UNEDUCATED ACADEMICS WROTE LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER NARENDRA MODI

Some persons listed at the end of this blog, reported themselves as prominent persons and self established intellectual persons. They have shown their sensitivity on the recent atrocity incidents in India.

LACKING IN COMMON SENSE:

It is a matter of common sense that India is a large and thickly populated country. When British left this country it was hardly having its share in the world trade and production. Generally it was exporting raw material and importing finished goods.

Somehow or other Nehru took over the rein and he ruled with huge majority for nearly two decades. By that time India remained poor. Once in the parliament Dr. Lohia had announced “out of 50 crores of population, 40 crores persons’ daily income is less than four Annas(25 paise).” Nehruvian Congress corrected the figure while replying to the statement, that it was not 25 paise, but 27 paise.

We know that it does not make any difference. But this was the outcome of Nehru’s rule of nearly two decades.

During this period Nehru introduced reservation by caste. But did not take care to look as to who took the benefit. Indira Gandhi also ruled with huge majority for more than two terms inclusive of two years with autocracy. She expanded the scope of reservation to more castes. Both the Nehruvians kept this type of reservation as a permanent feature. Ambedkar was for reservation only for untouchables and that too for a limited period of 10 years.

None of the Nehruvian cared to see as to how the reservation functions. i.e. Who are getting benefitted all the time,  and who are deprived of the reservation despite of being Dalit?

NEHRUVIANS WANTED THE RESERVATION SHOULD WORK LIKE THAT ONLY.

i.e. Those lower caste families who have improved their status would continuously take the benefit of reservation. These beneficiaries were their own people and they were to keep hold on vote-bank to misguide their own people. Nehruvian Congress was fond of creating this situation which was most favourable for them under “Vote Bank Politics”.

A State Governor’s son/daughter was entitled for reservation but a poor Dalit with little less percentage to the son/daughter of a Dalit caste Governor was miss the  reservation. 

This policy of Nehruvian Congress still works with minor correction.

POLICY OF IDENTIFYING A PERSON BY CASTE AND RELIGION

To identify a person by its caste had created heavy class conflict during Nehruvian Congress rule since 1970 when Indira Gandhi float “Garibi Hatao”.

Indira Gandhi deep rooted the Caste-ism in 1971. In nineteen eighties and nineties there were riots also. During Nehruvian Congress rule they instigated the riots so that the hatred get expanded and become very deep rooted. This was the culture Nehruvian Congress.

DROPs OF A DEVIL’s BLOOD

Just like a devil blood drop, dynastic cultural parties took birth due to the success and victories of Nehruvian Congress under vote bank politics. 

Now let us come to the point about the sensitivity of these elite persons of the list, who wrote a letter to the Prime Minister indicating their great concern on atrocity on Dalits and Muslims.

Yes. Now the gang has added Dalits. Previously the gang used to talk of Muslims-Christian mix. The idea behind the adding Dalits is to keep them away from rest of Hindus. Because Dalits are still poor and less literate and thereby they can be mislead very easily.    

WHO IS THIS GANG?

These persons are termed as “academics”. “Academics” is a quite confusing term. Similarly the same is with “learned”, “Educated”.

Literally an Academic means a studious or an expert in a field who is much more than a learned. Learned means it is simply holding some certificates, just like our Man Mohan Singh who was committed to Nehruvians’ instructions.

ARE THEY QUALIFIED?

A person has to be qualified to opine on an event. He/she is supposed to be “Educated person”. “Educated person” is that person who has understood the issue and he/she has the capacity and expertise to solve the issue.

“Conflict between or among communities” is a social issue.

After all, every issue barring “science and technology”, all are the social issues. Social workers supposed to be sensitive on social issue without discrimination.

A SOCIAL ACADEMIC IS SUPPOSED TO BE A SOCIAL SCIENTIST.

A Social scientist must know the historical back ground of an issue at hand. A social scientist must have the sense of proportion and the sense of comparability. The social scientist is not supposed to play a “Blame Game”. The social science is also a science. A scientist is not supposed to play a Blame Game.

But suppose a social scientist wants to show his research work and want to submit the REPORT then what should be done?

It appears from the letter addressed to the Prime Minister, these self recognized academics have jointly signed the letter. They do not have sense of proportion and they have not gone through deeply into the issue. An Academic must be studious. But here they have not studied the issue.     

A community may be composed of a Class, a Service, a Caste, a Religion, a Region, a Language… 

HAVE A LOOK AT THE HISTORY

(1) JL Nehru had kept the Indo-China boarder knowingly insecure all the time. This was a big factor for India’s quick defeat. It causes a CAKE WALK VICTORY FOR CHINA. Minimum 3000+ soldiers were killed, due to the folly of Nehru.

To ask the security forces to sacrifice despite of prolonged military infiltration of China, was not a sensitive issue?

(2) Indira’s folly/scam was the Simla pact, where the victory achieved by the Indian army was converted to total defeat.4000+ Indian soldiers were killed in that war.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

(3) Union Carbide defective deal belonged to Indira Gandhi. Bhopal Gas hazard was the out come.25000+ persons were died and 500000+ were injured for life time.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

(4) Anderson was provided with Government vehicle by Arjun Singh in association with Rajiv Gandhi to have a free pass to leave India.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

(5) Hundreds of Hindus’ temples were demolished in Kashmir before and after the Babri Mosq demolition.

Were these not sensitive?

(6) In 1989-90 thousands of Hindu women were raped, tens of thousands of kashmiri Hindus were murdered and lakhs of Hindus were driven out. All these were done with the pre-planned and openly using loud speakers on Mosqs and on Jeeps, asking Hindus to adopt Islam or to runaway or be ready to get murdered.

Farukh Abdullah had run away like a coward. Nehruvian Congress did nothing to establish human rights of Hindus. No investigation, No FIR, No arrest, No prosecution, what to talk of punishment to the culprits?

Farukh and his son were not even disqualified for elections. On the contrary their failure was rewarded by establishing them as the CM of J&K by Nehruvian Congress by extending support to them.

This was the unparallel breach of human and natural rights of Kashmiri Hindus in the world history, where the Muslims inclusive of locals and Muslims across the boarder jointly executed butchery, under the willful inactions and negligence of local political Muslim leaders and the Nehruvian Congress leaders.

What sensitivity by these signatories had been shown?

(7) Even after this also, several carnage took place where Hindus were identified,  driven out of buses and  straight way shoot to death.

Had these signatories shown any sensitivity?

(8) Please note that, in Kashmir, or in Kerana or elsewhere no Muslim was killed. Hindus were only killed.

(9) Besides this terrorists attack by Muslims of cross border with and without association of local Muslims, during Nehruvian Congress party rule, was maximum. It was a total failure of Nehruvian Congress government’s intelligence services, or the Nehruvian Congress in association with their cultural allies made the intelligence service ineffective or the same has been ignored willfully. When the defense top officers had complained that the defense have no spare parts, what to talk of services.

On these terrorists attack, the Nehruvian Congress government was a total failure.

Had these signatories written a letter to the then Prime Minister?  

(10) To talk about riots of 2002, is a fashion of some gangs so called intellectuals. But they never link the riots with the blazing of Sabarmati Express Coach C-6, at Godhra Railway station under a pre-planned conspiracy of a local district head of Nehruvian Congressman.

Victims were 59 Hindus because they were Hindus and returning from Ayodhya. In the post Godhra riots, both the communities had suffered. Hindus were also killed and Muslims were also killed. In the police firing of that Modi Government, Hindus were killed much more. Otherwise also Hindus were killed in unaccounted stabbing organized by the Muslims community, which was continued round the year.  

(11) Before Bombay Blast attack, the Government of India had issued instructions to costal security guards, to inspect the ships in the Arabian sea leniently. This was under the pressure of an allied party’s top leader, of Nehruvian Congress. This gave a smooth way for the terrorists of Bombay blast, to enter India through western sea coast.

(12) During Nehruvian Congress lead Government, there was a common feature of having terrorists’ attacks.

Had these signatories exhibited their concern?

All these indicate, that this lot of signatories is not educated. This lot has acted under Nehruvian Congress and its culturally allied parties’ political agenda. If this is not correct then they must be fool or childish.

Now let us scrutinize the list of these lost so-called literate people;

THE CONTENTS OF THIS LIST.

Bengalis are 53 and they are 14 in Calcutta. Can CPIM & TMC & Nehruvian Congress not manage to get signed this much ?

Persons belonged to Kerala, Chennai, Hyderabad and Bangalore is 26. Can CPIM and Nehruvian Congress no manage this much?

Christians are 13.and Muslims are 11. Most of them are against NaMo. They can manage easily.

Persons studying or serving in Foreign Universities are 70. They party with above lot. Otherwise also they are prone to mislead.

In Gujarat the persons from  IIM and SEPT  of Ahmedabad are 5. Among these five, three are female and 2 are male. All these five are non-Gujaratis. They failed to find a single Gujarati to sign. How marvelous?

If you count like this; take Bengalis, Hyderabadis, Bengaloris and Chennait including those studying serving  in foreign countries,  and then add Christians and Muslims plus JNU and Ramjas Delhi and Delhi University you have a clear cut picture of the conspiracy.

There is no intellectual lot in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, MP….  Etc… of rest of India.

What a funny picture?

They could have found some people for the name sake from these states. But who will work so hard.

Thereby this gang has obtained signatures from their own contacts. Yellow journalism gives them out of proportion coverage, instead of scrutinizing the matter. Yellow journalism of India is very well lacking from investigative approach. Yellow journalism is always concentrating how to construct the matter with emotional sentences. In one case they had given 40 crores to distribute among media to not make noise against a deal in UPA government.

One Odd man Sudhir Chandra is detailed as Historian . Vinita Chandra from Ramjas College must be knowing him.

Another odd man a Chinese female Ying Chen working in USA has signed.

Ms Kiran Asher might be knowing her.

We can do some more research, but it would be useless once fact is established.

Many of these so called educated persons might be carrying an impression that why had they kept mum on greater evil acts took place during Nehruvian Congress rule (as narrated above) on an excuse that they were walking with perambulator.

If it is really like that, then also they are not pardonable. Because many of those issues are alive on date. E.g. The Kashmiri Hindus are not re-established in their home. Still they are refugees.

Besides this, when Narendra Modi lead government taking action to re-establish them, then the local Muslim leaders start agitating against re-establishment activities on flimsy and un-sustainable ground of demography. The same people did not react when the Hindus were being driven out. Why? If you can drive out a community then also demography gets changed. Why did you not agitate to secure the human rights of Kashmiri Hindus?

None of these elite signatories has made any noise when atrocity cases took place during Nehruvian Congress Government. These cases were of the order of 40000 every year?

In fact these signatories and their sponsoring political gang is enjoying the atrocity on Dalits. The caste-ism is not supported by any Hindu scripture and the caste-ism though ready to die, but the Nehruvian Congress party lead gang, wants the caste-ism should prevail for secure their vote bank. It is a weak part of Hinduism so far it is survived. However the elites of Indian society are trying to uplift Dalits and trying to bring them in main stream.

The Nehruvian Congress openly dividing the nation based on not only Caste, but also based on Religion, Region and Language ….

The divisive culture of Nehruvian Congress lead gang is known to wise people of India very well. That is why the said gang is trying for survival at any cost to the nation. The gang is spreading and floating false, twisted, misinterpreted issues and news to create a negative atmosphere for the Narendra Modi lead government.

People have identified the gang.

NARENDRA MODI GOVERNMENT IS THE ALL TIME THE BEST GOVERNMENT.     

TRUTH PREVAILS, NOT UNTRUTH.

COPERATION OF ALL, DEVELOPMENT OF ALL

THESE ARE THE SLOGAN OF NARENDRA MODI GOVERNMENT.

These fellow signatories and their sponsored parties and some sick media  would be ashamed of their deed, when they will find the developed India by 2014 under the government lead by Narendra Modi.

As per email received by me they are as under:

Odd persons : Do you know the history of the back ground? You must know that India is changing very fast under the leadership of Narendra Modi. There are gangs who possess political agenda to capture power at any cost to the nation.

Better do not poke your knows where you are not educated.

Shirish Mohanlal Dav

Read Full Post »

UNDER WHOSE NOSE ARE/WERE THEY FLOURISHED AND SURVIVED?

UNDER WHOSE NOSE ARE/WERE THEY FLOURISHED AND SURVIVED?

CASE ANALYSIS 

Manmohan Singh must be prosecuted for not changing the system of recording and processing financial transactions. Not only this but it is on record that Sonia and RaGa used to instruct Man Mohan and the cabinet, how to act on every issue. Thereby Sonia and RaGa must also be, not only made answerable, but be arrested for exerting unconstitutional pressure on Man Mohan Singh, for prosecution. Man Mohan Singh should also be arrested for failing in his duties though he had taken oath that he would remain faithful to the constitution. It is a case of breach of public trust against him. How RaGa can be allowed to tear out a draft resolution prepared and passed by the ministerial cabinet?  

Why all, these?

(1) At the time of Harshad Mehta’s fraud, Man Mohan was the finance minister. He had stated before the parliament that the case of Harshad Mehta had taken place due to some system defect, and now he would modify all the systems which are prone to generate frauds.

(2) Thereafter this Finance Minister got promotion and he had been made Prime Minister by the Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies. This was done because either Sonia wanted to enjoy only extra constitutional power only or she was not eligible for PM-ship because our Indian Constitution does not permit any person to become a minister if he/she/it has lean towards citizenship of other country. Though Sonia had gone to the president with a proof of majority support of the MPs to her, the Nehruvians and its cultural allies made a drama as if Sonia was not willing to become the PM. After playing this drama Manmohan Singh was made the PM. The possibility of a treaty between Sonia and Manmohan Singh cannot be ruled out that he would accept the unconstitutional authority of Sonia Gandhi while taking any decision.

(3) And the people of India had come across the Satyam Scam in his first term of PM. Man Mohan Singh should have at least resigned. But he did not resign and continued to act as the PM to obey the instructions of unconstitutional authorities like Sonia and RaGa. This is on records.

(4) It appears though Man Mohan Singh had stated before the parliament in 1994 that he would make the systems of financial transactions fool-proof, he did not do that. The reason may be either he was not capable to do that or he was prevented to do that. Who had prevented can be guessed by even a primary student of economics.

(5) In both the terms of Man Mohan Singh, a lot of financial scandals took place and the financial position and prestige of India had gone to dogs.

(6) The then RBI governor should also be taken to task for his all ill advises to the government and or for keeping mum.

(7) Man Mohan Singh even did not pay any regards and heed to the instructions of the Supreme Court to form a Special Investigation Team to unearth Black-Money. Nehruvian Congress willfully allowed to lapse three years and it lost the elections in 2014. Narendra Modi the new incumbent did form the SIT within three days.

(8) Now the Nehruvian congress leaders and its culturally allied parties leaders are spreading lies and rumors of the scam of some Modi, which has no relation with the PM Modi, though the birth of this scam had taken place in 2011. The Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies are trying to allege PM Modi, to divert the attention of public to hide their own criminal inaction.

Could we taken to task “Sonu Nigam” for the faults of a Nagar Nigam?   

All these eight points, read together, and consider together, the intention related with actions/in-actions/mum/negligence/avoidance by Nehruvian Congress leaders becomes sky clear.

A SIT must be formed to investigate into all evil acts of Nehruvian Congress. They must be arrested on un-bailable warrants. A caveat must be filed so the leaders of Nehruvian Congress cannot get stay orders from the SC without hearing the prima facie of presented by the BJP government.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

CHAMATKRITI  (चमत्कृति);

A well known story of a Sardarji. (Sardarji-s would excuse us, as they are tolerant) 

A Sardarj went to a medical store near Regal Talkies, and asked for a castor oil as he could not go to toilet for the last two days. The shop keeper inquires whether he would purchase 100ml bottle or 200ml. Sardarji inquired the price. The shopkeeper said 100ml would cost Rs. 50/- and the 200ml would cost Rs. 75/- Sardarji purchased 200ml for the benefit of Rs 25/-.  He drank the whole bottle there and there only.

He might have hardly reached Flora fountain, an enormous pressure started. The stream of excreta commenced and started marking the road.  He inquired about toilet. A person told him to go to railway station. Sardarji started nearly running to the station. When he just reached the toilet of station, a man asked him where is Flora Fountain? Sardarji said “follow this line. The origin is the flora fountain”.

Compare: Randeep Surajewala stated under the nose of the PM Narendra Modi, Nirav Modi has escaped.

The question is under whose nose or line of excreta flushed from bowels, Anderson, Quattrocchi and Daud had escaped?

The whole world knows the origin is Italy so far the line of excreta had to be followed by Ottavio Quattrocchi.

Read Full Post »

NEHRUVIANS HAVE SPOILED THE MINDSET OF INDIAN MUSLIMS

It is a matter of surprise that the Nehruvian Congress has become successful to instigate a big lot of Muslims, even on the matters not related with Hindu-Muslim relations, that the court case of “Triple Talaq” has been generated by Hindus.

AN EPISODE OF A BOOK SHOP

In a book stall of Islam, there was a display board, which was indicating the Issue of “Triple Talaq” is being misunderstood, and Muslims are not favoring the existing provision of Triple Talaq. We are ready to discuss. Please come and discuss with us. So far the display is concern, it is fine, that Muslims are ready to protect the human rights of Muslim women.

Just as a curiosity I asked whether the existing method of giving Talaq to a Muslim woman  by a Muslim man, simply by spelling out “Talaq Talaq Talaq”, has been supported by Koran or not? It was a simple question, which could have been replied under “Yes” or “No”.

But instead of this, the Muslim young man tried to explain at length. He said, it the misunderstanding and misinterpretation of our own Muslims of what really has been provided in Quran. Then he explained that there is provision of one month gap, between each word “Talaq”. We are ready to provide justice to our women. Why the Government should interfere?

The Muslim further added, “Look … we have our own marriage ritual. When the Government does not interfere in marriage ritual, why should it interfere in our system of “Talaq”? What is more important? “Marriage” or “Talaq”? Marriage is more important in the life than the “Talaq”. When the Government does not interfere in an important matter of “marriage” then why is it interfering in the less important matter of “Talaq”. Talaq is a personal matter. Two partners of the life, are not ready to live together. One person wants to be separated, how can we force him to live together? In Quran, there is a procedure as to how to deal with this matter of talaq. It asks the husband to say Talaq once. Then a time period is given for one month, during which the wife has to stay in the same house, so that both can rethink on the idea of separation. They have scope to improve their performance. Once again a time of one month is given after the spell out of second “Talaq”. Then ultimately the third time “Talaq” is spelled out. What is wrong in it?

Off course the Muslim was silent on the procedure which is being applied in practice with the Muslim woman. I had no interest to pose to put cross questions.

The Muslim continued. He said when the Government does not interfere into the injustice made to Hindu Dalits, Hindu women, why should it interfere into Muslims? Look … I can show you Manu-Smriti. How much injustice made to Dalits and women?

I tried to clarify, that Manu-Smriti is not a recognized book in Hindu religion. Recognized book is Veda and Bhagvat Geeta. Since the language of Veda is difficult to interpret, there is a simpler book named Bhagvat Geeta. However if there is a contradiction between Veda and Bhagvat Geeta, then what Veda has said, has to be accepted. Besides this Shankaracharya has said, that what Veda said, that contradicts to our experience then what experience tells us, is to be accepted. E.g. If Veda says Fire is cool and our experience says Fire is Hot, then Fire is Hot is to be accepted.

The Muslim was not interested in this matter, he said, “Look at Jasodaben …?”

I said “Jasodaben? Which Jasodaben.” I could not link Jasodaben to this topic

HAD JASODABEN BEEN MUSLIM

The Muslim said; “oh! You do not know Jasodaben? Jasodaben is the wife of our Narendra Modi. Had this Jasodaben been a Muslim, she could have already re-married to another person if Narendra Modi would have given her divorce.”

I said “Jasodaben and Narendra Modi had mutually agreed to remain separate. Narendra Modi had taken clearance from Jasodaben, to live their own lives in their own way. If Jasodaben asked divorce, it would have been given by Narendra Modi. What is wrong if two persons get separated with mutual understanding? Look at the episode of Buddha. Buddha had not even taken the permission from his wife and he had left her even without any intimation.

The Muslim fellow was suddenly stopped the discussion and said “oh it is my time for Namaza” I am going. He went away.

What the Muslim fellow reflected to me an impression which was quite uncalled. He linked Hindu religion in the matter of “Triple Talaq”.

WHY THIS IMPRESSION IS BEING CARRIED BY MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS?

The responsible person and party for generating this atmosphere and mind set of minorities, is Nehru and his party.

NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS HAS NO GUTS

Nehru though presenting himself as a logical person, he himself was lacking in logical interpretation. He wanted India to be a secular country. But what was his definition of “Secular”?

In accordance to his belief and action, the definition of “Secular” means “let the religious minorities live their lives in their own way. The Government and the Constitution will not interfere in their traditions, rituals and lives. Even if any interpretation needed, the interpretation on any religious tradition, rituals and rights will be accepted as has been interpreted by their religious priests. If the interpretation contradicts the human rights provided under the Indian Constitution, the constitutional provisions would be modify to respect the religion of the minority community.

According to the Nehru and his fellow men, the feeling of religious minority community should not be hurt in the name of the constitution of India. It is the liberty of the religious community to have the feeling that “their religion is First” and their religion is above the Indian constitution. Nehruvian Congress leaders and their cultural allies still carry the same interpretation what Nehru had made. Shah Bano case is the good example to read the mindset of these pseudo secular gangs.

IT WAS BEYOND THE INTELLIGENCE OF NEHRU

Nehru was skillful in playing political Dramas. He could do all his adventures during the struggle of independence, as he had a lot money, the money his father earned as a lawyer. This made him very much popular among second level leaders of Congress, because Nehru’s house was the rest house for them as and when they come to Allahabad. Nehru’s dramas made him popular in lower level lots. All these could happen in the pre-independence period. This effect continued for few years after independence too.

WHAT IS DEMOCRACY?

The meaning of democracy is “The truth is honored irrespective of which level it comes from”.

The Democracy is the place “where all are equal before law”

Is it necessary to have the act in regards to a religion for its code of conduct, on the plea to show the respect to that religion?

There is no need to have any Code pertaining to a religion. i.e. To have a Hindu Code, Muslim Code, Christian Code … all is humbug on the plea that Indian Constitution has respect towards other religions and thereby our constitution has the provisions to approve the religious code.

TAKE AN EXAMPLE OF HINDU CODE:

What does a code incorporate?

Marriage, Divorce and Succession.

Do we need such code?

Government must say;   we are least concern with the system, ritual and celebration that you adopt in regards to your marriage. We want you to follow the following procedure.

PROCEDURE FOR MARRIAGE

Both of you should submit an affidavit that (1) Our status is unmarried (2) We want to marry each other (3) Our permanent addresses are as under with photo(4) We herewith  pay Rs xxxx/- to publish notice for inviting any objection from public on our proposed marriage. (5) We will sign the document of the marriage in this office on this Date.

The office of the Department of Family Welfare or the Family Court, would publish a notice with details of Name, parents’ full name, Surname, photos of the coupe of the proposed marriage, addresses etc… in the three prominent local news papers.

The Government is least concern with the ritual, celebration or system what adopted or even not adopted by the couple.

PROCEDURE FOR DIVORCE

Similarly in case of a divorce, the couple would submit an application jointly or separately that they have agreed to be separated under the mutually agreed conditions. The couple would submit a proposed mutually agreed Draft of Agreement. In case of any absence of mutually agreed conditions, the case would be heard (which even now prevails) as usual and judgement would be given to provide justice to each one of the couple.

LAW OF SUCCESSION

In the matter of succession, one man can marry one girl only. The government cannot permit more than one wife at a time. A person must apply for a divorce to the existing partner before getting married to another.

As for the property, the wife has right to 1/3 share of the property of her husband or vice versa if the property is an earned property. If the property is an inherited property, the wife will have the 1/3 of the share of her husband’s share.  Off course 1/3 share is shown here as an example. It may be decided by the Court depending upon the liability.

Law of succession must be same for all the religion and communities. At present the law of succession is different for different communities. It is prone to become a fraud unless the matter is brought before the court of law.

No person can enjoy a right to his own benefit, harming others for no fault of others. A person includes a group, a community based on geography, language, region, religion or organization as the case may be.

WAS NEHRU INCOMPETENT?

Was Nehru incompetent to understand Human Rights and respect towards religion? Nehru was not only incompetent, he was not capable to understand what is meant by justice. He was simply pampering minority to get spoiled.

We do not need several Acts like “Right to Information”, “Right to freedom to express”, “Consumers Right”, “Right to service”, “Right to organize”, “Right to elect”, “Right to call back (though this right is inbuilt in right to elect, but the EC does not entertain this right on the plea of absence of procedure. This looks funny) etc. … provided the Court is capable to interpret all the expressed rights in the light of the human rights.

In short the Muslims need not abuse Hindu religion in the matter of Teen TALAQ, simply because the present BJP lead government does not follow the line of action of previous Nehruvian Congress lead Government.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian Congress, Muslim, Triple Talaq, women, Jasodaben, Naendra Modi, Islam, Dalit, Manu Smriti, Veda, Bhagvat Geeta, Shankaracharya, Drama, pre-independence, struggle for independence,  Religious minority, minority Community, Intelligence, Competence, incapable, democracy, human rights, EC, Constitution of India, truth is honored

Read Full Post »

IF WE KILL MODI, WE CAN LOOT INDIA FOR FOUR TERMS

Nehruvian Congress rule of 60 years, has brought down the political and social moral to the dogs. Nehru and Indira the ever top persons in the Congress were themselves corrupted.

I see the victory of BJP in 2014 as a God given gift to India.

I want to recall the story of Pancha-Tantra where all foxes organize a meeting and start thinking as to how to kill the KARPUR TILAK (an elephant)? They were thinking that if this elephant is killed then they all can have food for four months.

Similarly these Nehruvian Congress and its allied foxes are thinking as to how to uproot this Modi so that they can have rein for four terms (20 years).

(1) TOPPLING THE GOVERNMENT:

Recall the Janata Party uproot in 1979. How Morarji Desai was uprooted.

Indira Gandhi instigated Charan Singh. She and Yashvant Rao Chavan instigated him to come out from Janata Party. They assured Charan Singh that they will support him forming the Government. Then Charan Singh toppled Mararji Desai. Then Indira and Yashvant betrayed Charan Singh. Charan Singh was toppled.

This strategy was tried out by Nehruvian Congress and its allies when Narendra Modi was approved and appointed to lead the Election Champaign. Advani was prompted by Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies with the help of media to oppose Narendra Modi. But the agenda failed miserably because Advani was a failure. He had been given chance twice (2004 and 2009) where 2009 was a favourable occasion. But it was Advani’s failure.

A chance had been given to Modi in 2014. Modi knew the strategy and he was successful. It is not possible for Nehruvian Congress to break BJP like what they did to Janata Party in 1979.

(2)NEGATIVE ATMOSPHERE:

Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies have so many options as how to uproot Modi. One of them is to create negative atmosphere for Modi. Hence on every small issue with the help of media they create controversy. J&K border insidents, JNU, Akhalak, twist on Mohan Bhagvat’s statement …. . In social media also some persons trying to divide the votes knowingly or unknowingly by floating dead issues.

The spokespersons of BJP are some what mild and not harsh. In fact they are supposed to hit them hard continuously. Since they are failing, it is common men’s duty to hit hard on Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies. Slowly the spokespersons of BJP would come up, but we as a well-wisher of the Nation, will have to be alert in exposing Anti-BJP’s activities. Fortunately, in social media we have good number of supporters of Modi. But we have to attack on these traitors restlessly.

(3)BREAKING INDIA:

The Nehruvian Congress has another strategy of unifying all Anti-Modi parties at the time of elections. This is more dangerous because the common mass is illiterate and literate leaders are selfish. Narendra Modi will have his strategy as to how to fight out under such situation. But in such situation, social media will have to attack Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies in Chorus.

Common mass will have to forget its own priorities. We must know that if BJP gets defeated then India will have to wait for minimum next 20 years. By this period there are extremely high chances of disintigration of India. This would be the great harm to the nation. If India would be disintegrated, Sanatan Dharm would end up. Pakistan, many Muslims within India, Communists and Christians priests are very much eager to see that India gets disintegrated. We have some intellectual slaves who believes that India was never a country. 

(4) KILL MODI:

One must know that antisocial elements are the product of Nehruvian Congress. It is a long story.

Nehruvian Congress had won the elections and retain the power with the help of anti-social elements, e.g. Unrest Communists, Maoists, Naxalites, smugglers (sukar Bakhia, Yusuf Patel, Ratan Khatri, Daud Ibrahim, Cross border Terrorists, Bhindaranvale, Azam khan, Shahbuddin, Babloos, Pappu etc… These are the product of JL Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi.

It is not extremely difficult for Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies to kill Narendra Modi.

Nehruvian Congress can go to any extent just like terrorists. Nehruvian Congress can execute joint venture with Pakistan ISI, and terrorists organization, in killing Narendra Modi. They must be planning for this. This fact cannot be ruled out.

Why Anti-Modi-s are so much furious?
The next stage of action for Narendra Modi is the property held by Nehruvian Congress and its allies in India and outside India. Most of the black money is accumulated in the property abroad. Property held in India will be the first target.

To stop such action, to kill Modi is inevitable. You will find many TV Channels will change their voice. “Chauthi Duniya” has already changed its voice.

Chauthi Duniya has reported that the supporters of demonetization are anti-nationals.

The soft targets are Modi’s relatives. They can be bribed or pressurized or kidnapped or killed. This possibility cannot be ruled out.  

(5) IF MODI IS KILLED THEN WHAT WOULD BE THE STRATEGY OF NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS: MEDIA WILL PLAY A BIG ROLE.

Recall when Morarji Desai was toppled then media gave very large scale coverage of all fake and controversial points against Morarji Desai and Janata Party. Media had given wide coverage to Indira’s slogans “Vote for Government that works”. (actually this was a bogus slogan. Factually Nehruvian Congress has never worked for the nation).

We will have to face and fight out against the Anti-BJP coverage of media. We will have to counter attack and hit very hard. Be ready for this situation.

(6) SUBSITUTE OF MODI: AMIT SHAH, PARIKAR, RAJNATH SINGH, V. K. SINGH, SHIVRAJ SINGH CHAUHAN are all honest.

We should give coverage to these leaders.

If the opposition could not be able to uproot or to kill Modi by the end of 2017, then the opposition would never to be able to kill him. They would become weaker and weaker day by day.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Rochelle Drive, Plano, Texas, USA

Tags: Demonetization, Property, Black Money, Anti-BJP, Anti-Modi, Nehruvian Congress, Cultural allies, joint venture, anti-social elements, smugglers, Sukar Bakhia, Yusuf Patel, Unrest Communists, Maoists, Naxalites, smugglers, Ratan Khatri, Daud Ibrahim, Cross border terrorists, Bhindaranvale, Azam khan, Shahbuddin, Babloos, Pappu Yadav, Mullayam, Laloo, media, Janata Party, Morarji Desai, Charan Singh,

Read Full Post »

THANKLESS VASIM AKRAM A HERO OF KASHMIR FLOOD

It has been reported that a young person named Vasim Akram by virtue of his humanity, had saved a lives of a lot Kashmiri people during the last flood hit the region of Kashmir.

The Government of India and several celebrities have recognized him as a hero.

The aforesaid hero was invited to KAUN BANEGA MAHA KARODPATI. There were several celebrities headed by our recognized as most popular hero of the century Amitabh Bachchan at the Show.

There was no reason for me to devaluate the honor accorded to Vasim Akram. Everybody would appreciate the government’s strategy and effort to save the lives of Kashmiri people and honoring Vasim Akram.

VASIM AKRAM

Look at the mindset of Vasim Akram.

When Amitabh conveyed the contribution of Indian soldiers in saving the lives of Kashmiri people. Amitabh mentioned and conveyed thanks to Indian soldiers, for their marvelous contribution by working day and night for several days.

WHAT DID VASIM AKRAM SAY?

Vasim Akram said “it was the duty of Soldiers to save the lives of Kashmiri people. They perform their duties…”

(“But as for me” Akram adds) “Neither anybody had forced me nor any body had asked me to save the lives of people of Kashmir. I have done this for the sake humanity. I worked without any discrimination. I did not look whether they are women or man, old or young, wealthy or poor, city or village. I simply worked out of my humanitarian approach, and determination of my own. On the contrary my family was asking me to stay at home and look after them.”

In short, a person having worked for victimized Kashmiri people for the reason of humanity, willfully fails and hesitate to thank Indian soldiers.

WHO WERE THESE INDIAN SOLDIERS?

These are the same soldiers who are being killed by Muslims designated as terrorists, with the cooperation of local Kashmiri Muslims. Soldiers are always attacked by stones and bullets. Despite of this the Indian soldiers at the risk of their lives, worked all the time without taking any rest to save the lives of Kashmiri people though these Muslims have treated them their enemy all the time.

We can understand the meanness of Yasin Malik and leaders having similar culture, could be thankless people. They enjoy the liberty as they are allowed to enjoy that liberty by Nehruvian Congress government associated with their cultural allies, that the Indian soldiers have not done any obligation by saving the lives of Kashmiri, because it is their duties. This is because the people of this gang lot are scoundrels and rogues. But is it applicable thankless for a common man who has been identified as a hero reported to be carrying humanity with him?

If a person of Kashmir and also a Muslim, have such culture of being thankless, then be sure that Muslims are going to be doomed at least in India as per the verdict of Koran. When God wants to punish a person then he create a situation so that he gets lost.

Now look at the mindset and cultural aspects of a Hindu.

Hindus never fail to submit their thanks to an entity by whom they are obliged and survived. Hindus would not look at the entity whether it has obliged by virtue of its duty, whether it has obliged by its nature, whether it has obliged willfully, whether it has obliged with an expectation from you say “Thank You”.

Hindus knows that we are being survived by the God made entities. Hindu knows that it is also the entities on which we should be thankful. That is why a Hindu does not worship only the God, but a Hindu looks and understand the obligations of the entities made by God. Hindu is not conveying his thankfulness once a while, but the Hindu worships them. Hindu knows that the human kind is under obligation of Fire, Air, Rain, Water, Ocean, River, Mountain, Earth, Nation, Animals, Sun, Planets and whole Universal conscious. Now these Hindus a real secular formation of God, have a lot obligation on Muslims. Muslims should try to look within themselves to understand as to how much they are obliged by Hindus.

Now if Vasim Akram had worked by virtue of the humanity within, then what has he done for the Hindus who had been driven out from their own houses by Muslims in 1990? Vasim Akram would say he was walking with perambulator at that time in 1990. Is this answer acceptable? No.

This answer is comparable to the answer being given by Farukh Abdulla, Omar Abdulla and all their goons. They say that at the time of massacre of 1990, they were not in Kashmir.

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that this reply is OK,

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they have no duty to perform when they came back to Kashmir.

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that They have no duty to act to bring back the Kashmiri Hindus from the tents.

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they had no duty to investigate who were the culprit who had executed massacre.

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they had no duty to perform as to who published the notices in newspapers of Kashmir, asking Hindus to run away from Kashmir to save their lives if they are not ready to embrace Islam,

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that it is not their duty to investigate who printed the communal posters, who pasted the communal posters on the wall asking Hindus to run away,

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they have no duty to perform to look at the misery under which the Kashmiri Hindus are living for decades together,

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they it is none of their duty to have any priority to reinstate these Hindus and to provide any relief to them.

Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that they have no duty to perform to take action against the leaders and persons who make communal remarks against Hindus of Kashmir on the matter of their settlement.

But these   Farukh, Omar and the goons cum scoundrels think that it is their duties to make noise on the issue of AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD.

Why?

Because a piece of land cannot be given the Amarnath Shrine Board, whose Chairman is Governor of J&K who is not a Kashmiri. Not an inch of Kashmir can be given to the Governor. Nehruvian Congress is a crook and cunning. Nehruvian Congress was watching with a joy. Indian government was foolish that it could not make a minor change in the structure of Amarnath Shrine board, make Hindus of Kashmir in the Board. Not only this it avoided to even think to dissolve the Board and could form a new trust.

Look at the mentality that these Muslims leaders. They used to watch the attacks on pilgrims of Amarnath but when any point related to the interest of Hindus arises they bluntly agitate to prevent it.

They are not ready to think that the Hindus give money to pay their Hujj-subsidies. Indian citizens pay billions of rupees to uplift these Kashmiri Muslims but the leaders and heroes of Kashmir are thankless to even make a note of it. They have become wealthy with the aids given by India.

WHAT IS THE FAULT WITH THESE MUSLIMS?

Hindus do not mind on the point that these Muslims were Hindus once upon a time.

Now if these Muslims think that they have opted a better religion then they are supposed to prove it. They prove contrary to it.

These Muslims prove the religion they chose is the worst religion. This religion has spoiled their culture and character.

Hindus have culture and tradition of believing in universal brotherhood. These Muslims even do not care for their own brothers simply because they are Non-Muslims, even if these non-Muslims rescue their lives.

 HAVE YOU EVER HEARD?

Have you ever heard Mahesh Bhatt, Shabana Azmi, Shah Ruck Khan, Amir Khan, Javed Akhtar and any other celebrity for agitating on the inaction of Farukh, Omar and Nehruvian Cong leaders?

THE REPLY IS AN ABSOLUTE AND BLUNTLY NEGATIVE.

Why?

Is it because, they are controlled by D-Gang? Yes. No one can discard this. How these celebrities and the learned analysts of TV Channel kept criminal mum on the suffering of Hindus of Kashmir?

If this allegation is false that these people are worth for still worse culture.

It is a high time to rethink on these converted Hindus. They have simply not lost their entity and culture of universal brotherhood which they had possessed when they were Hindus, but after becoming Muslims they have absolutely refused to recognize Non-Muslims as human being.

If the rationalist Muslims will not come out to educate these thankless community, then God will not spare them too.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Muslims, Vasim Akram, Kashmir, Hindu, Muslim, Farukh, Omar, Goon, Scoundrel, crook, Nehruvian Congress, leaders, pseudo secular, universal brotherhood, culture, character, responsibility, duty, Thankless

Read Full Post »

AAMCHI MUMBAI AND MARATHI MANOOS PART-2

AAMCHI MUMBAI AND MARATHI MANOOS PART-2

HISTORICAL BRIEF

Before understanding the Marathi manoos, we should recall the history of post Mogul period.

During the last days of Aurengzeb, the Mogul empire was nearly broken up. This could be mainly due to the religious militancy of Aurangzeb. The simplicity of Aurangzeb was not liked by many regional heads. They acted high handedly with Hindus in the name of Aurangzeb. This was against the tradition established by Akbar.

The successors of Aurengzeb were not that bad. But the damage could not be made up. Initially Maratha-s were stronger. then Peshvas became stronger. After the defeat of Bajirao – II, India got divided under small kingdoms. These kingdoms were fighting with each other. British tactfully handled the situation and got direct hold of many regions.

