Posts Tagged ‘vhp’


Gandhi had expressed that he was deadly against partition.

British had sent Crips Commission who was to discuss the partition conditions. It was not to discuss any other options.

MK Gandhi who was the invited member to participate to help the Congress in presenting the case as to how to achieve freedom. But the way the British framed the basic conditions for independence was not acceptable to MK Gandhi. MK Gandhi asked Congress working committee to pass a resolution to boycott the Cripps Commission.

The Congress members did not agree to the advice of MK Gandhi. At that stage MK Gandhi said loudly that had been my Subhas here, he would have definitely obeyed my advice of boycotting the commission. MK Gandhi further said, when the committee members are determined to accept the partition, I cannot be a member of that committee. He boycotted the commission by resigning from the commission. I would not be a party in dividing India. Then MK Gandhi said “No body in Congress is ready to discuss with me and even no body in Congress is ready to hear me”.

This was the time when the leaders who were outside the Congress, should have stand by the side of Mahatma Gandhi firmly. But they did not. They were either divided or confused. No body stood by the side of MK Gandhi to support him.


The call of “Direct Action” given by Jinnah had made most leaders to realize the inevitability of division of India. People were also of the opinion that there was no option but to accept partition.

MK Gandhi too realized the necessity of partition, at that moment of time under “the Call of Direct Action” and the decisive approach of British Government and Muslim league leaders. Jinna was of the opinion that Muslims are different culture and there by different nation. Muslim needs a separate nation. Congress and MK Gandhi were not for to accept the theory of two nations. Once Gandhi asked Jinna if you become Hindu, in what way your culture would be different than a Hindu. Jinna could not reply to MK Gandhi. It was an historical truth that the origin of most Muslims in India is Hindu. Those who are not, they have also adopted the Hindu culture.  

What were the other options for independence of India?


What meaning of “Federal Union”?

The meaning of Federal Union was to be worked out. As a simple meaning of Federal Union was a Union of Pakistan and India. Pakistan and India were to exists under the Federal Union, but India and Pakistan were to get autonomy in certain fields of governance. It was possible to pressurize British on the option of “Federal Un ion” had the proposal been made unanimously.

The British was firm in saying that the independence means to leave India with making proper arrangement and provision in a treaty that shows that they have cared to provide security and rights of all the communities of India.


The characters in dealing with the proposal for Federal Union were JL Nehru, Sardar Patel, MK Gandhi and Mhammeda Ali Jinna. It was not possible and advisable to call them at one place and to conduct the discussion. This was because it was a matter of confidentiality. Its premature disclosure can create a lot of problems. British can exploit the matter for instigating different community leaders indirectly to play decisive role. Bhulabhai Desai was the messenger. He was meeting and trying for consensus with Jinna, MK Gandhi, JL Nehru and Sardar Patel to make them agreeable on Federal Proposal.

Bhulabhai Desai met Sardar Patel and MK Gandhi. They were agreed to it. Then Bhulabhai Desai met Jinna. Jinna too agreed to it in principle. Bhulabhai Desai met JL Nehru. He totally disagreed to the proposal of Federal Union. JL Nehru out rightly rejected the proposal.

MK Gandhi was ready for Federal Union. It was the Semi Undivided India. i.e. It was united India. It was also divided India.

Then Sardar Patel went to JL Nehru to understand as to why had JL Nehru straight way rejected the idea of Federal Union.

Sardar Patel learnt that JL Nehru had a thought that it was highly possible that MK Gandhi would select Jinna as the head of Federal Union and he would have to work under Jinna. JL Nehru had allergy of Jinna. (Earlier at one stage Nehru had declared that if Jinna agrees to Undivided India, then he would not appoint Jinna even as his peon.)

However Sardar Patel reviewed the other factors. These were about the character and likely aptitude of the kings and kingdoms. Many of the kings were greedy and prone to get instigated for their own freedom and conditions. It was a matter of a lengthy and time consuming frame work for preparing accession or amalgamation conditions. Besides this the presence of decisive British was also there. They were keen to instigate self-centered and communal leaders to divide India in many other pieces. That is why MK Gandhi and Sardar Patel thought to divide India in two nations to avoid India, breaking in multiple pieces.


India, Pakistan and the kingdoms. As for the people of Kingdoms, they may decide at a later stage either they would remain as an independent kingdom or they may conduct plebiscite as to affiliate with whom. British said “We would provide the independence to the kings for their kingdom. We give them two option. They can remain independent. They can have accession either with India or Pakistan by adopting a fair plebiscite.”

MK Gandhi was of the opinion, that it was the Muslim leaders who were keen to divide India. As for Congress, the leaders were not ready to delay the independence any more. British were ever ready to spoil the situation. Gandhi and Sardar thought, it would be better to accept the independence with divided India. In democracy, the real power belongs to the people. It would be better to try for reunion at later stage.

MK Gandhi had foreseen the likely massacre to some extent after partition. He tried his best to prevent them and to build unity. He had gone on fast to establish peace. The peace was urged to both the people of both the communities. But some took it one sided without going through the details.

MK Gandhi wanted to visit Pakistan to try to reunite the nation. He wanted to see that the peace get established at least in Delhi. Because if both the community have no faith in each other they cannot reunite.


MK Gandhi was very much upset, when he learnt that the leaders of Congress who belonged to the region of Pakistan had run to India instead of staying in Pakistan for enforcing harmony with Muslims.

When Gandhi aksed them, the Congress leaders said “our life was not safe”.

MK Gandhi said, “So what? I have taught you to be brave and fearless. I have taught you to be ready to sacrifice everything. I have taught you to die. I have not taught you to run away. You are all coward. Had you been killed there, I would have been pleased a lot. I would have danced on hearing the news of your death. I would have really danced a lot.”

Now those who are having mindset to abuse MK Gandhi, they take the above Spell outs as that has been spelled out before Hindus who ran towards India. In fact the words were spelled out before Congress leaders of Pakistan.

MK Gandhi wanted the Congress leaders to remain in Pakistan. Had the people of Congress been nationalist, they would have remained in Pakistan. They could have formed a political party named “Pakistan National Congress”.

Look at the Muslim leaders. Many of them remained in India and formed an Indian Muslim League. The decisive Nehruvian Congress has joined the hands with the Indian Muslim League since 1958. There are lots of Muslim Organizations in India. It is only Nehruvian Congress who instigated Muslims to remain isolated from Hindus.

Soon MK Gandhi experienced that many Congress leaders were exerting pressure on him to get some position in the new government. Not only this but the leaders who to had deserted Pakistan, and had come to India to share the power. MK Gandhi publically declared to dissolve Congress.

“Diary of Last three months of Gandhi in Delhi” written by Manuben Gandhi, provides the full information on the role played by MK Gandhi. There is a day to day diary of MK Gandhi’s last three months in Delhi before he was killed. Manuben Gandhi has given report day to day and word to word. Those who read MK Gandhi would never carry a feeling that MK Gandhi had any attitude to appease Muslims and Muslims leaders. Instead he appears to be deadly against Muslim leaders. He has at one stage said that if Pakistan is not capable to provide proper securities to Hindus, India should attack on Pakistan and take over Pakistan.


Yes. It was JL Nehru who was more dangerous.

No provincial party committee had suggested the name of JL Nehru for PM’s post. Nehru declared before MK Gandhi that he want to head the government, then Gandhi told him that none of the provincial party committee and the CM has suggested his name.

It was the moral duty of JL Nehru to withdraw his name. But instead of doing that, he kept mum and silently left the room. MK Gandhi thought that Nehru is likely to do some adventure. This adventure would break the Congress party at that crucial stage when the separatists including British were working hard to weaken the Congress. MK Gandhi called Sardar Patel and got an assurance that Sardar Patel would see that Congress remained united.

It is needless to say that JL Nehru had already created a socialistic Group within Congress with a freedom to abuse other Congress leaders like Rajgopalachari, Sardar Patel etc…

MK Gandhi knew that in democracy nothing is final. Let JL Nehru be the PM, till the general elections under new constitution gets conducted.

But unfortunate to India, MK Gandhi was murdered, Sardar died before general elections. JL Nehru used media to divert the attention of public from his failure in external affairs, his failures in planning and wisdom-less vision. It is a matter of surprise and a matter of research as to how the learned people made no noise.

JL Nehru had become intolerant and autocrat. He became hungry of power. JL Nehru himself has written this, for himself to have a fun on himself.

A good opportunity had come, to have Federal Union. Iskandar Mirza had proposed for “Federal Union, in 1955. It was a good and proper time when everything was OK locally. The people who left their property in Pakistan were alive and this issue was also alive. Pakistan was ready to resolve this issue bilaterally. But JL Nehru indecently rejected the proposal of “Federal Union” without discussing it at any level.


The learned people including the learned people talking too much till date for passing blame on MK Gandhi for partition. They are feeling great for themselves for this, but they kept mum instead of calling for a strong agitation for Federal Union in 1955. Federal Union was the first step toward Undivided India. Most of the leaders who had abused Congress and MK Gandhi for passing the blame of dividing India, were very well alive and capable to launch wide spread agitation in favor of “Federal Union” in nineteen fifties. They never agitated for Federal Union, even that proposal had come up from the Pakistan. Not only this, these leaders had kept mum even on the absolute blunders of JL Nehru on external affairs related with Tibet, China and Burma in nineteen fifties.

Was it difficult for them? Was it that these were political issue and thereby they (RSS) cannot take part in politics?

It was never difficult for them. It was not a politics. It was related with and great concern with humanity and national interest. Despite of this they behaved like deaf and dumb.

It was not that there were no agitation during 1950-1960. It was not that that RSS was less popular. In fact at most of the school compound and street, RSS was running RSS Shaakhaa. Golvalkar was also alive. A lot of other agitations took place during 1951 to 1960. But none tried either for Federal Union nor against the Himalayan Blunders of JL Nehru.

The victory of Nehruvian Congress in 1952 was fraudulent. The victory of Nehruvian Congress was a fraud. But the defeat of pro-RSS parties made their leaders weak and frustrated. They achieve some confidence only when Nava Nirman agitation unseated the Nehruvian Congress party in 1974. The Nehruvian Congress party had earlier 140 seats in Assembly out of 168 in 1972 assembly elections.

It is needless to say that it was Jai Prakash Narain a veteran Mahatma Gandhian who lead the agitation against Nehruvian Congress and defeated Nehruvian Congress badly in 1977. The inaction and frustration of worthless leaders of RSS, VHP, BD and some leaders like Advani, Sushma, Murlimanohar gave life to Nehruvian Congress.



Shirish Mohanlal Dave

Tags: Nehruvian Congress, Federal Union, kings, kingdom, Cripp’s Commission, Gandhi, Bhulabhai Desai, Sardar Patel, RSS, VHP, BD, leaders

Read Full Post »


Attack at mid night

Unless the mass becomes active to show its indignation to sacks the UPA government lead by Nehruvian Congress prematurely out like what the people of Gujarat had done to the Nehruvian Congress in 1974 (wherein the Nehruvian Congress had absolute majority i.e. 140 seats out of 164 seats in the state Assembly) and dethroned in the subsequent assembly election, the people of India will have to wait for scheduled general election of the parliament.


As for 1974 the people of Gujarat had not very concrete examples of corruption against Nehruvian Congress, but the price rise in ground nut oil was the symptom of corruption. The Chief Minister who was not in good book of Indira Firoz Nehru Gandhi, had to resign under the public pressure. To take the credit of resignation of the CM, the local leaders of Nehruvian Congress had spread rumours that it was due to their own efforts only the CM viz Chimanbhai Patel had to resign. Indira Firoz Nehru Gandhi had a thought that if the said CM would resign, she would be able to kill the time and would survive. But unfortunate to some veteran Mahatma Gandhian leaders were still alive at that time and they had a good footing in Gujarat, the Nava-Nirman Stir continued and the members belonged to Nehruvian Congress of assembly resigned one by one. The Opposition party members viz. Congress (Organisation) had already resigned when a call was given by the leaders of Nava-Nirman Stir. Indira had no option but to suspend the Assembly. She had a game plan to conduct by-elections of the seats fell vacant, but the public opinion was very strong against her and it was impossible for her to face the consequences. Ultimately the assembly was dissolved.

At present we are facing a grave situation. Contrary to earlier situation of 1974, at present the allegations related to corruption are clear and visible at very large scale.  Further it is not only a matter of Black Money only, it is Red Money too. The amount involved is extremely large. Nehruvian Congress government is not in position to give philosophical replies.



However the minus points are that the media is not reflecting the feeling of the common mass. Media is creating controversy. It appears that media is interested in making money through under table deals. That is why instead of concentrating on the un-democratic attitude of Nehruvian Congress, it provides wide coverage and invite discussions on patriotic songs of Sushma Swaraj and the interpretation of Diggu on it wherein Digg has designated Sushma Swaraj as a dancer and further said that Sushma was enjoying at Gandhi’s Samadhi.
Media has neither given appropriate coverage to the remarks of Shanti Bhusan, Subrahmanian Swami and Narendra Modi nor invited any discussion on it.
When media is yellow, the people of
India have to go a long way to fight for re-establishment of democratic rights and human values.
Media is already concentrating creating controversy among the leaders fighting against corruption.


Nehruvian Congress wants to give a message to the people of

to have money is an offence,

to grow vegetation for herbal medicine is an offence.

to have ashram buildings is an offence,

to prepare medicine and sell it out is an offence,

to run yoga classes is an offence,

to run TV channels is an offence,

to have followers in India and abroad is also an offence,

to form trust is an offence,

Every thing by which you can contribute to nation and the society is an offence.

You can be down graded if you are against Nehruvian Congress.

And nothing is offence if you call some body mad, hypocrite, cheat, fraud, thief, murderer, killer, robber, if you are in Congress.

As soon as the talk between, Nehruvian Congress leaders and Baba Ramdev failed, Digg came out with large scale and loud statements calling Ramdev with all the bad words.



What was his party doing if really Ramdev was the man as he has been designated by Digg? Now either Ramdev should be behind the bar or Digg and his party leaders should be behind the bars without any delay.

If there would be any delay on the part of UPA, every of its parties should be disqualified as a political party. There can not be any option to it if we want moral values in democracy.


To justify the un-democratic and so-called strong police action Nehruvian Congress has the record to get declared itself a communal.

What is communal? It is the culture of Nehruvian Congress as to wherever RSS and VHP leaders are involved even marginally or controversially, the whole matter has to be declared as communal.


You can have multiple advantages.

One is you have a liberty to crush the agitation ruthlessly and pet your back that how much determined you are as you can act mercilessly on communal people.

Second advantage is that you can give a clear message that you are the only party who can safe guard the minorities.


Third advantage could be that the USA will never dream of you to refuse VISA.

Because once you have crushed the majority on the ground of religion, you are fully qualified for the US Visa. Once you qualify for the US Visa, the puppy UK will give you Visa without even you apply for it. Yes if it can refuse Narendra Modi in absence of his application, the UK ought to give you Visa in absence of an application too.



RSS and VHP have no democratic and human rights leave aside constitutional rights.

Recall, Roman period the slaves had no rights. Further the leaders of Nehruvian Government are trying to interpret the agitation as it is lead by Hindus.  The leaders of RSS and VHP are backing the agitation.

This indicates that Nehruvian leaders want to stamp the agitation as communal. Once the word communal is stamped on the agitation, the message given to minorities is that minorities are not safe under the agitators. We the Nehruvians are the only wise leaders always ready to safe guard your interest.



It is the similar strategy that was adopted by Indira Gandhi after her defeat in Gujarat Assembly in 1975 and during emergency.  Nehruvian Congress leaders were heavily spreading the message that the government was in fact working for poor the same did not like to upper class. The Nava Nirman Stir was against poor mass. The emergency was imposed to set right this upper class. Our aim is to uplift the backward class and poor mass. The upper class wants you lower class people to remain poor for all the time.

Similarly this time Nehruvian Congress leaders will try very hard to give a message that we are for democratic values but the fundamentalists try to disturb the atmosphere of brotherhood and they want to spread the communal hatred to destabilise the peacefully living minorities under one or other controversy.



Believe me some inherently pro-Nehruvian Congress persons have already activated the non-issues of Hindus vs Non-Hindus through internet and they try to instigate BJP to act with religion related agenda. They have two aims.

First aim is to curtail Hindu votes on the plea that BJP is power hungry and does not care for Hindus as it has kept the Hindu Agenda aside.

The second aim is to generate fear among minorities that if BJP would come to power it will surrender to Hindu fundamentalists.

Both are totally false.  Nehruvians go to any low level damn extent to retain power at any cost to the nation.



Do not overestimate your self. Politicians are politicians. They are to be viewed in their perspective and proportion. One cannot and one should not generalise politicians. If politicians poke their nose everywhere, you have to poke your nose in politics. You may accept power, you may not accept power.


Mahatma Gandhi was also in politics. Jai Prakash Narayan was also in politics. The ultimate aim of Dayanand Saraswati was to free India from slavery.  That was also a politics. Morarji Desai was also in politics. Morarji Desai brought the democracy on track. Power itself is not bad.


To achieve power is not a bad character. Power should not be achieved by bad means as to what Indira Gandhi, Charan Singh and Chandra Shekhar did. There are many large amount of so-called elite who are always active to launch discussions on minimum qualification for politician, maximum age for politicians, maximum period of holding power for politicians etc… all are fake games and part of a game of one or other political groups. Condemn them. The moral values and skills are to be honoured not the certificates, age and gender.


Take help of political party like BJP, missionaries like VHP and RSS and BJD. Disqualify all those who were with, who are with and who have proposed to ally with UPA. i.e. CPIM, Muslim League, BSP, RJD, SP of Mulayam, DMK, ADMK, and many regional parties. Never take their support because they are the party with Nehruvian Congress.  Also avoid people like Medha, Arundhati, Tista, Mallika and Agnivesh as they are facing crisis of identification and their tongue can harm your cause.

Tags: slaves. No rights, vhp, bjp, rss, communal, criminal, stamp them, indirai, nehruvian, Narendra modi, dayanand saraswati, mahatma Gandhi, Jai Prakash, Morarji Desai

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: