Posts Tagged ‘India’

The Editor, “Daily Sabah”

digital@dailysabah.com, letters@dailysabah.com, opinion@dailysabah.com

Dear Sir,

This is in connection with the article of Mr. Fai published in your “Daily Sabah” on 7th September 2021, with a subject line “Fundamental Misconceptions about Kashmir”

It is not difficult to reply on all the points of the topic. But one has to write a very lengthy reply to cover up, his all the points.

In ancient India there was a practice to insert a thin stick in a book, and open that page. Then read that page and give comment/opinion. Here in case of this article of Mr. Fai, the first point is analyzed for correctness. Why first point? Because it is first point. First point has got to be the most significance. I am reproducing the first point as under;

“1. Kashmir acceded to India on Oct. 27, 1947. Wrong.

The maharaja of Kashmir allegedly signed the Instrument of Accession to India while at the same time pleading for its military intervention to prop up his toppling repressive regime on Oct. 27, 1947. A full-scale internal and indigenous revolt was on the verge of success at that time. …. ……..

Moreover, as British scholar Alistair Lamb has convincingly demonstrated in “Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1846-1990,” the Instrument of Accession is probably as bogus as the ugly protocols of the elders of Zion confected by the Russian Tzar’s Okhrana secret police. An original of the document has never been produced by India or anyone else. ……………………………………..”

The paras contains hypothetical conclusions on the status of the Maharaja.

The next is non comparable can not be compared. Such practice of comparison is not permitted by logical science and by judiciary.

J & K IoA (Instrument of Accession) is available on line. There is no need to try to create a charming topic for a particular section of people.

What document had signed by Maharaja Hari Singh himself, similar IOAs were signed by other big kingdoms by even their (Prime) Minister and not by the Maharajas themselves. Here in case of the J&K, The Maharaja had signed because his Prime Minister Justice M.C. Mhajan was in Delhi.

India is a democratic country. The democracy in India works better than it worked in early decades of Independent India. There are people who can exist in India, with an intention to put, Government of India in trouble by way of false assumptions on an issue. e.g. J&K accession.

The current Government which is far more democratic, had changed the category of the document and made it accessible.

Till that time there were people who were spreading rumors under their agenda that such document did not and does not exist at all.

Any way, Mr. Venkatesh Nayak of “The Wire” got it, under Right to Information Act 2005. What Mr. Venkatesh says on this letter of accession which is signed by the Maharaja (King of a big kingdom) Hari Sigh with his own signature, and also accepted it by Lord Mountbatten with his own signature.

Mr. Venkatesh Nayak had publish the document in his article in “The Wire” October 26, 2016 and August 5, 2019. What he says about the authenticity of this document in his article ? “ … Through this article in The Wire, I can confirm that the J&K IoA exists for real, is safe and well preserved in the collection of the National Archives.”

It is well known among political lots of India that “The Wire” is termed as out of proportional “Liberal” and Anti-BJP.

The Pakistan was created by taking out the portion where the Muslims were in majority of British India which was under direct rule of Agency (Viceroy of India). This agreement was signed by Pakistan and Viceroy at midnight of 14th August 1947. After creating Pakistan only, the India was made independent on 15th August 1947.

This was not applicable to Princely states. The princely states have the liberty to come under dominion of India or Pakistan. The princely state had to act as per the desire of their people. i.e. Princely states had to take opinion of their people under democratic way. It must be noted that till that time the princely states were under the dominion of the country to their accession. India got independence on 15 August 1947, the princely states acceded to India fell under control of India as the IoA.

India had conducted elections in J&K too, like every other princely state. The elected members of the state assembly passed the resolution of merger with India. That is all.

Now the dispute remains with Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. The Assembly Seats of POK is till kept vacant. Even if that number been counted in negative, the Assembly of the princely state J&K had passed the resolution of merger unanimously.

The UN had resolved and according asked the Pakistan to vacate the POK and banned it to perform any military activity, so that the Indian Government to which the Maharaja Hari Singh had signed the document of IOA with India, can have control on POK. And this was supposed to be, to conduct, free and fair elections. No body in the world had challenged the election of peoples’ representative in J&K State Assembly 1951-52.

Thanking you,

With regards,

Yours truly,

Shirish M. Dave.

Read Full Post »

Supreme Court of India has to interpret laws in true spirit of the human rights

Nehruvian Congress a political party of India had ruled India for more than six decades with small breaks. During these six decades, it has ruled 30 years with absolute majority. 2 years with absolute autocracy, and remaining period with majority.

Despite of this, it has made more than 100 amendments in the Indian Constitution, In the name of public interest.

Was it necessary?

When this Congress party is addressed as Nehruvian Congress, there is a purpose.

You cannot say this Congress as “Indian Nation Congress Party” though on record it is like that.

This name has given, and still it gives, a very wrong message that this is the same Congress Party that gave big contribution, to make India independent from foreign rule.

This matter has been discussed by me in Gujarati language on my website (TreenetramDOTwordpressDOTwwwDOTcom)

If it has to be told in brief, than we can say that a person is identified by its culture. Culture can be identified by its behaviour. The behaviour is experienced or being experienced or it is on record.


Suppose you are A and the other is B.

A and B both had respect for each others.

A is communicating with B.

B suddenly stopped communication with A. A got confused.

It was an insult indirectly but direct. A felt so.

Instead of being emotional, A asked B. B kept mum.

The reason was unknown to A. Even though A is open at  heart, there was no way for A as to how A can correct itself? B has to be transparent.
A cultured society maintains democracy and transparency.

A human is prone to commit mistake and error, knowingly or unknowingly.

The democracy provide scope for correction of individuals. To ask the other person for a clarification is the democratic cultured mindset. If the a behaviour or belief of A or B is not liked to B or A as the case may be. This thing to get clarified is advisable.

Because after all, all of us are here for pleasure and spread pleasure.

One cannot hurt a person and boycott that person without asking that person to clarify.

What applies to person to person (He to She, He to He, She to She or whatsoever) that applies to political parties too.

This is universal. If the cap fits to She or He can review her/his action. This is necessary to give a chance to a person to correct itself. This is called democratic and humanitarian mind set.

Here the subject is the so called Indian National Congress Party.

Let us come to the point of above Congress.

This Congress has always been run by Nehruvians after the independence since 1947. The Congress had been founded by Hume, a British, in nineteenth century. It was a party of white collars. When MK Gandhi came to India and he joined the Congress, he made it open for the whole mass of India irrespective of caste and economical status.

The intention had been changed from “Acting as an agency to be interface between British and people of India” to “Home Rule” and then to “Complete Independence”.

MK Gandhi thought that without involving mass, India cannot achieve proper independence with the tool of Non-violence. This was the culture of Congress at that time. In nineteen thirties, it had also passed a resolution that India would be a democratic country and it will have a written constitution.

The big question is what is democracy?

According to MK Gandhi, the definition of democracy is the political system under which “the truth is heard and the truth is honoured”. MK Gandhi more specifically called “Rama Rajya” means the way Lord Rama ruled India.

Who was Rama?

Rama Rajya

Rama was a king emperor of India walked on this earth, some 6000 years back from now.

What were the main political features of Rama.

(1) The ruler (king) has to rule as per the accepted legal and social traditions prevailing in the society.
(2) The ruler has only executive authority,
(3) Ruler is not authorised to make any change in the rule and traditions,
(4) The authority for making any change in a rule or tradition is the people
The group of preacher (teachers) will decide the method of finding out the way to decide peoples desire to change.
(5) The preachers (Teachers) will have no executive power.

We know the details of life of Rama and his wife Sita.
How did people behave?
How did Rama behave?
How did the group of teachers headed by Vashishtha behave and what was the result?
How did Rama honoured the controversial truth which was against a tradition (which still prevails in the democratic countries of world ) which he could not challenge to prove it as a falsehood?
The challenge had come from a very lower class poor person. But it was honoured by Rama.
Rama has been taken as an incarnation of Sun God (Vishnu), not because he won a lot wars. Rama was taken as an incarnation of Sun God because he discharged his duty very efficiently. He maintained law and order in democratic way.

Now here, in the present period, who has to act as a Rama? Who has to act as the team of teachers? Who has to propose reforms?

The head of the elected representatives are Rama.

We have a method of electing representatives under Indian Constitution. Off course the elections have to be proper and fair.

But the system was no fair enough for four decades. In 1988, VP Singh appointed Shesan as the Chief Election Commissioner, who enforced election provisions provided under law, very firmly. Till then, unless there was a flood against Nehruvian Congress, the Nehruvian Congress had never faced a defeat.

But after the enforcement of law strictly, the Nehruvian Congress could not get clear majority at any time.

This means, rules are there, but the interpretation has either not been made properly by the ruler in execution


the Supreme Court has not been asked to interpret the law,


the Supreme Court has not intervene of its own, to interpret any rule which could not protect the constitutional rights of citizens.

In fact, if the Supreme Court of India interprets the provisions of the Indian Constitution, in relevance to the human rights and natural rights, there is no need to enact further Acts.

Now let us look at the democratic rights based on and prevailed under the rule of Rama.

(1) The ruler has only executive authority: Why?
It is natural that some body has to take the responsibility of execution of rule.

(2) Ruler is not authorised to make any change in rule and traditions: Why?
Because if ruler is authorized to make changes, then the ruler will make the changes which are beneficial to that ruler only.
This has been very well experienced by India, during the rule of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Nehru and Rajiv Gandhi.
As for changes made in laws, by Indira NehruGandhi, one can write a thick Book like epic “Maha Bharata”. We will look into it, on the day of anniversary of “Emergency imposed by Indira in 1975.

(3) The authority for making any change in a tradition is the people: Why?
It is only the people are suffering. They are suffering due to any law or tradition and the rule is defective and required to be modified to meet with the protection of human rights. That is why the proposals should also come up from the mass. the mass includes teachers, experts, leaders of political parties etc… They cn come up through media or/and common platforms. Then political parties will draft a bill in consultation with experts and put it before public through the party’s election manifesto. If that party wins the elections, then the bill can be passed in parliament.


(4) The group of preacher (teachers) will decide the method of finding out the way to decide peoples’ desire to change the law: Why?

This is in fact drafting a bill. Supreme Court can re-examine or ask an expert committee to review the draft or bill or law.

(5) The preachers (Teachers) will have no executive power. Why?
Executive power has been entrusted with the ruler. And if preachers are entrusted with executive power then they become ruler. In these circumstances the ruler will get the power to change the law. In fact we want to deprive the ruler from using the power of making changes in the law, unless it has been proposed or permitted by the mass.

We want a system which enables the truth to be heard and honoured.
We do not want to promote old type of Rama Rajya. We want Rama Rajya where Sita the wife of Rama too gets justice.

How did Nehruvian Congress fail to provide justice to the mass by not protecting human rights?

In 1950-s, there were some scandals. But the then Prime Minister Javaharlal Nehru told the parliament that “we will not attend the scandals. You put before the public. Public would decide in the next election.”
A poor lot was remaining poor. JL Nehru introduced reservation for lower class, instead of providing employment with dignified salary to all poor mass. This was the foundation of Vote Bank politics.

MK Gandhi had said in his book, written somewhere in 1930-s, to first concentrate on cottage industries and education. But Nehru overlooked.

MK Gandhi had asked complete prohibition of liquor, to prevent the poor and illiterate mass from domestic economical anarchy. But Nehru ignored it.

Contrary to this, the successive government encouraged the relaxation in Prohibition on Liquor enacted under British Rule in Bombay State.

In many other ways, the Congress existed before independence lost its character after independence. That is why person like me address this Congress as Indian Nehruvian Congress Party, in place of Indian National Congress Party.

Why did Supreme Court fail to supervise the human rights?
There was no provision in Indian Constitution to take up the issue before the Court of Law, unless some one is affected adversely by any act or whatsoever.

P. I. L.
The First Non-Congress Congress government headed by Morarji Desai, enacted the provision of “Public Interest Litigation”.

This provision provides, any citizen to go before the High Court of a state or before the Supreme Court to declare specified law as null and void, as it is harmful to human right. Supreme Court would either ask the Government to amend the law suitably or to drop it or to re-frame it.

But why there should be a Public Litigation Act? In fact it is inbuilt in democracy that any law becomes null and void if it harms a human right.

Information Act
Why this act is needed?
You have appointed a servant to whom you pay against the duty you have asked to perform.
Now suppose you gave him some money to purchase some vegetable.
You have the right to tell that person as to what he has to purchase and from where he should purchase, how he has to purchase and how much he has to purchase.
When he comes back, it is your right to ask the person, to tell you the full information. It is the right of the person who gave the earned money for a purpose to a person who has been employed on payment.
Now what did the Congress do?
It restricted the right by enacting the act and provided lot exceptions. The act became nail-less to great extent.

Consumer Protection Act
You have the full liberty to select the item, the amount, the way and the quantity to spend the money you have earned.
The right to selection, the right to quality, the right to know the contents, the right to compare the prices, the right to enjoy options, the right to have the record of your purchase. All these rights are inbuilt rights under human rights.

Right to “call back” the elected representative.
This act yet not been enacted.

But it can be interpreted as inbuilt right to human right.
You are selecting your representative to represent and execute, your view, desire, security and welfare.
You are paying the representative for that duties.
There is a system of payment by Tax. This is called public fund.
There is a system for selecting person. This is called system of elections.
Somehow jointly, you have selected a person of your geographical area for 5 years.
Now suppose this person increases its own monthly payment without your permission,
Suppose this person shows negligence on your security,
Suppose this person hides the facts,
Suppose this person making joint ventures with your recognized enemy,
Suppose you have lost faith in this person and you feel to terminate its services.
Definitely it is your inbuilt human right to terminate the services of this person at any time as soon as you feel that this person is not faithful.
Terminate the services of a person whom you have elected is termed as “Call Him/Her Back”.

This “Right to call back” has not been enacted yet. But such right to call back is inbuilt right in democracy.

How to call a person back if there is no system constituted in the Indian Constitution.

Let us take an example:

In 1971 Nehruvian Congress had won 140 seats out of 163 seats of Gujarat State Assembly.
The said government lost the faith of public. Its governance was full of scandals and frauds. People of Gujarat were highly dissatisfied by the government. It became a hot issue of discussion as to how to call, all the elected members of the state assembly, back.

People had to lodge a wide spread agitation and asked the representatives to resign. But Nehruvian Congress Members did not pay any heed and did not resign.

All the opposition party members had resigned. There was a very big mass movement in Gujarat. This was known as Nava-Nirman-Stir (A movement for Reconstruction of State Assembly). It is a long story as to how it became successful and at what cost.

But how to achieve this success, without loss of blood?

What do we do in a normal housing society?

20 percent members can ask the president of the society to call for an extra-ordinary general meeting with an agenda.

Here, in the “Call them Back” case,  20 percent voters of that area can submit an affidavit before the Election Officer, asking the election officer to conduct a vote of confidence in respect of the elected member.
If the representative secures 50+ percent of the votes polled, he would be continued as the representative, otherwise by-elections would be conducted for that assembly seat.

This means that only interpretation or directives are required for fulfillment of any human right, from the Supreme Court.

Shirish M. Dave

Tags: Democracy, Rama, Rajya, Rule, Law, act, enact, person, party, Nehruvian, MK Gandhi, Indira, Nehru, India, human rights, natural right, Information, consumer, election, representative, fraud, faith, preacher, teacher, executive, power

Read Full Post »

Nehruvian Congress is a GONE CASE


Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has projected Narendra Modi as the Prime Ministerial candidate of the party. Narendra Modi was otherwise also very much active. After his selection as the Prime Ministerial candidate, he has become very much active and he has floated several issue base questions before ruling parties at center and at the relevant states associated with  Nehruvian Congress.

 The land side success and victory of Narendra Modi and BJP in all the Hindi speaking four states, has wiped out Nehruvian Congress.

What is the present mindset of Nehruvian Congress leaders and its allies?


Modi is Now the Lion of India

The allies of Nehruvian Congress were not much in the picture significantly but they too are wiped out and most of them have lost their deposit. They have not received any coverage due to their insignificance in the fight. They have kept mum on the efforts and success of Narendra Modi.

But the all level failure in all the fields has posed before the Nehruvian Congress a big problem.

However look at the excuses of its leaders. Somehow they are not ready to accept the Modi-Effect in the election. They are still trying to negate Modi-Effect.

Why Nehruvian Congress is not worried for its failure in performance?

This is because:

Still money plays a big role in winning elections,

Still caste, religion, language and can play a role in dividing voters,

Media too can play a big role to mislead common mass and learned people.

This is because poor mass is looking for short term and immediate attention of its problems of starving. Let it be a short term effect.

Media and learned persons are purchasable. They can use philosophical meaningless language for hiding the failure of Nehruvian Congress to misguide the mass. It can also prevent mass by hiding the facts, related with failures, scams and frauds of Anti-BJP parties.

Why the media and Nehruvian Congress leaders are concentrating on rejection Modi-Effect?

Modi is becoming popular all over India in a big way. Thereby Nehruvian Congress is more interested in nullifying Modi-Effect. At moment, media is not helping Nehruvian Congress much, because of the recent success of Modi-Effect in the four State Assembly elections. This is because media does not want to be unauthentic and untrustworthy. It cannot hide the reflection of people’s voice immediately. But media cannot hide its inherent culture. Media has already shown some symptoms of its hidden and likely approach of its future trend.

 Nehruvian Congress can hide its failures very easily.

This is because; it has a very long experience of 60+ years as to how to win elections. There is no scope for opposition to beat the Congress in his game.

E.g. Nehruvian Congress had miserably failed in its Central Intelligence. It failed to prevent terrorists attack in Mumbai. Its failure caused several terrorist blasts in 2008 just before elections of 2009. But Nehruvian Congress was able to just generalized the issue with the blessing of media, learned people and Bollywood celebrities. It is said that the activities of Bollywood is controlled by Daud. Daud has close links with Nehruvian Congress and some of its allies.  Nehruvian Congress also tackles the issue of its corruptions, scandals and scams in similar way.

Media can dilute the success stories of BJP in performance of development by not giving any coverage. Media can highlight the so-called good performance of Nehruvian Congress by providing repeated coverage.


Nehruvian Congress has been clean bawled and wiped out in recent four assembly elections by Modi-Effect.

What could be the “would be approach” of Nehruvian Congress and its allies on Modi-Effect.

Deny the Modi-Effect.

There is No Modi Effect in India at all.

1                    The development, that Modi carried out in Gujarat is false. This has now been proved.

2                    Gujarat was a developed state from the very beginning.

3                    Modi is a liar on his claims of achievements about development. This has been also proved by the several independent reports.

4                    Modi’s Modal of development cannot be applied all over India because geography is not the same in India.

5                    Modi is communal and not acceptable to minorities. Nobody can forget and forgive him on his 2002 communal riots.

6                    There was no Modi-Effect in any elections.

7                    Had there been any Modi-Effect, how had he been a failure in Karnatak state assembly elections in last year?

8                    There was no Modi-Effect in recent four state assembly elections

9                    In MP State, Congress lost because we have not made adequate efforts at grass root level.

10                Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong.

11                In Rajasthan State, we lost power and could get only few seats due to the factor of anti-incumbency in the state and in the center. In fact we could not take our message of our success story and programs to grassroots level. Here also Modi-Effect was nil. Because Modi had organized his shows at so many places where the BJP candidates were otherwise also strong.

12                Defeat in Delhi, the reason is also the same. (Repeat whatsoever said for Rajasthan State).

13                As for the question “But how has been your party ranked third in Delhi State Assembly elections? How have been gone below the newly formed party AaP? The answer is “We had under estimated AaP. AaP had approached mass at grass root level. But our defeat was not due to Modi-Effect. Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong. We are defeated due to anti-incumbency effect.

14                As for Zarkhand state, how could you not get the benefit of anti-incumbency effect of BJP? Reply of Nehruvian Congress; “We have improved our position. We have won two more seats in the assembly. Here also there was no Modi-Effect. Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong.

15                Question: What would you do in forthcoming Parliamentarians Elections due in 2014?

Reply by Nehruvian Congress. “The issues of state assembly elections and parliamentarian elections are quite different. In 2008 we had lost assembly elections in some states. But we had won parliament elections.


“Our leaders, are now determined to go to grass root level, as directly by Rahul (the Nehruvian progeny). He is a person of determination. He has decided to change the program and system of canvassing. We are going to plan a revised program. You know Rahul is now Vice President of our party. Earlier in 2008 assembly elections he was not given a big role. In view of his great influence on mass, we had given him a big role of Vice President in our party. Off course we agree that in these recent elections we could not take sufficient advantage of his influence. But now Rahul has decided to change the plan of Election Champaign. We are firm on our success in forthcoming elections. We totally deny the Modi-Effect.

Modi is uncultured. Modi uses abusive language. Modi does not know how to talk respectfully to opponents. Modi is shameless. Modi is a rat. Modi is a worm. Modi is a liar. Modi is a cockroach. Modi is monkey. Modi is vulgar. Modi is illiterate. Modi does not know history and geography. Modi is communal. Modi is killer.

Can you expect that Nehruvian Congress can correct and improve its approach? Not at all. It is next to impossible. What JL Nehru could not do, what Indira Gandhi could not do, what Rajiv Could not do, how can one expect from these cunning people who are interested only in making money through Coalgate scam, 2G Frequency scam, Common Wealth Game bundle of scams, Adarsh Scam, Fake currency printing scam, Oil and gold smuggling and what not? Leave aside scams and scandals of their predecessors related with terrorism.

Minorities have adopted attitude and set their mind to join mainstream. But to expect Nehruvians and their allies to embrace morals is next to impossible.

Let them die as per the Hindu Law of Karma.    

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian, Congress, failure, hide, highlight, success, anti, incumbency, deny, Modi, Effect 

Read Full Post »



Is it that Kapi Sibbal is illiterate?

Three years back at the time of general elections campaign, Kapil Sibbal of Nehruvian Congress had announced that he would give “Akash Tablet” to all the youths at the rate of Rs. 3000/-.

Many youths had deposited money for “Akash”.

Nehruvian Congress came to power again in 2009. The days have been passed, the weeks have been passed, moths have been passed and years are passing. Now a time has come that again the general elections have become due (at any time), but no “Akash” had come down to meet the youths on the earth. Narendra Modi pointed out this fraudulent promise of Nehruvian Congress leader in one of his lectures.

Narendra Modi further said that Nehruvian Congress has a habit and culture to give false promises. It gives false promises not to only to common men, but it gives false promises to youths too. Such type of practice, generates bad moral values in youths. This is dangerous for a nation.

In reply to this Kapi Sibbal forwarded one Akash Tablet to Modi, instead of fulfilling the promises given to the youths of Delhi. Kapi Sibbal further abused Narendra Modi, and asked him to be a cultured leader. This means that to point out the false promises of Nehruvians, is a bad culture and to make a false and fraudulent promises is a good culture according to Nehruvian Congress culture.


JL Nehru had taken an oath in 1963 before the Indian parliament that he would not take rest till he would re-capture the land snatched by China during the war in 1962. Now if Narendra Modi would point out this point, the Nehruvian Congress would forward a photo of lost land to Narendra Modi and further it would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.


If Narendra Modi would point out the oath taken by Nehruvian Progeny Indira Gandhi of “I will remove the poverty” in 1969, then Nehruvian Congress leaders would send Rs.60/- (the daily wage of NAREGA) to Narendra Modi, and ask him to be a cultured person.


If Narendra Modi would point out the promise recalled before a foreign news channel by  Indira Gandhi in 1970 that all the infiltrators came from Pakistan will be sent back to their country, the Nehruvian Congress leaders would send some Bangladeshi Muslims to Gandhinagar and further the would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.


Recall the statement of Nehruvian Congress ruling Cabinet made during the pre-India Pak war period of 1971 that “India will not give return the land won by India if any war is imposed on India by Pakistan”, and after winning the war with the great braveness of Indian soldiers, it was announced by the Indira Gandhian Cabinet that Pakistan will have to sign a package deal and will have to meet the demands as under:


What was the PACKAGE DEAL”?

Reimbursement of all the expenses incurred by India due to this war on India imposed by Pakistan,

Return of the land of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, so that the Issue of Kashmir ends up,

Take back the all the infiltrators and refugees came from Pakistan in India,

Settlement of property cases of Hindu refugees came to India from Pakistan in 1947-48,

Deportation of anti-social elements that had committed crimes in India and taken shelter in Pakistan,

All the fishermen and whatsoever Indian prisoners available in Pakistan jails will have to be released,  

“No war pact” with India,

No hatred and propaganda against India in Pakistan,



Unless Pakistan signs this pact, then only the Prisoners of War (90000 soldiers who were fed by India with due respect from 1971 to 1972) and the land won by India during the war would be returned to Pakistan.


But what has been happened in Simla pack?

No gain for India,

Indira Gandhi returned all the POW i.e.  90000 soldiers,

Indira Gandhi returned all the land pieces that had won by Indian soldiers,

Indira Gandhi also returned the land piece of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) on which India had the claim,


On the other hand Pakistan released no Indian soldier. They are still with Pakistan, in 400+ numbers, in Pakistan Jail.


Now if Narendra Modi points out this fraud of progeny and party viz Nehruvian Congress, Kapi Sibbal or any damn leader would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and to behave with good culture.


It is not a surprise so far Nehruvian Congress leader and their allies are concerned. They have possessed all the evils available in the world. You can write a bigger book than the epic Mahabharat. Nehruvians and their party leaders can abuse any leader howsoever he may be great and popular among learned and common, if he/she opposes a Nehruvian and its party, they will abuse him/her without any logic and sense. They have spared none. They can do any damn thing to hide their evils and divert the mind of common mass by talking irrelevant and baseless.


Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Narendra Modi, Akash tablet, Kapi, Kapil, Sibbal, Nehruvian, Youth, election campaign, false, fraud, promise, Simla pact, Indira

Read Full Post »

ભયભીત ભૂતપૂર્વ હોદ્દેદારો અને સમાચાર માધ્યમો.



વાત તો કેશુભાઈની અને તેમના મળતીયાઓની જ હોય ને!

કેશુભાઈનું ડરાઉં ડરાઉં

ચોમાસું બેસવાનું હોય અને એકાદ ઝાપટું પડે એટલે દેડકાઓની “ડરાઉં ડરાઉં” ની મોસમ ચાલુ થાય. વાદળનો ગડગડાટ થાય એટલે મોર ભાઇઓ પણ “મેઆવ મેઆવ” ના ટહૂકા કરે. આ તો કુદરતની કરામત અને સૌંદર્ય છે. સૌ કોઈ એનો આનંદ માણે છે. 

ગુજરાત માટે વિધાનસભાની ચૂંટણીની મોસમ નવેમ્બર ડીસેમ્બરમાં આવશે. થોડી વચગાળાની ચૂંટણીઓ થઈ તેમાં ગુજ્જુ કોંગી દેડકાઓએ પેટ ફુલાવ્યા. પણ બળદ જેવડું કદ તો ન જ થયું. પણ ખાસીયત પ્રમાણે “મીયાં પડ્યા પણ તંગડી ઉંચી” (મીયાં ભાઈઓ માફ કરે), કોંગીઓએ પ્રદર્શનપ્રિયતા ચાલુ રાખી. કોંગી મહાજનોના વિદેશી ખાતાઓના પૈસા ક્યારે કામ લાગશે? વાપરો ભાઈ વાપરો. છાપાવાળા કહેશે લાવો ભાઈ લાવો. તમે કહેશો તે અને તેમ છાપીશું. તમારો ટકલો મુંઝાતો હશે તો અમે અમારા ટકલાને કામે લગાડીશું.

બીજેપીવાળાને વગોવવા અને ખાસ કરીને નરેન્દ્રભાઈ મોદીને વિકૃત રીતે રજુ કરવા એ તો અમને ગોઠી ગયું છે. શબ્દોની ગોઠવણમાં અમે પાવરધા છીએ. અને તમે જોજો અમે કેટલાક મૂર્ધન્યોને પણ અમારી લાઈનમાં લાવવાની કોશીશ કરીશું.

કથા સંજયભાઈ જોશીની

એક ભાઈ છે જે સંજય જોશી નામે ઓળખાય છે. જોકે કદીય અખબારોમાં કે સામાન્ય કાર્યકરોને મુખેથી તેમનું નામ સીડી પ્રકરણ પહેલાં સંભળાયું ન હતું. પણ એ વાત જવા દઈએ. તેઓશ્રી બીજેપી, આરએસએસમાં મોટા લીડ હતા. અને એક જાતીય સંબંધને લગતી સીડી માં કેદ થયેલ. એ સીડી ફરતી થઈ. હવે ગુજરાતમાં કંઈપણ થાય એટલે નરેન્દ્રભાઇને તો લપેટમાં લેવા જ પડે. નહેરુવીયન કોંગ્રેસના નેતાઓને આ બનાવ સાથે કંઈ લેવા દેવા નહીં. પણ પ્રસંગનો (ગેર)લાભ ન લઈએ તો ખોળીયું લાજે. માટે  બનાવ સાથે જોડો નરેન્દ્ર ભાઈ મોદીનું નામ.

જો કે નહેરુવીયન કોંગ્રેસીઓને બદલે હવે કોંગી એમ કહીશું. કોંગ + ઈ = કોંગી. આ શબ્દ ૧૯૬૯થી પ્રચલિત હતો અને હજી પણ પ્રચલિત છે.

તો હવે નરેન્દ્રભાઇ મોદીને કેવીરીતે આ સીડી પ્રકરણ સાથે જોડીશું? સર્વે મીડીયા મૂર્ધન્યો અને ગુજ્જુ કોંગીબંધુઓ વિચાર કરવા લાગ્યા.  “કહોને કે, સીડીને લગતી આદિથી અંત સુધીની પ્રક્રીયામાં નરેન્દ્ર ભાઈ જ પ્રોડ્યુસર, ડાઈરેક્ટર, ફોટોગ્રાફર અને ડીસ્ટ્રીબ્યુટર છે.  ફક્ત હીરો હિરોઈન જ બીજા છે.”

જો કે ગઈ ચૂંટણી વખતે ટીવીની એક ચેનલ ઉપર કુંવારા નરેન્દ્ર ભાઇની, નરેન્દ્રભાઈને પરિણિત સ્ત્રીએ દેખા દીધેલી. એ વાત ચાર આંખવાળા પ્રસારણ માધ્યમના ખેરખાંઓએ કેમ કરીને આગળ ન વધારી તે સંશોધનનો વિષય છે.

જોશીભાઈને તો બીજેપીમાંથી ફારેગ કર્યા અને તપાસ ચલાવી. સીડી બનાવટી જાહેર થઈ.

કોંગીવાળા બોલે તો બે ખાય

કોંગી નેતાઓ આ વિવાદથી અળગા રહ્યા. કારણ કે તેમનામાંના કેટલાક મહાજન નેતાઓ જાતિય કૌભાન્ડોમાં બીજેપીના કોઈપણ નેતાને અભડાવે એવા છે. આ બાબતમાં જગજીવન રામના સુપૂત્રના પ્રસિદ્ધ થયેલા ફોટાઓ અને હાલમાંના કોંગી મહાજન અભિષેક સીંઘવીની જાતીય સીડીના બનાવ હાજરા હજુર છે. જો તેઓ જોશીભાઈની સીડીના મુદ્દાને હથીયાર બનાવે તો બીજેપીવાળા તેને બૂમરેન્ગ બનાવી દે. માટે તેમને થયું કે તત્કાલ પૂરતા મૂંગા રહો. જો નરેન્દ્ર મોદી, સંજય જોશી જોડે સંબંધ રાખશે તો આપણે એ મુદ્દાને ચગાવીશું કે જુઓ, ગુજરાતના મુખ્ય મંત્રી કેવા દુરાચારીઓ સાથે સંબંધ રાખે છે! એટલે હાલ પૂરતું તો, સંજય જોશીના મુદ્દા વિષે સમાચાર માધ્યમોને સીડીએ(દાદરે) ચડવા દો.

ટૂંકમાં નરેન્દ્રભાઈ, સંજય જોશી સાથે સંબંધ રાખે તો બે ખાય અને ન રાખે તો તો પણ અધધધ ખાય. એમ કહેવાય કે જુઓ નરેન્દ્રભાઈ મિત્રોને કેવા આઘાતો આપે છે, આવી વાતોને મીર્ચ મસાલા સાથે ચગાવી શકાય.

સંજયભાઈતો નિર્દોષ ઠર્યા. જો કે આ બીજેપીની અંદરની વાત છે. પણ નિર્દોષ ઠર્યા અને બીજેપીમાં હોદ્દા ઉપર પાછા આવ્યા તો એ વાતને ચગાવો કે હવે નરેન્દ્રભાઈનું આવી બન્યું છે.

યુપીની ચૂંટણીમાં સંજયભાઈ પ્રભારી હતા. યુપીમાં જો બીજેપી પ્રમાણમાં સારો દેખાવ કરે તો એમ કહેવું કે; નરેન્દ્રભાઈ તમે શું એમ માનો છો કે કૂકડો નહીં હોય તો શું વહાણું (સવાર, પ્રભાત, સૂર્યોદય) નહીં વા? છાપો …. નરેન્દ્રભાઈનો ગર્વ ચકનાચૂર. નરેન્દ્રભાઈને તો ઘણું યુપીમાં જવું હતું, પણ તેમના ગર્વિષ્ઠપણાએ તેમને રોક્યા. તેમને એમ કે કુકડો હશે તો જ વહાણુ વાશે. પણ જુઓ સંજય જોશી અને ઉમાભારતીએ કેવું નરેન્દ્રમોદીના ગર્વનું ખંડન કર્યું!

પણ ધારોકે નરેન્દ્ર મોદી યુપી ગયા હોત અને જો ખરાબ પરિણામો આવ્યા હોત તો? તો તો કોંગી, ધર્મનિરપેક્ષીઓને અને સમાચાર માધ્યમોને ગોળના ગાડાં મળી જાત.

સંજય જોશીની નરેન્દ્ર મોદી સાથેની મિત્રતાની કે મિત્રદ્રોહની વાતને શું કામ ચગાવવી?

શંકરભાઈ, સુરેશભાઈ અને કેશુભાઈ શું હતા? અરે કેશુભાઈ તો નરેન્દ્રભાઇ મોદીના ગુરુ હતા.  શંકરભાઈ તો અધિરા થયા અને પૉરો ખાધા વગર દુશ્મનપક્ષમાં પોતાની ખજુરાહો-સુશોભિત  ભજનમંડળી સાથે  ઘુસી ગયા.  શંકરભાઈએ, કેશુભાઈને કોંગીનો સાથ લઈ સત્તા ઉપરથી ઉથલાવી દીધેલ. પણ પછીની ચૂંટણીમાં ગુજ્જુભાઈઓએ કેશુભાઈને ઉભા કર્યા અને તેમને રાજગાદી ઉપર પૂનર્‌સ્થાપિત કર્યા. કારણ કે તેમને ગુજ્જુદ્રોહી કોંગીઓ તો ખપે જ શેના? પછી કોંગીએ પોતાની આદત પ્રમાણે શંકરભાઈને વેતર્યા.

કેશુભાઈની સરકાર અને વહીવટના વહીવટદારો

કેશુભાઈ મુખ્યમંત્રી તરીકે કેવા હતા? કેશુભાઈ પાસે સ્વપ્નો હતાં. તેમણે તે સ્વપ્નોને સાકાર કરવાના પ્રયત્નો કરેલા. પણ સ્વપ્ન હોવાં અને વહીવટ કરવાવાળાઓ ઉપર બધું છોડી દેવું એ બરાબર તો ન જ કહેવાય. જ્યારે પ્રસંગો અને તેને લગતી પ્રણાલીઓ પૂર્વ નિર્ધારિત હોય તો થોડો સમય બધું થોડું ઘણું સમુસૂતરું ચાલે પણ પછી સરકારી નોકરોની અને આડતીયાઓની (આડતીયાઓમાં પક્ષના કાર્યકરો પણ હોય.) આદતો બગડે જ.

મોટાભાગના સરકારી નોકરો તો પોતાની આદતો બગાડવા માટે એવરરેડી જ હોય. આ બધાના પરિણામે અમદાવદની કોર્પોરેશનની ચૂંટણીમાં બીજેપીનો પરાજય થયો. આ પરાજય આમ તો બીજેપી મોવડીમાંડળ માટે અગમચેતી હતી. પણ કેશુભાઈને ચાલુ રખાયા. તે પછી કુદરતી આફત આવી દરિયાઈ વાવાઝોડા આવ્યાં. વહીવટી તંત્ર અસફળ રહ્યું. ૨૦૦૧માં ભિષણ ધરતીકંપ આવ્યો અને વહીવટી તંત્ર તદન નિસ્ફળ ગયું. કેશુભાઈ મજાકનું પાત્ર બની ગયા. કેશુભાઈના દરેક ઉચ્ચારણોની મજાક થવા માંડી. સરકારી નોકરોની ખાયકીમાં પૂર આવ્યું. દાનમાં મળેલા તંબુઓ સરકારી નોકરોએ ઠાંગી લીધા. દાનના લેબલ લાગેલા ખાદ્ય પદાર્થો લેબલ સાથે બજારમાં ખૂલ્લેઆમ વેચાવા લાગેલા. ભ્રષ્ટ વહીવટની જાણે પરાકાષ્ઠા હોય એવું લાગી રહ્યું હતું. આવી સ્થિતિમાં ૨૦૦૨માં ચૂંટણી આવવાની હતી. જો આ ચૂંટણી જીતવી હોય તો કાબેલ મુખ્ય મંત્રીની જરુર હતી. ઈશ્વરનું કરવું કે બીજેપી મોવડી મંડળને સદબુદ્ધિ સુઝી અને નરેન્દ્ર મોદીને મુખ્ય મંત્રી બનાવ્યા. આ નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ બઘેડાટી બોલાવી. ખાઉકડ સરકારી અમલદારોમાંથી જેટલા પકડાયા તેમના ઉપર તવાઈ આવી અને કામગીરી ચાલુ થઈ.

ગોધરા રેલ્વેસ્ટેશન કાંડમાટે નરેન્દ્ર મોદી જવાબદાર

બધું ઠીકઠાક ચાલતું હતું અને નરેન્દ્રભાઈ એ એક ઉચ્ચારણ કર્યું કે “બીજેપી ના શાસનમાં કોમી દંગાઓનું નામોનિશાન મટી ગયું છે.” આ સાંભળી દંગાખ્યાત એવા ગુજ્જુ કોંગીઓના પેટમાં તેલ રેડાયું. ગોધરાના એક કોંગીલીંકવાળા નેતાથી સહન ન થયું અને યોજનાબદ્ધરીતે સાબરમતી એક્ષપ્રેસને સળગાવવાનું કાવત્રું થયું. પણ તે ટ્રેન મોડી પડતાં ફક્ત તેનો એક જ ડબ્બો સળગાવી શકાયો. કોંગી નેતા બોલ્યા કે નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ “બીજેપી ના શાસનમાં દંગાઓનું નામ નિશાન મટી ગયું છે.” એવું કહીને અમારા મુસ્લિમભાઈઓને પરોક્ષ રીતે દંગા કરવા ઉશ્કેર્યા હતા. મોદી એવું બોલ્યા જ શું કામ?

હા ભાઇ, વાંક તો નરેન્દ્રભાઈ મોદીનો જ ગણાવો જોઇએ. અમે કોંગીઓએ અમારા પચાસ વર્ષના શાસનમાં ભલે અમારા મુસ્લિમભાઈઓને ગરીબ, અભણ અને બેકાર રાખ્યા. પણ આ બાબતમાં તો અમે હિન્દુઓને પણ ક્યાં બકાત રાખ્યા છે? પણ અમે મુસ્લિમભાઈઓનું ઘણું ભલું કર્યું છે અને તે એ કે અમે તેમને ધર્મ બાબતમાં સંવેદનશીલ (આળા) બનાવ્યા છે. એટલે ૧૯૯૨માં બનેલા બાબરી મસ્જિદ ધ્વંશના બનાવની સંવેદના દશવર્ષ પછી પ્રગટ કરે તો ખરા જ ને! તમે કહેશો કે શું સંવેદના પ્રગટ કરવાનું મુહૂર્ત દશ વર્ષે આવ્યું? અરે ભાઈ,

દરેક કાર્ય કરવાના કોંગીભાઈઓ માટે મૂહુર્ત હોય છે. (ચૂંટણી પણ એક મુહૂર્ત છે). 

હવે તમે વિચારો કે કુદરતી આફતોમાં મળેલી વહીવટી નિસ્ફળતા અને બદનામી પછી પણ જો કેશુભાઈ મુખ્યપ્રધાન પદે રહ્યા હોત તો ગુજરાતમાં તો યુપી કરતાંય બદતર રીતે બીજેપીનું નામું નંખાઈ જાત.

નરેન્દ્ર મોદી જ આવે સમયે ગુજરાતને તારી શક્યા તે માટે ઈશ્વરનો આભાર માનો.

પણ સમાચાર માધ્યમના મૂર્ધન્યોની યાદદાસ્ત સામાન્ય માણસની યાદદાસ્ત કરતાં પણ બેહદ ઉણી હોય એવું લાગે છે. તેમની કેશુભાઈ પરસ્તી અને નરેન્દ્રમોદી-વિરોધી પરસ્તી જોતાં આવું લાગે છે. પણ સાચી વાત એ છે કે સમાચાર માધ્યમના મૂર્ધન્યો પોતાનો ઉલ્લુ સીધો કરવામાં પડ્યા છે. ઉંઘતાને જગાડી શકાય પણ જાગતાને ન જગાડી શકાય. તેવી રીતે જે ભૂલી ગયો હોય તેને તમે યાદ કરાવી શકો પણ જે પોતાને બહુશ્રુત માનતા હોય પણ હેતુ દુષિત હોય તે જનતાને આડે માર્ગે જ દોરેને!

દુષિત વિસ્મૃતિ

સમાચાર માધ્યમોનું પણ આવું જ છે. તેઓ જ વાવાઝોડા અને ભૂકંપ વખતે કેશુભાઈની મજાક ઉડાવતા હતા અને ભાંડતા હતા અને અત્યારે કેશુભાઈ પરત્વેની ચાપલુસીમાંથી ઉંચા આવતા નથી.

વરમરો કન્યા મરો પણ ગોરનું તરભાણું ભરો

શું કેશુભાઈ ગુજરાતમાં યુપી-બિહાર-રાજસ્થાન મત-કલ્ચર લાવવા માગે છે? એટલે કે શું ગુજરાતની જનતાએ જ્ઞાતિને ધ્યાનમાં રાખીને મતદાન કરવું? દુઃખની વાત એ છે કે સમાચાર માધ્યમો પણ કેશુભાઈના ઉચ્ચારણોને અને જ્ઞાતિવાદને ઉત્તેજન મળે તેવા સમાચારોને ચગાવે છે. આ એક ગુનો ગણાવવો જોઇએ. નરેન્દ્ર મોદી કદી જ્ઞાતિવાદી સભામાં જ્ઞાતિવાદી મતોનું રાજકારણ ચલાવતા નથી. આ બંને વલણોમાં રહેલા ભેદને સુજ્ઞજનોએ સમજવો જોઇએ. અને તે રીતે તેઓને મુલવવા જોઇએ.

ભૂત(પૂર્વ)ની ભ્રમિત ભયની ભૂતાવળ

કડવા-લેઉઆ પાટીદારોના સમ્મેલનો ભરાયા. ભૂતપૂર્વ મુખ્યમંત્રી શ્રી કેશુભાઈએ કહ્યું આપણા ભાઈઓ ભયભીત છે. જે જ્ઞાતિએ વલ્લભભાઈ જેવા વીર અને અભય પુરુષ પેદા કર્યા તે જ્ઞાતિજનો શામાટે ભયભીત છે? ભય ખંખેરી નાખો. નિડર બનો. વિગેરે વિગેરે.

કોઈએ બાબલાને રાત્રે કહ્યું કે જા રસોડામાંથી પાણી લઈ આવ. તો બાબલાએ કહ્યું ના હું એકલો નહીં જાઉં. મને બીક લાગે છે. મા એ પહેલો સવાલ એ જ કર્યો કે “બીક શાની લાગે છે? બાબલાએ કહ્યું અંધારાની બીક લાગે છે. મા એ બીજો સવાલ કર્યો કે અંધારાની બીક શા માટે લાગે છે? બાબલાએ કહ્યું ભૂતની બીક લાગે છે. માએ કહ્યું તો રામનું નામ લે. ભૂત ભાગી જશે. આ બાબલો એ બીજું કોઈ નહીં પણ ગાંધી બાપુ હતા. તેમની માતા ખાસ ભણેલાં નહીં પણ લખી વાંચી શકે ખરાં.

હવે મૂળ વાત પર આવીએ. પાટીદાર ભાઈઓ શું મોરીદાર છે? જો તેમ હોત તો તેઓ આફ્રિકા, અમેરિકા અને યુકેમાં પોતાનો ડંકો કેવીરીતે વગાડત? અરે હજી પણ તેઓના નામના ડંકા અમેરિકામાં વાગે છે. અમેરિકામાં ગેરકાયદેસર ઘુસવામાં પણ હિંમતતો જોઇએ જ. સામાન્ય કક્ષાનું ભણેલા અને લગભગ અભણ પટેલો પણ અમેરિકામાં ડંકા વગાડે છે. અંકલ સામ કદાચ આ પોટેલો થી ડરતા હોય તે વાત નકારી ન શકાય. એટલે પટેલ ભાઇઓ ભયભીત હોય તે વાત તો ગળે ઉતરે તેવી નથી.

સહી શબ્દોંકા પ્રયોગ

તો પછી કેશુભાઈએ ભય અને ભયભીત શબ્દો કેમ વાપર્યા? શું તેઓ શબ્દના અર્થોને સમજી શકતા નથી? શું તેમનામાં “સહી શબ્દોંકા પ્રયોગ કરેં” ની અક્કલ નથી?

કદાચ તેમને ભય શબ્દ અસરકારક કે વિદ્વત્તાપૂર્ણ લાગ્યો. આવું ઘણી વખત બને છે. પચાસના દાયકાની વાત છે. એક વિદેશી ડીપ્લોમેટનું દિલ્લીમાં આગમન થયું. વિમાન મથકે તેમનું સ્વાગત થયું. ગુજરાતના તે વખતના ખ્યાતનામ ગુજ્જુ સમાચાર દૈનિકે શિર્ષરેખા આપી .. ” ‘ ___ ‘ નું દિલ્લીમાં થયેલું અવસાન”. સમાચારની વિગતમાં અવસાન કે તેની વિગત વિષે કશો ઉલ્લેખ નહીં. પછી બીજે દિવસે માફી સમાચાર આવ્યા કે સ્વાગતને બદલે અવસાન શબ્દ વપરાઈ ગયો હતો. મેં મારા પિતાજીને પૂછ્યું સ્વાગત અને અવસાન વચ્ચે કશો મેળ નથી. આવી ભૂલ કેવી રીતે થઈ શકે? તો મને જવાબ મળ્યો કે “શબ્દ સારો લાગ્યો એટલે વાપરી નાખ્યો હશે. ઘણા લોકોને શબ્દના અર્થની બરાબર ખબર હોતી નથી. આકર્ષક લાગે તો વાપરી નાખે.”  

આપણા કેશુભાઈને પણ કદાચ “ભય અને ભયભીત” શબ્દો આકર્ષક લાગ્યા હશે. પણ અર્થને કેવીરીતે જોડશો? આપણા સમાચાર માધ્યમના મૂર્ધન્યો તો વિદ્વાન અને તર્કજ્ઞ છે. તેઓએ સર્વ પ્રથમ સવાલ કેશુભાઇને એજ કરવો જોઇએ કે “કોનો ભય લાગે છે અને શા માટે ભય લાગે છે?”

જો કેશુભાઈ અને સમાચાર માધ્યમોના મૂર્ધન્યોની મથરાવટી મેલી હોય તો અર્થ અને સવાલો કરવાની ઝંઝટમાં શાના પડે! પણ આશ્ચર્ય એ વાતનું છે કે કોઈબી માઈનો પૂત ન તો મૂર્ધન્યોમાં નિકળ્યો કે ન તો કટાર લેખકોમાં નિકળ્યો કે જે “શેનો ભય અને શા માટે ભય” વિષે પ્રૂચ્છા કરે.

આપણા સમાચાર માધ્યમના વિદ્વાનોની આવી આદતો કંઈ નવી નથી. અમૂક વ્યક્તિઓ એવી છે જ કે જેમને અમૂક સવાલો પૂછાય જ નહીં. જોકે આ બાબત અત્યાર સુધી નહેરુવંશના ફરજંદો પૂરતી અને તેમના કેટલાક સંલગ્ન મળતીયાઓ સુધી મર્યાદિત રાખવામાં આવી હતી. તેની પાછળ સમાચાર માધ્યમના, ટીવી ચેનલોના અંગત કાળા-પીળા હિતો હોય છે. કેશુભાઈને ખાસ સવાલો ન પૂછાય તે તો નવિન પ્રણાલી છે.

અધ્યાહારની અકળ લીલા

જે વાત ખાસ કહેવી છે તેને અધ્યાહાર (અનુલ્લેખિત) રાખો. એટલે સૌ કોઈ ભળતા શબ્દો, મુકી શકે. અને વાતને ચગાવી શકાય.

કેશુભાઈએ કહ્યું પાટીદારો જ નહીં, મોરીદાર, તીખીદાર, કરવીદાર, છરેરીદાર, છર્યાવગરની દાર, બધી જ ગુજ્જુદારો ભયભીત છે.

 ભયભીત કેશુભાઈ

હે કેશુભાઈ, પણ ફોર તો પારો કે કોનાથી ભયભીત છે અને શામાટે ભયભીત છે?

કેશુભાઈ શું કામ વિગતે બોલતા નથી? શું તેઓ તે માટે પણ ભયભીત છે? તો પછી જે ખુદ ભયભીત છે તે બીજાને કેવીરીતે ભયમૂક્ત થવાની શિખામણ આપી શકે? આ તો “ડાહી સાસરે જાય નહીં અને ગાંડીને શિખામણ આપે” એવી વાત થઈ.

સામાન્ય માણસ અંદાજ મુકે છે કે કેશુભાઈ અને સમાચાર માધ્યમોનું નિશાન કોણ છે અને  આ બધું શા માટે, આ રીતે શા માટે થાય છે?

નિશાન નરેન્દ્ર મોદી છે

સમાચાર માધ્યમો, કોંગીઓ અને કેશુભાઈ અને તેમના મળતીયાઓનું નિશાન, નરેન્દ્ર મોદી છે. આ બધો પ્રપંચ નરેન્દ્ર મોદીના રાજકીય કે કોઈપણ જાતના મૃત્યુ માટે થાય છે. અને આરીતે એટલે કે વિગતો આપ્યા વગર એટલા માટે થાય છે કે જો વિગતો આપે તો નરેન્દ્ર મોદી સણસણતો એવો જવાબ આપે કે આ બધા મોદી-વિરોધીઓ ભોંયભેગા થઈ જાય. સોનીયા ગાંધીએ નામ દીધાવગર ગુજરાતીઓને ગોડસેને ચૂંટનાર અને નરેન્દ્ર મોદીને નામ દીધા વગર મૌતકા સૌદાગર કહ્યા હતા. તો નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ તેમના શબ્દોને એવા બૂમરેંગ કર્યા કે ચૂંટણીમાં કોંગીઓ ચત્તાપાટ પડ્યા. એટલે હવે નરેન્દ્રમોદીના વિરોધીઓ વિગતો આપવામાં માનતા નથી. આવ પથરા પગ ઉપર કે “આ બૈલ મુઝે માર” એવું કોણ કરે. એના બદલે ભય, ભયભિત, હાંસીયામાં, ઉદ્યોગપતિઓને ખેરાત, ખેડૂતોની અવગણના, ગૌચર એવું એવું બોલે રાખો અને સાર્વત્રિક અસંતોષ પ્રવર્તે છે એવું વાતાવરણ તૈયાર કરો. આપણા તડમાં લાડુ આપોઆપ પડશે.

વાસ્તવમાં નરેન્દ્ર મોદી થકી અસંતુષ્ટ કે ભયભીત શિયાળવાંઓ કોણ છે? એક તો કેશુભાઈ પોતે જ છે. બીજા સુરેશ મહેતા છે. થોડા ઘણા કેશુભાઈસાથે નવરા પડેલા આરએસએસના એવા કાર્યકરો કે જેઓ સરકારી નોકરો સાથે વહીવટ ગોઠવનારા હતા તેઓ છે, સમાચાર માધ્યમોના વહેતા મુકેલા ગુબ્બારા પ્રમાણે સંજય જોશી પણ હોઈ શકે છે. એટલે સમાચાર માધ્યમો સંજય જોશીના અઘ્યા-પાદ્યાના સમાચારો ચમકાવ્યા કરે છે.

દાખલા તરીકે, સંજય જોશીએ ભલે રાજીનામું આપ્યું પણ તેઓ ઘણા લોકપ્રિય છે. અને તેઓ રેલ્વે રસ્તે દિલ્લી જશે જેથી તેમના અનુયાઈઓ સાગમટે તેમનું સ્ટેશને સ્ટેશને સ્વાગત કરશે. તેથી નરેન્દ્ર મોદીના પેટમાં તેલ રેડાશે.

પણ થયું એવું કે સંજયભાઈનું હવાઈ માર્ગે દિલ્લી જવાનું નક્કી કર્યું. તેથી આપણા સમાચાર માધ્યમે થુંકેલું ગળીને વાત ફેરવી તોળી કે બીજેપીના મોવડી મંડળે વિવાદ ન વકરે તેમાટે સંજયભાઈને હવાઈ ટીકીટ આપી દીધી. આ તો એવો ઘાટ થયો કે “મનમાં ને મનમાં પરણ્યા અને મનમાં ને મનમાં રાંડ્યા.”

બારદાનની અગત્ય

એક મિત્રે મને કહ્યું કે તો સરકારી નોકરો ભયભીત છે. અને કેશુભાઈ સરકારી નોકરોને પડખે લેવા માગે છે. હા સરકારી નોકર એક એવું “બારદાન” (પેકીંગ, ખોખું) છે, જે બરાબર ન હોય તો તમારી પ્રોડક્ટને હતી ન હતી કરી નાખે. એટલે જો એક વખત સરકારી નોકરો ખીસ્સામાં આવી જાય તો નરેન્દ્ર મોદીને ચીત કરી શકાય.

સરાકરી નોકરોમાં તો એક, બે, ત્રણ અને ચાર વર્ગના કર્મચારીઓ આવે. ચાર વર્ગના કર્મચારીને તો અનસ્કીલ્ડ કામ કરવાનું હોય છે. તેઓને કોઈ ભય હોઈ શકે નહીં. શિવાય કે કામમાં દગડાઈ કરે. બે અને ત્રણ વર્ગના કર્મચારીઓ અફસરો/અધિકારીઓ અને બાબુઓ કહેવાય છે. એક અને બે વર્ગના અફસરો નક્કી કરેછે કે ત્રણ વર્ગની જવાબદારી કેટલી! બે અને ત્રણ વર્ગના કર્મચારીઓ મોટા સાહેબો (વર્ગ એક) થી ડરતા હોય છે. પણ જો તેઓ નીતિમાન હોય તો તેમણે ડરવાની જરુર હોતી નથી. ખાસ કરીને ત્રીજા વર્ગના કર્મચારીઓ આડતીયા થવાનું બંધ કરે તો તેઓ ડરથી મૂક્ત થઈ શકે.

પ્રથમ વર્ગમાં બે કક્ષા હોય છે. જુનીયર એડમીનીસ્ટ્રેટીવ   અને સીનીયર એડમીનીસ્ટ્રેટીવ. વર્ગના બીજા વર્ગના કર્મચારીઓ અને જુનીયર એડમીનીસ્ટ્રેટીવમાંના કેટલાક  કરોડ રજ્જુ સમાન હોય છે. આમાં ઘણું પોલીટીક્સ ચાલતું હોય છે.

પણ સુજ્ઞજનોએ સમજવું જોઇએ કે કાયદો કાયદાનું કામ કરશે. સૌને કાયદાનું રક્ષણ છે અને તેમને તેમની જવાબદારી નભાવવાનું મહેનતાણું મળે છે. અધિકારીવર્ગના મોટાભાગે ઘણી લાલીયા વાડી ચલાવી છે. ઘણા હજી પણ ચલાવતા હશે. જો તેમની પૂંછડી પકડીને કાબુમાં રાખવામાં નહી આવે તો તેઓ વધુ વકરી શકે છે. આ વિશે લખવા બેસીયે તો મહાભારત જેવડું પુસ્તક લખાય. જો થોડા અફસરો જેઓ નીતિમાન રહી શક્યા તેઓ જો ભેગા થઈને તટસ્થ રહીને લખે તો મહાભારત પણ સર્જાય.


પણ ટૂંકમાં કાયદામાં એવી જોગવાઈ છે કે સરકારી નોકરો પોતાને થયેલા અન્યાય માટે ચૂંટાયેલા સભ્યો પાસે જઈને કે તેમની મારફત ન્યાયની માગણી ન કરી શકે. તેઓ ન્યાયિક અદાલતમાં જરુર જઈ શકે છે.

કોંગી જનોને તેમના પક્ષના કુદરતી મોત તરફ જવા દો. તેને સુધારવાની જરુર નથી. જેણે અર્ધી સદી ઉપરાંત દેશનું સૂકાન અને અબાધિત અધિકારો આપ્યા છતાં ન સુધર્યા અને દેશને પાયમાલ કર્યો, તેને તક આપવામાં બેવકુફી છે. કેશુભાઈ અને તેમના મળતીયાઓએ

તથા સમાચાર માધ્યમના વિદ્વાનોએ કમસે કમ તર્ક અને મુદ્દા આધારિત ચર્ચા કરવી જોઇએ.

તેઓ કોણ છે તે અમે જાણતા નથી”

સંસ્કૃતમાં એક શ્લોક છે કે;

૧ “એ લોકો સજ્જન છે જેઓ પોતે પોતાનું હિત ત્યજીને બીજાનું હિત કરે છે.”

૨ “એ લોકો સામાન્યજન છે જે બીજાને નુકશાન ન થાય તે પ્રમાણે વર્તીને પોતાનું હિત સાધે છે”

૩ “એ લોકો માનવરાક્ષસ છે જેઓ બીજાને નુકશાન કરીને પોતાનું હિત સાધે છે”

૪ “પણ જેઓ કોઈ કારણ વગર જ બીજાનું અહિત કરે છે તેઓ કોણ છે તે અમે જાણતા નથી.”

કેશુભાઈ, તેમના મળતીયાઓ અને અખબારી મૂર્ધન્યોએ જ પોતાની કક્ષા ત્રણ નંબરની છે કે ચાર તે નક્કી કરવાનું છે. જનતા તો તેમને તેમનું સ્થાન બતાવતી જ રહી છે.

કોંગીજનોને જવા દો. તેઓ તો “ગૉન કેસ” છે.


શિરીષ મોહનલાલ દવે


ટેગઃ ભય, ભયભિત, ભૂતપૂર્વ, કેશુભાઈ, શંકરભાઈ, કોંગીભાઈ, બૂમરેનંગ, માનવરાક્ષસ, સરાકારી નોકર, અફસર, અધિકારી, બારદાન       

Read Full Post »


Hello Governor

Hello Governor

Let us go through some of the actions of Nehruvian Congress Private Limited and its purpose behind those actions.

It is very common among Nehruvians in India to act under disguise of public interest or in the interest of poor people but to have some different purpose behind that action.

Jawaharlal Nehru

1948: Case of Kashmir taken to UNO by Nehru and accepted the date of report to UNO as LOC with an intention (purpose) to show his out of proportion respect towards UNO. In fact it was a political blunder because Nehru had no wisdom and foresight.

1950: Founded Non-alliance Movement with an aim to show the First world (NATO countries) that military alliance is not the solution for world peace. But indirectly it was unregistered alliance with Second World (Communist countries Russia and China)

1952: Accepted sovereignty of China on Tibet. To show the Communist countries Russia and China that he was more aligned to socialism than human rights. Internally he wanted backing of Russia and China against the influence of USA and others.


1952: Puch-sheel treaty with China, to show the world that he loved peace and has soft corner for Buddhism (the vote-bank of Ambedkar).


1953-1962: Non-action on Chinese military infiltration and denial before parliament of India on any Chinese  infiltration in India. To show Russia that he had soft corner towards China and how much faith the people of India had in him despite of his blunders. It cannot be ruled out that he wanted political assistance from Russia in playing political unfair tactics with people of India.


1962: Nehru said “enemy has betrayed us on his Defeat against China due to neglecting security of borders. This statement was made to misguide the people of India to show that he was innocent. When Nehru was asked that when the forward movement of China in India would get stopped? Nehru replied “where and when we would stop them by our strength”. But China had captured 30000 square miles additional land more than what it had claimed in Indian land. China made cease fire of his own and gave back the additional seized land of 30000 square miles out of 92000/- square miles of total seized land.


1963: Nehru took oath “we will not take rest until we recapture the lost land of mother India”. The purpose was to show his sincerity towards mother India. In fact Nehru was a fraud and he made fraudulent statement. He and his progenies knew very well that the lost land was never going to be recaptured.




1963: Kamraj Plan: Nehru spelled purpose to strengthen the party by utilising services of senior leaders. Internally his purpose was to remove Morarji Desai who was his number one opponent.


Indira Gandhi:

Removal of privy-purses of Kings: This was with a view to show that she was socialistic. In fact the privy-purses were in accordance to the agreement signed with them when they handed over their kingdoms to independent India. The annual payment was to getting reduced to end up to zero in due course. However Indira wanted to show her promptness and militancy on establishing socialism to remove poverty.


Nationalisation of 14 leading private banks: Morarji Desai had introduced socialisation of banking. The RBI controls the policy of advances. Hence Morarji Desai was on right path. But Indira Gandhi wanted to spoil the bank employees for her political benefit. Nationalisation of Banks spoiled the administration of all these banks. Banks’ money got utilised for granting no-return loan as per the unwritten understanding. Like this the purpose was in no way effective to remove poverty or to uplift poor mass, but to share loan amount among managers (not always), recommending authority of loan (viz. Nehruvian Congress local leaders) and the borrowers. 1968 to 1984 of further rule of Indira Gandhi no poverty had been removed.


Remove Poverty was a fraud

Remove Poverty was a fraud

Emergency: Indira declared emergency under the plea that her opponents instigating people to revolt against government and there was bulk indiscipline. But in reality her purpose was to retain her power and PM-ship.


Weak deal with Union Carbide: to make India self sufficient on pesticides. In fact under table deal cannot be ruled out as it is a practice of western industrialists to establish such hazardous production units in poor countries so that they can fool the local governments in case of hazard by way of executing defective agreement with purchasable government like Nehruvian Congress of India Private Limited.


Indira had no wisdom to see what could happen consequent to Simla Pact

Indira had no wisdom to see what could happen consequent to Simla Pact

Simla Pact: Bhutto said If I would solve all the problems and issues with India and agree to any such pact, I would be killed in Pakistan, and the agreement would not have any meaning. Indira Gandhi agreed to this as reported by Indira and no issue or problem was solved and converted victory into defeat. Further reality was so-called weak pact had also been made useless, as otherwise also Bhutto had been killed by the successive government of Pakistan. It cannot be ruled out that there could be an undertable deal with Bhutto by Indira Gandhi.

Rajiv Gandhi 

Deal with Ceylon: The aim was to have good relation with Ceylon. But it was complete avoidance of the interest of Tamilians in Ceylon. It was a blunder. Can you imagine that Pakistan would send its military in Kashmir to kill Muslim terrorists?


Every body has to make Nehruvian Congress comfortable in a deal

Every body has to make Nehruvian Congress comfortable in a deal

Boffors tanks: To make India stronger in military. We know the fact.


Anderson of Union Carbide: Rajiv said he would come back whenever we call him under investigation. It was a fraudulent statement. Under table deal cannot be ruled out for giving an easy pass to Anderson.


Man Mohan and Sonia Gandhi:


Harshad Mehta security scam: Man Mohan the then Finance Minister announced that he would take suitable corrective step such that security scam would not get repeated. The purpose was to show to the public that they were innocent. He said it was the fault of system. In fact the designers of the system were themselves. Man Mohan had made several phones to pressurise the then Income Tax Commissioner Vishvabandhu Gupta not to take action.


Though Man Mohan was FM at that time, when he became PM, Satyam scam took place.


Ravan Lila at Ram Lila Maidan: Nehruvian Government says law was taking its own course. In fact the police authority said, it was a political decision.


Jan Lok Pal Bill: Nehruvian Cong leaders say Parliament is supreme and government wants strong Lokpal. In fact the Civil Society was formed in consultation with government and Nehruvian Congress never wanted a strong Lokpal. Nehruvian Congress never tried to discuss on the merits. Arun Jetley had never been replied to the points.


Similar are the cases of Black-red money, Printing of currency notes by RBI, Distribution of Fake currency notes by RBI, Statements related with deportation of Daud, curtailing the scope of RTI act. EVM … there is no end. We can write a bigger book than Maha Bharat on the frauds, scams, scandals and blunders Nehruvians and Nehruvian Congress together with their allies.




Governor appoints Lok Pal in Gujarat: Nehruvian Congress says we are sincerely on Lok Pal. Chronology says the issue has been made political by Nehruvian Congress. Governor and opposition party (Nehruvian Congress of India Private Limited) in Gujarat in joint venture rejected the proposal of ruling party (BJP Gujarat), without any merits and convincing reason. The HC has not gone through the political aspect and aims of Nehruvian Congress. Purpose behind the action is important. The purpose cannot be set aside in jurisprudent.

Do they want to scrap the state government? Let us rent out the State Assembly building.


Shirish Mohanlal Dave



Nehruvian, Purpose, Action, Power, Politics, Jawahar, Indira, Man Mohan, FM, PM, Governor, Gujarat, State Assembly, Rent out

Read Full Post »

Since we are in democratic nation we are supposed to have differences. This can be minimized with communication in right direction.


It is better not to mix two drafts of Lok Pal Bill.



Joke Pal bill put up by the government, lead by Nehruvian Congress of India Private Limited


Jan Lok Pal bill submitted by Civil Society.


When we say only Lok Pal, then it creates confusion among common mass. Lok Pal of the government is useless and it has lot of loop wholes.


Jan Lok Pals covers many aspects like Citizen Charter and responsibility of the wings entrusted with justice. But separate bill by the Congi on citizen charter is a fun. Similarly to keep CBI out side Lok Pal by the government is also to make Lok Pal ineffective.


Why Anna does not talk about Black money?


As I understand that all the people who want some reforms including political reforms have liberty to decide their priorities. Anna has a liberty to have priority on Jan Lok Pal Bill. Baba Ramdev has priority on Black money. Swami Subrahmanian has priority on the filed litigation.


In fact “black money” is not a proper term.


As per legal interpretation Black money is a civil matter. In reality the black money is not simply black money only, but this money is RED Money also. Red money means money involved in criminal activities including terrorism.


Leaders of Nehruvian Congress, Sharad, RBI top officers, ISI, Pakistan government including Daud, Bangladesh, Mauritius are heavily involved in the scams of Fake currency notes and black-red money. So far UPA is in power there cannot be any hope for any meaningful action under present system on black-red money and illegal accounts of Indians in foreign banks. This is because UPA’s commitment on proceedings on black money is a fraud.


Our legal system is not capable to handle this promptly, unless we provide Jan Lok Pal as a constitutional authority. For Lok Pal Bill Nehruvian Congress has commitment and this point can be taken to public on merits.

Where are we confused and lost? 

But unfortunately, instead of this, we find some learned persons trying to create confusion  for the people, which may due to either lacking in sense of significance or ill knowledge or own interest. We can understand the vested interest of Nehruvian Cong leaders on misinterpretation of its Lok Pal Bill as a strong Lok Pal bill, but the interpretation of some others on the term Lok Pal in general is misguiding.

Let is not highlight the differences: 

Any way at this stage, we should take Anna as a person. Let us view his fight as a fight for a cause. Kiran Bedi and some others of Anna’s team are lacking in strategy even if they present them selves as public spirited persons.

Take up issue one by one

Fight has to be taken up with one by one issue. Mahatma Gandhi had fought like that only.

We should not forget that Mahatma Gandhi had understanding on widely spread mass of India. He had matured, foresighted and well thought political strategies. He had management skills and sense of significance. We should not expect and search for such calibre in other leader who is fighting for public interest.


Instead of concentrating on finding out faults with a person or a team which is fighting for a good cause, we should take some possible burden on our head for fighting for the reforms. This applies on every body who thinks them selves as nationalist, learned and wise or otherwise also.


To me we should have only one point program at a time like this:


Constitutional Jan Lok Pal Bill,

If not and or if it fails and otherwise also,


Launch agitation to dissolve parliament,

If not or otherwise also,


Defeat Nehruvian Congress of India and its past, present and would be allies in all the forthcoming elections,


Political reforms,


Prosecute all the leaders of Nehruvian Congress of India and their allied leaders and punish them. Disqualify their parties.


Remove the names of Nehruvians from all the projects, schemes and landmarks. Remove their statues and paintings as the case may be from roads, gardens and public buildings.

One equally important point is not to create and float any other subject for discussion like, Muslims, Vedas, Atheist, Theist, Christians, RSS, Undivided India, subjects of worship, temples, etc… In fact Nehruvian Congress of
India wants some people who are having crisis and or complex of identification, to float less relevant or insignificant or even irrelevant subjects for discussion. This is with a view to divert the attention of mass to divert the attention from frauds, scams, scandals and blunders of Nehruvian Congress leaders, and to divide people.

We should not give any coverage to the persons who are Anti-Anna, Anti-Modi, Anti-Ramdev, Anti-Subramanian. This is necessary to avoid indirect negative image on the people fighting against Nehruvian Congress and its allies.

Tags; Jan Lok Pal, Joke Pal, Fraud, Citizen charter, reforms, Anti-Modi, subject of worship, temple, religion, Nehruvian

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: