Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Nehruvians’

NEHRUVIANS INTOLERANCE AND DISRESPECT TOWARD HUMAN RIGHTS

Just to create fake controversies, and to divert the attention of the public from the achievements of BJP Government lead by Narendra Modi the pseudo seculars are making noise.

During this short period of 18 months the BJP government has gained a lot of prestige abroad. It has made remarkable changes on foreign policies and local governance.

Due to this reason the Anti-BJP leaders have become terribly upset. They feel politically insecure. However during the last Bihar Assembly election they could realize that the hope to remain politically alive has not become zero.

They have gained a confidence that they can manufacture even fake controversies and can very well create a negative atmosphere for BJP and Narendra Modi.

It is a matter of research as to how the middle level BJP leaders have not prepared themselves to hit back the controversy manufacturers.

Let us read the records of Nehruvians, as to how much had they tolerated opposite views and given respect to human rights !!

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU:

DISRESPECTS:
(1) 1946-47 None of the provincial Congress Committee had proposed the name of JL Nehru for the post of PM. Despite of this, JL Nehru did not withdraw his candidature. This matter was brought to his notice by Mahatma Gandhi. To avoid partition of Congress party, MK Gandhi had to take assurance from Sardar Patel that he would keep the Congress intact and he would not claim for the PM post.

(2) 1947-50 Nehru did not respect the advice of Sardar Patel on foreign policy with China.

(3) 1948 Nehru had abused Sardar Patel on his action on the matter of Hyderabad issue.

(4) 1948 Nehru did not like to respect democratic procedure of taking a decision only after discussing the matter in Cabinet. He took the issue of Kashmir with UNO, without discussing it with his cabinet.

(5) 1952-1962 Nehru never respected the oppositions’ point raised in the parliament on the military infiltration of China into Indian Territory.

(6) 1950s Nehru did not respect the moral aptitude on Jeep Scandal to protect his beloved VK Menan.

(7) 1956-1959 Nehru did not respect the Congress working committee’s decision on Bombay State.

(8) 1956 Nehru as a PM did not respect the neutrality on the dispute between two states. E.g. Maharashtra and Gujarat.

(9) 1962-64 Nehru did not like to respect the qualification, seniority and genuine right of others to succeed him on the post of PM. He acted, out of way and cunningly to see that Indira Gandhi who was less qualified, less dignified, less learned, less experienced, less honest … become his successor for the post of PM.

(10) 1962 Nehru had no respect towards parliament and towards his own oath. He had taken an oath before the parliament that he would not take any rest till he recapture the lost land of India to China. His oath was simply a fraud.

INTOLERANCE OF NEHRU

(1) 1956-1964 Nehru was highly intolerant towards his competitors. Due to stupid foreign policy and stupid defense policy of JL Nehru, China could achieve a cake walk victory over India. China captured 91000 square miles of Indian land. Nehru was solely responsible for the defeat of India. In respect of his failure and to owe the moral responsibility JL Nehru was supposed to resign. JL Nehru had not own his moral responsibility. Contrary to this when he noticed that Morarji Desai is trying to become his competitor for the post of PM, Nehru could not tolerate Morarji Desai. JL Nehru removed him from his Cabinet.

INDIRA GANDHI:
DISRESPECTS:

(1) 1968 she had no respect towards party’s constitutional procedure. The working committee of her party had approved and recommended the candidature of Sanjiv Reddy for Presidential election.

(2) 1968 she had no respect to her own oath. She signed the candidature form of presidential election in 1969, she made campaign for the opposite to party’s candidate.

(3) 1968 she had no respect for the dignity of her own colleagues. As an understanding with the working committee, Morarji Desai had to be absorbed in Cabinet. But without consulting the party president Indira Gandhi removed Morarji Desai from her cabinet.

(4) 1968 She had no respect towards moral values in politics. There were lot of allegations on her doubtful integrity. But she did not resign.

(5) 1975 She had no respect towards verdicts given by court of law. She ignored the verdict of HC on her disqualification.

(6) 1975-1977 She had no respect towards constitutional provisions, human values and democratic rights of others. She imposed emergency and suspended even natural rights of citizens. Her governments representative told on oath before the court of law that during emergency, government can even kill a person at government’s will.

(7) 1972-75 she had no respect towards truth. When she was making statements before the Allahabad High Court on a case against her unfair practice in election and abuse of power, she told 14 lies on oath before the court.

(8) 1975-1976 She had no respect towards humanity. She had put 60000+ citizens behind the bars even without existence of any offence.

(8.1) 1972 She had nullified the victory achieved through the sacrifice of Indian soldiers and people of India. She, under Simla pact, handed over even the land of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) to Bhtto. This land was captured by India in the Pak-India war .

(8.2) 1972 She had disrespect towards her own promise of executing a packing deal with Pakistan to resolve all the issues with Pakistan. She had very good and full scope to execute “The Package Deal” with Pakistan. She willfully ignored it.

(8.3) 1972 Indira Gandhi disrespected even the constitution. To hand over a part of India, to the enemy or to any of the other countries, is against the constitution. That is our Indian cnstitutioin does not permit such transaction of land. POK is a part of India as per Indian Constitution, one cannot hand over a part of India to any other country even with an affirmation of the total MPs. To do like this India has to form a new constitution committee and a new parliament.

(8.4) 1980-83 Indira had disrespect towards the nation. She had joined hand with Bhinderanwale. She had supported terrorism and naxalite movement.

(9.1) 1968-1984 Indira had no respect towards her own words and oaths. She had promised to send back the 10000000+ (more than one crore), Bangladeshi infiltrators. But she did nothing. Her oath was simply a fraud.

(9.2) 1967-1984 Indira had no respect for truth. She floated a lot of fraudulent rumors to misguide mass with the help of her government owned media.

INTOLERANCE OF INDIRA GANDHI:

(1) 1968-69 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to accept the candidature of a person (Sanjiv Reddy), proposed by the working committee of her own party. Resultantly she put up her own candidate viz. VV Giri for presidential election in 1969.

(2) 1972 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to accept the leader elected by the state legislature party members for the post of CM. Indira always asking to accept a person of her own choice. Viz. 1972 Gujarat Assembly members had proposed Chimanbhai Patel with majority, as CM. But Indira Gandhi rejected him and imposed Ghanshyambhai Oza, who was not even an elected member of the assembly.

(3) 1972-1984 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance even if a leader of her own party, if he takes credit of his good work and good achievement. She can tolerate a leader only and only even if he/she gives credit to herself (Indira Gandhi), what had been achieved. E.g. VP Singh, Hemvatinandan Bahuguna and many others were removed by her from her cabinet for this reason only.

(4.1) 1968-77 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to opposite view and opposite voice. She abused even veteran Gandhians like Jai Prakash Narain.

(4.2) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and therefore she had imposed emergency for indefinite period.

(4.3) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and Indira put 60000+ persons behind the bar for indefinite period.

(4.4) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and Indira impose censorship on private media too, to suppress them by force.

(4.5) 1975 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and she even suppress the High Court judgments which were against her government,

(4.6) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and she asked every type of associations, to pass a resolution in its meeting, that the association had supported emergency.

(4.7) 1978 Indira had no tolerance to remain without political power. She instigated Charan Sing to topple democratically elected government of Morarji Desai. She supported Charan Sing and then she betrayed him.

RAJIV GANDHI

(1) 1984 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect towards democratic procedure. He, without looking into the propriety of the President invitation to take an oath as the PM, he took the oath, without the resolution of the working committee and the cabinet of the party and the government respectively. In fact he should have refused to take the oath in absence of such resolutions.

(2.1) 1984-1989 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for the human rights. He avoided action against his party lead carnage on Sikhs.

(2.2) 1984 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for human rights and humanity. He gave a smooth passage to Anderson to runaway safely from India. Anderson was the culprit of Bhopal Gas Hazard.

(3) 1984-89 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for morality. He was involved in Boffors scam. He had written and forwarded an instruction chit through Madhav Singh Solanki a minister of his cabinet, to Swiss Government to go very slow on the matter of investigation related with Boffor Kickback.

(4) 1986-1988 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect towards nation. He gave a smooth passage to Ottavio Quatrochie to run away safely from India.

SONIA GANDHI, CONGI and ASSOCIATES
i.e. The PSEUDO SECULAR GANG

300

(1)The GANG does not like to respect anybody else as “Number One” in the party. Sitaram Kesri was manually lifted and driven out from the seat of the Congi-President.

(1.1) The GANG does not respect the personality of opposite party.

(1.2) The GANG does not respect the achievement of the government of opposite party,

(1.3) The GANG does not respect the constitutional provisions. The GANG paralyses the functioning of the parliament.

(1.4) The GANG does not respect the very purpose of the parliament which is to discuss the matters and exchange the views to arrive to a decision.

(1.5) The GANG disrespects the natural right of opposite party (BJP leaders) to present their side on the floor of the parliament on the allegations made by the GANG.

(2) The GANG disrespects BJP leaders.

(2.1) The GANG addresses opposite party leaders with abusive words. Like “Maut kaa Sodaagar”, “Godse’s progeny”, Communal, Manav Bhakshi, Pishaach, Chaay Waalaa, Intolerant …

(3) The GANG does not have tolerance to any opposite view to Congi’s governance.

(3.1) The GANG could not tolerate Anna’s agitation. Anna Hazare was abused and alleged by all spokespersons of the Congi

(3.2) The GANG could not tolerate Baba Ramdev’s agitation. Baba Ramdev was also abused and manhandled. A lot fraudulent allegations were made on him. Congi had executed investigations too, but found nothing against Ramdev. Despite of this, Congi never thought of submitting apology.

(3.3) The GANG could not tolerate participants’ personality. Kiran Bedi was also alleged and abused. The investigations were carried out but no guilt was found on making money by Kiran Bedi,

(3.4) The GANG had no tolerance to the functioning of the opposite party. The GANG is in habit to manufacture fake controversies.

(4) The GANG does not have any respect for the human rights of Hindus:

(4.1) The GANG willfully neglected the human rights of Hindus in Kashmir, North East and some pockets of South India.

(4.2) The GANG does not have respect towards the rule of law that everybody is equal before law.

(4.3) The GANG has willfully discriminated the Hindus’ human rights.

(4.4) Kashmiri Hindus had been threatened to be ready for the death unless they adopt Muslim religion. They were told either to adopt Muslim religion or to vacate their houses and leave Kashmir. The threat was announced through loud speakers, from Mosqs, pamphlets pasted on the doors, publications through the news paper, writing on the walls and through every means.

(4.5) The Muslims of Kashmir in joint venture with the GANG, had given a dead line date in advance about the carnage they were going to execute.

(4.6) The GANG had committed cognizable offences, as it kept mum, took no action, done no arrest, registered no FIR, initiated no investigation and no prosecution.

(4.7) The GANG kept total non-transparency on the prolonged carnage. It was a cognizable disrespect of protection of human rights of Hindus of Kashmir.

(4.8) The GANG happily watched the murders of 5000+ Hindus, and the migration of 50000000+ driven out Hindus from their houses.

(4.9) The GANG paid no heed on the issue of the rehabilitation of the Hindus. These Hindus are living in substandard living condition since last 25 years. This is nothing but a continued terrorist attack sponsored by the GANG.

What does this GANG want?

The GANG wants Hindus and pro-BJP inclusive of BJP persons should tolerate as under:

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE all the injustice and discrimination applied upon them inclusive of end of their lives and carnage executed by the GANG.

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE even if the GANG curtails suspends or dismisses their human rights.

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG abused them by any bad name

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG manufactures any fraudulent and fake controversy, rumor or allegation upon them,

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE even if the GANG does not use its sense of proportion and or it does not use its sense of relevance while alleging

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG condemns the views of them on historical events even without material

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG terms the material conclusion of existence of some historical character as fake and fictitious and the GANG avoids discussion

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG insults your Gods and Goddesses,

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG does not talk to the point

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG simply shouts while discussion on TV channels and consumes most of the time

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG simply shouts and disturbs them while they submit their replies

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG openly tries to divide society by caste, religion, language and region,

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG stops them and abuses them for speaking against Nehruvians’ frauds, blunders, scams, scandals, stupidity or whatsoever,

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE as the GANG persons are not supposed to tolerate any thing whatsoever against them, even if the allegations are proved in Court of Law. This is because the Gang has full liberty to express inclusive of anti-national, derogative to Indian culture or whatsoever.

HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE as the GANG persons are not supposed to respect any of their right inclusive of human rights or natural rights or constitutional rights whatsoever.

Shirish M. Dave

Tags:

Intolerance, Nehruvians, Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Sonia, Congi, BJP, Narendra Modi, Emergency, Censorship, Media, Pseudo, Secular

Read Full Post »

HOW TO NULLIFY THE SIGNIFICANT GAINS ACHIEVED BY NARENDRA MODI & BJP

खूनिपंजेका खेल

Nehruvian Congress and its paid media inclusive of print media have an agenda to nullify the gains of BJP which has been achieved and being achieved by Narendra Modi lead BJP government.

What are the gains of Narendra Modi?

EVENT OF TAKING OVER

Narendra Modi has made a lot foreign trips. It is normal that a new incumbent has to make more foreign trips in its first term. As for the Narendra Modi lead BJP government, the foreign trips are essential and unavoidable. This could have been foreseen by the foreign policy experts of India, when Narendra Modi invited all the heads of neighboring nations in the ceremony of taking over the rein by the new government. Fortunately at that time the media had given due coverage to the event and had also conducted discussion on the likely strategy of Narendra Modi with the neighbors.

“CHOR MACHAAYE SHOR” चोर मचाये शोर

The next important action taken by Narendra Modi was constitution of special investigation team to investigate into the illegal beneficiary account of Indian citizen in foreign banks.

The formation of SIT was willfully avoided by Nehruvian Congress till it remained in power despite of the instructions of the Supreme Court. But at the earliest coming to opposition, Nehruvian Cong leaders started abusing Narendra Modi, as Modi is going slow on the issue and the people are waiting for as t when Rs.15 lakhs would get deposited in their account. Media used to give wide publicity to the noise and criticism of Nehruvian Congress leaders. It was just like “CHOR MACHAAYE SHOR”. But media never tried to corner Nehruvian Congress leaders on black money issue. In fact it was the Nehruvian Congress party that had established defective system of governance to easily make black/red money. Media concentrated and still doing the same to give wide coverage to the abusive statements of Nehruvian Congress leaders. This is with a view to dilute the news on positive and effective actions being taken by Narendra Modi lead BJP Government.

If one would write on the agenda policy of the paid media or media associated with vested interest adopt double standard one can write so many big books. But let us look at the approach of the media vernacular or national media as the case may be, on the very recent issues/events.

OROP:

The issue of OROP is not a brand new demand. It did exist in 1993 when I was in Defense communication Circle of Eastern India. It was existed even before 1993. It might have become a demand subsequent to end of Janata Party rule in 1980, probably due to some of the reforms made by the Morarji Desai lead Janata Party Government, in the provisions of Natural Rights. This was necessary to restrict the scope for a mad government to curtail the Indian Citizen’s rights. Ref: Indira’s Emergency for securing power.

  Let us not discuss on the material and merits of the issue of OROP. Our intention is not to make the issue controversial, when the Narendra Modi lead government has agreed to the demand in principles.

The people of India have great respect for the persons of defense. This is mainly due to they are different from their counterparts of Pakistan.

IMPATIENCE OF EX-SERVICE OFFICERS

Definitely it is a matter of great surprise as to why the ex-service officers should launch agitation against the BJP Government when BJP Government has agreed principally on the demand of OROP? A question is very natural as to why the Ex-service officers kept mum for decades when the Nehruvian Congress was ruling? Why the ex-service officers have suddenly became impatient on the issue within one year of the BJP Government? Nobody raise this question and nobody gives answer. Nobody discusses on this. No media asks questions to Nehruvian Cong leaders as to why they practically neglected the demand. They can corner the Nehruvian Congress leaders especially MMS, SG, RG, Chidu, DM, FM and HM.

EX-SERVICE OFFICERS COULD HAVE AVOIDED EMOTIONAL BLACK MAILING

Is it that in India it is the right of the agitators to select the time to agitate?

Yes it is ok. But the Ex-Service officers must know that after Janata Party in 1977, BJP is the only party which is fairly dedicated to democratic values in politics. Nehruvian Congress and its culturally allied parties are far away, from political, social and moral values.

Media could have abused Nehruvian Congress and its cultural allies repetitively. But media concentrated on the opposite way. This is with its agenda to create negative atmosphere for BJP. Everybody knows that media mostly owned by minorities. There is no reason that Ex-Service officers are ignorant of this.

How would the damage and loss underwent by the BJP, be made up by the Ex-Service Officers even if the BJP resolves the issue in favor of Ex-Service Officers? Look at the fact, that the party neglected the issue gets positive coverage in media, whereas the party which is resolving the issue so promptly, its image is being damaged by media. Now the next action of the media and the Nehruvian Congress leaders is to find out faults with the demand resolved. You will definitely observe this.

Agitation of Patidars (Patels) in Gujarat.

This is another recent coverage of media.

The generated issue is a demand for reservation for Patel Community in Government services and also in medical/Engineering etc… in the Government colleges.

The eligibility for reservation for Patidars is an absolutely fake issue.

The issue of reservation has been produced by Ambedkar and reservation was introduced by JL Nehru. There was some material in the issue. Ambedkar wanted to restrict the reservation up to socially backward class. That is, the reservation had to cover the untouchables and rejected class only. But Nehru and his Dot (daughter) gradually extended to other communities by forming OBC.

MK Gandhi had opposed any type of reservation. He was deadly against dividing people by any class or creed except poor and non-poor. MK Gandhi had vision and he was capable to foresee the resultant effect of reservation. Now India has been brought to a very confusing stage by the Nehruvian Congress, where the reservation has become a most decisive and deceiving issue have no path of return.

Narendra Modi is the first person to understand, realize and to initiate action meaningfully on every issue.  The source of generation of any issue is illiteracy and unemployment to a very great extent. If development is less, then jobs would be less. If education is less, the scope to switch over to a job would be meager. To depend upon agriculture in a big way, results into increase in poverty. Modi concentrated on development in other fields like productions and infrastructure.

Media and many so-called learned analysts are resistive and abusive on “Development through providing  infrastructure and expanding production. E.g. Amartya Sen, Anna Hazare. There are various reasons for that. We would not discuss on it. BJP rule, is a punch on them. Either these people are idiot or cunning.

DO PATIDARS GARLAND SARDAR PATEL,

THE GARLAND THAT MADE OF SHOES?  

The Patidars belong to the community of farmers basically and in majority. As a farmer they do get all benefit what a farmer is entitled. They belong to the same community to which the man of unity Sardar Vallabha bhai Patel belonged.

Sardar Patel had great foresight and wisdom. He could foresee a lot what Nehru missed knowingly or unknowingly, willfully or unwillfully.

Leave this aside. But Sardar Patel very clearly had stated about MK Gandhi, “when we are confused and do not find a way out, follow MK Gandhi blindly. He has very great vision which is even not possible for us to understand, we must follow him and we would be safe.” This MK Gandhi was deadly against reservation. JL Nehru introduced reservation instead of starting “ONTO THE LAST”, and we have reached to a stage today, where Patels have started agitating for reservation for them.

Tomorrow Kshatriyas and Brahmins would demand reservation for their communities. Then reservation would become a source of corruption while checking an application comes up to take decision. A person of a creamy layer is not eligible even if he is from schedule caste. How to decide a person of upper class be identifiable as eligible for reserved quota? Besides this, SC has given a ruling that reservation quota cannot go beyond 49 percent.

Leave aside all these. Media has never discussed such thing while giving the coverage to the agitation of Patels. Media does not like, media does not believe, media does not like to educate the mass and media does not have such academic interest. The interest of media is to provide coverage of agitation in a big way.

Media like to provide coverage;

How many people gathered?

How many hurt?

Who are they?

How they run?

How they broke public property?

How they were beaten?

Police acted excessively or not?

Police was at fault or not?

What has been said by the various leaders?

How the nehruvian leaders attacked on BJP,

BJP leaders are crossed fingers?

Why NaMo is mum?

The BJP government would go?

Anandiben (CM Gujarat) would go?

Count down started?

How much Patels are united?

Who are Patels?

From where have they come?

What is their history?

How they are great?

How they fought in past?

What happened to those who neglected them?

And what was not?

Some wrote about 10000+ years’ old history of Patels,

None media inclusive of vernacular print media opted to say in their editorial or news headlines that this is a wrong demand. Fortunately Gujarati writers have opposed the demand of Patels for reservation. But such articles are  not entertained.

FREEDOM OF FORMING GROUPS

What is the position of Hindu Castes (baring schedule Castes) as per the constitution of India?

Nothing. All citizens are equal. That is all.

Schedule Castes have some reservation quota in the services educational institution. This is for the reason of their social backwardness, that too for a limited period, due to the mindset of upper class.

Then why the people of different class and caste are allowed to form their association?

This is allowed, because in democracy it is one’s freedom to form groups and to join groups. The people of a group can enjoy its life by any means they like without harming others. This is their personal matter.

We can form a group of the people who likes to eat cauliflower.

We can organize meetings and discussions on any subject.

We can play drama or can conduct any cultural program.

We can conduct tours for sightseeing.

But we cannot ask,

We cannot agitate,

We cannot pressurize the Government that some of our cauliflower community members are poor; hence provide us a quota in various jobs.

Sardar Patel liked cauliflower.

Subhash Chandra Bose too liked to eat cauliflower.

Chhatrapati Shivaji was also fond of cauliflower.

Our Cauliflower community possessed splendid reputation and has served the nation remarkably. Our forefathers had been awarded with certificates of excellence.

O! Government of Gujarat, now you recognize our forefathers’ certificates as our certificates to be in our favor in providing jobs and education, as many of our members are poor. It is a shame for the nation that our members are poor.

O! Gujju-s and others!! do not quote the example of Parsi community before us. (Parsi-s who had entered India to have a secured shelter have not demanded for any reservation). They flew in aircraft (Ref: JRD TATA), we Patels are neither aircrafts nor rockets. We Patels are Baloons. We need air of reservation to flow up. O! Gujjars, O! Kurmis, O! Jats, O! Kshatriyas, O! Brahmins join us. You will get air and hand from Nehruvians.

You may take this narration as a fun. But in reality Nehruvians and its cultural allies have made fun of the reservation. The root cause is Nehruvian Congress. Hang them.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags:

Reservation, Employment, Poor, Patels, Certiuficates, OROP, Ex-service Officers, Nehruvians, Root of reservation, Root cause of reservation, Divide nation, schedule, caste, OBC

Read Full Post »

MEDIA DOES NOT KNOW THE ROOT CAUSE OF PUBLIC SUPPORT TO ANNA

MEDIA DOES NOT KNOW THE ROOT CAUSE OF PUBLIC SUPPORT TO ANNA


NEHRUVIANS AND MEDIA HAS BETRAYED THE PEOPLE

Nehruvian Congress and Media wants to defeat the aim of Anna and people

 

WHAT IS THE STAND OF NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS?

LOOK AT THE HISTORY:

We are already aware of the culture of Nehruvians and Nehruvian Party leaders from its top to bottom level.

Look at the recent behavior of Nehruvian Number One and Top leaders.

Several corruption cases came up and reported to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister took no intensive action. Matter had been taken to Supreme Court. Supreme Court issues directive and constituted special investigation team headed by Supreme Court judge.

Look at the scams: CWG, DMK and 2G scam where the Prime Minister wilfully neglected his constitutional duties and responsibilities, Adarsh Tower, Mishandling of food grains … it is a long and unparalleled list,

A Nehruvian progeny and his mom with her near relatives,  are alleged on making money through un-authorised channels. E.g. 2G scam and they were on pay roll of KGB,

Case has been reported to the Prime Minister Man Mohan. The case will go to Supreme Court. Once again Supreme Court will give directive.

Could a common man afford to go to Supreme Court for justice?

LOOK AT THEIR AFFAIRS AT DEBATE IN PARLIAMENT.

Ms Shushma Swaraj of BJP raised a question as to why the authorised leaders of Nehruvian Congress had started ridiculing Anna Hazare who was launching a peaceful agitation and the government was ready to talk with him?

Kapi Sibbal the Nehruvian Congress Minister replies” You too ridiculed Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh?”

LET US HAVE LOGICAL ANALYSIS ON THIS.

First Point;

Had Anna ever ridicule Man Mohan? No.

Then there was no reason for any of the Nehruvian Congress leaders to ridicule Anna Hazare.

 

Second Point:

On what ground Man Mohan was ridiculed and or criticized?

He was ridiculed and criticized by not only BJP leaders but also by many people, for his own loose comments on the scams of his team, where he carried constitutional responsibilities, he neglected the duties. Even Supreme Court has criticized and ridiculed Man Mohan. E.g. “Was your Prime Minister sleeping for two years?”

 

Was there a case against Anna Hazare where Anaa Hazare was criticized by Supreme Court?

No.

Then the fun on these two persons is not comparable. Mr. Kapi Sibbal should have this much sense of comparison.

 

Third point:

Prime Minister is supposed to be ridiculed and or criticized.

Man Mohan by virtue of the post held by him under constitution, he is required to be corrected by the people, to prevent nation from anarchy.

 

If the Government is of the opinion that Anna Hazare has done anything illegal, the government instead of criticizing and putting false allegations on him, should have prosecuted him. Has the government initiated any proceedings according to the allegations?

A Big No.

Government has done nothing so far.

Not only this, but an other minister has recognized Anna Hazare as a Mahatma Gandhian leader. Therefore either the minister is wrong or the authority putting the allegation is wrong.

Both cannot be correct.

“Attack on opposition before they attack” says Culture of Nehruvian Congress: (Because they are not funding Nehruvian Congress leaders)

It is the culture of Nehruvian Congress recorded in its history to attack opposition.

Nehruvian Congress government does not like to function with proper culture of democracy.

 

There are off course many other points where the leaders of Nehruvian Congress have contradictions.

Nehruvian Congress leaders have chosen to attack on the persons whosoever is opposing them. These Nehruvian Congress leaders are determined to reply by attacks instead of going for communication with material and merits. These leaders have no respect for democratic values.

 

Look at their action against Anna Hazare (leave aside the episode of Baba Ramdev)

Anna Hazare had suggested several locations for peaceful protest against the Lok Pal Bill presented in parliament. Government denied all the locations. Then Government suggested an untraceable Park.

 

Government allotted JP Park initially. Then it put a lot of conditions. Anna said he would not accept any condition. He was arrested before he could reach there and launch his protest.

 

Court ordered for jail to Anna Hazare, under pressure of government. Then it revoked its own order under further pressure of government. (Matter needs to be investigated.

 

Anna launched agitation in Tihar Jail. He said he would not accept any condition but he is ready to talk. Earlier and meanwhile all Nehruvian Congress leaders abused Anna with personal allegations. Looking to the public support to Anna, government granted permission after 3 days to launch agitation from Ram Lila ground.

 

For every point, Anna Hazare and his team had to struggle for democratic rights and they  could get the justice only after intervention of the High Court.

 

WHAT ROLL HAD BEEN OBSERVED FROM THE END OF MEDIA?

 

Indian Media is purchasable entity.

Although local media is afraid of foreign media. Foreign media is also watching the agitation. The local media does not want to miss its synthetic authenticity while presenting the minute to minute happening and inviting the so-called learned people and political analysts to discuss on some philosophical points related with agitation.

 

Media is trying tactfully to concentrate on philosophical and classical aspect of political science. Off course such points too, are synthetic and with the purpose of their own vested interest under joint venture with Nehruvian Congress leaders. The roll of such media persons has already been recorded. E.g. the phonic talk between Ms. Radia and Ms. Barkha  in relation with lobbying on allotment of ministerial posts. Most people have heard and enjoyed this conversation.

WHAT CARE IS BEING TAKEN BY MEDIA WHILE COVERING THE EVENTS AND DISCUSSIONS?

 

Care is taken that the statements of BJP leaders should get minimum coverage. If there is a scope or chance, contradict them on flimsy ground and divert the discussion onto some other point.

Prevented BJP leader from taking any advantage out of the situation.

If time permits always raised the issue of saffron terrorism, Yedyurappa and Coffin.

Baba Ramdev should also not get any coverage.

Did not find a need to call Baba Ramdev and his team members for discussion or interview.

Avoided completely these two leaders. Viz. Dr. Subramanian Swami a prominent lawyer and Mr. Desh Bandhu Gupta a prominent leader and retired Income Tax Commissioner. (Because if the media calls them they would hilariously ridicule media and its joint venture partner Nehruvian Congress.

 

MEDIA HAS AVOIDED WILLFULLY & COMPLETELY, ANY DISCUSSION ON MATERIAL AND MERITS OF THE TWO DRAFTS OF LOK PAL BILLS.

Viz. Jan Lok Pal Bill submitted by Civil Society (constituted by the government) and the Lok Pal Bill (famous as Joke Pal Bill) prepared by the government committee.

 

MEDIA HAS PREFERRED TO DISCUSS;

Whether this agitation is launched by Anna or politicians?

Whether Anna’s agitation is comparable with Mahatma Gandhi’s agitation or not?

Whether Anna is modern Mahatma Gandhi or not?

Whether Anna believes in constitutional authority or not?

Whether the agitation is supported by middle class or by every class?

Whether the agitation is a part of democracy or it is a extra constitutional?

Whether the method of agitation will strengthen democracy or would it weaken the democracy

Whether the agitation is a momentary or transitory event or a bubble or would it bring some permanent result?

Whether the agitation would enforce extra-constitutional power towards anarchy or not?

Whether the agitation is comparable with the revolt of people of Egypt or not?

 

Media has willfully avoided the hatred of people against out of proportion corruption of UPA especially hatred against Nehruvian Congress leaders,

Media has willfully avoided the basic reason of public support to agitation which is scams of Nehruvians and Nehruvian Congress leaders and their allies,

 

RED MONEY IN JOINT VENTURE WITH DAUD

RED MONEY RED MONEY IN JOINT VENTURE WITH DAUD

Media has willfully avoided point of black-red money lying in foreign banks in trillions of rupees in unauthorised accounts,

 

BLACK MONEY COLLECTED FROM DEALS

BLACK MONEY COLLECTED FROM DEALS

Media has willfully avoided every discussion on criticism of Supreme Court on non-governance of Nehruvian Congress Government. In fact this has played a significant roll to launch the wide spread agitation.

MEDIA HAS GENERALISED THE CORRUPTION ISSUE

Media has generalised the corruption issue, instead of targeting the Nehruvian Congress leaders who has played 99% roll in corruption.

 

Media has much more concentrated only on one item, i.e.  of low level corruption. Media has willfully avoided every event of high level corruption and black money.

 

Most funny part of the media coverage is that none of the Congress allies are called for discussions. Similarly media is avoiding contacting MPs of UPA in individuals, to hide their say.

 

In short media has also the same aim and interest that of Nehruvian Congress leaders. That is vested interest.  

What do people like me think on democracy?

Democracy is a system where truth is heard and honored, irrespective from which level does it come.

e.g. Rama and his ministry could not defend against the statement made by the washer man. (Read “Rama the real in flesh and blood” under the blogs of shirish-dave.sulekha.com). Thereby they had to follow the spirit of the washer man.

Civil Society has been recognised by the UPA ministry, thereby it has been recognised by the government, thereby the parliament is supposed to discuss the draft of the bill which has been prepared by the Civil Society members.

Otherwise also there is no ban on the parliament, to be open for any material discussion on merit.

There is no question or dispute can be raised on involvement of supremacy of  Parliament versus Civil Society. Constitution is superior to Parliament. Human values are superior to Constitution. Constitution is for human values.

WE ARE HERE TO PROTECT OUR MONEY

WE ARE HERE TO PROTECT OUR MONEY

In fact Nehruvians, Nehruvian Congress leaders and their allies want to save their red and black money lying in their foreign bank account. Media and UPA leaders must have executed a confidential non-closure joint venture agreement.

If this is not the truth Contact each MP individually and disclose his/her opinion on the both drafts point to point on merits. Corner them.

Ask them to resign to get fresh verdict.

If media will not do this, people will do this.

People had done this in 1973-74 in Gujarat. State Assembly was got dissolved. 

WHAT SHOULD BE THE ROLL OF MEDIA?

Parliament is composed of elected members. Now each member is the representative of people its constituency. No political party had put up any draft of Lok Pal Bill before the voters nor any candidate at the time of election. Now the dispute is on the jurisdiction of Lok Pal and the power of Lok Pal. i.e.

There are certain aspects listed in the comparative statement of both the draft.

Let us take an example for logical discussion.

Whether Prime Minister should be covered under the jurisdiction of Lok Pal or not.

Nehruvian Congress opposes  on the plea

It is a respectable post and it contains the full confidence of the Members of Parliament,

Common man replies

The Prime Minister is in fact most responsible authority. He has nearly full administrative power. The integrity of Prime Minister is supposed to be beyond doubt as he is responsible for every ministry.  A special Committee can be form to look into the complaint against Prime Minister for scrutiny.

 

It would make the government unstable,

Common man replies

This is hypothetical and absolutely political. If any party becomes unable to select its leader in the parliament on resignation of the existing Prime Minister, than it is not the fault of people of nation who should allow the Prime Minister whose integrity is doubtful.

It may invite frequent general election.

Common man replies

If a party is unable to function with the High Command Working Committee, means a party has no democratic constitution which can allow the party to withstand on resignation of a leader. That means the party is not constituted with any principles, but it is group of some power hungry coterie. Or they party is not capable to function with common program. This means the members have no capacity and talent to function as an entity though initially they agreed to it. Thereby such party or union of parties can create an anarchy if it is allowed to continue to rule.

 

There by it would create an anarchy.

Common man says

In fact if the Prime Minister is weak, lazy, wisdom less and autocrat can put the nation to anarchy. The Nehruvian Congress Prime Ministers are the proper examples who all the time carried the nation towards anarchy despite of and irrespective of absolute majority.

The nation cannot afford frequent election expenditure

Common man says

Election expenditure can be brought to minimum by constituting Voters Councils under election reforms.

A Census commission can be constituted which would be again an independent Commission with independent staff like judiciary. This commission will look after all type of elections and conducting of meetings on single platform. This would also enrol citizens and members of every type of unions including the cooperative housing societies and labour unions) This would eliminate all types of frauds in union activities and housing societies.)

(Information Commission should also be made totally independent just like judiciary. At present Information Officers are from the concern department. These officers have tendency to provide least possible transparency)

Media should take video interview of every Member of Parliament and each one should be forced to give logical and convincing reply to the queries made on the comparison of the two drafts of Lok Pal Bill.

EACH MP SHOULD CLARIFY HIS STAND

WHY MUST WE INSIST ON LOGICAL AND EXTENSIVE REPLIES FROM MPS?

MPs are highly paid. Each MP is a liability on Public Fund. Rs. 90000/- is paid to each MP per month as salary plus free accommodation and a lot perks. Besides this for 5 years of membership the MP gets life time pension. This fund runs in billions. We do know and we have not so far insisted upon any duties and responsibilities. Now each MP  should be made responsible for the precise answers to our queries. Each MP is supposed to read and understand the merits and de-merits of both the drafts. If any MP fails to give answer he must resign.

Compare:

Existing System

No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take permission from the same bosses, against whom the case has to be investigated.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Lokpal at centre and Lokayukta at state level will be independent bodies. ACB and CBI will be merged into these bodies. They will have power to initiate investigations and prosecution against any officer or politician without needing anyoneⳠpermission. Investigation should be completed within 1 year and trial to get over in next 1 year. Within two years, the corrupt should go to jail.

 

 

Existing System

No corrupt officer is dismissed from the job because Central Vigilance Commission, which is supposed to dismiss corrupt officers, is only an advisory body. Whenever it advises government to dismiss any senior corrupt officer, its advice is never implemented.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Lokpal and Lokayukta will have complete powers to order dismissal of a corrupt officer. CVC and all departmental vigilance will be merged into Lokpal and state vigilance will be merged into Lokayukta.

