+ Hindu women were raped, 1000s Hindus were murdered and 500000+ Hindus were driven out from Kashmir.

• Hindus were threatened openly with mobile van with loud speakers and also from Mosques on loud speakers, announcing the last date by which all the Hindus had to leave Kashmir. They were told with the three options. (1) Adopt Islam, or (2) leave Kashmir or (3) be ready to die. Kashmiri Hindus were also told that they should leave their women back in their house.

• All these criminal acts were done openly in 1989-90.

• It was known to Congress and very well known to JK Government, that Terrorists had heavily increased their activities in Kashmir. It was also known to them that Khalistanis had links with Pakistani terrorists. The central intelligence agency and the state intelligence agency were functional. As a part of their duties the agencies have used to update the governments. Hence any denial and any excuse of their inaction i.e. inaction from the end of the CMs and the PMs are the blatant lies.

• The Local Muslims of JK were ready to help whole hardheartedly the terrorists, as much as the Congis and their cultural allied parties’ leaders were helping them in Kashmir.

• The Congi Government at, central level and the state government at the state level, in the Kashmir had got full support by the separatists leaders and also had got full support by the confirmed terrorists, financially, medically, politically … with salary, security, perks,  and 5 stars treatments.

• The terrorist activities was initiated as early as 1982. It reached to its pick in 1989. Their plans were to make Hindu-less Kashmir. This  was very well known to Farukh Abdulla who was the then CM. Everything was known to Farukh and his government. When Farukh felt ensured that in two days the genocide of Hindus is going to poise in large scale, Farukh flawn away to UK. Congi did nothing to stop Farukh from running away. Further Congi did not want to stop genocide and also did not want to provide security to Hindus. The Governor did write a report to the Congi lead Central Government on activities of terrorists and the failure of the local Government.

• All the 500000+ Kashmiri Hindus were forced to leave their houses. Some went to Jammu and some went to Delhi and some elsewhere. For all the period from 1948 to 2014 Congi and its allied ruled at Centre and in the state, barring BJP rule period of 1999-2004. Congi and its allies did nothing.

• The Hindus of Kashmir were living in tents and no local or central governments tried to get them reinstated till 2014.

This is not the end of the genocide of Hindus.

Those few Hindus tried to go back to Kashmir, they were murdered. Even the local Muslims used to help the terrorists to furnish the information of the migrant laborers too, who arrived in Kashmir for development work. Terrorists used to kill them too.

Demography supersedes security

This is not the end of genocide.

When Narendra Modi initiated to settle deserted Hindus in new colonies, Farukh, Omar, Mehbooba, Yassin Malik, and all the others ( who direct and indirect participants in the genocide of Hindus), opposed the reinstatement of Hindus in Kashmir openly.

They opposed on the separate colonies for the Hindu of Kashmir. These leaders opposed the reinstatement of Hindus,  on the plea as these colonies change the demography of Kashmir.

Filthy and Scoundrels

Look at the contradiction of these Lutyen leaders’ logic on “demography”.

Since 23+ years the Kashmir is without Hindus. But these direct and indirect helpers of the terrorists, were not bothered at all to reinstate the Hindus of Kashmir. At that time they did not feel the total absence of Hindus in Kashmir as the death demography.

Criminal mind set of Farukh, Omar and Co.

The Congi, Farukh, Omar, Mehbooba and other antisocial elements generated an idea to grab Kashmiri Hindus’ property, under a beautiful named plan as “Roshni Act”.

These scoundrels were determined to see that in no case, the Hindus should come back in Kashmir. They and their beloved persons grabbed the properties of Kashmiri Hindus. To make the grabbing lawful, they had framed a law known as Roshni Act.

Under this “Roshni act” Farukh, Omar, Mehbooba, their beloved and terrorists who had occupied and or wanted to occupy the rest vacant properties of Hindus in Kashmir after 1986, to regularize their ownership of the property, on a nominal payment to the state government.

This also confirms that the desertion of Hindus was started from 1986. This was known to both the Governments.

Fortunately the HC had termed the law as void in November 2020, under BJP rule.

The movie “Kashmir file” provides the details of some events from the genocide. When events are pictured, it becomes more impressive and effective.

People already knew as to what happened to the Hindus in Kashmir. But people never came to know, the details of any event. Stray stories were floating in social media. But these had been termed and taken as controversial.

Kashmir File is a movie been made to show the reality, by the way of collecting real information with real narratives from the victimized persons and or their relatives. It is supposed to be effective.

Who are guilty and who are supposed to be punished (hanged)?

Farukh Abdulla

Yes Farukh Abdulla must be arrested on non-bailable warrant and put to jail.

He was the Chief Minister of the state right from 1982. He was paid for the duties which he was supposed to perform to protect the Hindus’ natural and constitutional rights. But this fellow willfully failed.

The plan to conduct genocide of Hindus was not made overnight.

Farukh was having full information of the plan as the CM. He knew very well from 1982 that Hindus are to be targeted soon. Just a day before of final date, Farukh and party ran away to UK. Thus he must be treated at par with the terrorists.

Modi would had been crucified on Godhra After Math

If on 28^th February 2002, Modi would had run away from Gujarat, and further suppose at that time, Congi had been the government at the center, what the judiciary and the Congi would had done?

Off course the genocide of Hindus in Kashmir and the riots of 2002 in Gujarat are not comparable at all.

In the genocide of the Hindus in Kashmir, 500000+ Hindus were the sufferers. They, either killed or raped or beaten or deserted. Still they are in the deserted condition. Whereas in 2002, the riots were controlled within no time, i.e. 2/3 days. No Muslim left their city. Every Muslim house got repaired and every Muslims reinstated. Legal action initiated and all those proved the guilty had been punished.

Suppose in the place of Farukh, had Modi been there … then?

Judiciary would had taken SUO MOTTO and issued a non-bailable search warrant to arrest of Modi. Modi would had been hanged.

Congi would had dismissed and disqualified Modi immediately, besides many other legal actions.

[Congi was keen to finish Modi by any vague means. e.g. on tapping a call of a police officer, talking to the other police officer, mentioning about a black beard and white beard for keeping watch over a movement of a young girl who was likely kidnapped. The girls parents had complained about her missing. It was a personal and a family matter of the father of the girl. But since the girl was 18+, the Congi PM MMS had called a cabinet meeting to take action to investigate and to take Modi to task. This is the type of  mind set of the Congi leaders what they possess.] 

Now look at the other aspect.

Narendra Modi did not run away from Gujarat. He performed his duties very well and he ensured that all the natural rights and the constitutional rights of Muslims, get protected. He did all these and controlled the riots of his own within 2/3 days, in spite of non-cooperation of neighboring states ruled by Congi. Despite of this, he was made a party to be investigated.

Lastly Narendra Modi got clean chit from SC.

Farukh and Son were treated free bird

In the case of Farukh Abdulla, the Congi and the judiciary has made him a free bird. Neither he was taken to task nor was he warned. But when the situation in JK improved Farukh came back and become the CM of Kashmir again. Even after becoming the CM again and again, he did nothing for the Kashmiri Hindus. Omar Abdulla has shown the same tendency and the similar character.

LOOK AT THE NAKED SHAMELESS LIES AND HYPOCRISY OF OMAR

Very recently (after a 23 years’ long sleep, which is much more longer i.e. 50 times longer than the sleep of “Kumbh Karna”) Omar said that he was almost ready to introduce the rehabilitation of the deserted Hindus in Kashmir. But the movie “Kashmir File” has spoiled everything. Look at their lies. When they were power and otherwise too they did nothing, now suddenly when a movie is made, Omar says  “My his tube light is glowing.”

https://youtu.be/kPu4D80crcc

There are 5 lakhs files of the genocide in Kashmir. 5 lakhs Hindus of the Kashmir want to tell and share their suffering. Leave aside the genocide of the Hindus elsewhere.

Lutyen Gangs’ leaders wants the “Kashmir File” Movie should be banned. Hindus have no right to cry even if they are lynched to murder under genocide. They must tolerant of their genocide.

According to Lutyen gangs, Hindus are intolerant.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

P.S.

Lutyens say, O! Hindu, we are taking your body to crematorium to blaze. Neither You nor your relatives are supposed to  cry. You must be tolerant.

Read Full Post »

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy – 4

Common Civil Code need not be linked with religion only. Actually the Common Civil Code means all are equal before law. This is the prime requirement of democracy.

An out line and the moral spirit is shown here under. This is only the general requirement of the  Common Civil Code. It has to be written into a legal language. It is not possible to indicate every thing in a blog. 

(1) Government means the State Government and the Central Government as the case may be, will not provide any type of exclusive help to any religion. All the religions are equal before law.

(1.1) Every religious place will have to be registered before it occupies any type of property. What properties are available at present (at the time of implementation of CCR) will have to be renewed. Trust those are not registered, will be taken as a private individuals. The Income Tax will be charged in accordance to the tariff applied to an individual.

(1.2) Accounts of every religious trust will be audited by the Government for the every quarter.

(1.3) Accountant General will depute an officer to conduct the special, general and emergency meeting of all the trustees as per the routine or on the request of majority trustees.

(1.4) All the meetings of board of trustee will be video recorded and there will be four copies. Central, state, office of the local official who is the chairman of the trust. And the forth copy with the trust.

(1.5) Any trust working for the welfare of a community exclusively, their activities will not be allowed to be harmful to the other communities, the functioning of the Government and the public.

(1.6) Any dispute among the trustees, or a member of the board of trustees, will be settled as stipulated for the board of a company under Company Act. The arbitrator will also impose punishment in the form of penalty/ies if a member of the board of the trustee or any other person of the community found guilty of offense. The punishment could be temporary to permanent of the withdrawal of its citizenship, and or monetary penalty or and prison and or capital punishment and or de-recognition of the trust and or disqualification of the members of the board of trust.

(1.7) An amendment to the current Indian Charitable Trust Act will be carried out to meet the requirement of indiscrimination among communities (inclusive of religions, castes, creed, languages, fields, level, … ) in line with the democratic values.

(1.8) All the Government acts in force, related with Religious rights will be treated null and void with retrospective effect. The government will examine individual cases on receipt of application, to protect the democratic rights of communities or individual cases by case on its merits.

(1.9) All the transactions of a registered community trust/company, mandatorily through Card, one line or cheque.

This law will supersede all the laws found deviating from the democratic value and principles.

(2) Communities based on religious, caste, creed, language, region, jobs, … :

(2.1) No community will get any exclusive treatment.

(2.2) No community trust will be allowed to grab land. It will be termed as encroachment.

(2.3) No community place will be allowed to use loud speaker above 20 – 30 decibel outside its territory. For a sound more than this, the the Mosq/Temple/ … has to take permission under prescribed form. The permission cannot been a routine type.

(2.4) No processions, gathering or picketing will be allowed in a public place or a place which does not belong fully, to the person/s who is/are doing agitation. To enjoy freedom of expression, Government will allot some ear marked public places on receipt of the application for a limited time. As for the precessions the permission will be given as discussed in Chapter – 3 of this blog.

(2.5) A Community … can impart education of its scriptures. But it will have to submit an undertaking duly registered, the education will not be related to create hatred against any other community whatsoever. Any deviation on this, is liable to face prosecution for criminal offense as at above (1.6).

(3) Any tradition followed by a couple of a community/ies for marriage will not be recognized by the Government.

(3.1) A couple has to take a written as well as a verbal oath (video-graphical before the Government Registrar) in witness of the Guardians.

(3.2) As far as possible, the Guardians should be the parents.

(3.3) A valid reason to the satisfaction of the Registrar, should be recorded if the witnesses are not the parents.

(3.4) A public notice in advance of one month must be given in the news papers of the state or where the guardians or parents reside.

(3.5) Any fraud on the marriage will land to the punishment of prison and limited suspension or withdrawal of citizenship for those who played role in the marriage.

(3.6) To change the religion for the purpose of marriage will not be a valid reason. On the contrary this will be termed as “Force”, and if noticed the persons involved in this “Force” will be punished and penalized including the limited suspension of citizenship or withdrawal of citizenship and or a prison.

(4) Any body talks to discriminate other/s on the ground of any community, (i.e. religion, language, caste, creed, job, …) or to create hatred will be termed as criminal offence, it would be liable for prosecution. The person/s if found guilty, a punishment of a limited suspension or withdrawal of citizenship or prison.

(4.1) Any person holding a post where the salary payment if made from public fund, and if the alleged person found guilty at prima facia, will be immediately suspended from the post. ( E.g. Lalloo, Mamata, Kejri, Mullayam, Stelin, Mayavati, … etc… many have openly insulted others as “outsiders”. Mamata had conducted genocide of Hindus in W.Bengal through Rohingya Muslims, where Hindus did not vote to TMC.) The same will be prosecuted and if found guilty, it will be punished as at (1.6).

E.g. Mayawati once announced a slogan, Tilak, Taraju aur Talwar, usko maro Jute Char (टिलक, तराजु और तल्वार, उसको मारो जूते चार) . Hit Brahmin, Baniya, Kshatriya, four times with your shoes.

(4.2) Persons will be classified by their income. As for the current classification, viz. Lower caste, backward, Schedule, other backward, … the reservation will continue for 10 years only based on the income per head. After 10 years if it is found that they could not be lifted up, then the parties and their elected members who ruled for more than two terms will get disqualified.

Amendments to other laws e.g. Shop Act, Company Act, Contract Act, Cooperative Act, People’s representative Act, Service rules, Pension rules, labor laws, Government Residential Accommodation Rules … Separate and permanent staff and office with Auditoriums and TV channels for Election Commission.

This is because, the Congi lead Governments have created wide spread anarchy to make money and allowed to make money through immoral ways.

La fin.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Not A Joke but Miracle.

We know that the Ministers and members of the public representative Assembly (i.e. State Assembly, Lok Sabha, Raj Sabha, gets life time pension, despite of they are running other business…

Kerala Government had framed and passed a resolution to provide life time pension to the personal staff of the minister who has put in service of two years in the office. Minister will change every person of his personal staff as soon as it completes 2 years. So more persons can get life time benefit of pension. Governor’s signature is pending.

Read Full Post »

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy – 3

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy – 3

As we have seen in part-2 of this blog, to follow a prescribed procedure before launching an agitation, is not a new one.

Every type of protest must have regulations;

This mandate had been framed by MK Gandhi for conducting protest / agitation. It was followed by him, right from when he was conducting agitation in South Africa.

In 1922, at Chauri Chaura, 22 policemen were killed by the agitators who set fire to a police station. MK Gandhi took the responsibility and called of the agitation. Off course the agitation was against an event previously occurred where the police executed gun firing on the agitators, who were agitating in a non-violent way.

Setting Fire to the police station was a reaction of public. Police was not supposed to use bullets against non-violent satyagrahis.

Satyagrahis are supposed to remain non-violent.

MK Gandhi had given a call to agitate, against police firing on non-violent agitators. But subsequent to Chauri Chaura incident, he called of the protest.

Why?

Because the agitators (the public) were not qualified to conduct non-violent agitations.

“Quit India”

The same Gandhi when conducted “Quit India” movement, at that time too, some stray incidences of violence did occur.

But in proportion to the wide spread agitation, the violence were negligible and minor.

Besides this, there were many parties who were against “Quit India movement”. There were enough scope for them to call back the “Quit India movement” by Gandhi on the ground of it was becoming violent.

There is nothing like absolute non-violence according to MK Gandhi.

Besides this, all the leaders were under prison. How can they stop violence? How the British Government can blame the Congress for violence?

While doing agitation, the dialogue has to be prevailed. To put a pre-condition more than once by the authority or the agitators is not permissible.

But we see, in the agitations at, Shaheen Bag, Sindhu border … every mandatory guide line for the agitators has not been followed. The well read judiciary also could not point out this.

Hence in reality, it was not an agitation but a violent pressure by un-qualified agitators.

The agitators were supposed to be taken to task by the state Government. If the state fails, then the Central Government is supposed to dismiss the state government.

But a PIL was filed and the Central Government opted to keep mum. Off course it is a matter of research as to why the Central Government did not punish Kejri and his gang for providing wifi facilities free of cost / at the cost of the public money, and allowing the agitators to block even the highways. Judiciary had also not passed any order. Judiciary was more interested in giving goody goody remarks. It Looked very funny.

Why PIL?

What is mandatory?

What is hypothetical?

In any legal case, there are two or more parties. First is the party which asks for justice. Others are causing the injustice knowingly or unknowingly. If evidently it is in the interest of public, a PIL (Public Interest Litigation) can be filed.

But who will decide the existence of Public Interest?

A PIL has been filed in SC India in connection with the students held up in Ukraine. Everybody knows, that Ukraine does not fall under the jurisdiction of the SC India. SC India should have straight a way rejected the application and it should have also imposed penalty for wasting the time of the SC. Is not it?

No. It is not like that. SC India would like to give some remarks, some emotional remarks to show its sensitivity. Hence it did not reject the application.

The Government is already taking action actively, before any body file a PIL. What to do?

There is a gang, who is rather late this time, in preparing a PIL and filing it before the SC. Had it been filed in time, the SC and the gang could have enjoyed the scope of questioning the Central Government and asking to explain the action taken/ to be taken with the details of quantification.

But the Lutyen gang thought, it is never too late.

Now look at the other’s case.

If “A” feels to file a case against “B”, “A” has to first write to “B” about the injustice. If “A” is not satisfied with the reply of “B”, then “A” has to give a notice to appropriate authority of “B”, with a time limit of 15 days. Then only “A” can go to the lower court. Then lower court if satisfied with the channel “A” has used, can accept the case eligible to register. Then it issues notice to “B/B-s” by the date to the next hearing. This would be further one month or more in general.

Matter of PIL

In the matter of PIL, the SC (though it is always crying heavily and complaining that it is very busy and overloaded with the pending cases) can straight a way accepts the application in many rotten infructuous cases. It also issues notices, takes the matter on hearing on supper priority, and while hearing, it gives goody goody remarks.

The Godi-media of Lutyens (Pet media suffering from Modi/BJP phobia), gives big big “Head Lines” to the emotional remarks of judges to spread with enhanced emotions.

The Gang leaders of Political Analysts with golden frame spectacles, and or French-cut beard or Stalin-cut beard, discuss this sensitive case with sensitive remarks of the SC. This is all necessary to condemn the current central Government (BJP).

It is a matter of research as to why the SC did not corner the applicants in the matter against Abrogation of 370, 35A, amendment of CAA, … NRC, NRP, Farm Law, … where the applicants were/are not ready at all, to specify the injustice. They are even not ready to brief the court of law.

The Court happily passes emotional remarks.

Last but not the least is “the Students held up in Ukraine”

Is it, Rahul Gandhi is the only single entity who spells out one or other remark , simply to prove his existence. There is no shortage of such entities who construct emotional remarks on whatsoever happens in India? Enjoy the fun!!

But how the Common Civil Code will help to make India a real democratic country?

(Continued…)

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy – 2

Should we have Different Criminal Code for different communities?

No.

Why?

Because Criminal Code is related with criminal offences, and criminal Offences are affecting to the very existence of human life. It is related to the body and mental torture, whereas the civil code is related with the property and family disputes. Mental torture can be generated by the civil offender/s too. Somehow or other, there is a political tradition to view both separately. A civil case can be withdrawn without the permission of the court, whereas for withdrawing a criminal case,  because it is lodged by the government, the Government can withdraw the case withdraw the case with the permission of the court.

Mental torture is common in both the type of cases. Mental torture makes a human unhappy. Classification of offences under the civil and the criminal is simply a further classifications just to deal with arrest, bails and the authorities to lodge the complaint. The cases related with criminal offence are lodged by the police and dealt by the police whereas the civil cases are filed by the affected individual/s or the institutions.

Now when the Glob is becoming a village, and rise in democratic values, a country which thinks itself a democratic country has to go towards Common Civil Code for all its communities.

What is community?

A group of people which has something in common among them and they want to maintain that commonality.

E.g.

The people who like liquor,

The people who like potatoes,

The people who like tragedy movies,

The people who like comedy movies,

The people who speak a same language

The people who play instruments e.g. Drum, flute, …

The people who like to sing,

The people who like to hear music, e.g. Desi Classical, Folk, Western, … or of every place,

The people who like to think on a same class of thought

The people who like to do physical exercise,

The people who like to believe to do the same activity

The people who like to follow some tradition,

The people who like to have varieties, (This is also a choice and that exists too)

.

.

.

The list has no end.

Like minded people get more pleasure when they perform jointly,

They also like to spread their belief so that they can be more happy.

Every thing could be good to some extent, unless the group of like minded people do not harm the other lot/s.

Thereby the mentally developed countries have framed some rules (e.g. national constitutions) with the help of some people who had so called wisdom and foresight. These rules are to be followed by every body.

The existence of such rules is the first step towards non-violence. Non-violence means minimum violence by the given and designated authority. This authority imposes punishment on the person/s who broke a rule.

If a rule itself provide injustice, then a designated institution say a court, would decide . Peoples’ representative will change the rule under recognized and stipulated procedure.

Now suppose there is a party having majority in the LS and RS. A scam takes place. The opposition parties ask for the investigation. But the ruling party bluntly denies to carryout any investigation. Then what to do?

A scam on a purchase of Jeeps by the Ministry of the Defense

In early fifties of last century, a purchase order of 2000 refurbished Jeeps was placed on a bogus company of the UK. A scam was noticed. It is a long story. The Nehruvian Government had no excuse. Opposition parties asked for a regular investigation. Nehru refused bluntly in 1955 and asked the opposition to take the case in the next general elections before the public which was due in 1957.

At that time there was no PIL. HC/SC did not take SUO/ MOTTO. How do you grade Nehruvian Government on this point?

People were ignorant at a large. Nehru and Menon were made highly popular. Nehru had got a tremendous welcome in China and USSR. Menon delivered a prolonged lecture in UNO on Kashmir. Both were made popular on these points. People were not aware of the facts related to the Jeep Scam.

Under this circumstances, an agitation had to be launched. The opposition parties were helpless. During the general elections of 1957 the reconstructions of states based on local language was introduced. The people were more interested for their local rights. The Jeep Scandal was sidelined.

What is the purpose of agitation in democracy?

The purpose of agitation in democracy is to make the people aware of any issue generated or came to the notice that causes injustice to individual/s.

The injustice could be by a defective law, noticed under a changed circumstance of an individual or a community or the nation.

Is it that in this circumstances people can ask the government to find out solution?

No. Not at this stage. At this stage the law has to be interpreted by judiciary. If Judiciary finds it is making injustice and the same is hurting the right/s provided by the constitution, it can be straightway declared null and void.

But supposed the matter is confusing to the judiciary, the judiciary can ask the government to modify the law or to frame a new law.

If the Government willfully fails to follow the advice of judiciary the people can use the right to agitation.

What is the permissible way to conduct agitation?

There has to be a system in democracy.

No agitation is permissible where a time limit by the Judiciary has proposed or the government itself has given a time limit to modify the law or to frame a new law.

No agitation is permissible which causes inconvenience to the others. E.g. What we had observed at Shaheen Bag, Sindhu border ….

A state Government cannot conduct agitation against other State Government or the Central Government. Such matters must be resolved through court.

E.g.

Mamata had obstructed the work of a central investigation team. (The judiciary was supposed to take Suo Motto on the protest of Mamata. The judiciary could had passed an order of suspension of Mamata who behaved rashly and obstructed the work entrusted to the Central Government agency.

When a dispute between an organization/person and the Government/organization arises, the matter must be decided by the judiciary. If the judiciary says that it is out of its jurisdiction, then only agitation is permissible.

What could be the main principles of Agitation? On what type of points, one can agitate?

(1) There should be the specially constituted courts and these courts shall work under HC/SC to entertain such application for conducting agitation,

(2) The person/organization who is desirous to agitate shall apply before the special court with its full details of the organization with a list of office bears, and the details of the persons going to take part in agitation, their names, addresses and identity

(3) The application should contain the pointwise brief description of dispute including the reaction or approach of the opposite party,

(4) The applicant/s should indicate as to what is/are point/s and how its rights/interest are damaged,

(5) The applicant/s must indicate the type of agitation, viz, Place, route, picketing, procession, Token strike Hunger strike, on to the death strike, rally, …

(6) The applicant must indicate as to what arrangement has been made to see the agitation remains non-violent (i.e. Not going to harm others in others in any way).

(7) The applicant must indicate as to how the agitation is going to be managed financially,

(8) The special court will grant the permission after serving the notice to the concern Government and ”the public through local Government owned TV Channel” in the place where the agitation is to be launched.

(9) There must be court clearance, and court should pass an order, that this agitation is permissible and the people involved cannot wait to take the matter in the next general elections.

(10) While conducting agitation, the agitating person/institution must be meaningfully ready all the times for discussion with opposite party.

(11) To provide such procedure in a democratic country and to make provision of such courts, is inevitable, because the judges are, like many others, do not have physical and moral courage, both. Under such circumstances, we cannot expect judges to give independent judgement. This has been also confirmed by a retired Supreme Court judge. What else proof is required?

How the Common Civil Code will work?

(Continued)

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy – 1

Common Civil Code and Real Democracy

It is needless to praise Nehru, Nehruvian and Congi for maintaining the Democracy in India.

On the contrary the first credit goes to the people of India, Non-Congis especially Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Morarji Desai, Firoz Ghandi, … BJP leaders like Shyama Prasad Mukharjee, Dindayal Upadhyay, Atal Bihari Bajpai and some MK Gandhians like J. B. Kripalani, Jai Prakash Narayan, Ram Manohar Lohiya, Govindrao Deshpande … who expose Indira Gandhi’s autocracy and criminal mindset and defeated her in 1977. 

Sardar Patel had warned Nehru on his craze on so-called socialism and his policy towards China. But Sardar Patel died in 1950. He could had given much more contribution towards democracy had he been remained alive at least till 1952.

We will not discuss on this matter. Because the current generation and some of the media analysts have either no-knowledge, or ill-knowledge on the situation prevailed during 1947 to 1989 or false perception on democracy or suffering from one or other phobia due to prejudice.

The real rescuer of democracy and promoter to approach towards the real democracy in India is Narendra Modi.

There are at least three big deficiency in our Indian democracy on this date. Off course Narendra Modi cannot be blamed for these scars.

Before the arrival of Narendra Modi, the democracy was limited to conducting the elections (how much fair is a matter of research), the existence of somewhat independent judiciary of the so-called democratic Indian Constitution and to some extent the freedom of speech.

A very big deficiency was to identify a citizen for its rights under Article 370 and 35A. These articles were based on citizen’s religion, caste and gender.

How and why did no body agitate against such provisions is a matter of research.

In first decade of independence, Nehru had introduced these articles in an irregular way on the plea that these provisions are only for a temporary period. But period was not fixed, just like reservation based on caste.

Narendra Modi team abrogated articles 370 and 35A. This caused India to go nearer towards the democracy.

What is about reservation in education and jobs?

Actually reservation in jobs will become useless, once number of jobs would be much more than the number of the unemployed persons.

As for the reservation in educational institutions, the passing mark has to be obtained as the minimum requirement for the admission. Narendra Modi works as per his priority. He has introduced the idea of skill development and entrepreneurship.

Narendra Modi (BJP), is introducing changes very fast.

The opposition parties’ business of making money through unauthorized channels has been reduced sharply. Under the current situation, the opposition parties find no scope to power. Hence the opposition parties have decided to oppose every action taken by Narendra Modi even if, when they were in power in the past, they themselves have suggested such reforms but they had no guts and the courage. Besides this, now the opposition parties had/have open up some funny fronts.

E.g. Citizenship Amendment Act, National Register of Citizenship, National Register of Population, Farms Law.None of these is putting Citizens and farmers to any loss.

How do the opposition parties can create atmosphere of unrest if there is no loss to the citizens and the farmers?

To have a common sense with a common man is uncommon.

Further the learned persons of media are purchasable.

Lutyen gangs hitherto do not suffer from the shortage of money. Further the judiciary and the civil service officers are not free from the influence of Lutyen gangs. There are states where the Lutyen parties are ruling.

Under these circumstances the battle on fake issues and no issues is on.The recent topic is HIJAB.

The judiciary could have rejected the petition out rightly.

Why did not judiciary dismiss the petition?

Is this not a matter of research?

What is wrong with the judiciary?

Why does the judiciary want others to apply their mind?

Why the judiciary does not apply its own mind?

Why does the judiciary prolong the hearing?

Can the Common Civil Code solve such problems?

Can the Common Civil Code solve all the problems related with right to religion and right to protest?

YES … YES … YES …

(Continued … )

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

Why the Judiciary does not apply its mind?

Lutyen Gangs are determined to generate Civil War in India, because their main aim is to throw out BJP lead Government from power at any cost and at any means. Lutyen gangs have strategies. They are active on their different strategies.

Lutyens in joint venture

Lutyen gangs incorporate Congi gang ( Congi means INC = Indian Nehruvian Congress alias Indira Nehru Congress & Off-springs),

Mamata Gang incorporated with Muslim antisocial elements including Rohingya Muslims,

Urban Naxal Gang, Daud Gangs working in India,

ISI and Pakistan Government in association with terrorists’ gangs,

CPIM in association with Urban Naxal gangs,

NC gang of Farrukhand PDP Gang of Mehbooba,

Sewage Sena Gang of Uddhav,

Antisocial gang of Daud and his right hand Sharad associated with Drug mafia,

SP gang of Mullayam associated with land mafia,

RJD gang of Lalloo,

Christian Missionaries supported Anti-BJP foreign based gangs …

Why are these gangs united?

None of these gangs is based on any principle nor any purity of means. They are united only to throw away Narendra Modi, because their mafia business is stopped my BJP Government. Besides this the different central agencies investing into Lutyens’ scams and antisocial activities when they were in power at the Center and currently in few states.

These gangs are known to most of the people of India. There is no doubt that whenever wherever necessary, every gang supports each other. Evidentially there are lot of examples. The gang leaders are liable and can also be picked up and arrested on non-bailable warrant to put to jail at any time.

Why Not?

But this is not being done by the BJP lead government. Whether it is a part of its strategy or its non priority or its stupidity. This is a matter of research of political analysts. There is a belief that if these gangs are ending up naturally of their own follies of being antisocial and criminal, why the Government should be super active upon them in hurry.

Fortunately a common man of Hindus and nationalists, is trying to keep mum or does not react with violence even if the Lutyen gangs behave rashly, communally and violently to the extent what is possible for them.

Why is it so?

Because, some time back (two decades ago), some Hindus in Gujarat had tried to react violently. This was their reaction, against the preplanned blazing of two railway coaches of Sabarmati Express. This blazing of coaches was lead by a Congi local leader of Godhra. This was done, at Godhra railway station. 59 innocent Hindus were burnt alive. As a result, reactive riots had been broke up, and much more Hindus were died as a result of police firing. Narendra Modi was the then Chief Minister of Gujarat was taken to task by all legal and illegal means by the Lutyen gangs. It is a long story. The details are available somewhere on this blog site.

It is very common and very frequent that the Government officers including top level officers those who are supposed to have the quality of foresight, wisdom, fearlessness, judicious mind, patience of mind, brave, deep understanding of issues, are lacking in each quality in general. The corruption in selection of the officers, cannot be ruled out. (Rs 10000000+ was seized from the house of the then Chairman of a public service Commission Punjab state, nearly 25 years back) These officers in general or in specific, never apply their mind while taking decisions.

But what is about the Indian Judiciary?

Are the judges competing with the officers of Indian Public Service Commission in lacking the aforesaid qualities? Are they not supposed apply their mind while taking decisions.

Look at the issue of some Muslim girls agitating in a school of Karnataka State. They wanted to wear HIJAB in the school and the class room.

These Muslim girls created an issue from nothing for nothing.

That is, these girls wanted to show that they have the liberty to select their dress while they attend the school. This liberty as they say, is under religious freedom and democratic freedom of selection of dress under constitutional rights in India.

This is wrong. Yes. There is a freedom to agitate against a government or an authority. But this freedom is not unrestricted.

Here, in the case of dress code of schools, the Government has entrusted the School authority to prescribe the Dress Code, and enforce it upon their students. This is not unconstitutional. Such dress code does exist among many corporate bodies, offices, hospitals, defense wings, police … all over the world.

If any body wants to challenge this authorization of the Government, given to the school authority, it can be challenged in the court of law. There are judgements on such matters.

In view of the past verdicts of Courts, what was the school supposed to do?

School should not have allowed the girls inside the compound of the school. If the girls have already entered the compound, police should have been called for, to drive them out. Let them make noise out side the school premise. Then it becomes the matter of law and order in public place, for police when the girls are shouting out side the school. The school authorities could have given notice to the parents through the girls or a notice should have been served to the parents through the post, asking the parents to meet the school authority in person. Then, if the parents/guardians have been found with negative approach, a School Leaving Certificate should have been handed over to them.

If the noise created by the girls disturbs the classes, the police should be informed so, to take action who are causing inconvenience to the school, and to the road traffic.

If the school authority, has been made a party in the petition, even in that case also, the school authority could have acted on the above line. The school authority could very well say that we have not received any deviating instructions on the dress code, from the Government authority.

There was no need for the non-Muslim students to counter agitate against the Muslim girls. There is no need to communalize the agitation by launching counter agitation. Let Muslim girls to say “Allah hoo Akbar”. Let them shout Allah hoo Akabar. How do the non-Muslim students concern with Allah and Akbar? In what way Allah and Akbar are going to harm the non-Muslim students?

But when you non-Muslim students started reacting with the shouting “Jai Shree Ram” with saffron cloth, according to others, you have Islamized your own religion. Off course it is not exactly the same, because Ram is a historical character, whereas for Muslims only Akbar is the historical character. But when you spell out against their religious attitude, Ram becomes a religion character. Actually these students have not applied their mind under their desire to do something to show as a reaction.

These non-Muslim students are not to be blamed as much as the Muslim Girls can be blamed. Because the Muslim Girls acted like a puppets under the instructions of pre-planned strategy of some Lutyen gangs. These girls have already contradicted themselves. Further they have shown that they wanted to disturb the society and to create anarchy.

Leave aside GODI (Pet) MEDIA. What is about other media, better known as nationalists media like Zee News. Why have they given so much coverage? They must have sense to understand that such agitating lots, have intention to get a coverage. The Muslim Girls do not mind what would be the outcome of their agitation when they shouts and link it with their religious freedom. They even do not mind that by their action they are defaming their own religion.

Last but not the least, the Judiciary.

The HC JUDGE has opined to put the matter before a bench. Actually the Judge could have dismissed the petition. The Judge has got sufficient ground of many verdicts to dismiss the petition. Let the petitioner go to the Supreme Court.

But the Judges too, do not apply their mind to understand the inbuilt spirit and sense of the petition. It is a matter of research whether was it known to the Judge as the petition could be a part of a Tool Kit to create unrest in Educational Institutions.

Due to Corona Epidemy, the educational institutions were functioning with their 40 to 50 percent efficiency through ON LINE classes. But now when Corona is gone, the Lutyen gangs want nothing should be normal. Is it that Indian judiciary is incapable to realize the threat to the Indian society?

A retired Chief Justice of Supreme Court has already exposed that Indian Judiciary is not able to give independent judgments. Indian Judiciary is working under influence of Lutyen gangs. Yes this could be correct. Mamata who is a part and parcel of Lutyen gang, recall how is she behaving with the Governor of her state!

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

We are strategical Off-Springs of Western Lutyens-2

Who killed Jai Prakash Narayan?

Ishvar Chandra Vidyasagar was responsible for the death of Jai Prakash Narayan.

Sorry Sorry Sorry. It was not Ishvar Chandra Vidyasagar responsible for the death of Jai Prakash Narayan, but it was Raja Ram Mohan Roy, responsible for the death of Jai Prakash Narayan.

To become Shastri or Brown Saheb

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had backed British rule in India. Raja Ram Mohan Roy pleaded for only British rule can uplift and step up people of India. Sanskrit learning has deteriorated the Indian society.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy, it is said to have studied Bengali, Sanskrit, Persian, Arabic, Latin, Greek, English….

It is a matter of research as to how much expertise he got other than in English. It is said that he had studied Vedas and Upanishads.

Lot of questions existed as to how much validity was, of his translation of Vedas in English. Actually he was brought up under two parents. One wanted him to become Shastri and other parents tried to make him a Brown Saheb. It appears he became a Brown Saheb.

He was fond of British Rule.

He was impressed by the logic of British rule and British educational policy. William Bentinck had introduced new education policy where no expenditure was allowed for Vernacular Pathshalas. Government aids to be given to only for English and English medium schools as designed by McCauley to suppress India and its culture.

Instead of appropriate interpretation of Indian scriptures, he introduced the same as directed by British historians.

Sati tradition was prevailing.

How much it had being prevailing is a matter of research.

“Sati” was actually the wife of Symbolic God lord Shiva the Cosmos. Sati blazed her self not because her husband died, Her husband Lord Shiva is eternal. Leave aside the symbolic story of Sati. But the so called Sati’s husband was insulted by her father. Therefore she blazed herself.

Now suppose if William Bentinck had not introduced ban on Sati Tradition in India with the help of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, it would have spread to whole of India. Then it would have continued to even in twentieth century.

“So what? How can you say that Raja Ram Mohan Roy is responsible for the murder of Jai Praksh Narayan?

“ Be calm … Have some patience. There were very good scope for the spread of Sati Pratha among Muslims too …

“How?“

“Because Hindus could have become intolerant towards other religion because they have learnt the lesson from Christianity and Islam, that only through own Hindu religion, one can go to heaven. Under this circumstances those Muslim could have adopted Sati Pratha, under their vote bank politics. Nehru or Indira would have done Ghar Vapsi, and Indira otherwise too.

“But Indira Nehru was not a Muslim … !!!

“Even being a Hindu Indira had to follow Sati Pratha. Hence when Firoz Ghandi died, Indira Gandhi would had blazed her self, under Sati Pratha in 1959.

“So what … ? … !!

“Then, in that case, Nehru could had not been in position to plan a strategy with his syndicate members to install Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India after his death. Nehru would had become incapable, to hide the frauds of his friends and to hide his own blunders. ….

… Hence No Indira … no anarchy … no further innumerable frauds … no further blunders … no stir of Nav-Nirman in Gujarat … no defeat of Congi in Assembly elections in Gujarat … no Nationwide stir launching by Jai Prakash Narayan … no imposition of emergency … no arrests of people … no arrest of Jai Prakash Narayan … no conspiracy to kill Jai Prakash Narayan …

That is all … QED.

La Fin

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

We are strategical Off-Springs of Western Lutyens

We believe in logical argument. Logical Argument must be associated with evidence.

But because we are logical we have to define terminology of the terms which we are going to use.

What is strategical?

What is our desire? We desire power. We want to have power. Power to control the society. Power to get the work done through the society, of the society, as we want .

Society is made of Humans, These Humans have mind. Mind can be controlled by some factors. We have to control the factors. How to handle all these? We have to prepare a systems of communication. i.e. To achieve our goal, we work out project/s.

We will give you an example.

We Britishers found that, it was difficult to rule this India which has a very well set, ancient, progressive, philosophical, and inclusive society. They were more scientific and orderly in all the fields, than what we were.

Hence we thought “we have to set up a strategy to rule the people of India.

We worked out some projects

“how to make this country poor,

“how to make this country dependent upon us for jobs,

“how to brainwash them that their culture is not that old,

“how to establish our superiority in their mind that we are superior to them,

“how to establish in their mind that they had not the sense of writing their history, science and technology,

“how to establish the feeling, that they are outsiders in India,

“how to establish in their mind that they are different from each others in their cultures …

This was the Grand Project of British, in India.

In establishing all these thoughts in the mind of the Indian people, the British were successful ultimately. Because they had strategies for each goal by creating fake fault lines and then attacking on them.

Got it?

We are members of Lutyen Gangs. Our gangs are working on various projects.

Our goal is to uproot Narendra Modi and BJP, from States and Central Governments.

We are not one Gang. We are different gangs, and we may have different goals for different aims at other places too. But for India we have a common single goal. That one is to uproot Narendra Modi and BJP.

We are jointly working on this project, under “Joint Venture”.

This project is composed of many work elements.

We have a strategy. Very well planned strategy. We also have a gang with the mask of pro-BJP/pro-Namo/pro-Hindu/pro-nationalist. We ask them to attack simultaneously, and or occasionally (e.g. 2nd October and 30th January and or other days too) on MK Gandhi.

Why?

Because MK Gandhi had helped Nehru, out of way of democratic principles. MK Gandhi made Nehru the President of the Congress in 1946. This Nehru had committed many blunders and allowed frauds. The effect of those frauds and blunders have become irreparable and due to those blunders and fraud, India is still suffering. We have to make somebody responsible, other than Nehru.

We can very easily establish MK Gandhi only and only, was responsible. And we will side line all topics related with Nehru and his progenies.

We have an other gang

Further we have an other gang. This gang will float general topics against, Islam, Moguls, Aurangzeb, Tipu Sultan, British, conversion, castes, …

This gang will prevent nationalists from floating real and relevant topics, which are against our Lutyen Gangs. We will keep them busy on the topics we want time to time. This is necessary because we know, a lot of the pro-Nationalists are ready to attack on our Lutyen Gangs’, on current anti-national activities of our gangs.

Our aim is to divert their attention from real topics to dead or irrelevant topics.

Rahula Gandhi is a STAR Canvasser of BJP.

Why?

Because RaGa talks so much loose and false, that normal people take him non-authentic. RaGa says Modi has donated 5000 Crore acres of land to Ambani in Katchh. Katchh is a part of Gujarat state. Total land available on this “Planet Earth” is of the order of 3700 crore acres. This land includes deserts, waste lands and mountains too. Hence to take RaGa seriously is not possible.

But we Congi gang people, say to Rahul Gandhi; “ Oh! Boss, … don’t worry Boss …, you keep it up ….

Below average person is not aware of the facts, figures, errors, proportion, relevance etc., … All those are unknown to common man. What a common would understand is;  … there is something wrong with Modi. Modi has donated some sizable quantity of land to Ambani … and that to be unlawfully … That is all. Our gang’s job is done.

Half baked and unbaked among nationalists

Many pro-BJPs/ pro-nationalists are also available among Hindus, many of them are half-baked /unbaked on MK Gandhi and his literature. Further they are lacking in sense of proportion, sense of relevance and sense of proportion/significance. Some of them are vocal. Some of them are silent. We can pick these vocal persons and give them a platform, and they will get publicity. Who does not like publicity?

We are in a democratic country. In democracy freedom of expression is a right. It is not a crime if a person does not express properly. Hence our employed crazy person can tell lies too.

MK Gandhi is dead long back. His followers think MK Gandhi is a SUN. Hence no body would come in his defense.

When anybody talks against Nehru or Gandhi, that person is taken as SANGHI. To talk against Nehru is not much advisable. Nehru’s progenies are very well alive and active. They have very wide network of anti-social elements and terrorists. Why to take risk?

MK Gandhi is an easy and soft target.

Why did Godse choose MK Gandhi to kill?

Why did Godse not choose Jinna, Nehru, Liyakat Ali, Suharavardi, … who were much more responsible for riots or and partition?

Hence OUR PERSON will also select MK Gandhi as the TARGET.

One more plus point in selecting MK Gandhi as a target is, OUR GANG PERSON can freely tell lies also. Our GANG PERSON can fabricate stories also. MK Gandhians are not going to corner Our GANG PERSON. If some body comes up with logical argument to corner Our GANG PERSON, our GANG PERSON, is not supposed to reply. That is all. Our aim is our GANG PERSONS should be labeled as SANGHI. And common mass must feel that, SANGHIs are not AUTHENTIC.

In this way the persons who have respect for MK Gandhi, either would vote for Lutyen Gang’s candidate or would press NOTA or would not go to cast its vote. That is all.

We Lutyen gangs want this situation. Our aim is to divide Hindus in every possible ways.

“Who is responsible for partition? and we will say it was MK Gandhi, who was responsible for partition.”

“Now suppose, some of the nationalists use our style and strategy !!  Then what would happen?

“As for example !

“Who was responsible for murdering Jay Prakash Narayan?

“Reply is; Ishvar Chandra Vidyasagar was responsible for the murder of Jaya Prakash Narayan”

(continues)

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

સુરક્ષા ક્ષતિને વિવાદાસ્પદ બનાવો

લુટ્યેન ગેંગોના નેતાઓ અને ખાસ કરીને કોંગીના નેતાઓ, પછી એ નેતાઓ ગમે તે કેટેગરીના હોય, તેમની ઓળખ ફક્ત કૌભાંડો કરવાની, દેશને લૂંટવાની, ગુંડાગર્દી કરવાની, કાયદાથી ઉપર રહેવાની, જૂઠું બોલવાની, દેશ દ્રોહ કરવાની જ નથી પણ પોતાની જવાબદારીઓની ક્ષતિઓને બીજાની ઉપર ઢોળવાની પણ છે. આ આપણે સારી રીતે જાણીએ છીએ.

તટસ્થ સુજ્ઞજનો આ સમજી શકે છ. પણ કેટલાક સુજ્ઞ જનો ગોદી સમાચાર માધ્યમોના સદસ્ય હોવાથી એટલે કે લુટ્યેન ગેંગોએ ખોળે લીધેલા હોવાથી તેઓ તેમના દૂધને વફાદાર રહે છે

શા માટે “દૂધ” શબ્દ વાપરવામાં આવ્યો છે?

સમજી જાઓને!! માતુશ્રી નો ધર્મ છે કે તે પોતાના બાળકના જીવનની રક્ષા કરે. કારણ કે બાળક મોટું થઈને માતાને સુરક્ષા પ્રદાન કરવાનું છે. માતા – બાળક, કોંગી તથા તેના સહયોગી સાંસ્કૃતિક સાથી પક્ષો – મીડીયા, આ બંને જોડીઓનો સુરક્ષા મામલે નો સંબંધ એવો છે કે, આમાં મીડીયા ગેંગ કદી બાળક હોતું નથી. તે જન્મે ત્યારથી વયસ્ક હોય છે. તેમજ સામે કોંગીની રાજકીય ગેંગોને બાળકબુધ્ધિ અપનાવવાની છૂટ હોય છે.

લુટ્યેનગેંગની મીડીયા ગેંગ ને નહેરુ શાસનના સમયથી ખોળે લીધેલી છે.

નહેરુ કેટલા લોકશાહી વાદી હતા તેની ઉપર બહુ મોટા પ્રશ્નચિન્હો છે. તો પણ આ બાબતમાં તો મીડીયા ગેંગ તેમને વફાદાર રહે છે. કારણ કે આ સંબંધો એક દિવસ માટેના નથી. નહેરુ, વડા પ્રધાનપદની ખુરસી ઉપર આમરણાંત બેસી શકે તેમાં મીડીયા ગેંગનો સિંહ ફાળો હતો. અન્યથા હિમાલય જેવડી એક નહીં પણ અનેક ભૂલો અને તે પણ સજાગતા પૂર્વક કરે અને છતાં પણ વડાપ્રધાન પદની ખુરસી ઉપર બેસી શકે, એ “ન ભૂતો ન ભવિષ્યતિ” જેવી ઘટના છે.

મૂળવાત ઉપર આવીએ.

કોંગી પક્ષ શાસિત રાજ્ય પંજાબમાં વડા પ્રધાન ની સુરક્ષામાં ચૂક

નરેંદ્ર મોદીની સુરક્ષા, એટલે કે વડાપ્રધાનની સુરક્ષા ની શી વાત કરો છો?

દેશની સુરક્ષાને પણ જ્યારે લુટ્યેન ગેંગના સદસ્યો, પોતાની ધ્યેય પ્રાપ્તિ માટેના યજ્ઞમાં, હોમી દેવા હમેશા સજ્જ રહેતા હોય, તો તેમના આશ્રિતો એવા સમાચાર માધ્યમના કટારીયા વિદ્વાનો (વિદૂષકોની જેમ) તૈયાર જ હોય છે.

પોતાના દોષ અને પોતાની ક્ષતિઓ પોતાના દુશ્મનોને માથે ઠોકી દેવી એ તો નહેરુવીયનોની પ્રકૃતિ છે. આ જન્મજાત પ્રકૃતિ અને નહેરુ અને નહેરુવીયનોમાં ૧૯૪૭ થી ચાલી આવે છે.

નહેરુ પોતે જ, દેશનું હિત અવગણીને, સરદાર પટેલને, તેમણે દેશહિતમાં લીધેલા પગલાંઓને કારણે તેમને ટોક્યા કરતા હતા, અને તે પણ ધર્મનિરપેક્ષના સ્વયં પ્રમાણિત ઓઠા હેઠળ. “હૈદરાબાદ”ના મામલે પણ નહેરુએ સરદાર પટેલને “કોમવાદી” કહેલા. વાસ્તવમાં કોમવાદી નહેરુ પોતે જ હતા.

આગોતરી ચેતવણી ઓની અવગણના અને મનમાની

સરદાર પટેલે નહેરુને ૧૯૪૯માં ચેતવ્યા હોવા છતાં પણ, નહેરુએ તેમની વાતને અવગણેલી. નહેરુ ચીનના તીબેટ પરના આક્રમણને યોગ્ય માનતા હતા. ચીનના તિબેટ પરના આક્રમણને નહેરુએ ભારતના હિતમાં જોયેલું, ગુજરાતના મહાન સાહિત્યકાર અને ઇતિહાસકાર કનૈયાલાલ મુનશીએ પણ ચીનની વિસ્તારવાદી નીતિને વિષે નહેરુને જાહેરમાં ચેતવ્યા હતા છતાં નહેરુના વલણમાં ફેર પડ્યો ન હતો. આ બધા માટે ઐતિહાસિક દસ્તાવેજો છે. નહેરુએ ચીનને, હિમાલયનો કબજો લેવા માટેનો માર્ગ ખુલ્લો કરી આપે. હિંદી-ચીની ભાઈ ભાઈ. ચીન ભારતનો ૯૧૦૦૦ ચોરસ માઈલ પ્રદેશ સરળતા થી કબજે કરી શક્યું.

“રાષ્ટ્રભવનકા સબસે ઉંચા કંગુરા, લપટોંસે ઘીર કર, જલકર, ગીરકર ક્ષાર હુઆ, તબ હમેં પતા ચલા કિ, ઘરમેં તો હૈ આગ લગી.” બચ્ચન

જ્યારે નહેરુની આ ક્ષતિ જનતાની સમક્ષ આવી ત્યારે નહેરુએ કહ્યું “ક્યા કરેં? દુશ્મનને હમેં દગા દિયા …” રાજગોપાલાચારીએ કહ્યું “ દુશ્મન દગો નહીં કરે તો બીજું કોણ દગો કરશે?”.

પોતાના મોંઢાની કાલીમા છુપાવવા તેમણે સંસદ સમક્ષ પ્રતિજ્ઞા લીધી કે; “ તે અને તેમનો પક્ષ ગુમાવેલા પ્રદેશો પાછા લીધા વગર જંપીને બેસશે નહીં.” 

પછી શું થયું? બસ વાત પૂરી. પૂર્ણવિરામ.

થાય શું? આજની ઘડી અને કાલનો દિ’ … નહેરુએ, તેમના ફરજંદોએ અને તેમના પક્ષે તે પછી ૬૦+ વર્ષ રાજ કર્યું. પણ આ પ્રતિજ્ઞાને યાદ જ ન કરી. તમે યાદ કરો તો જવાબદારી બને ને? મસ્જિદમાં ગર્યો તો જ કોણ?

જવાહરલાલ પોતાની જવાબદારી સમજવા માગતા જ ન હતા. નહેરુએ નહેરુ-લિયાકત અલી કરારનું ધરાર પાલન ન કરાવ્યું તે ન જ કરાવ્યું. એટલું જ નહીં, મોદીએ કરેલા કાયદા સી.એ.એ. નો પણ નહેરુના ફરજંદોએ અને તેમની ગેંગોએ વિરોધ કર્યો એટલું જ નહીં તેની સામે હિંસક લડત ચલાવી. ગુનો નહેરુવીયનોનો હતો, અને તેને દૂર કર્યો મોદીએ, તો પણ વાંકમાં લીધો મોદીને.

“કહેતા ભી દિવાના ઔર સૂનતા ભી દિવાના…”

ઇંદિરા ગાંધી તો નહેરુ કરતાં ચાર ચાસણી ચડે એવી હતી. તેણે તો ભારતીય સેનાએ ૧૯૭૧માં જીતેલો પાકિસ્તાનનો પ્રદેશ પણ પાછો આપી દીધો એટલું જ નહીં “પાકિસ્તાન હસ્તકના કાશ્મિર (પી.ઓ.કે.)નો જે હિસ્સો ભારતીય સેનાએ કબજે કરોલો અને તેની ઉપર તો ભારતનો બંધારણીય હક્ક હતો, તે હિસ્સો પણ ઇંદિરાએ કોઈને પૂછ્યા વિના પાકિસ્તાનને રાતોરાત આપી દીધો. ઈંદિરા ગાંધીની ક્ષતિઓ તો અપાર છે. જે કોંગી શ્યામાપ્રસાદ મુખર્જી ને મરાવી નાખી શકે અને જયપ્રકાશ નારાયણ જેવા ગાંધીવાદીને “હતા ન હતા” કરીને મૃત્યુને દ્વાર પહોંચાડી શકે,   તેની પાસેથી તમે દેશ હિતની અને લોકશાહીની સુરક્ષાની અપેક્ષા રાખો તો તમે મૂર્ખ જ ગણાઓ. છતાં તેમના ભક્તો એવો દાવો કરે છે કે કોંગીએ લોકશાહીની રક્ષા કરી. “કહેતા ભી દિવાના ઔર સૂનતા ભી દિવાના…” એ આનું નામ.

પંજાબમાં શું થયું?

કેંદ્રીય સુરક્ષા એજંસીએ તો ચાર દિવસ પૂર્વે જ ભયસ્થાનોની પ્રવર્તમાન શક્યતાઓ અને તેનું વિવરણ પંજાબ રાજ્યના શાસનના ખેરખાંઓને આપી દીધેલું. (અરે! આ તો પ્રણાલીઓ છે. આમાં શું!!). આપણે આપણી વ્યુહરચના પ્રમાણે વર્તવાનું છે. એમ નહેરુવીયનોએ અને તેમના પંજાબના પક્ષના પ્યાદાઓએ વિચાર્યું. બીજા નેતાઓને તો એમ જ કે આપણે તો તાલીઓ જ પાડવાની છે. અને તેના કારણો માટે આપણા મગજમાં જે કંઈ મગજવગું (હાથવગું) હશે તે બોલી નાખવાનું જ છે ને. એમાં તો આપણે પાવરધા છીએ. આપણા માટે તર્ક અને સિધ્ધાંતોનું બંધન નથી.લૂલીને લગામ શેની?

દરેક ધર્મના, દરેક તરેહના, આતંકવાદીઓ સાથે કોંગીઓનો અને તેમના સાંસ્કૃતિક સાથીઓનો ઘરોબો જાણીતો છે. તેમની વચ્ચે પરસ્પરની ભેદ રેખા જેવું કશું હવે રહ્યું નથી. આ સ્થિતિ આમ તો જો કે પહેલેથી છે.

ગોધરા કાંડના કર્તા હર્તા, અને પક્ષના સ્થાનિક વડાને, પણ આતંકી હુમલો ઘડવાની અને કરવાની છૂટ હોય છે. શરદને પણ છૂટ હોય છે કે “ભાઈ તટ રક્ષકો, તમે અરબી સમૂદ્રમાં અવરજવર કરતા વહાણોમાં, અમારા વહાણોનું ચેકીંગ નામ પુરતું જ કરો. અમારા આતંકીઓને અને અમારા ક્રુડના સ્મગ્લરોને પરેશાન ન કરો. …”

અમે કંઈ જેવા તેવા નથી. અમે તો દરિયા પારના મુસ્લિમ આતંકવાદીઓને … “અરે આ તો સંઘી ભગવો આતંકી છે” … એવું સાબિત કરી શકીએ તેવા છીએ … પણ ભાઈ , અમારે અને અમારા ભક્તોએ તેવું કરવામાં મહેનત કરવી પડે છે … એટલી મહેનતમાં તો અમે બે ત્રણ વિકસિત ટાપુઓ ખરીદી શકીએ એટલા પૈસા કમાઈ શકીએ… એ તો તમને ખબર જ હશે. અજમલ કસાબને, અમે કેવી રીતે એક પુસ્તક દ્વારા ભગવો આતંકવાદી સિદ્ધ કરી દીધેલો, અને કેવા મજાના અમે તે પુસ્તકનું વિમોચન પણ કરવાના હતા …? આ તો સાલુ … એ સાલો જીવતો પકડાઈ ગયો એટલે અમારું કર્યું કારવ્યું ધૂળમાં ગયું … ”

એની વે, કોંગીઓની કુકર્મો કરવાની સીમા રેખા ચીનની વિસ્તારવાદી સીમા રેખાઓની જેમ વિસ્તરતી ને વિસ્તરતી જાય છે. કોંગીઓ આ બાબતમાં ચીની શાસકોના પટ્ટશિષ્ય છે. તેઓ તેમના ગુરુ પાસેથી દાન દક્ષિણા પણ મેળવે છે કારણ કે તેમના આ શિષ્યોએ ભૂતકાળમાં ચીનની ઘણી સેવા-પગચંપી કરી છે, અને પૅરીપન્ના તો ચાલુ રાખવા જ પડેને!

ચન્નીભાઈ ને થયું કોંગીપક્ષના મહામહિમની સેવા તો કરવી જ પડશે. આ સેવાની કોઈ સીમા નથી. એટલે ચાલો “ મોદીની સુરક્ષા” બાબતમાં પણ આપણે કંઈક ખેલ કરીએ અને આપણા એ દિશાના એજંડાને જરા ચકાસી લઈએ.

અરે ભાઈ ચીન્ની !! મોદી એ કંઈ ફક્ત મોદી નથી. મોદી તો વડા પ્રધાન છે. અને વિષયનું નામ “મોદીની સુરક્ષા” એમ રહેતું નથી, પણ વિષયનું નામ “દેશના વડા પ્રધાનની સુરક્ષા” બની જાય છે. અને તેના કાયદા અને તેના પાલનની રીત રસમ પણ સ્પેશીયલ હોય છે. આ કંઈ “પટના”ની મોદીની ૨૦૧૪ની જાહેર સભા નથી કે તમે બોંબ બ્લાસ્ટ્સ કરાવી શકો.

પણ આપણા ચન્ની ચવન્નીભાઈએ, રામ ભરોસે કોંગીનેતાઓને શોભે એ પ્રમાણે, કહી દીધું કે માર્ગનો ફેરફાર “ અચાનક જ કરવામાં આવ્યો … એટલે થોડું મોડું તો થાય જ ને … !!” પણ ચવન્નીભાઈને ખ્યાલ ન રહ્યો કે માર્ગના વિકલ્પો તેમના સુરક્ષા અધિકારીઓએ નિયમ અનુસાર તૈયાર જ રાખેલા. ખાટલે ખોડ એ હતી કે ચન્નીભાઈને આ જોગવાઈની ખબર નહીં અને તેઓ શ્રી કોંગી નેતાઓની પ્રકૃતિની રુએ ખેલ ખેલવા લાગ્યા.

કોંગીના પરચુરણીયા નેતાઓ અને નહેરુવીયન ફરજંદો તો બેવકુફ છે પણ આ ચન્ની પણ અક્કલમાં ચવન્ની નિકળશે તે કોઈએ ધાર્યું નહ્તું.

શિરીષ મોહનલાલ દવે

Read Full Post »