BRITISH RULE AND EDUCATION

British introduced English educational system and also established universities. Because of many regions had been covered by the kingdoms for local governance, the upper class and upper caste could come up as a white collar service class lot.

Marathi people are falling under this category. Gujarat (present Gujarat State) was made of many kingdoms, thereby the educated people had not to go out of Gujarat for a job. On the contrary due to Marathi ruler Gaekwad, Marathi people were dominating in services in Baroda state. Similarly people of upper caste were dominating in the rest of Gujarat.

Due to development of Mumbai during the period of British, Mumbai had provided good employment opportunities.

Pune and Mumbai were the good education centers.

In Gujarat, Baroda, Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar were education centers.

Calcutta, Madras, Banaras and Allahabad were good education centers in rest of India.

That is why South Indians, Bengali and Bhaiyajis (Hindi speaking regions mainly UP and Bihar) were dominating in government services all over India.

Gujarati educated class was divided in textile, commerce, trade and local education. Hence people from other regions had to come to Gujarat for central government job.

Due to language problem the local government services (services in kingdoms), were not available for other regions, these were available for the locals. However for labor jobs, outsiders had good opportunities.

Similar was the case with Mumbai.

IS IT A SOCIAL ISSUE OR POLITICAL ISSUE?

After independence the scenario got changed. Especially in Maharashtra.

The small scale industries were coming up. To meet the demand in white collar and labor jobs, outsiders started coming in Mumbai in large scale. Due to Mumbai being commercial capital, the jobs in Central Government had also been increased. South Indians started getting white collar jobs significantly in Mumbai.

In second half of ninety fifties, Nehruvian Congress noticed that Vote Bank Politics has good opportunities in Mumbai.

Initially Nehruvian Congress tried to divide Mumbai under Gujarati and Marathi as we have seen in part-I.

Nehruvian Congress was partially successful. But this was not enough. Due to heavy number of labor class, the vote bank of Communist was not insignificant. Similar was the case with service class.

To reduce the strength of Communists, Nehruvian Congress produced Datta Samant.

To corner the vote bank of Marathi, Yashvant Rao Chavan produced Shiv Sena.

Sharad Pawar produced MNS to reduce the strength of Shiv Sena.

IS IT ABSOLUTELY POLITICAL?

Yes. So far politics is concern, especially the politics of Nehruvian Congress, NCP, Shiv Sena and MNS is concern, the Issue of Marathi Manoos is political.

The politicians have nothing to do with the interest of Marathi Manoos.

Why?

Shiv Sena is of the opinion that Marathi Manoos is getting neglected in employment, we are here to safe guard the interest of Marathi Manoos.

If it is really like that, then what about the infiltrators coming from Bangladesh and living in Mumbai?

Similar is the case of cross border antisocial elements. Daud Gang is working in Mumbai. It is smuggling and resolving disputes of real property-cases, out of court. What should be the role of Shiv Sena?

Is it that Marathi antisocial elements are getting jobs in the network of Daud? Is it that the allotment of huts on the encroached land of the Government, the Sena is one of the parties? What is Sena’s role on the Bangladeshi infiltrators?

LEAVE THIS ASIDE

If outsiders are capturing the job where the Marathi Manoos has a lien, then who is responsible for this?

The responsibility lies only and only with ruling parties in Maharashtra. The ruling party in Maharashtra is Nehruvian Congress and NCP alliance.

WHAT IS THIS NCP?

NCP got itself separated from Nehruvian Congress simply because Sharad Pawar has no scope to become PM if he remains in Nehruvian Congress. This is because, “Number One post” is reserved for Nehruvians.

The agenda of Yashavant Rao Chavan and Sharad Pawar has always remained, to share the power. They are the cultural Incarnation of Nehruvian.

But how can multiple incarnation exist simultaneously?

How Rama and Parashurama had existed simultaneously? God can go beyond the principle of physics. Similarly Nehruvian Congress is supposed to exist as multiple parties.

During emergency, Yashvant Rao Chavan had supported Indira Gandhi. When she got defeated, he deserted her party. When she won again he joined the same party.

Sharad has a culture to support any party which can serve his vested interest.

The undivided Shiv Sena had supported Emergency of Indira Gandhi as soon as she imposed.

What is the “Interest of Marathi Manoos”?

Is it not, one type of reservation?

Yes it is a reservation in job.      

WHAT IS THE POSITION OF EMPLOYMENT

Nehruvian Congress has established a culture that the jobs, and mainly the government jobs, are for Charity.

If the governance is corrupted, every system would be failed.

You can keep any types of entrance examination for entry in a service, it would be a failure.

e.g.

ONCE UPON A TIME (ONCE COULD BE VERY WELL MANY)

Once upon a time, a cash of one crore rupees was seized from the house of a Chairman of Public service Commission of Punjab. This gives you the appropriate message of functioning of the governance.

Even the GRE examinations which is being conducted by foreign institution, the cases of leakage of question papers occur. Off course it is good that the institution cancels the examinations and conducts re-examinations.

Once upon a time there was a news line on a rate of 2 Crore rupees for becoming a Rail Board Member. This amount was collected from GM West Zone by a Nephew of the then Railway Minister.

Case of Railway recruitment for Class-IV advertisement published in local newspapers of Bihar and not in vernacular papers of Maharashtra.

All the times, the railway stations of zone and or divisions in Western Zone  get flooded with Bihari candidates. Look at as to how many number of Bhaiyaji working in Railways. Are Marathi Manoos not capable to function as Class-IV?

There was a case where MTNL Mumbai had to appoint 40 Stenographers. 39 candidates belonged to Kerala, were selected. A noise had been made by Shiv Sena. Was the noise not justified?

Similar could be the case with non-Marathi Mannoos also. Marathi Manoos too acts like this to some extent.

I was in Prabhadevi MTNL building. I noticed very few Gujaratis even in Class –III. The population of Gujarati in Mumbai is not less than 20 percent. At least 10 percent Gurajari Manoos could have been employed by Marathi Manoos in Mumbai. Gujarati Manoos are almost like Marathi Manoos in Mumbai. That is, they speak Marathi as well.

CONTRARY TO THIS, WAS NOTICED IN MUSCAT

In the building of Ministry of Communication in Muscat, more percentage of the Gujarati Manoos had been employed by the Muslim ruler of Oman than they are employed in Mumbai.

Now look at the Central Government Offices in any state barring Gujarat and Maharashtra, you would find, all most all local persons right from Class-III to Class-I. You cannot think of a non-local person employed by a local head of the office or industry.

Yes. As for UP and Bihar and North East states, the matter is little different.

In Bihar and UP you will find Bengali officers in good numbers. In North East you will find domination of Bengali speaking officers.

Bengali, Maravadi and Bihari would employ their own people in their shops or restaurants.  Whereas a Gujarati would employ locals. That is why Khasi (the local people known as Khasi) would not trouble Gujarati during local riots.  

As for North East states, the officers would say; “local people are lazy, and they do not like to work.”

As for Gujarat, the outsiders say: “Gujarati-s do not know English.”

But one should know about the English of Non-Gujarati peoples too. It is not remarkable. In fact the shortage of good correspondents is a worldwide phenomenon.  

I can quote a lot examples on the English of Non-Gujarati-s. An ITS (Indian Telecom Services means who are recruited directly after passing a competitive examination) officer who once upon a time was in Material Management in the Directorate of Communication, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi. Since he was in Material Management, he was supposed to be good in English. This is because for constructing the specifications, in a tender, one has to be good in drafting. This officers was transferred to North East. The reason of transfer was not his English.

I found him, not able to write a letter promptly. He used to take full one day to prepare a final draft of a letter of one page, paper size A4.

I have worked under a lot ITS officers. Hardly 5 percent were worth for their post. I would like to mention only 3 remarkable Officers. One was excellent in every field. Another was excellent in strategy. Third one was good in relations.

First two were ITS officers, but they were Departmental Outsiders. Departmental outsider means they were already working in a lower post (Class III), but had been appointed to the cadre, as they passed the examination of ITS.

The government is run by IAS, ITS, IPS, IFS etc… officers. Their capability is nearly the same. Nearly the same, means they are not worth for the post they hold. If Narendra Modi is to scrap these cadres, it is not bad.

But what is the answer to the Subject issue “Marathi Manoos”?

It is only the mismanagement of bureaucrats and self-centeredness of politicians.

Why the states could not do development of their own?

Shiv Sena and MNS leaders are making Marathi Manoos fool. If this is not true then they themselves are fool.

What is the difference between a stray dog and a lion?

If you hit a dog by throwing a stone, the dog would run towards the stone. Lion would deal with the person who threw the stone.

Shiv Sena and MNS leaders are like stray dogs. They attack Hindi speaking entrants, instead of hitting Nehruvian Congress and NCP leaders.

The cause of unemployed Marathi Manoon, is Nehruvian Congress, its culturally allied leaders in UP, Bihar, Bengal and Maharashtra (NCP).

The unemployed persons coming from UP, Bihar, Bengal etc.. are not at any fault. They are starving there. They leave their homes, they leave their relatives, they leave their friends, when they come to Maharashtra or Gujarat. Their intention is not to trouble Marathi and Gujarati Manoos.

RESOURCES:

The water level in UP, Bihar, Bengal is not below 15 feet. Bihar has coal for 400 years. Bengal has forest. All of them have man power. What do you need for productions? Kashmir is called Heaven on the Earth. North East is called the land of Kuber the wealthiest king of India.

Marathi Manoos individually, are not bad. This is just like Vora and Khoja among Muslims who are not bad. But Muslim leaders defame the whole community. Similar is the case with Manoos of UP and Bihar.

Yes. As for infiltrators, the government should act high handedly.

Suppose, the development in India becomes very fast, and it is balanced also, then what should be the policy on Son of the Soil?

You should follow the policy of Gujarati business man. Employ the best suitable person on merits.

Even in Government services, if one is sincere, intelligent and hard worker, he/she would be in heavy demand. He/she would not be identify by a region to which he/she belongs. This is true only if the next superior is not self-centered.

JOB IS NOT A CHARITY

In Nehruvian Congress, by virtue of birth in Nehru family, the Number One power post is 100% reserved for Nehruvian progeny. This has produced parties with similar culture, in many states. This has spoiled the social and working culture in India.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Aurangzeb, Mogul, Maratha, Marathi, English, Education, King, kingdom, Upper, Class, Caste, job, employment, university, Mumbai, Calcutta, Madras, Bhavnagar, Ahmedabad, Pune, Banaras, Allahabad, Gujarat, UP, Bihar, Bengal, North East, Maharashtra, Peshva, Gaekwad, Baroda, Datta Samant, Shiv Sena, MNS, NCP, Nehruvian Congress, Sharad Pawar, Chavan, antisocial

Read Full Post »

WAS M. K. GANDHI RESPONSIBLE FOR DIVIDING INDIA? Part – 2

WHAT WAS THE DEPARTING KICK OF BRITISH?

Gandhi had expressed that he was deadly against partition.

British had sent Crips Commission who was to discuss the partition conditions. It was not to discuss any other options.

MK Gandhi who was the invited member to participate to help the Congress in presenting the case as to how to achieve freedom. But the way the British framed the basic conditions for independence was not acceptable to MK Gandhi. MK Gandhi asked Congress working committee to pass a resolution to boycott the Cripps Commission.

The Congress members did not agree to the advice of MK Gandhi. At that stage MK Gandhi said loudly that had been my Subhas here, he would have definitely obeyed my advice of boycotting the commission. MK Gandhi further said, when the committee members are determined to accept the partition, I cannot be a member of that committee. He boycotted the commission by resigning from the commission. I would not be a party in dividing India. Then MK Gandhi said “No body in Congress is ready to discuss with me and even no body in Congress is ready to hear me”.

This was the time when the leaders who were outside the Congress, should have stand by the side of Mahatma Gandhi firmly. But they did not. They were either divided or confused. No body stood by the side of MK Gandhi to support him.

The call of “Direct Action” given by Jinnah had made most leaders to realize the inevitability of division of India. People were also of the opinion that there was no option but to accept partition.

MK Gandhi too realized the necessity of partition, at that moment of time under “the Call of Direct Action” and the decisive approach of British Government and Muslim league leaders. Jinna was of the opinion that Muslims are different culture and there by different nation. Muslim needs a separate nation. Congress and MK Gandhi were not for to accept the theory of two nations. Once Gandhi asked Jinna if you become Hindu, in what way your culture would be different than a Hindu. Jinna could not reply to MK Gandhi. It was an historical truth that the origin of most Muslims in India is Hindu. Those who are not, they have also adopted the Hindu culture.  

What were the other options for independence of India?

THE OTHER OPTION WAS “FEDERAL UNION”

What meaning of “Federal Union”?

The meaning of Federal Union was to be worked out. As a simple meaning of Federal Union was a Union of Pakistan and India. Pakistan and India were to exists under the Federal Union, but India and Pakistan were to get autonomy in certain fields of governance. It was possible to pressurize British on the option of “Federal Un ion” had the proposal been made unanimously.

The British was firm in saying that the independence means to leave India with making proper arrangement and provision in a treaty that shows that they have cared to provide security and rights of all the communities of India.

FEDERAL UNION COULD NOT GET MATERIALIZED

The characters in dealing with the proposal for Federal Union were JL Nehru, Sardar Patel, MK Gandhi and Mhammeda Ali Jinna. It was not possible and advisable to call them at one place and to conduct the discussion. This was because it was a matter of confidentiality. Its premature disclosure can create a lot of problems. British can exploit the matter for instigating different community leaders indirectly to play decisive role. Bhulabhai Desai was the messenger. He was meeting and trying for consensus with Jinna, MK Gandhi, JL Nehru and Sardar Patel to make them agreeable on Federal Proposal.

Bhulabhai Desai met Sardar Patel and MK Gandhi. They were agreed to it. Then Bhulabhai Desai met Jinna. Jinna too agreed to it in principle. Bhulabhai Desai met JL Nehru. He totally disagreed to the proposal of Federal Union. JL Nehru out rightly rejected the proposal.

MK Gandhi was ready for Federal Union. It was the Semi Undivided India. i.e. It was united India. It was also divided India.

Then Sardar Patel went to JL Nehru to understand as to why had JL Nehru straight way rejected the idea of Federal Union.

Sardar Patel learnt that JL Nehru had a thought that it was highly possible that MK Gandhi would select Jinna as the head of Federal Union and he would have to work under Jinna. JL Nehru had allergy of Jinna. (Earlier at one stage Nehru had declared that if Jinna agrees to Undivided India, then he would not appoint Jinna even as his peon.)

However Sardar Patel reviewed the other factors. These were about the character and likely aptitude of the kings and kingdoms. Many of the kings were greedy and prone to get instigated for their own freedom and conditions. It was a matter of a lengthy and time consuming frame work for preparing accession or amalgamation conditions. Besides this the presence of decisive British was also there. They were keen to instigate self-centered and communal leaders to divide India in many other pieces. That is why MK Gandhi and Sardar Patel thought to divide India in two nations to avoid India, breaking in multiple pieces.

BRITISH WANTED TO DIVIDE INDIA IN MULTIPLE PIECES

India, Pakistan and the kingdoms. As for the people of Kingdoms, they may decide at a later stage either they would remain as an independent kingdom or they may conduct plebiscite as to affiliate with whom. British said “We would provide the independence to the kings for their kingdom. We give them two option. They can remain independent. They can have accession either with India or Pakistan by adopting a fair plebiscite.”

MK Gandhi was of the opinion, that it was the Muslim leaders who were keen to divide India. As for Congress, the leaders were not ready to delay the independence any more. British were ever ready to spoil the situation. Gandhi and Sardar thought, it would be better to accept the independence with divided India. In democracy, the real power belongs to the people. It would be better to try for reunion at later stage.

MK Gandhi had foreseen the likely massacre to some extent after partition. He tried his best to prevent them and to build unity. He had gone on fast to establish peace. The peace was urged to both the people of both the communities. But some took it one sided without going through the details.

MK Gandhi wanted to visit Pakistan to try to reunite the nation. He wanted to see that the peace get established at least in Delhi. Because if both the community have no faith in each other they cannot reunite.

WISDOM-LESS, SELFISH CONGRESS LEADERS

MK Gandhi was very much upset, when he learnt that the leaders of Congress who belonged to the region of Pakistan had run to India instead of staying in Pakistan for enforcing harmony with Muslims.

When Gandhi aksed them, the Congress leaders said “our life was not safe”.

MK Gandhi said, “So what? I have taught you to be brave and fearless. I have taught you to be ready to sacrifice everything. I have taught you to die. I have not taught you to run away. You are all coward. Had you been killed there, I would have been pleased a lot. I would have danced on hearing the news of your death. I would have really danced a lot.”

Now those who are having mindset to abuse MK Gandhi, they take the above Spell outs as that has been spelled out before Hindus who ran towards India. In fact the words were spelled out before Congress leaders of Pakistan.

MK Gandhi wanted the Congress leaders to remain in Pakistan. Had the people of Congress been nationalist, they would have remained in Pakistan. They could have formed a political party named “Pakistan National Congress”.

Look at the Muslim leaders. Many of them remained in India and formed an Indian Muslim League. The decisive Nehruvian Congress has joined the hands with the Indian Muslim League since 1958. There are lots of Muslim Organizations in India. It is only Nehruvian Congress who instigated Muslims to remain isolated from Hindus.

Soon MK Gandhi experienced that many Congress leaders were exerting pressure on him to get some position in the new government. Not only this but the leaders who to had deserted Pakistan, and had come to India to share the power. MK Gandhi publically declared to dissolve Congress.

“Diary of Last three months of Gandhi in Delhi” written by Manuben Gandhi, provides the full information on the role played by MK Gandhi. There is a day to day diary of MK Gandhi’s last three months in Delhi before he was killed. Manuben Gandhi has given report day to day and word to word. Those who read MK Gandhi would never carry a feeling that MK Gandhi had any attitude to appease Muslims and Muslims leaders. Instead he appears to be deadly against Muslim leaders. He has at one stage said that if Pakistan is not capable to provide proper securities to Hindus, India should attack on Pakistan and take over Pakistan.

WHO WAS DANGEROUS FOR MK GANDHI? JINNA OR JL NEHRU?

Yes. It was JL Nehru who was more dangerous.

No provincial party committee had suggested the name of JL Nehru for PM’s post. Nehru declared before MK Gandhi that he want to head the government, then Gandhi told him that none of the provincial party committee and the CM has suggested his name.

It was the moral duty of JL Nehru to withdraw his name. But instead of doing that, he kept mum and silently left the room. MK Gandhi thought that Nehru is likely to do some adventure. This adventure would break the Congress party at that crucial stage when the separatists including British were working hard to weaken the Congress. MK Gandhi called Sardar Patel and got an assurance that Sardar Patel would see that Congress remained united.

It is needless to say that JL Nehru had already created a socialistic Group within Congress with a freedom to abuse other Congress leaders like Rajgopalachari, Sardar Patel etc…

MK Gandhi knew that in democracy nothing is final. Let JL Nehru be the PM, till the general elections under new constitution gets conducted.

But unfortunate to India, MK Gandhi was murdered, Sardar died before general elections. JL Nehru used media to divert the attention of public from his failure in external affairs, his failures in planning and wisdom-less vision. It is a matter of surprise and a matter of research as to how the learned people made no noise.

JL Nehru had become intolerant and autocrat. He became hungry of power. JL Nehru himself has written this, for himself to have a fun on himself.

A good opportunity had come, to have Federal Union. Iskandar Mirza had proposed for “Federal Union, in 1955. It was a good and proper time when everything was OK locally. The people who left their property in Pakistan were alive and this issue was also alive. Pakistan was ready to resolve this issue bilaterally. But JL Nehru indecently rejected the proposal of “Federal Union” without discussing it at any level.

WERE THEY DEAF AND DUMB?

The learned people including the learned people talking too much till date for passing blame on MK Gandhi for partition. They are feeling great for themselves for this, but they kept mum instead of calling for a strong agitation for Federal Union in 1955. Federal Union was the first step toward Undivided India. Most of the leaders who had abused Congress and MK Gandhi for passing the blame of dividing India, were very well alive and capable to launch wide spread agitation in favor of “Federal Union” in nineteen fifties. They never agitated for Federal Union, even that proposal had come up from the Pakistan. Not only this, these leaders had kept mum even on the absolute blunders of JL Nehru on external affairs related with Tibet, China and Burma in nineteen fifties.

Was it difficult for them? Was it that these were political issue and thereby they (RSS) cannot take part in politics?

It was never difficult for them. It was not a politics. It was related with and great concern with humanity and national interest. Despite of this they behaved like deaf and dumb.

It was not that there were no agitation during 1950-1960. It was not that that RSS was less popular. In fact at most of the school compound and street, RSS was running RSS Shaakhaa. Golvalkar was also alive. A lot of other agitations took place during 1951 to 1960. But none tried either for Federal Union nor against the Himalayan Blunders of JL Nehru.

The victory of Nehruvian Congress in 1952 was fraudulent. The victory of Nehruvian Congress was a fraud. But the defeat of pro-RSS parties made their leaders weak and frustrated. They achieve some confidence only when Nava Nirman agitation unseated the Nehruvian Congress party in 1974. The Nehruvian Congress party had earlier 140 seats in Assembly out of 168 in 1972 assembly elections.

It is needless to say that it was Jai Prakash Narain a veteran Mahatma Gandhian who lead the agitation against Nehruvian Congress and defeated Nehruvian Congress badly in 1977. The inaction and frustration of worthless leaders of RSS, VHP, BD and some leaders like Advani, Sushma, Murlimanohar gave life to Nehruvian Congress.

WHY MK GANDHI DID NOT GO ON FAST?

(Continued)

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian Congress, Federal Union, kings, kingdom, Cripp’s Commission, Gandhi, Bhulabhai Desai, Sardar Patel, RSS, VHP, BD, leaders

Read Full Post »

APOLOGY IS A TRAP

APPLOGY IS A TRAP:

Apology is vague term being used to trap BJP and NaMo.

LOCAL NEHRUVIAN CONG LEADER’S PLAN

It is nothing but decisive stupidity to give exclusive treatment to 2002 riots of Godhra Aftermath.

These riots had taken place as a reaction of blazing of Railway coach where 59 Hindus were burnt alive, under a planned conspiracy of a local leader of nehruvian congress of Godhra (this local leader had run away in Pakistan soon after blazing the coach). If on account of Godse, the whole of RSS is Godse, then it is beyond doubt that whole Nehruvian Congress and its allies are terrorists. Godse at least was devoted to his (decisive) thoughts, he did not ran away from the spot he killed MK Gandhi. But here in case of the blazing of the railway coach conspiracy of Nehruvian Congress leader, ran away to a country which is the source of production of terrorists.

HOW CAN WE EXPECT ONLY GUJARATIS SHOULD BE SAINTED?

Only individuals are not only the living organism. Each group of living organism is also a living organism with different properties, behavior and aims. Refer “One and One only Not even Two” on “Advait” at treenetramDOTwordpressDOTcom.

How can one expect Gujaratis to behave like saints, in this India whose atmosphere has been spoiled as a result of Nehruvian Congi’s rule of 60 years with anarchy?

ONE HAS TO GET QUALIFIED

Who is qualified to ask Gujaratis to behave like saints? No one is qualified.

Now look here. As for every terrorists act, Muslims and the pseudo secular use to say, it was a reaction of Muslims, due to demolition of Babri mosq at Ayodhya. Such reactions are in multiples in numbers, and appears to remain for unlimited times, right from 1993 Bombay blasts to 2008 multiple blasts.

Then how do the Muslims and the pseudo secular can qualify them selves, to defame others?

BE AWARE:

Look if Nehruvian Congress would continue to rule, the Muslims are likely to see worst situation for them due to the double standards of pseudo secular and nehruvian congress.

Soon India would get converted into a communal country like Pakistan. Pakistan is horrible for other other religions.

NARENDRA MODI IS A MAN OF FULL WISDOM:

Narendra Modi knows very well that for the common mass, the main problem is the monetary problem. Development can solve all problems. That is why people go to Gulf countries, European countries and America. Why poor mass from Bangladesh, infiltrates into India? They infiltrate mostly for searching some job, barring some political reasons.

Fortunately Narendra Modi is becoming popular and most likely to take over the rein of India is good for Muslims in India, because under the 11 year rule of NaMo, Gujarat is peaceful and does not show any reaction even the Muslim terrorists had attacked Akshardham Temple and some other places with several blast thereafter. If nehruvian cong and pseudo secular cannot have culture to appreciate this, hell is ready for them. When the God wants to destroy some body, he makes them to get lost by their brain. 

The irrational Muslims and pseudo secular should be thankful to NaMo and the people of Gujarat that they decided to remain in peace despite of several odds. Why don’t you call them saint? They have stopped reacting despite of the decisive role of Nehruvian congress in governance.

A TRAP  IS LINKED WITH APOLOGY

I do have the reply. It is just like a question to put a person into a trap, against his NO FOUL or principles.

One should compare this episode just like Nehruvian Cong and its allies along with some secular ask Narendra Modi (to trap him), as to why Narendra Modi does not submit apology for the Godhra After Math?

According to this pseudo Secular gang, the GANG wants Modi, to make Modi responsible for the killings, on the plea that Narendra Modi was the CM, and thereby he was responsible for the Godhra Aftermath.

But Modi is clever enough to void the trap. He knows that this pseudo secular gang wants to trap him, by picking him up, exclusively. He puts a question. He says if I am guilty hang me. How one can relieve a guilty person on his apology?

This is because; many riots have taken place in India and also in Gujarat. Many of them were even bigger than 2002 of Gujarat. None of the CMs was asked to submit apology. Why only Narendra Modi exclusively is being asked to submit apology?

Similar is the case with Capital punishment to Bhagat Singh.

British asked Gandhi to request British government to reduce the punishment from capital punishment to some lower one. By asking MK Gandhi like this, they wanted to trap MK Gandhi on his principle of nonviolence. If Gandhi requests the British Government the way it wanted, the British were very much ready to trap Gandhi, to contradict him and can abuse him for his double standards. Off course MK Gandhi was the last person to deviate from his faith. He said bluntly that he is in principle against the capital punishment. Otherwise also, Gandhi had said very clearly on many occasion that British government had proved not trust worthy. British government had failed in keeping their words.

However at this moment of time, it is not desirable to favor the floating of such controversial or even any matter that can defame Mahatma Gandhi, because according to many the call of the current period is to concentrate to defeat Nehruvian Congress.

MK Gandhi is widely honored all around the world. He has become a man of inspiration of many great people. If he would be abused by some body, the group to which the critics belong, would become unauthentic and unreliable. Similar would be for Modi where Modi will be honored equally.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Trap, Narendra, Modi, 2002 riots, Nehruvian Congress, Local leader, conspiracy, Godhra, Railway Coach, Living organism, Group, Bhagat Singh, Gandhi, Capital punishment

Read Full Post »

Hypocrite Spineless Nehruvian Congress derogates Narendra Modi

Hypocrite Spineless Nehruvian Congress derogates Narendra Modi

Very recently when Narendra Modi pointed out the failure of foreign policy of Nehruvian Congress, Kapil Sibbal miserably failed to reply Narendra Modi. Kapil Sibbal had once again exposed his party’s low level culture. Kapil Sibbal has no logical material to defend the allegation made on foreign policy of Nehruvians and its Congress till date. To hide his government’s  folly and self-centeredness of Nehruvian Congress, he diverted the point of discussion to some irrelevant episode related with Narendra Modi. In fact in Narendra Modi’s case also, actually Nehruvian Congress itself is at fault. That case too, exhibits the failure of foreign policy of Nehruvian Congress.

This is about the statement Kapil Sibbal where he himself is a part and parcel of Nehruvian Congress and the government led by its own party.

Kapil Sibbal asked Narendra Modi to first obtain US VISA, before telling about the failure of his party’s foreign policy.

It was the responsibility of Nehruvian Congress

Who is responsible for the denial of the US Administration on issue of US VISA to Narendra Modi?

It is Nehruvian Congress who is absolutely responsible for this failure.

One must know that the US administration is always working in the interest of its Nation. It could be a short term also. As a part of its policy it opted to balance the Muslim Lobby against the hatred prevailing against Muslims in the USA. The US administration picked up an opportunity when the Nehruvian Congress lead government of India applied for the VISA for Narendra Modi.

The US diplomacy knows very well that Nehruvian Congress party is spineless and self centered too.

The US administration knows very well that the Nehruvian Congress will get pleased instead of protesting severely for showing disrespect of Indian Constitution and Indian judiciary. The US administration knows very well that Nehruvian Congress will never react against the denial of the VISA. Instead of this, it would try to take political mileage. The US administration proved correct in its assumption, as the Nehruvian Congress and its allies shamelessly are trying to derogate Narendra Modi on this episode. Nehruvian Congress leaders miserably failed to understand that the US Administration is not bothered on democratic values when matter is related with other countries irrespective the other country is a democratic one or autocrat. Pakistan which was generally remained under martial law, was favored out of way by the USA against India. All the US Military aids had been utilized by Pakistan against India and the USA had kept mum.  

What should be the stand of Nehruvian Congress Government?

Before the ground of denial of VISA is accepted by Nehruvian Congress leaders, they are supposed to know the inherent assumptions of the US administration about India. This can be  logically derived by our government.

1          What are the comments of Nehruvian Congress leaders, on the points which could be raised, consequent to the denial of VISA? Had they any comment at all?

2          Whether the election of Narendra Modi had been challenged in any court of law of India?

3          Whether the post held by Narendra Modi was constitutional or not?

4          Does this Nehruvian Congress want to protect the dignity of Indian Constitution or not?  

5          Whether the Nehruvian Congress believes that the constitution of India is authentic or not?

6          Whether the parliament that had passed the constitution of India was lawful or not?

7          Whether the Indian Constitution is democratic or not?

8          Whether India is a republic or not?

9          Whether all the governments elected by people of India were constitutionally authentic or not?

10        Whether the election commission of India is a constitutional authority or not?

11        Whether the judiciary of India is constitutional authority of India or not?

12        Whether any FIR has been lodged against Narendra Modi or not?

13        Whether the Nehruvian Congress lead Government had applied for the US VISA for Narendra Modi or not?

14        Whether the election of Narendra Modi had been challenged in any court of law of India?

15        Whether the Nehruvian Congress has submitted any protest against the US administration that distrusted the Indian constitution and insulted the nation and its constitutional authenticity?

16        Whether the Nehruvian Congress has taken any type of diplomatic action to maintain the dignity of people of India or not?

Any reply of Nehruvian Congress leaders would prove their hypocrisy. Nehruvian Congress from the very initial stage, has not only avoided democratic values but it has also avoided national interest and dignity, for achieving personal benefits.

Look at the failures of Nehruvian Congress

Nehru under his folly of 1950 to 1962, allowed China to have a cake walk victory to occupy Indian land of 92000 square miles, though Sardar Patel had warned Nehru in 1950.

We would never know the truth kept hidden by the Nehruvians on the demise of LB Shastri.

Nehruvian have executed defective contract deeds irrespective of trade, production or diplomatic.

Punchsheel with China: We are the looser.

This has caused to irreparable harms to India facing till date,

Indira lost all the gains achieved by the military in 1971 war with Pakistan, under Simla pact in 1972.

Indira Gandhi had an uncalled treaty with the USSR before the Indo-Pak war 1971, that both would have mutual consultation on internal and external issues.

What information Indira got on disintegration of USSR?

Was she consulted at all by USSR when the latter was under disintegration? No. Nothing. She was no consulted at all. She was kept in dark in toto.

Union Carbide Deal: Generated Bhopal Gas hazard. Victims got nothing meaningful compensation due to weak deed with Union Carbide.

Safe passage of Anderson, Quatrochie, Daud and what not?

Nehruvian Congress failed to influence

Nehruvian Congress failed miserably to dominate by its influence on neighboring countries as small as even Ceylon and Maldives.  Ceylon can ignore India and Tamilians, leave aside domination.

Not only this, but many small neighbors are controlling Indian market and currency through introducing fake currency notes and money laundering.

Indira had designated Bhindaranvale as a saint who had organized terrorists network with the help Pakistan who latter flourished its network in India.

Even Burma which was a part of India in early decade of last century had driven out all Indians from Burma in fifties. Contrary to this, under Nehruvian Congress rule, of the order of 5 crores infiltrators in numbers from terrorist countries entered and settled in India during the period from 1969 to till date. Many of them got Unique Identification Card as Indian Resident.

Indira Government had released 90000 (ninety thousands)  POWs (Prisoners of War) of 1971, within in one year, whereas she and her successor Nehruvian Congress failed miserably even to get release of 500 soldiers (POWs with Pakistan) from Pakistan, even after a lapse of 40years.

Nehruvian Congress leaders have no capacity to execute diplomatic reactions.

Very recent example is Nuclear Deal.

Wikileaks had leaked a communication. A Nehruvian Congi Minister had assured an US Diplomat in India that his government had kept several crores of rupees ready to bribe MPs to vote in favor of Nuclear Bill. The Indian further said that he would like to show the money if the US diplomat wanted to convince himself of the arrangement made by Nehruvian Congress. The US Diplomat had communicated this position to the US foreign affairs. This communication was leaked out by wikileaks.

Now there are two possibilities.

Either the US Diplomat told lie to the US foreign affairs or he told the truth.

Nehruvian Congress had said that it was a lie.

If it was a lie, then what action had been taken by the Nehruvian Congress with the US?

If Nehruvian Congress is of the opinion that Wikileaks had lied, then it should tell the people of India as to on what ground it assumed it to be a lie?

If Nehruvian Congress has no ground and otherwise also it should ask the US foreign affairs that they should clarify and confirm that it was a lie.

If the US does not say anything then the Nehruvian Congress should say to the people of India that the US does not reply. It should also initiate diplomatic reaction against the US administration on this issue.

If the US Foreign Affairs says it was on their record as to what the US Diplomat in India had conveyed was a truth, then either Nehruvian Congress should take severe diplomatic reactive action against the US administration as the US Diplomat in India was a responsible person. This is because Nehruvian Congress has already declared it was a lie.

Now if the Nehruvian Congress does not act at all, then it means that it is a spineless government and has no guts to take diplomatic action against the USA.

Thereby under all the circumstances Nehruvian Congress led Government gets proved a spineless, coward and inefficient government with all round failures.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian Congress, minister, Foreign policy, US, Diplomat, wikileaks, Narendra Modi, US VISA, denial, report, reactive, action, spineless, coward, inefficient, failure, government

 

Read Full Post »

IS IT THAT KAPI SIBBAL IS ILLITERATE?

AFTER DOING ALL THESE, WE ARE CULTURED AND HONEST SAYS KAPIL

Is it that Kapi Sibbal is illiterate?

Three years back at the time of general elections campaign, Kapil Sibbal of Nehruvian Congress had announced that he would give “Akash Tablet” to all the youths at the rate of Rs. 3000/-.

Many youths had deposited money for “Akash”.

Nehruvian Congress came to power again in 2009. The days have been passed, the weeks have been passed, moths have been passed and years are passing. Now a time has come that again the general elections have become due (at any time), but no “Akash” had come down to meet the youths on the earth. Narendra Modi pointed out this fraudulent promise of Nehruvian Congress leader in one of his lectures.

Narendra Modi further said that Nehruvian Congress has a habit and culture to give false promises. It gives false promises not to only to common men, but it gives false promises to youths too. Such type of practice, generates bad moral values in youths. This is dangerous for a nation.

In reply to this Kapi Sibbal forwarded one Akash Tablet to Modi, instead of fulfilling the promises given to the youths of Delhi. Kapi Sibbal further abused Narendra Modi, and asked him to be a cultured leader. This means that to point out the false promises of Nehruvians, is a bad culture and to make a false and fraudulent promises is a good culture according to Nehruvian Congress culture.

 

JL Nehru had taken an oath in 1963 before the Indian parliament that he would not take rest till he would re-capture the land snatched by China during the war in 1962. Now if Narendra Modi would point out this point, the Nehruvian Congress would forward a photo of lost land to Narendra Modi and further it would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.

 

If Narendra Modi would point out the oath taken by Nehruvian Progeny Indira Gandhi of “I will remove the poverty” in 1969, then Nehruvian Congress leaders would send Rs.60/- (the daily wage of NAREGA) to Narendra Modi, and ask him to be a cultured person.

 

If Narendra Modi would point out the promise recalled before a foreign news channel by  Indira Gandhi in 1970 that all the infiltrators came from Pakistan will be sent back to their country, the Nehruvian Congress leaders would send some Bangladeshi Muslims to Gandhinagar and further the would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.

   

Recall the statement of Nehruvian Congress ruling Cabinet made during the pre-India Pak war period of 1971 that “India will not give return the land won by India if any war is imposed on India by Pakistan”, and after winning the war with the great braveness of Indian soldiers, it was announced by the Indira Gandhian Cabinet that Pakistan will have to sign a package deal and will have to meet the demands as under:

 

What was the PACKAGE DEAL”?

Reimbursement of all the expenses incurred by India due to this war on India imposed by Pakistan,

Return of the land of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, so that the Issue of Kashmir ends up,

Take back the all the infiltrators and refugees came from Pakistan in India,

Settlement of property cases of Hindu refugees came to India from Pakistan in 1947-48,

Deportation of anti-social elements that had committed crimes in India and taken shelter in Pakistan,

All the fishermen and whatsoever Indian prisoners available in Pakistan jails will have to be released,  

“No war pact” with India,

No hatred and propaganda against India in Pakistan,

 

 

Unless Pakistan signs this pact, then only the Prisoners of War (90000 soldiers who were fed by India with due respect from 1971 to 1972) and the land won by India during the war would be returned to Pakistan.

 

But what has been happened in Simla pack?

No gain for India,

Indira Gandhi returned all the POW i.e.  90000 soldiers,

Indira Gandhi returned all the land pieces that had won by Indian soldiers,

Indira Gandhi also returned the land piece of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) on which India had the claim,

 

On the other hand Pakistan released no Indian soldier. They are still with Pakistan, in 400+ numbers, in Pakistan Jail.

 

Now if Narendra Modi points out this fraud of progeny and party viz Nehruvian Congress, Kapi Sibbal or any damn leader would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and to behave with good culture.

 

It is not a surprise so far Nehruvian Congress leader and their allies are concerned. They have possessed all the evils available in the world. You can write a bigger book than the epic Mahabharat. Nehruvians and their party leaders can abuse any leader howsoever he may be great and popular among learned and common, if he/she opposes a Nehruvian and its party, they will abuse him/her without any logic and sense. They have spared none. They can do any damn thing to hide their evils and divert the mind of common mass by talking irrelevant and baseless.

 

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Narendra Modi, Akash tablet, Kapi, Kapil, Sibbal, Nehruvian, Youth, election campaign, false, fraud, promise, Simla pact, Indira

Read Full Post »