 

 

 

 

Existing System

No action is taken against corrupt judges because permission is required from the Chief Justice of India to even register an FIR against corrupt judges.

 

 

System Proposed by civil society

Lokpal & Lokayukta shall have powers to investigate and prosecute any judge without needing anyoneⳠpermission.

 

 

Existing System

Nowhere to go – People expose corruption but no action is taken on their complaints.

 

 

System Proposed by civil society

Lokpal & Lokayukta will have to enquire into and hear every complaint.

 

 

Existing System

There is so much corruption within CBI and vigilance departments. Their functioning is so secret that it encourages corruption within these agencies.

 

 

System Proposed by civil society

All investigations in Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be transparent. After completion of investigation, all case records shall be open to public. Complaint against any staff of Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be enquired and punishment announced within two months.

 

 

 

 

Existing System

Weak and corrupt people are appointed as heads of anti-corruption agencies.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Politicians will have absolutely no say in selections of Chairperson and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta. Selections will take place through a transparent and public participatory process.

 

 

Existing System

Citizens face harassment in government offices. Sometimes they are forced to pay bribes. One can only complaint to senior officers. No action is taken on complaints because senior officers also get their cut.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Lokpal & Lokayukta will get public grievances resolved in time bound manner, impose a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay to be deducted from the salary of guilty officer and award that amount as compensation to the aggrieved citizen.

 

 

Existing System

Nothing in law to recover ill gotten wealth. A corrupt person can come out of jail and enjoy that money.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Loss caused to the government due to corruption will be recovered from all accused.

 

 

 

Existing System

Small punishment for corruption- Punishment for corruption is minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years.

 

System Proposed by civil society

Enhanced punishment – The punishment would be minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment.

 

दर्द होता रहा छटपटाते रहे, आईने॒से सदा चोट खाते रहे,

वो वतन बेचकर मुस्कुराते रहे
हम वतन के लिए॒सिर कटाते रहे

 

shirish mohanlal dave

Read Full Post »

Yes it good that Baba Ramdev has ended up his fast.

Faith of Nehruvian Congress in Non-violence

Faith of Nehruvian Congress in Non-violence

Why it is good? Because this is in accordance to the Mahatma Gandhian principles.

What are the pre-requisite conditions while going on fast?

 

IT IS NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS CULTURE WHOSOEVER AGAINST THEM ARE CREATING CHAOS

IT IS NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS CULTURE WHOSOEVER AGAINST THEM ARE CREATING CHAOS

REQUISITE CONDTIONS:

The person who goes on fast and the organisation against which the fast is, both need certain qualification.

 1     BOTH HAVE FAITH IN LAW AND ORDER:

 

Here in this case Ramdev had faith in law and order but Nehruvian Congress leaders have no faith in rule of law.

 

RAMDEV IS A CHEAT ... RAMDEV IS A FRAUD ... RAMDEV IS POWER MONGER ... RAMDEV IS KIDNAPPER

RAMDEV IS A CHEAT ... RAMDEV IS A FRAUD ... RAMDEV IS POWER MONGER ... RAMDEV IS KIDNAPPER

2     BOTH SHOULD HAVE FAITH AND LOVE FOR EACH OTHER

Here Ramdev had faith and love for Nehruvian Congress leader but Nehruvian Congress had no faith and love for Ramdev. Under this Nehruvian Congress leaders betrayed Ramdev and disclosed the letter given by Ramdev as a confidential one. Further Nehruvian Congress leaders started abusing Ramdev and launched fake propaganda against Ramdev. They also used bad language for Ramdev and call him a fraud and a cheat. This indicates Nehruvians have no love towards Ramdev.

 

3     COMMUNICATION BETWEEN BOTH THE PARTIES SHOULD GO ON

 

MID NIGHT ATTACK OF RAVAN AT RAMLILA WAS NOT FOR COMMUNICATION

MID NIGHT ATTACK OF RAVAN AT RAMLILA WAS NOT FOR COMMUNICATION

Ramdev was already for communication. Nehruvian Congress leaders attacked at mid night on Ramdev and the people who were supporting Ramdev. Not only these Nehruvian Congress leaders got Ram Lila Maidan evicted on flimsy ground and arrested Ramdev and shifted him elsewhere. There was no indication from the end of Nehruvian Congress leaders for launching communication.

 

4     BOTH SHOULD HAVE FAITH IN NON-VIOLENCE, DEMOCRATIC VALUES AND HUMAN LIVES:

 

Here Nehruvian Congress leaders have no faith in democratic values and to the importance of Baba Ramdev’s life. What to talk of non-violence?

 

NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS LEADERS HAVE LEARNT LESSON FROM THE US WHEN IT ATTACKED ON LADEN

NEHRUVIAN CONGRESS LEADERS HAVE LEARNT LESSON FROM THE US WHEN IT ATTACKED ON LADEN

Under such circumstances it was OK for Ramdev to end his fast.

 

It would also be ok to train his followers for self protection.

 

MAHATMA GANDHI WOULD HAVE DONE THE SAME THING HAD HE FACED SIMILAR SITUATION

 

I CANNOT GO ON FAST AGAINST THOSE WHO HAVE NO HUMAN VALUES

I CANNOT GO ON FAST AGAINST THOSE WHO HAVE NO HUMAN VALUES

There were two occasions where he dropped the idea of his fast onto death.

 

FIRST INSTANCE:

With a king of a small kingdom in Saurashtra. The king was not ready to discuss the issue with Mahatma Gandhi or any body. That is no scope of communication. The king had said he would not mind if Gandhi dies in his state. He would be happy if his kingdom would become a place of pilgrim. King had no faith in non-violence and human values.

 

SECOND INSTANCE:

The other occasion was the division of India into Pakistan & India, where though earlier he had said the partition would be possible on his dead body. But he did not go on fast onto death because no one supported him and no one was ready to communicate with him. Besides this British had plan to encourage further divisions of India under Pakistan, Khalistan, Dalitistan, and Dravidistan. British had already long back divided greater India into Afghanistan, Burma, Ceylon, Nepal etc…

 

NEHRUVIANS HAVE SAME APPROACH:

Here also Nehruvian Congress leaders have similar approach to see that Baba Ramdev dies. Nehruvians and their stooges think they have capacity to handle the situation by way of high lighting fake allegation on Baba Ramdev. This is mainly because media is yellow and it is ever ready to co-operate Nehruvians. The quantity of their Black – Red money deposited in tax heaven banks is so huge that they cannot write them off at any cost.

 

Indira Gandhi too had same approach with Jai Prakash Narayan and Morarji Desai when they had been put in jail during emergency. Morarji Desai did not go fast because during emergency communication and democratic values had no existence.

 

At moments Nehruvians are in Switzerland. Don’t you know it why? Don’t be silly.

 

FIRST PRIORITY AND THE ONLY PRIORITY IS TO SAFE GUARD OUR RED & BLACK MONEY

FIRST PRIORITY AND THE ONLY PRIORITY IS TO SAFE GUARD OUR RED & BLACK MONEY

Tags: Ramdev, Fast against corruption, Red & Black, Swiss Bank Accounts, Nehruvians, Indira Gandhian approach, Gandhian principles, pre-requisite conditions

Read Full Post »

My History is more important than power politics of Nehruvians

My History is more important than power politics of Nehruvians

Why is the CongI not interested in the History of Ayodhya?
  
Yes the post independence history of Nehruvian Congress is worst.
  
That is why the Nehruvian Congress has tried very hard to see that people forget its history. For this reasons its top and dynasty successors asking the people of India to forget history and look ahead for the future.
  
This is mainly because if the people of India forget history of Nehruvian Congress, the Nehruvian Congress can repeat the history. E.g. In 1970 Indira Gandhi had given a slogan “Remove poverty” and the left out CongI leaders thought they themselves are poor hence they removed their own poverty and flooded the accounts in Swiss and other banks. Off course people had forgotten that Nehru had given the same slogan in other wordings in 1952.
  
Now again in 2008 the dynasty successor asked people of India to forget history and gave a slogan of “Remove poverty”. It is the Nehruvian culture to give infructuous slogans all the time and fool the common mass, which they have kept willfully poor and illiterate.
OK at the moment this is not our topic.
 
Our topic is as to why the Nehruvian Congress asks us to forget the Indian history as a whole?
 
Not clear?
 
It is only the way of handling the issue of Ayodhya by the Nehruvian Congress.
 
Why are there the archeology department and a minister thereof?
What is there duty?
For what are they there?
Are they paid for taking rest and not to apply their mind?
Are they paid for some routine maintenance of few selected structures of heritage and to neglect others unless a big hue and cry made against their negligence and they are forced to act otherwise they would lose of power?
 
In fact the ministry of archeology has very wide functions and duties. But it does not like to apply its mind and does not like to act unless the Nehruvian dynasty leader presses them to act. What can be done if a matter is beyond the caliber of the dynasty leader?
These Nehruvian dynasty leaders need consultants who either is from cross border (USSR) or some leaders of vote banks. The latter have their own limitations and vested interest.
 
Now let us come to the point.
 
What was the duty of CongI at least when the structure of the Mosque in Ayodhya was demolished?
 
It is on recorded history that it is the traditional culture of the rulers belonged to the herds of Christian and Muslim religions to demolish the cultural structures especially the places of devotion of the people whom they conquered.
 
Christians especially of western world have discontinued this tradition. But Muslims still maintain the tradition. This cultural tradition had been articulated in Afghanistan. Some Hindus had also articulated this in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Kashmir by Muslims on the name of reaction of the demolition of a Mosque in Ayodhya by some Hindus. There is no end to the reaction of Muslims fanatics in the world. They do not need even a reason for reaction.
 
What was the issue in Ayodhya?
 
A case was pending in a court of law where one party was Hindu and the other party was Muslim had a claim on a same property.
 
After demolition of the Mosque, the court asked government to acquire the place and to excavate the site as to know what existed under the ground of the structure of Mosque.
Now you must have a look at the site. The vast area itself is a high level area. Further the land of the Mosque itself on a significantly high Plateau.
 
It is a matter of common sense that there must exist something archeological interest.
 
It is a well known dispute whether the character of Rama was a myth or historical. Rama lived in Ayodhya as per the epic. Off course according to Nehruvian dynasty lead Congress and some western historians, Rama merely a fictiaous character, and thereby it was a very good opportunity for this Maculae’s devotees to prove themselves pious and lovers of Historical truths.
 
Some how the court of law had given the instructions to carry out excavation beneath the mosque. Viz. approximately 30feet by 40 feet i.e. 1200 square feet that had been occupied by the mosque.
 
The team of archeological excavation found a lot small and big items of archeological interest.  It was the duty of the ministry of archeology to give instructions to carry out wider and extensive excavation to try to find out likely more archeological structures. This ministry could have done this of its own, as this was its duty to put efforts to unearth the archeological evidences of Indian history.
 
Since the existence of archeological evidence had been proved, the whole of the area or even whole of Ayodhya with land covered within 8 kilometers of radius, must have been acquired by the government. No body’s claim on that place can be entertained once the site becomes archeological interest.
 
But Nehruvian Congress wants to divide people by religion. The Ayodhya issue has been allowed to continue as an issue related with religion instead of being historical evidence.
Since all the coverage is being given with a communal color, the Nehruvian Congress is trying very hard to keep the fear alive of communal riots.
 
In fact neither Hindus nor the local Indian Muslims (with minor exceptions who support cross border terrorists) are interested in riots.
 
The cross border terrorists only are interested in making people of India unrest.
 
These cross border terrorists have never reacted suddenly. They use to survey the target. Then they plan for the attack. Then they prepare gangs and then execute the plan.
CongI and its intelligence must be aware of this tradition. Inspite of this CongI is making big show of its security arrangement. CongI has generated a paper tiger and it has presented it as a real tiger.
 
Consequent to the Court’s judgement nothing would happen but CongI would say that by its security arrangement the tiger could not harm the people.
This is called politics in joint venture by Communists & Gobbles.
 

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: