UNDER WHOSE NOSE ARE/WERE THEY FLOURISHED AND SURVIVED?

UNDER WHOSE NOSE ARE/WERE THEY FLOURISHED AND SURVIVED?

CASE ANALYSIS 

Manmohan Singh must be prosecuted for not changing the system of recording and processing financial transactions. Not only this but it is on record that Sonia and RaGa used to instruct Man Mohan and the cabinet, how to act on every issue. Thereby Sonia and RaGa must also be, not only made answerable, but be arrested for exerting unconstitutional pressure on Man Mohan Singh, for prosecution. Man Mohan Singh should also be arrested for failing in his duties though he had taken oath that he would remain faithful to the constitution. It is a case of breach of public trust against him. How RaGa can be allowed to tear out a draft resolution prepared and passed by the ministerial cabinet?  

Why all, these?

(1) At the time of Harshad Mehta’s fraud, Man Mohan was the finance minister. He had stated before the parliament that the case of Harshad Mehta had taken place due to some system defect, and now he would modify all the systems which are prone to generate frauds.

(2) Thereafter this Finance Minister got promotion and he had been made Prime Minister by the Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies. This was done because either Sonia wanted to enjoy only extra constitutional power only or she was not eligible for PM-ship because our Indian Constitution does not permit any person to become a minister if he/she/it has lean towards citizenship of other country. Though Sonia had gone to the president with a proof of majority support of the MPs to her, the Nehruvians and its cultural allies made a drama as if Sonia was not willing to become the PM. After playing this drama Manmohan Singh was made the PM. The possibility of a treaty between Sonia and Manmohan Singh cannot be ruled out that he would accept the unconstitutional authority of Sonia Gandhi while taking any decision.

(3) And the people of India had come across the Satyam Scam in his first term of PM. Man Mohan Singh should have at least resigned. But he did not resign and continued to act as the PM to obey the instructions of unconstitutional authorities like Sonia and RaGa. This is on records.

(4) It appears though Man Mohan Singh had stated before the parliament in 1994 that he would make the systems of financial transactions fool-proof, he did not do that. The reason may be either he was not capable to do that or he was prevented to do that. Who had prevented can be guessed by even a primary student of economics.

(5) In both the terms of Man Mohan Singh, a lot of financial scandals took place and the financial position and prestige of India had gone to dogs.

(6) The then RBI governor should also be taken to task for his all ill advises to the government and or for keeping mum.

(7) Man Mohan Singh even did not pay any regards and heed to the instructions of the Supreme Court to form a Special Investigation Team to unearth Black-Money. Nehruvian Congress willfully allowed to lapse three years and it lost the elections in 2014. Narendra Modi the new incumbent did form the SIT within three days.

(8) Now the Nehruvian congress leaders and its culturally allied parties leaders are spreading lies and rumors of the scam of some Modi, which has no relation with the PM Modi, though the birth of this scam had taken place in 2011. The Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies are trying to allege PM Modi, to divert the attention of public to hide their own criminal inaction.

Could we taken to task “Sonu Nigam” for the faults of a Nagar Nigam?   

All these eight points, read together, and consider together, the intention related with actions/in-actions/mum/negligence/avoidance by Nehruvian Congress leaders becomes sky clear.

A SIT must be formed to investigate into all evil acts of Nehruvian Congress. They must be arrested on un-bailable warrants. A caveat must be filed so the leaders of Nehruvian Congress cannot get stay orders from the SC without hearing the prima facie of presented by the BJP government.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

CHAMATKRITI  (चमत्कृति);

A well known story of a Sardarji. (Sardarji-s would excuse us, as they are tolerant) 

A Sardarj went to a medical store near Regal Talkies, and asked for a castor oil as he could not go to toilet for the last two days. The shop keeper inquires whether he would purchase 100ml bottle or 200ml. Sardarji inquired the price. The shopkeeper said 100ml would cost Rs. 50/- and the 200ml would cost Rs. 75/- Sardarji purchased 200ml for the benefit of Rs 25/-.  He drank the whole bottle there and there only.

He might have hardly reached Flora fountain, an enormous pressure started. The stream of excreta commenced and started marking the road.  He inquired about toilet. A person told him to go to railway station. Sardarji started nearly running to the station. When he just reached the toilet of station, a man asked him where is Flora Fountain? Sardarji said “follow this line. The origin is the flora fountain”.

Compare: Randeep Surajewala stated under the nose of the PM Narendra Modi, Nirav Modi has escaped.

The question is under whose nose or line of excreta flushed from bowels, Anderson, Quattrocchi and Daud had escaped?

The whole world knows the origin is Italy so far the line of excreta had to be followed by Ottavio Quattrocchi.

Read Full Post »

Cashing blood and cashing on dead body: Part-2

The purpose of this blog is to react to the response of hypocrite Indian Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies on the recent surgical attack of Indian military.

Leave aside the demanding for the proof of the operation by Nehruvian Cong leaders and their associates, but what they say that BJP is politicizing of the action taken by our Jawans. The credit goes to jawans and not to the BJP. However BJP is now trying to be the agent of the blood. That is BJP is trying to cash the blood of jawans.

INDIAN NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS & MEMORY 

Is it that Nehruvian Congress has short memory?

No. Nehruvian Congress cannot have short memory. Recall the elections of 1999, where Nehruvian Congress had floated a fake news that during the 1942 “do or dye” call, the arrested Bajpai had apologized and applied for his release. In fact there was no such Atal Bihari Bajpai who had applied for his release. It was some other Bajpai. The sources has clarified this. Despite of this during 2000 and 2004 the same allegation was floated. Now look at this point. There are many Nehruvian Congress leader have applied for advance bails in connections to their scams. Any way leave this aside. Point is Indian Nehruvian Congress leaders have no short memory.

We have seen as to how Indira Gandhi cashed the victory of 1971 war. The military action from the end of Indian (Indira Government) was delayed by at least one year. However let the matter be as controversial, the whole credit was given to Indira Gandhi as the  action was taken after the clearance of the Indira Government. Though the clearance was delayed by one year, this was actually the fault of the Indira Govenrment, the Nehruvian Congress took the total credit of the victory. The victory was cashed for getting the victory in assembly elections in 19 states in 1972.

After toppling Janata Party Government, Indira came to power again in 1980.

NO CHANGE IN NEHRUVIAN CULTURE

As usual she was a failure and her political achievements were zero. Not only this she became the mother of terrorism in India. She for her political interest, designated Bhindaranvale a SAINT. This Bhindaranvale was the leader of Khalistan movement. His organization had cross border connections.

Janata Front government could have cash, on the reforms it carried out in Indian Constitution and made easy the restrictions on production.  The Government was toppled by Indira Gandhi with the help of Charan Singh a self imposed and disguised as the pro-Mahatma Gandhian but proved as pro-Indira Gandhian. Media too, highlighted the insignificant shortcomings of the Janata Front, instead of highlighting the significant achievements.

EXHIBITION OF DEAD BODY AND LAST IRRELEVANT SPEACH

In 1984 L.S. elections, Nehruvian Congress was likely to be defeated. But she was killed and the dead body of Indira Gandhi was being shown throughout the period of election. Nehruvian Congress cashed the dead body of Indira Gandhi in the following manner.

The dead body of Indira Gandhi was being displayed on the screen of the TV all the time. At that time there was only Door Darshan. Door Darshan belonged to Nehruvian Congress. Same was true for All India Radio.

What else …. One more video clip Indira Gandhi saying “I remain or I may not remain but my last drop of blood would be useful … ” was continuously being shown on TV Channel.

In fact this “sentence” was meaningless. We have not heard that Indira had ever even donated his blood. Indira had not even donated her body. Leave all these aside, the Nehruvians were becoming the liability  for Congress for its future period of history. No part of her body was donated. On the contrary Indira rule had collapsed the political morality. We observe high level corruptions, it is the product of Indira’s own corrupt practices.

Though Indira Gandhi rule had remain a failure all the time and in all the field barring wide spread corruption in every field. Her death was also a cause of her failure.

During the elections, to do propaganda with the help of showing dead body and the afore said video clip of Indira’s speech was not enough because most people had no TV. Hence  an audio Clip was prepared and used for propaganda. viz. ” …. I remain or I may not remain but my last drop of blood would be useful …. ” was run in all over India in every street continuously during the election campaign. The emotional campaign brought 340 seats for Indian Nehruvian Congress.

EXHIBITION OF THE DEAD BODY OF RAJIV GANDHI

In the Lok Sabha elections of 1989, Indian Nehruvian Could not get clear majority. V. P. Singh became the PM of an alliance. Then Chandra Shekhar for a short time. All the governments were unstable. Elections were declared in 1991. During this period Rajiv Gandhi was killed. The media again tried its best to exhibit his dead body.   But since the Indian Nehruvian Congress was not the ruling party, Indian Nehruvian Congress cannot get the desired benefit however Indian Nehruvian Congress could form a government under the leadership of Narsinha Rao.

Now the same Indian Nehruvian Congress is telling that BJP is trying the cash the blood of Jawans. This looks ridiculous. There is no Lok Sabha election.

Yes. There are assembly elections in U.P. State. But to have elections in one or other state, the situation has been created by Indira Gandhi by toppling the state government now and then as and when time permits. (She had toppled the first elected Government in 1959 in Kerala. She had allied with the communal party Muslim Legue of Kerala in that election).

Narendra Modi is trying to hold all the elections i.e. Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections simultaneously. Indian Nehruvian Congress has to face the all odds created by her self.

It is the Military Chief who declared the surgical attack. Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies are questioning him and asking for the proof. They keep mum as to what type of proof they want.

Besides this the same Nehruvian Congress is saying that during their rule they had done several surgical operations. But she had never tried to cash them.  V.K. Singh the Minister of State said that he was holding the post. There were no such surgical operation during the period of Nehruvian Congress rule. Cross border firing cannot be equated with surgical operation. Cross Border Firing is a normal phenomenon on LOC with Pakistan.

INDIAN NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS IS AN ALL TIME FRAUD. TO TALK FRAUDULENTLY IS IN HER CULTURE FROM1948.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags:

Dead body of Indira Gandhi, Dead body of Rajiv Gandhi, Exhibition, Audio clip, Video clip, All India Radio, Door Darshan, Fraud

Read Full Post »

Supreme Court of India has to interpret laws in true spirit of the human rights

Supreme Court of India has to interpret laws in true spirit of the human rights

Nehruvian Congress a political party of India had ruled India for more than six decades with small breaks. During these six decades, it has ruled 30 years with absolute majority. 2 years with absolute autocracy, and remaining period with majority.

Despite of this, it has made more than 100 amendments in the Indian Constitution, In the name of public interest.

Was it necessary?
No.

When this Congress party is addressed as Nehruvian Congress, there is a purpose.

You cannot say this Congress as “Indian Nation Congress Party” though on record it is like that.

This name has given, and still it gives, a very wrong message that this is the same Congress Party that gave big contribution, to make India independent from foreign rule.

This matter has been discussed by me in Gujarati language on my website (TreenetramDOTwordpressDOTwwwDOTcom)

If it has to be told in brief, than we can say that a person is identified by its culture. Culture can be identified by its behaviour. The behaviour is experienced or being experienced or it is on record.

WHAT IS EXPECTED FROM A CULTURED PERSON?

Suppose you are A and the other is B.

A and B both had respect for each others.

A is communicating with B.

B suddenly stopped communication with A. A got confused.

It was an insult indirectly but direct. A felt so.

Instead of being emotional, A asked B. B kept mum.

The reason was unknown to A. Even though A is open at  heart, there was no way for A as to how A can correct itself? B has to be transparent.
A cultured society maintains democracy and transparency.

A human is prone to commit mistake and error, knowingly or unknowingly.

The democracy provide scope for correction of individuals. To ask the other person for a clarification is the democratic cultured mindset. If the a behaviour or belief of A or B is not liked to B or A as the case may be. This thing to get clarified is advisable.

Because after all, all of us are here for pleasure and spread pleasure.

One cannot hurt a person and boycott that person without asking that person to clarify.

What applies to person to person (He to She, He to He, She to She or whatsoever) that applies to political parties too.

This is universal. If the cap fits to She or He can review her/his action. This is necessary to give a chance to a person to correct itself. This is called democratic and humanitarian mind set.

Here the subject is the so called Indian National Congress Party.

Let us come to the point of above Congress.

This Congress has always been run by Nehruvians after the independence since 1947. The Congress had been founded by Hume, a British, in nineteenth century. It was a party of white collars. When MK Gandhi came to India and he joined the Congress, he made it open for the whole mass of India irrespective of caste and economical status.

The intention had been changed from “Acting as an agency to be interface between British and people of India” to “Home Rule” and then to “Complete Independence”.

MK Gandhi thought that without involving mass, India cannot achieve proper independence with the tool of Non-violence. This was the culture of Congress at that time. In nineteen thirties, it had also passed a resolution that India would be a democratic country and it will have a written constitution.

The big question is what is democracy?

According to MK Gandhi, the definition of democracy is the political system under which “the truth is heard and the truth is honoured”. MK Gandhi more specifically called “Rama Rajya” means the way Lord Rama ruled India.

Who was Rama?

Rama was a king emperor of India walked on this earth, some 6000 years back from now.

What were the main political features of Rama.

(1) The ruler (king) has to rule as per the accepted legal and social traditions prevailing in the society.
(2) The ruler has only executive authority,
(3) Ruler is not authorised to make any change in the rule and traditions,
(4) The authority for making any change in a rule or tradition is the people
The group of preacher (teachers) will decide the method of finding out the way to decide peoples desire to change.
(5) The preachers (Teachers) will have no executive power.

We know the details of life of Rama and his wife Sita.
How did people behave?
How did Rama behave?
How did the group of teachers headed by Vashishtha behave and what was the result?
How did Rama honoured the controversial truth which was against a tradition (which still prevails in the democratic countries of world ) which he could not challenge to prove it as a falsehood?
The challenge had come from a very lower class poor person. But it was honoured by Rama.
Rama has been taken as an incarnation of Sun God (Vishnu), not because he won a lot wars. Rama was taken as an incarnation of Sun God because he discharged his duty very efficiently. He maintained law and order in democratic way.

Now here, in the present period, who has to act as a Rama? Who has to act as the team of teachers? Who has to propose reforms?

The head of the elected representatives are Rama.

We have a method of electing representatives under Indian Constitution. Off course the elections have to be proper and fair.

But the system was no fair enough for four decades. In 1988, VP Singh appointed Shesan as the Chief Election Commissioner, who enforced election provisions provided under law, very firmly. Till then, unless there was a flood against Nehruvian Congress, the Nehruvian Congress had never faced a defeat.

But after the enforcement of law strictly, the Nehruvian Congress could not get clear majority at any time.

This means, rules are there, but the interpretation has either not been made properly by the ruler in execution

or

the Supreme Court has not been asked to interpret the law,

or

the Supreme Court has not intervene of its own, to interpret any rule which could not protect the constitutional rights of citizens.

In fact, if the Supreme Court of India interprets the provisions of the Indian Constitution, in relevance to the human rights and natural rights, there is no need to enact further Acts.

Now let us look at the democratic rights based on and prevailed under the rule of Rama.

(1) The ruler has only executive authority: Why?
It is natural that some body has to take the responsibility of execution of rule.

(2) Ruler is not authorised to make any change in rule and traditions: Why?
Because if ruler is authorized to make changes, then the ruler will make the changes which are beneficial to that ruler only.
This has been very well experienced by India, during the rule of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Nehru and Rajiv Gandhi.
As for changes made in laws, by Indira NehruGandhi, one can write a thick Book like epic “Maha Bharata”. We will look into it, on the day of anniversary of “Emergency imposed by Indira in 1975.

(3) The authority for making any change in a tradition is the people: Why?
It is only the people are suffering. They are suffering due to any law or tradition and the rule is defective and required to be modified to meet with the protection of human rights. That is why the proposals should also come up from the mass. the mass includes teachers, experts, leaders of political parties etc… They cn come up through media or/and common platforms. Then political parties will draft a bill in consultation with experts and put it before public through the party’s election manifesto. If that party wins the elections, then the bill can be passed in parliament.

(4) The group of preacher (teachers) will decide the method of finding out the way to decide peoples’ desire to change the law: Why?

This is in fact drafting a bill. Supreme Court can re-examine or ask an expert committee to review the draft or bill or law.

(5) The preachers (Teachers) will have no executive power. Why?
Executive power has been entrusted with the ruler. And if preachers are entrusted with executive power then they become ruler. In these circumstances the ruler will get the power to change the law. In fact we want to deprive the ruler from using the power of making changes in the law, unless it has been proposed or permitted by the mass.

We want a system which enables the truth to be heard and honoured.
We do not want to promote old type of Rama Rajya. We want Rama Rajya where Sita the wife of Rama too gets justice.

How did Nehruvian Congress fail to provide justice to the mass by not protecting human rights?

In 1950-s, there were some scandals. But the then Prime Minister Javaharlal Nehru told the parliament that “we will not attend the scandals. You put before the public. Public would decide in the next election.”
A poor lot was remaining poor. JL Nehru introduced reservation for lower class, instead of providing employment with dignified salary to all poor mass. This was the foundation of Vote Bank politics.

MK Gandhi had said in his book, written somewhere in 1930-s, to first concentrate on cottage industries and education. But Nehru overlooked.

MK Gandhi had asked complete prohibition of liquor, to prevent the poor and illiterate mass from domestic economical anarchy. But Nehru ignored it.

Contrary to this, the successive government encouraged the relaxation in Prohibition on Liquor enacted under British Rule in Bombay State.

In many other ways, the Congress existed before independence lost its character after independence. That is why person like me address this Congress as Indian Nehruvian Congress Party, in place of Indian National Congress Party.

Why did Supreme Court fail to supervise the human rights?
There was no provision in Indian Constitution to take up the issue before the Court of Law, unless some one is affected adversely by any act or whatsoever.

P. I. L.
The First Non-Congress Congress government headed by Morarji Desai, enacted the provision of “Public Interest Litigation”.

This provision provides, any citizen to go before the High Court of a state or before the Supreme Court to declare specified law as null and void, as it is harmful to human right. Supreme Court would either ask the Government to amend the law suitably or to drop it or to re-frame it.

But why there should be a Public Litigation Act? In fact it is inbuilt in democracy that any law becomes null and void if it harms a human right.

Information Act
Why this act is needed?
You have appointed a servant to whom you pay against the duty you have asked to perform.
Now suppose you gave him some money to purchase some vegetable.
You have the right to tell that person as to what he has to purchase and from where he should purchase, how he has to purchase and how much he has to purchase.
When he comes back, it is your right to ask the person, to tell you the full information. It is the right of the person who gave the earned money for a purpose to a person who has been employed on payment.
Now what did the Congress do?
It restricted the right by enacting the act and provided lot exceptions. The act became nail-less to great extent.

Consumer Protection Act
You have the full liberty to select the item, the amount, the way and the quantity to spend the money you have earned.
The right to selection, the right to quality, the right to know the contents, the right to compare the prices, the right to enjoy options, the right to have the record of your purchase. All these rights are inbuilt rights under human rights.

Right to “call back” the elected representative.
This act yet not been enacted.

But it can be interpreted as inbuilt right to human right.
How?
You are selecting your representative to represent and execute, your view, desire, security and welfare.
You are paying the representative for that duties.
There is a system of payment by Tax. This is called public fund.
There is a system for selecting person. This is called system of elections.
Somehow jointly, you have selected a person of your geographical area for 5 years.
Now suppose this person increases its own monthly payment without your permission,
Suppose this person shows negligence on your security,
Suppose this person hides the facts,
Suppose this person making joint ventures with your recognized enemy,
Suppose you have lost faith in this person and you feel to terminate its services.
Definitely it is your inbuilt human right to terminate the services of this person at any time as soon as you feel that this person is not faithful.
Terminate the services of a person whom you have elected is termed as “Call Him/Her Back”.

This “Right to call back” has not been enacted yet. But such right to call back is inbuilt right in democracy.

How to call a person back if there is no system constituted in the Indian Constitution.

Let us take an example:

In 1971 Nehruvian Congress had won 140 seats out of 163 seats of Gujarat State Assembly.
The said government lost the faith of public. Its governance was full of scandals and frauds. People of Gujarat were highly dissatisfied by the government. It became a hot issue of discussion as to how to call, all the elected members of the state assembly, back.

People had to lodge a wide spread agitation and asked the representatives to resign. But Nehruvian Congress Members did not pay any heed and did not resign.

All the opposition party members had resigned. There was a very big mass movement in Gujarat. This was known as Nava-Nirman-Stir (A movement for Reconstruction of State Assembly). It is a long story as to how it became successful and at what cost.

But how to achieve this success, without loss of blood?

What do we do in a normal housing society?

20 percent members can ask the president of the society to call for an extra-ordinary general meeting with an agenda.

Here, in the “Call them Back” case,  20 percent voters of that area can submit an affidavit before the Election Officer, asking the election officer to conduct a vote of confidence in respect of the elected member.
If the representative secures 50+ percent of the votes polled, he would be continued as the representative, otherwise by-elections would be conducted for that assembly seat.

This means that only interpretation or directives are required for fulfillment of any human right, from the Supreme Court.

Shirish M. Dave

Tags: Democracy, Rama, Rajya, Rule, Law, act, enact, person, party, Nehruvian, MK Gandhi, Indira, Nehru, India, human rights, natural right, Information, consumer, election, representative, fraud, faith, preacher, teacher, executive, power

Read Full Post »

IS IT THAT KAPI SIBBAL IS ILLITERATE?

AFTER DOING ALL THESE, WE ARE CULTURED AND HONEST SAYS KAPIL

Is it that Kapi Sibbal is illiterate?

Three years back at the time of general elections campaign, Kapil Sibbal of Nehruvian Congress had announced that he would give “Akash Tablet” to all the youths at the rate of Rs. 3000/-.

Many youths had deposited money for “Akash”.

Nehruvian Congress came to power again in 2009. The days have been passed, the weeks have been passed, moths have been passed and years are passing. Now a time has come that again the general elections have become due (at any time), but no “Akash” had come down to meet the youths on the earth. Narendra Modi pointed out this fraudulent promise of Nehruvian Congress leader in one of his lectures.

Narendra Modi further said that Nehruvian Congress has a habit and culture to give false promises. It gives false promises not to only to common men, but it gives false promises to youths too. Such type of practice, generates bad moral values in youths. This is dangerous for a nation.

In reply to this Kapi Sibbal forwarded one Akash Tablet to Modi, instead of fulfilling the promises given to the youths of Delhi. Kapi Sibbal further abused Narendra Modi, and asked him to be a cultured leader. This means that to point out the false promises of Nehruvians, is a bad culture and to make a false and fraudulent promises is a good culture according to Nehruvian Congress culture.

 

JL Nehru had taken an oath in 1963 before the Indian parliament that he would not take rest till he would re-capture the land snatched by China during the war in 1962. Now if Narendra Modi would point out this point, the Nehruvian Congress would forward a photo of lost land to Narendra Modi and further it would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.

 

If Narendra Modi would point out the oath taken by Nehruvian Progeny Indira Gandhi of “I will remove the poverty” in 1969, then Nehruvian Congress leaders would send Rs.60/- (the daily wage of NAREGA) to Narendra Modi, and ask him to be a cultured person.

 

If Narendra Modi would point out the promise recalled before a foreign news channel by  Indira Gandhi in 1970 that all the infiltrators came from Pakistan will be sent back to their country, the Nehruvian Congress leaders would send some Bangladeshi Muslims to Gandhinagar and further the would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.

   

Recall the statement of Nehruvian Congress ruling Cabinet made during the pre-India Pak war period of 1971 that “India will not give return the land won by India if any war is imposed on India by Pakistan”, and after winning the war with the great braveness of Indian soldiers, it was announced by the Indira Gandhian Cabinet that Pakistan will have to sign a package deal and will have to meet the demands as under:

 

What was the PACKAGE DEAL”?

Reimbursement of all the expenses incurred by India due to this war on India imposed by Pakistan,

Return of the land of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, so that the Issue of Kashmir ends up,

Take back the all the infiltrators and refugees came from Pakistan in India,

Settlement of property cases of Hindu refugees came to India from Pakistan in 1947-48,

Deportation of anti-social elements that had committed crimes in India and taken shelter in Pakistan,

All the fishermen and whatsoever Indian prisoners available in Pakistan jails will have to be released,  

“No war pact” with India,

No hatred and propaganda against India in Pakistan,

 

 

Unless Pakistan signs this pact, then only the Prisoners of War (90000 soldiers who were fed by India with due respect from 1971 to 1972) and the land won by India during the war would be returned to Pakistan.

 

But what has been happened in Simla pack?

No gain for India,

Indira Gandhi returned all the POW i.e.  90000 soldiers,

Indira Gandhi returned all the land pieces that had won by Indian soldiers,

Indira Gandhi also returned the land piece of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) on which India had the claim,

 

On the other hand Pakistan released no Indian soldier. They are still with Pakistan, in 400+ numbers, in Pakistan Jail.

 

Now if Narendra Modi points out this fraud of progeny and party viz Nehruvian Congress, Kapi Sibbal or any damn leader would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and to behave with good culture.

 

It is not a surprise so far Nehruvian Congress leader and their allies are concerned. They have possessed all the evils available in the world. You can write a bigger book than the epic Mahabharat. Nehruvians and their party leaders can abuse any leader howsoever he may be great and popular among learned and common, if he/she opposes a Nehruvian and its party, they will abuse him/her without any logic and sense. They have spared none. They can do any damn thing to hide their evils and divert the mind of common mass by talking irrelevant and baseless.

 

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Narendra Modi, Akash tablet, Kapi, Kapil, Sibbal, Nehruvian, Youth, election campaign, false, fraud, promise, Simla pact, Indira

Read Full Post »

BJP AND BABA RAMDEV TEAM SHOULD HAVE AN ALLIANCE

 There is no general solution to tackle the issues and problems of India.

Discussion on nonviolent way or violent way or dialog or no dialog, democratic way or non-democratic way, communistic way or capitalistic way etc… All humbug.

All the problems should be tackled individually. Every problem and issue has its own way out.

 DON’T GET CONFUSED:

Decide whether we are satisfied with the present state of affairs or not?

The answer must be a “BIG NO”.

Then go ahead hereunder.

WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STATE OF AFFAIRS?

Nehruvian Congress only.

WHO HAS ALLOWED THEM TO CONTINUE FOR 6 DECADES?

Policy of Nehruvian Congress and its paid, unpaid, vested interest and confused media resulted in the continuance of illiteracy, unemployment and thereby their sole dependence on the ruler which is mainly Nehruvian Congress.

WHAT IS THE FIRST PRIORITY?

The first priority is to remove Nehruvian Congress and their all types of allies (former, current and likely).

Why their all types of allies of Nehruvian Congress?

Because they too have the same character and this they have confirmed by supporting this retched party.

 WHO ARE THE ALLIES AND LIKELY ALLIES OF NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS?

Maya, Mamata, Jaya, Karunanidhi, Lalloo, Pasvan, Mulayam, Ajit, Farukh, CPM, CPI, Bal Thakare, Jagannath, Agnivesh, all members of Team Anna, Keshubhai Patel and his allied parties, etc… who are not reliable and trustworthy because they are ready to support Nehruvian Congress at any time. They are not trustworthy.

Why Team Anna Members are not trustworthy?

Because they are pseudo secular and having soft corners towards terrorists. They have double standards. No argument is required. They have proved it.

WHAT IS THE SUBSTITUTE?

Substitute is only BJP and Team Baba Ramdev. Team Baba Ramdev should have an alliance with BJP. If Team Baba Ramdev will go alone, it would be a suicidal act.

How to support them? 

Concentrate only on the shortcoming of Nehruvian

Congress. It is a big mine of blunders, scandals and frauds.

Do not create, float and highlight any controversy against BJP and Baba Ramdev.

What do you want from BJP and Baba Ramdev?

1   Nationalization of foreign bank accounts where the holder of the account or the beneficiary are Indian citizens. 

In the case of where the account holder is foreign national and a beneficiary is an Indian citizen, freeze its accounts in India.

Collect his/her passport and cancel it.

Do not grant any VISA to such foreign nationals to enter into India.

2   Prosecute Naheruvian Congress leaders and their allies for their corruption, scams, scandals, defective deals and pact, unconstitutional acts. Investigate their links with Daud, ISI, fake stamp papers, currency notes, inaction on the infiltration of Bangladeshi, inaction on reinstatement of Hindus driven out of their homeland. Regain Shah Commission Report and take action against those who had not taken action or associated with destroying it,

3   Disqualify the above leaders those who are found guilty. Punish them maximum, De-recognize their parties,

4   Merge Election Commission with census, for all types of elections of registered bodies like co-operative societies, labor unions and whatsoever. All types of canvassing would be on common platform only. This will eliminate money and muscle power in the election. All proceedings will be chaired by the E & C Commission. E & C can keep watch on infiltrators also, Voting should be compulsory,

5   Frame national realty construction policy for building and township constructions, 

6   Restructure Information Commission with wide power. All the NGOs and political parties should fall under the purview under Information Commission. Make all information Officers independent of any Government Department, (At present the Information Officers belong to concern department), Information officers shall be zone-wise,

7   Restructure local bodies for making them to public oriented,

8   As for development the policy should be

Development = Technology + Humanity (Jai Prakash Narayan)

9   Restructure water, land (Desert, waste land and fertile land), mine, forest, saline water, Solar, wind and hydro energy policy for exploration of all natural and human resources for green power at any cost.

10  Restructure health policy and make it people oriented

11   Restructure education policy linked with the aptitude of pupil, teacher with a human approach.

12  Restructure judiciary to make it effective and prompt. Make lawyers and judges responsible and answerable.

BJP and Baba Ramdev should jointly prepare a detail election manifesto with time bound program precisely. There’s no power in the world which can prevent BJP and Baba Ramdev to coming to power.

Shrish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian Congress, Allies, Lalloo, Maya, Mamata, Jaya, Karuna, Mulayam, Farukh, Thakare, Keshu, Ajit, Narendra Modi, Anna, Team, BJP, Scandal, Scam, Fraud, Pact, Deal, Hindus, infiltrators, Daud, ISI

Read Full Post »

Are we lost on Jan Lok Pal Bill?

Since we are in democratic nation we are supposed to have differences. This can be minimized with communication in right direction.

 

It is better not to mix two drafts of Lok Pal Bill.

 

Viz.

Joke Pal bill put up by the government, lead by Nehruvian Congress of India Private Limited

and

Jan Lok Pal bill submitted by Civil Society.

 

When we say only Lok Pal, then it creates confusion among common mass. Lok Pal of the government is useless and it has lot of loop wholes.

 

Jan Lok Pals covers many aspects like Citizen Charter and responsibility of the wings entrusted with justice. But separate bill by the Congi on citizen charter is a fun. Similarly to keep CBI out side Lok Pal by the government is also to make Lok Pal ineffective.

 

Why Anna does not talk about Black money?

 

As I understand that all the people who want some reforms including political reforms have liberty to decide their priorities. Anna has a liberty to have priority on Jan Lok Pal Bill. Baba Ramdev has priority on Black money. Swami Subrahmanian has priority on the filed litigation.

 

In fact “black money” is not a proper term.

 

As per legal interpretation Black money is a civil matter. In reality the black money is not simply black money only, but this money is RED Money also. Red money means money involved in criminal activities including terrorism.

 

Leaders of Nehruvian Congress, Sharad, RBI top officers, ISI, Pakistan government including Daud, Bangladesh, Mauritius are heavily involved in the scams of Fake currency notes and black-red money. So far UPA is in power there cannot be any hope for any meaningful action under present system on black-red money and illegal accounts of Indians in foreign banks. This is because UPA’s commitment on proceedings on black money is a fraud.

 

Our legal system is not capable to handle this promptly, unless we provide Jan Lok Pal as a constitutional authority. For Lok Pal Bill Nehruvian Congress has commitment and this point can be taken to public on merits.

Where are we confused and lost? 

But unfortunately, instead of this, we find some learned persons trying to create confusion  for the people, which may due to either lacking in sense of significance or ill knowledge or own interest. We can understand the vested interest of Nehruvian Cong leaders on misinterpretation of its Lok Pal Bill as a strong Lok Pal bill, but the interpretation of some others on the term Lok Pal in general is misguiding.

Let is not highlight the differences: 

Any way at this stage, we should take Anna as a person. Let us view his fight as a fight for a cause. Kiran Bedi and some others of Anna’s team are lacking in strategy even if they present them selves as public spirited persons.

Take up issue one by one

Fight has to be taken up with one by one issue. Mahatma Gandhi had fought like that only.

We should not forget that Mahatma Gandhi had understanding on widely spread mass of India. He had matured, foresighted and well thought political strategies. He had management skills and sense of significance. We should not expect and search for such calibre in other leader who is fighting for public interest.

 

Instead of concentrating on finding out faults with a person or a team which is fighting for a good cause, we should take some possible burden on our head for fighting for the reforms. This applies on every body who thinks them selves as nationalist, learned and wise or otherwise also.

 

To me we should have only one point program at a time like this:

 

Constitutional Jan Lok Pal Bill,

If not and or if it fails and otherwise also,

 

Launch agitation to dissolve parliament,

If not or otherwise also,

 

Defeat Nehruvian Congress of India and its past, present and would be allies in all the forthcoming elections,

 

Political reforms,

 

Prosecute all the leaders of Nehruvian Congress of India and their allied leaders and punish them. Disqualify their parties.

 

Remove the names of Nehruvians from all the projects, schemes and landmarks. Remove their statues and paintings as the case may be from roads, gardens and public buildings.

One equally important point is not to create and float any other subject for discussion like, Muslims, Vedas, Atheist, Theist, Christians, RSS, Undivided India, subjects of worship, temples, etc… In fact Nehruvian Congress of India wants some people who are having crisis and or complex of identification, to float less relevant or insignificant or even irrelevant subjects for discussion. This is with a view to divert the attention of mass to divert the attention from frauds, scams, scandals and blunders of Nehruvian Congress leaders, and to divide people.

We should not give any coverage to the persons who are Anti-Anna, Anti-Modi, Anti-Ramdev, Anti-Subramanian. This is necessary to avoid indirect negative image on the people fighting against Nehruvian Congress and its allies.

Tags; Jan Lok Pal, Joke Pal, Fraud, Citizen charter, reforms, Anti-Modi, subject of worship, temple, religion, Nehruvian

Read Full Post »