Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘political party’

Which one is the real Shiv Sena? – 2

The second part of the story is dismissal of the MLAs who had already sworn in, i.e. taken an oath before the Governor.

Speaker did not carry the trust of the majority members. When the speaker knows this, the speaker should resign from his post.

To not follow the whip by a MLA a non-member is not a democratic decision and it is against the freedom of the member. When the party’s line of action itself is undemocratic and it becomes the matter controversial, one cannot decide the matter by simply YES or NO.

First of all the matter is to be decided as to who represent the verdict of the people. What verdict had been given by the people in the assembly elections?

Is it the party or its member?

Do people elect a person, or a party by casting votes?

If the party, is the verdict of the people, then why the name is incorporated on the list of the Voting Machine? It can be said vice versa, as the symbol pertains to the party.

But if we take this way;

A party is proposing a person, who would authorized to act as per the principles of the party in the assembly if elected. So if the people, likes the policy of the party, the people may elect him/her who has been proposed by a party.

The policy is the part and parcel of the principles of a party. Change in policy, if the same has not been processed properly, and that too not in a democratic way, the person who received the verdict of the people is entitled to act as per the original policy. Because the people had elected him on that Ground. Further, the party has not asked the person’s opinion or his desire before making change in the policy.

Thus neither the dismissal of a person from its party nor the dismissal from the assembly- membership of the person, is possible in a democratic set up.

The judiciary is supposed to decide the matter in a whole and with a broader view in a democratic way. It is not important as to how the matter took place technically. The importance has to be given to the moral and democratic value.

Right to Call Back the people’s representative

If there is no provision of the procedure to use “the right to recall” by the people, in the Indian Constitution, it does not mean that the people can be deprived of their right to recall. There are always general principles for any procedure.

e.g. How much strength is required for a meeting?

(1) In a regular meeting, more than 20% presence is required. Why 20 % presence of Members?

20% are supposed to be out of station. 50% will have some vivid mind and or some other work or priorities than to attend the meeting. We left with 20%. If after serving a notice of the meeting to be held, less than 20% are present in the meeting the meeting has to be postponed. Meeting has to be recalled, by issuing a Notice indicating the reason the last meeting could not be held. If with this notice also, less than 20% members turn up, then this has to be recorded in the minute of the meeting. The meeting’s proceedings should be conducted even with this less than 20% presence of the members.

(2) Similar is a case with floating a tender. There are general principles of calling for the competitive rates. First of all, it has to be decided as to what exactly we want and for what purpose and for which usage. This is called specification of the item. We may also contact experts if needed. Or we may call for opinion as to what should we purchase to meet the requirement to meet with our purpose.

E.g. We may also prepare a Contract Agreement to avoid could be loss. We may also consult a lawyer. If we receive rates only from two parties, we have to extend the date of submitting tender. If thereafter also we receive only two or less tenders, we may opt for retendering or extending the date again or we can open out the tender with the discretion of the competent authority. Then market rate should be ascertained. If any officer does not follow the general condition of the tender, he/she is liable to undergo disciplinary proceedings. It was a matter of surprise as to how the judiciary did not take cognizance while giving the judgement on 2G scam of Congi..

(3) Everywhere there are general rules and special rule. Similarly in absence of special rule or prescribed rule, right to Call Back the representative of the people by the people can be availed. If 20% of voters submit on affidavit to the EC, saying that they have no faith in their representative, the Election Commissioner can call for the re-verdict as Yes/No. If the previously elected person receives majority votes in favour, then the cost should be borne by the persons who voted against in the affidavit. If majority voters votes against, then the re-election should be conducted. This way we can avail the freedom of Right to Call Back.

We can also compare the division of Congress in 1969. There the Judiciary had given its verdict in favour of Congress (Indira).

The brief story is like this:

Indira had called emergency meeting with the members who became member after she was dismissed by the Central Executive Committee of Congress. Off course she had sizable original members too.

Both the Congress were claiming for the original Congress title. Technically the Congress (O) had a control over the Congress organisation. Matter need to be decided based on the position prevailed before the status of Congress membership and the public representatives (i.e. MLA-s, MP of LS and RS of Congress who voted for the Congress party’s official candidate in the presidential election in 1969). But the judiciary gave its verdict on the basis of the public representatives elected in 1980 on Congress ticket. The judiciary stated, “In democracy the public is supreme.”

The great parliamentarian Piloo Modi remarked on the judgement, “ It is funny. If this is the line of giving judgement, then, in case in future, the judgement will FLIP-FLOP based the election result.

The case of Shiv Sena, is little different.

Here the point is about the change of policy without calling the General Body meeting, after the election results. The public had elected the representatives based on the then existed alliance. If the judiciary believes in the same principles, related with the Indira Gandhi’s Claim to be the original Congress, the Shiv Sena of Shinde should be the real Shiv Sena.  

Further the Judiciary should not deny the “right to call back” in the absence of the system in Indian Constitution. Let us hope, the judiciary is not confused.

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

Which one is the real Shiv Sena? – 1

What is party?

Leave aside the meaning “Sena” and then discussing on “Who is real Shiv Sena”, if the party has been registered with the EC (Election Commission), then the party is supposed to have its Constitution and aim.

The aim of a political party is generally to act for the welfare of the people. The constitution of a party indicates as to how it would execute its action.

A political party is composed of its registered members and the office bears elected by the registered members under the procedure prescribed in its constitution. These office bears will act in accordance to the party’s constitution.

To incorporate any change in the policy matter, the president of the party has to call a General Body Meeting. Otherwise also to make the changes in the office bearers it has to call for General Body meeting in a regular interval as prescribed in the constitution. If the registered membership is very large, the members of every region, would elect their delegates in proportion (e.g. one delegate per 100 members) to send to the General Body meeting with its suggestions and views.

In a democratic country, all the parties are supposed to have to meet with the democratic requirements, including transparency.

By naming a party as “Sena”, the office bearers cannot function and treat the members as their soldiers. Sena does not carry a specific dictionary meaning. It is just a part to a proper noun.

What is the position of Shiv Sena?

The Shiv Sena had alliance with BJP. This was a part of its policy since long. The last election was fought by Shiv Sena as a partner of the BJP. i.e. the Shiv Sena and the BJP had not put their Candidate against each other. Further it was agreed by the Shiv Sena and BJP both to fight 50% seats of total seats of the Assembly. As a general principle and also as a natural principle, whichever party wins more seats, that party’s leader should be the CM. Here in this case, it was decided that the BJP’s leader viz. Mr. Devendra Fadanvish will be the CM of the alliance (NDA) in Maharashtra. The canvassing also done with the posters prepared on this line. This was as usual.

The Inside Story of Shiv Sena

Most leaders of Shiv Sena, by its nature, used to collect protection money (hapta Vasuli). But BJP is not with this nature. Shiv Sena leaders were not able to act with “Free Will” so far kick-back-s and protection money is concern. This was visible from the statements made by Shiv Sena leaders till Ram Mandir issue was not settled. The Shiv Sena leaders used to blame BJP by saying “BJP says ‘We will construct the temple at the same place (Babri Mosq place) but we will not tell you the date’.” This was the politics of Shiv Sena leaders, with a view to defame BJP indirectly. BJP knew this. But BJP had taken it, as political liberty of Shiv Sena.

Sharad Pawar did know this. He could see that the bonding of Shiv Sena and BJP is not very strong.

Sharad Pawar instigated Shiv Sena’s Uddhav Thakare to have post-election-alliance with his party. However Shiv Sena should not break the alliance with BJP before assembly election, so that Shiv Sena can take benefit of the alliance with BJP.

Shiv Sena might have asked to what to answer, in case a questions is raised on the Shiv Sena’s betrayal towards BJP. Sharad Pawar would have explained the whole plan to Uddhav Thakare. Otherwise also Uddhav Thakare personally was fed up with the alliance with BJP. 

As soon as the Maharashtra Assembly results were out, Uddhav Thakare as per pre-prepared fabricated story, asked BJP, that it was a pre-poll agreement in the alliance that for 2 ½ years the CM should be from Shiv Sena and for 2 ½ years it would be from the BJP. Uddhav Thakare insisted his son Aditya Thakare should be made the CM.

It was natural, that such proposal was certainly to be rejected from the end of BJP. Because the main weapon of BJP is to fight against the rule of dynasty. Hence BJP rejected it. Sharad Pawar also tempted the BJP, to have alliance with NCP. Sharad Pawar instigated Ajit Pawar of his own party to woo BJP to form the government. BJP fell in the net of Sharad Pawar. Ultimately the BJP was fooled.

After failing to form the Government, BJP has no scope to woo with Sharad Pawar again for asking his support, because Ajit Pawar of NCP had betrayed the BJP already.

We will keep all these stories aside.

What should be the position in a democratic country?

Most important point has been neglected by every learned person including the judiciary.

To change the alliance partner is a policy matter or not?

Off course, to Change the pre-poll alliance Partner, after the results are out,  is definitely a policy matter. To discuss the matter related with party’s policy in the General Body meeting is mandatory. Executive body of the party is not authorized to take decision on making the enemy as an ally and vice versa. Hence the post-election alliance, itself is undemocratic.

Judiciary should have taken SUO MOTTO. Why the judiciary has kept silence is a matter of research. The same is with the Election Commission. Because this is a betrayal with the people who gave their verdict as to who should form the Government.

(continued …)

Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Read Full Post »

UNEDUCATED ACADEMICS WROTE LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER NARENDRA MODI

Some persons listed at the end of this blog, reported themselves as prominent persons and self established intellectual persons. They have shown their sensitivity on the recent atrocity incidents in India.

LACKING IN COMMON SENSE:

It is a matter of common sense that India is a large and thickly populated country. When British left this country it was hardly having its share in the world trade and production. Generally it was exporting raw material and importing finished goods.

Somehow or other Nehru took over the rein and he ruled with huge majority for nearly two decades. By that time India remained poor. Once in the parliament Dr. Lohia had announced “out of 50 crores of population, 40 crores persons’ daily income is less than four Annas(25 paise).” Nehruvian Congress corrected the figure while replying to the statement, that it was not 25 paise, but 27 paise.

We know that it does not make any difference. But this was the outcome of Nehru’s rule of nearly two decades.

During this period Nehru introduced reservation by caste. But did not take care to look as to who took the benefit. Indira Gandhi also ruled with huge majority for more than two terms inclusive of two years with autocracy. She expanded the scope of reservation to more castes. Both the Nehruvians kept this type of reservation as a permanent feature. Ambedkar was for reservation only for untouchables and that too for a limited period of 10 years.

None of the Nehruvian cared to see as to how the reservation functions. i.e. Who are getting benefitted all the time,  and who are deprived of the reservation despite of being Dalit?

NEHRUVIANS WANTED THE RESERVATION SHOULD WORK LIKE THAT ONLY.

i.e. Those lower caste families who have improved their status would continuously take the benefit of reservation. These beneficiaries were their own people and they were to keep hold on vote-bank to misguide their own people. Nehruvian Congress was fond of creating this situation which was most favourable for them under “Vote Bank Politics”.

A State Governor’s son/daughter was entitled for reservation but a poor Dalit with little less percentage to the son/daughter of a Dalit caste Governor was miss the  reservation. 

This policy of Nehruvian Congress still works with minor correction.

POLICY OF IDENTIFYING A PERSON BY CASTE AND RELIGION

To identify a person by its caste had created heavy class conflict during Nehruvian Congress rule since 1970 when Indira Gandhi float “Garibi Hatao”.

Indira Gandhi deep rooted the Caste-ism in 1971. In nineteen eighties and nineties there were riots also. During Nehruvian Congress rule they instigated the riots so that the hatred get expanded and become very deep rooted. This was the culture Nehruvian Congress.

DROPs OF A DEVIL’s BLOOD

Just like a devil blood drop, dynastic cultural parties took birth due to the success and victories of Nehruvian Congress under vote bank politics. 

Now let us come to the point about the sensitivity of these elite persons of the list, who wrote a letter to the Prime Minister indicating their great concern on atrocity on Dalits and Muslims.

Yes. Now the gang has added Dalits. Previously the gang used to talk of Muslims-Christian mix. The idea behind the adding Dalits is to keep them away from rest of Hindus. Because Dalits are still poor and less literate and thereby they can be mislead very easily.    

WHO IS THIS GANG?

These persons are termed as “academics”. “Academics” is a quite confusing term. Similarly the same is with “learned”, “Educated”.

Literally an Academic means a studious or an expert in a field who is much more than a learned. Learned means it is simply holding some certificates, just like our Man Mohan Singh who was committed to Nehruvians’ instructions.

ARE THEY QUALIFIED?

A person has to be qualified to opine on an event. He/she is supposed to be “Educated person”. “Educated person” is that person who has understood the issue and he/she has the capacity and expertise to solve the issue.

“Conflict between or among communities” is a social issue.

After all, every issue barring “science and technology”, all are the social issues. Social workers supposed to be sensitive on social issue without discrimination.

A SOCIAL ACADEMIC IS SUPPOSED TO BE A SOCIAL SCIENTIST.

A Social scientist must know the historical back ground of an issue at hand. A social scientist must have the sense of proportion and the sense of comparability. The social scientist is not supposed to play a “Blame Game”. The social science is also a science. A scientist is not supposed to play a Blame Game.

But suppose a social scientist wants to show his research work and want to submit the REPORT then what should be done?

It appears from the letter addressed to the Prime Minister, these self recognized academics have jointly signed the letter. They do not have sense of proportion and they have not gone through deeply into the issue. An Academic must be studious. But here they have not studied the issue.     

A community may be composed of a Class, a Service, a Caste, a Religion, a Region, a Language… 

HAVE A LOOK AT THE HISTORY

(1) JL Nehru had kept the Indo-China boarder knowingly insecure all the time. This was a big factor for India’s quick defeat. It causes a CAKE WALK VICTORY FOR CHINA. Minimum 3000+ soldiers were killed, due to the folly of Nehru.

Image result for IMAGES OF 1962 INDO CHINA WAR

To ask the security forces to sacrifice despite of prolonged military infiltration of China, was not a sensitive issue?

(2) Indira’s folly/scam was the Simla pact, where the victory achieved by the Indian army was converted to total defeat.4000+ Indian soldiers were killed in that war.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

Untitled

(3) Union Carbide defective deal belonged to Indira Gandhi. Bhopal Gas hazard was the out come.25000+ persons were died and 500000+ were injured for life time.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

Image result for IMAGES OF VICTIMS OF BHOPAL GAS HAZZARD

(4) Anderson was provided with Government vehicle by Arjun Singh in association with Rajiv Gandhi to have a free pass to leave India.

Was it not a sensitive issue?

(5) Hundreds of Hindus’ temples were demolished in Kashmir before and after the Babri Mosq demolition.

Were these not sensitive?

(6) In 1989-90 thousands of Hindu women were raped, tens of thousands of kashmiri Hindus were murdered and lakhs of Hindus were driven out. All these were done with the pre-planned and openly using loud speakers on Mosqs and on Jeeps, asking Hindus to adopt Islam or to runaway or be ready to get murdered.

Image result for IMAGES OF VICTIMS OF HINDUS IN KASHMIR IN 1990

Farukh Abdullah had run away like a coward. Nehruvian Congress did nothing to establish human rights of Hindus. No investigation, No FIR, No arrest, No prosecution, what to talk of punishment to the culprits?

Farukh and his son were not even disqualified for elections. On the contrary their failure was rewarded by establishing them as the CM of J&K by Nehruvian Congress by extending support to them.

This was the unparallel breach of human and natural rights of Kashmiri Hindus in the world history, where the Muslims inclusive of locals and Muslims across the boarder jointly executed butchery, under the willful inactions and negligence of local political Muslim leaders and the Nehruvian Congress leaders.

What sensitivity by these signatories had been shown?

Related image

(7) Even after this also, several carnage took place where Hindus were identified,  driven out of buses and  straight way shoot to death.

Had these signatories shown any sensitivity?

(8) Please note that, in Kashmir, or in Kerana or elsewhere no Muslim was killed. Hindus were only killed.

(9) Besides this terrorists attack by Muslims of cross border with and without association of local Muslims, during Nehruvian Congress party rule, was maximum. It was a total failure of Nehruvian Congress government’s intelligence services, or the Nehruvian Congress in association with their cultural allies made the intelligence service ineffective or the same has been ignored willfully. When the defense top officers had complained that the defense have no spare parts, what to talk of services.

On these terrorists attack, the Nehruvian Congress government was a total failure.

Had these signatories written a letter to the then Prime Minister?  

(10) To talk about riots of 2002, is a fashion of some gangs so called intellectuals. But they never link the riots with the blazing of Sabarmati Express Coach C-6, at Godhra Railway station under a pre-planned conspiracy of a local district head of Nehruvian Congressman.

Victims were 59 Hindus because they were Hindus and returning from Ayodhya. In the post Godhra riots, both the communities had suffered. Hindus were also killed and Muslims were also killed. In the police firing of that Modi Government, Hindus were killed much more. Otherwise also Hindus were killed in unaccounted stabbing organized by the Muslims community, which was continued round the year.  

(11) Before Bombay Blast attack, the Government of India had issued instructions to costal security guards, to inspect the ships in the Arabian sea leniently. This was under the pressure of an allied party’s top leader, of Nehruvian Congress. This gave a smooth way for the terrorists of Bombay blast, to enter India through western sea coast.

(12) During Nehruvian Congress lead Government, there was a common feature of having terrorists’ attacks.

Had these signatories exhibited their concern?

All these indicate, that this lot of signatories is not educated. This lot has acted under Nehruvian Congress and its culturally allied parties’ political agenda. If this is not correct then they must be fool or childish.

Now let us scrutinize the list of these lost so-called literate people;

THE CONTENTS OF THIS LIST.

Bengalis are 53 and they are 14 in Calcutta. Can CPIM & TMC & Nehruvian Congress not manage to get signed this much ?

Persons belonged to Kerala, Chennai, Hyderabad and Bangalore is 26. Can CPIM and Nehruvian Congress no manage this much?

Christians are 13.and Muslims are 11. Most of them are against NaMo. They can manage easily.

Persons studying or serving in Foreign Universities are 70. They party with above lot. Otherwise also they are prone to mislead.

In Gujarat the persons from  IIM and SEPT  of Ahmedabad are 5. Among these five, three are female and 2 are male. All these five are non-Gujaratis. They failed to find a single Gujarati to sign. How marvelous?

If you count like this; take Bengalis, Hyderabadis, Bengaloris and Chennait including those studying serving  in foreign countries,  and then add Christians and Muslims plus JNU and Ramjas Delhi and Delhi University you have a clear cut picture of the conspiracy.

There is no intellectual lot in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, MP….  Etc… of rest of India.

What a funny picture?

They could have found some people for the name sake from these states. But who will work so hard.

Thereby this gang has obtained signatures from their own contacts. Yellow journalism gives them out of proportion coverage, instead of scrutinizing the matter. Yellow journalism of India is very well lacking from investigative approach. Yellow journalism is always concentrating how to construct the matter with emotional sentences. In one case they had given 40 crores to distribute among media to not make noise against a deal in UPA government.

One Odd man Sudhir Chandra is detailed as Historian . Vinita Chandra from Ramjas College must be knowing him.

Another odd man a Chinese female Ying Chen working in USA has signed.

Ms Kiran Asher might be knowing her.

We can do some more research, but it would be useless once fact is established.

Many of these so called educated persons might be carrying an impression that why had they kept mum on greater evil acts took place during Nehruvian Congress rule (as narrated above) on an excuse that they were walking with perambulator.

If it is really like that, then also they are not pardonable. Because many of those issues are alive on date. E.g. The Kashmiri Hindus are not re-established in their home. Still they are refugees.

Besides this, when Narendra Modi lead government taking action to re-establish them, then the local Muslim leaders start agitating against re-establishment activities on flimsy and un-sustainable ground of demography. The same people did not react when the Hindus were being driven out. Why? If you can drive out a community then also demography gets changed. Why did you not agitate to secure the human rights of Kashmiri Hindus?

None of these elite signatories has made any noise when atrocity cases took place during Nehruvian Congress Government. These cases were of the order of 40000 every year?

In fact these signatories and their sponsoring political gang is enjoying the atrocity on Dalits. The caste-ism is not supported by any Hindu scripture and the caste-ism though ready to die, but the Nehruvian Congress party lead gang, wants the caste-ism should prevail for secure their vote bank. It is a weak part of Hinduism so far it is survived. However the elites of Indian society are trying to uplift Dalits and trying to bring them in main stream.

The Nehruvian Congress openly dividing the nation based on not only Caste, but also based on Religion, Region and Language ….

The divisive culture of Nehruvian Congress lead gang is known to wise people of India very well. That is why the said gang is trying for survival at any cost to the nation. The gang is spreading and floating false, twisted, misinterpreted issues and news to create a negative atmosphere for the Narendra Modi lead government.

People have identified the gang.

NARENDRA MODI GOVERNMENT IS THE ALL TIME THE BEST GOVERNMENT.     

TRUTH PREVAILS, NOT UNTRUTH.

COPERATION OF ALL, DEVELOPMENT OF ALL

THESE ARE THE SLOGAN OF NARENDRA MODI GOVERNMENT.

These fellow signatories and their sponsored parties and some sick media  would be ashamed of their deed, when they will find the developed India by 2014 under the government lead by Narendra Modi.

As per email received by me they are as under:

Odd persons : Do you know the history of the back ground? You must know that India is changing very fast under the leadership of Narendra Modi. There are gangs who possess political agenda to capture power at any cost to the nation.

Better do not poke your knows where you are not educated.

Shirish Mohanlal Dav

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: