Posts Tagged ‘Narendra modi’
CAN THE JUDICIARY POKE ITS NOSE IN ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS?
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged Adityanath Yogi, CM of U.P., HC, Narendra modi, renewal of license, SC, slaughter houses, Uncalled remark, Vegetarian food on May 14, 2017| Leave a Comment »
CAN THE JUDICIARY POKE ITS NOSE IN ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS?
Either the Indian media hides the meaningful words of the remarks passed by the judiciary, with a view to give a negative message against the BJP lead government or the judiciary pokes its nose in administrative matters and passes uncalled remarks on the action taken by the government.
Yes. This has been observed twice on some major actions of the government.
Demonetization:
Somebody had filed a PIL before SC against the demonetization of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 currency notes, on the plea that the Government had not followed legally prescribed procedure and had not taken sufficient precautionary measures. The action taken by the government was in haste.
The media had given head line that SC had asked the Central Government to clarify its position. Besides this, the SC had also feared whether the government had examined the law and order situation likely to take place in the states, like agitations and riots, before taking the decision. It appears that the SC was of the opinion or the SC was to show its wisdom that the demonetization could be a reason that can burst riots or can deteriorate the law and order situation in the states.
Surprisingly such remarks were made after several weeks of demonetization. There was not a single news, showing occurrence of such incidents where the bad law and order situation was noticed on account of demonetization. People used to stand in queue calmly. Some stray incidents occurred due to mismanagement in distribution of new currency notes. But ultimately such cases did not result into riots. Despite of this, the well-read SC passed a remark as to what precautions and preventive measures were taken by the government against riots in the states.
It is possible that the antisocial elements had to suffer a lot due to the demonetization. As per the report of a government appointed committee of early nineties of the last century, the anti-social elements have the nexus with political parties and local police. The Nehruvian Congress cannot be ruled out from the nexus, what to talk about its allied parties? The allied parties have the same culture.
Who had made big noise against demonetization?
The people knew very well.
The remark of SC can have genuine fear of breaking up riots provided the nexus gangs plans out quickly. But the nexus had two fight out at three fronts.
First front was to replace their currency notes by new ones as much as possible and as soon as possible.
Second front was to create an atmosphere of large scale dissatisfaction and anarchy.
Third front was to plan out to create riots.
But to plan out for riots, the nexus had a fear that their activities were being monitored by the government intelligence. The nexus knew that they cannot take Narendra Modi for granted, on his intelligence performance. They feared a big risk in planning out for riots. However we cannot ruled out that the nexus had dropped the idea of planning of generating riots. That is why they incorporated the fear of bursting riots. And it is possible that for that reason, the SC might have put up the remark related with possible likely hood of riots.
However, so far SC is concern, it was supposed to put a cross question against the petitioners, that the matter of law and orders pertains to the state. Why have you not made the state governments as the opposite parties? Or the SC could have sent of its own the notice of the petition to the state governments. This is because the SC had entertained the point of “law and order” viz. Riot as a factor.
The second incident is of HC of U.P. on the litigation related to ban of illegally running slaughter houses.
The remarks of HC for the U.P. Government;
-
Renew the licenses which are pending for approval, by such and such date.
If the media has published this remark of the HC in its true literary sense and spirit, both the remarks of HC are uncalled.
The HC has instructed the U.P. Government to renew the licenses pending for renewal by such and such date. This remark is uncalled. Not only this, but the remark of HC gives a message that, the HC has examined the renewal applications of the owners of the slaughter houses and found them in order. Thereby HC has taken the status “Pending” of the applications, as a fraud on the part of the U.P. Government.
There is no information that HC has visited the places of slaughter houses whose applications for renewal of the license, were pending. There is no information as to a committee has submitted a report before the HC on the fulfillment of all the stipulated conditions required for the renewal of the license.
Is it not a matter of surprise as to how the HC can issue a blanket administrative instructions without going through the details in each case?
In case the finding of the HC is, that the previous government had kept the approval of the renewals of the licenses ready, but the succeeding government (i.e. present government) has withhold the licenses. Then in such situation the HC can issue orders to take disciplinary actions against the officers concern. If HC is active even on passing a hypothetical remarks (discussed below) against the Government, it was more desirable to make the government active on preventive measures against the lethargy of officers, by proposing/ordering disciplinary actions.
The second remark of HC is most astonishing.
-
The government cannot enforce its idea upon the people to change their food habit, and ask the people to be vegetarian.
This remark is absolutely hypothetical. One cannot abuse anybody on hypothetical basis. The media has not furnished any details as to on what ground the HC has passed such remark. Such remark of the HC gives a message that the U.P. Government has the willful tendency to not renew the licenses of the slaughter houses though they have fulfilled all stipulated conditions for the renewal of the licenses.
It is possible that the petitioner might have narrated a point that the U.P. Government machinery wanted to please the new CM and thereby it has shown its reluctance in renewing the licenses.
This looks funny if the HC takes such points of petitioners for granted and pass abusive remark against the U.P. Government.
It is a well-known fact that the Indian Constitution is not against non-vegetarian food. A state Government is capable enough to understand this provisions of the Indian Constitution, at least through its learned officers how are presenting their case before HC.
Can we ruled out the possible influence of Media on the judiciary? Yes the media has a habit to emotionalize every matter. Thereby it diverts the discussion to suit to its agenda. By linking the action taken by Adityanath Yogi on illegal slaughter houses, as his approach towards to change the eating habit of people of India, the action can be sensationalize. But we expect the judiciary to apply its mind before spelling out some remarks.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tag: Uncalled remark, SC, HC, Vegetarian food, slaughter houses, renewal of license, CM of U.P., Narendra Modi, Adityanath Yogi
NEHRUVIANS INTOLERANCE AND DISRESPECT TOWARD HUMAN RIGHTS
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged bjp, Censorship, Congi, Emergency, indira, Intolerance, Media, Narendra modi, Nehru, Nehruvians, Pseudo, Rajiv, Secular, Sonia on November 28, 2015| Leave a Comment »
NEHRUVIANS INTOLERANCE AND DISRESPECT TOWARD HUMAN RIGHTS
Just to create fake controversies, and to divert the attention of the public from the achievements of BJP Government lead by Narendra Modi the pseudo seculars are making noise.
During this short period of 18 months the BJP government has gained a lot of prestige abroad. It has made remarkable changes on foreign policies and local governance.
Due to this reason the Anti-BJP leaders have become terribly upset. They feel politically insecure. However during the last Bihar Assembly election they could realize that the hope to remain politically alive has not become zero.
They have gained a confidence that they can manufacture even fake controversies and can very well create a negative atmosphere for BJP and Narendra Modi.
It is a matter of research as to how the middle level BJP leaders have not prepared themselves to hit back the controversy manufacturers.
Let us read the records of Nehruvians, as to how much had they tolerated opposite views and given respect to human rights !!
JAWAHARLAL NEHRU:
DISRESPECTS:
(1) 1946-47 None of the provincial Congress Committee had proposed the name of JL Nehru for the post of PM. Despite of this, JL Nehru did not withdraw his candidature. This matter was brought to his notice by Mahatma Gandhi. To avoid partition of Congress party, MK Gandhi had to take assurance from Sardar Patel that he would keep the Congress intact and he would not claim for the PM post.
(2) 1947-50 Nehru did not respect the advice of Sardar Patel on foreign policy with China.
(3) 1948 Nehru had abused Sardar Patel on his action on the matter of Hyderabad issue.
(4) 1948 Nehru did not like to respect democratic procedure of taking a decision only after discussing the matter in Cabinet. He took the issue of Kashmir with UNO, without discussing it with his cabinet.
(5) 1952-1962 Nehru never respected the oppositions’ point raised in the parliament on the military infiltration of China into Indian Territory.
(6) 1950s Nehru did not respect the moral aptitude on Jeep Scandal to protect his beloved VK Menan.
(7) 1956-1959 Nehru did not respect the Congress working committee’s decision on Bombay State.
(8) 1956 Nehru as a PM did not respect the neutrality on the dispute between two states. E.g. Maharashtra and Gujarat.
(9) 1962-64 Nehru did not like to respect the qualification, seniority and genuine right of others to succeed him on the post of PM. He acted, out of way and cunningly to see that Indira Gandhi who was less qualified, less dignified, less learned, less experienced, less honest … become his successor for the post of PM.
(10) 1962 Nehru had no respect towards parliament and towards his own oath. He had taken an oath before the parliament that he would not take any rest till he recapture the lost land of India to China. His oath was simply a fraud.
INTOLERANCE OF NEHRU
(1) 1956-1964 Nehru was highly intolerant towards his competitors. Due to stupid foreign policy and stupid defense policy of JL Nehru, China could achieve a cake walk victory over India. China captured 91000 square miles of Indian land. Nehru was solely responsible for the defeat of India. In respect of his failure and to owe the moral responsibility JL Nehru was supposed to resign. JL Nehru had not own his moral responsibility. Contrary to this when he noticed that Morarji Desai is trying to become his competitor for the post of PM, Nehru could not tolerate Morarji Desai. JL Nehru removed him from his Cabinet.
INDIRA GANDHI:
DISRESPECTS:
(1) 1968 she had no respect towards party’s constitutional procedure. The working committee of her party had approved and recommended the candidature of Sanjiv Reddy for Presidential election.
(2) 1968 she had no respect to her own oath. She signed the candidature form of presidential election in 1969, she made campaign for the opposite to party’s candidate.
(3) 1968 she had no respect for the dignity of her own colleagues. As an understanding with the working committee, Morarji Desai had to be absorbed in Cabinet. But without consulting the party president Indira Gandhi removed Morarji Desai from her cabinet.
(4) 1968 She had no respect towards moral values in politics. There were lot of allegations on her doubtful integrity. But she did not resign.
(5) 1975 She had no respect towards verdicts given by court of law. She ignored the verdict of HC on her disqualification.
(6) 1975-1977 She had no respect towards constitutional provisions, human values and democratic rights of others. She imposed emergency and suspended even natural rights of citizens. Her governments representative told on oath before the court of law that during emergency, government can even kill a person at government’s will.
(7) 1972-75 she had no respect towards truth. When she was making statements before the Allahabad High Court on a case against her unfair practice in election and abuse of power, she told 14 lies on oath before the court.
(8) 1975-1976 She had no respect towards humanity. She had put 60000+ citizens behind the bars even without existence of any offence.
(8.1) 1972 She had nullified the victory achieved through the sacrifice of Indian soldiers and people of India. She, under Simla pact, handed over even the land of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) to Bhtto. This land was captured by India in the Pak-India war .
(8.2) 1972 She had disrespect towards her own promise of executing a packing deal with Pakistan to resolve all the issues with Pakistan. She had very good and full scope to execute “The Package Deal” with Pakistan. She willfully ignored it.
(8.3) 1972 Indira Gandhi disrespected even the constitution. To hand over a part of India, to the enemy or to any of the other countries, is against the constitution. That is our Indian cnstitutioin does not permit such transaction of land. POK is a part of India as per Indian Constitution, one cannot hand over a part of India to any other country even with an affirmation of the total MPs. To do like this India has to form a new constitution committee and a new parliament.
(8.4) 1980-83 Indira had disrespect towards the nation. She had joined hand with Bhinderanwale. She had supported terrorism and naxalite movement.
(9.1) 1968-1984 Indira had no respect towards her own words and oaths. She had promised to send back the 10000000+ (more than one crore), Bangladeshi infiltrators. But she did nothing. Her oath was simply a fraud.
(9.2) 1967-1984 Indira had no respect for truth. She floated a lot of fraudulent rumors to misguide mass with the help of her government owned media.
INTOLERANCE OF INDIRA GANDHI:
(1) 1968-69 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to accept the candidature of a person (Sanjiv Reddy), proposed by the working committee of her own party. Resultantly she put up her own candidate viz. VV Giri for presidential election in 1969.
(2) 1972 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to accept the leader elected by the state legislature party members for the post of CM. Indira always asking to accept a person of her own choice. Viz. 1972 Gujarat Assembly members had proposed Chimanbhai Patel with majority, as CM. But Indira Gandhi rejected him and imposed Ghanshyambhai Oza, who was not even an elected member of the assembly.
(3) 1972-1984 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance even if a leader of her own party, if he takes credit of his good work and good achievement. She can tolerate a leader only and only even if he/she gives credit to herself (Indira Gandhi), what had been achieved. E.g. VP Singh, Hemvatinandan Bahuguna and many others were removed by her from her cabinet for this reason only.
(4.1) 1968-77 Indira Gandhi had no tolerance to opposite view and opposite voice. She abused even veteran Gandhians like Jai Prakash Narain.
(4.2) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and therefore she had imposed emergency for indefinite period.
(4.3) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and Indira put 60000+ persons behind the bar for indefinite period.
(4.4) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and Indira impose censorship on private media too, to suppress them by force.
(4.5) 1975 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and she even suppress the High Court judgments which were against her government,
(4.6) 1975-1977 Indira had no tolerance to opposite voice and she asked every type of associations, to pass a resolution in its meeting, that the association had supported emergency.
(4.7) 1978 Indira had no tolerance to remain without political power. She instigated Charan Sing to topple democratically elected government of Morarji Desai. She supported Charan Sing and then she betrayed him.
RAJIV GANDHI
(1) 1984 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect towards democratic procedure. He, without looking into the propriety of the President invitation to take an oath as the PM, he took the oath, without the resolution of the working committee and the cabinet of the party and the government respectively. In fact he should have refused to take the oath in absence of such resolutions.
(2.1) 1984-1989 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for the human rights. He avoided action against his party lead carnage on Sikhs.
(2.2) 1984 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for human rights and humanity. He gave a smooth passage to Anderson to runaway safely from India. Anderson was the culprit of Bhopal Gas Hazard.
(3) 1984-89 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect for morality. He was involved in Boffors scam. He had written and forwarded an instruction chit through Madhav Singh Solanki a minister of his cabinet, to Swiss Government to go very slow on the matter of investigation related with Boffor Kickback.
(4) 1986-1988 Rajiv Gandhi had no respect towards nation. He gave a smooth passage to Ottavio Quatrochie to run away safely from India.
SONIA GANDHI, CONGI and ASSOCIATES
i.e. The PSEUDO SECULAR GANG
(1)The GANG does not like to respect anybody else as “Number One” in the party. Sitaram Kesri was manually lifted and driven out from the seat of the Congi-President.
(1.1) The GANG does not respect the personality of opposite party.
(1.2) The GANG does not respect the achievement of the government of opposite party,
(1.3) The GANG does not respect the constitutional provisions. The GANG paralyses the functioning of the parliament.
(1.4) The GANG does not respect the very purpose of the parliament which is to discuss the matters and exchange the views to arrive to a decision.
(1.5) The GANG disrespects the natural right of opposite party (BJP leaders) to present their side on the floor of the parliament on the allegations made by the GANG.
(2) The GANG disrespects BJP leaders.
(2.1) The GANG addresses opposite party leaders with abusive words. Like “Maut kaa Sodaagar”, “Godse’s progeny”, Communal, Manav Bhakshi, Pishaach, Chaay Waalaa, Intolerant …
(3) The GANG does not have tolerance to any opposite view to Congi’s governance.
(3.1) The GANG could not tolerate Anna’s agitation. Anna Hazare was abused and alleged by all spokespersons of the Congi
(3.2) The GANG could not tolerate Baba Ramdev’s agitation. Baba Ramdev was also abused and manhandled. A lot fraudulent allegations were made on him. Congi had executed investigations too, but found nothing against Ramdev. Despite of this, Congi never thought of submitting apology.
(3.3) The GANG could not tolerate participants’ personality. Kiran Bedi was also alleged and abused. The investigations were carried out but no guilt was found on making money by Kiran Bedi,
(3.4) The GANG had no tolerance to the functioning of the opposite party. The GANG is in habit to manufacture fake controversies.
(4) The GANG does not have any respect for the human rights of Hindus:
(4.1) The GANG willfully neglected the human rights of Hindus in Kashmir, North East and some pockets of South India.
(4.2) The GANG does not have respect towards the rule of law that everybody is equal before law.
(4.3) The GANG has willfully discriminated the Hindus’ human rights.
(4.4) Kashmiri Hindus had been threatened to be ready for the death unless they adopt Muslim religion. They were told either to adopt Muslim religion or to vacate their houses and leave Kashmir. The threat was announced through loud speakers, from Mosqs, pamphlets pasted on the doors, publications through the news paper, writing on the walls and through every means.
(4.5) The Muslims of Kashmir in joint venture with the GANG, had given a dead line date in advance about the carnage they were going to execute.
(4.6) The GANG had committed cognizable offences, as it kept mum, took no action, done no arrest, registered no FIR, initiated no investigation and no prosecution.
(4.7) The GANG kept total non-transparency on the prolonged carnage. It was a cognizable disrespect of protection of human rights of Hindus of Kashmir.
(4.8) The GANG happily watched the murders of 5000+ Hindus, and the migration of 50000000+ driven out Hindus from their houses.
(4.9) The GANG paid no heed on the issue of the rehabilitation of the Hindus. These Hindus are living in substandard living condition since last 25 years. This is nothing but a continued terrorist attack sponsored by the GANG.
What does this GANG want?
The GANG wants Hindus and pro-BJP inclusive of BJP persons should tolerate as under:
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE all the injustice and discrimination applied upon them inclusive of end of their lives and carnage executed by the GANG.
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE even if the GANG curtails suspends or dismisses their human rights.
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG abused them by any bad name
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG manufactures any fraudulent and fake controversy, rumor or allegation upon them,
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE even if the GANG does not use its sense of proportion and or it does not use its sense of relevance while alleging
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG condemns the views of them on historical events even without material
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG terms the material conclusion of existence of some historical character as fake and fictitious and the GANG avoids discussion
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG insults your Gods and Goddesses,
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG does not talk to the point
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG simply shouts while discussion on TV channels and consumes most of the time
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG simply shouts and disturbs them while they submit their replies
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG openly tries to divide society by caste, religion, language and region,
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE Even if the GANG stops them and abuses them for speaking against Nehruvians’ frauds, blunders, scams, scandals, stupidity or whatsoever,
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE as the GANG persons are not supposed to tolerate any thing whatsoever against them, even if the allegations are proved in Court of Law. This is because the Gang has full liberty to express inclusive of anti-national, derogative to Indian culture or whatsoever.
HINDUS AND PRO-BJP INCLUSIVE OF BJP PERSONS SHOULD TOLERATE as the GANG persons are not supposed to respect any of their right inclusive of human rights or natural rights or constitutional rights whatsoever.
Shirish M. Dave
Tags:
Intolerance, Nehruvians, Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Sonia, Congi, BJP, Narendra Modi, Emergency, Censorship, Media, Pseudo, Secular
WHO WILL HANG BUREAUCRATS
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged A D Gorwala, Administrative, Black Money, Bureaucrats, G R Khairnar, IAS, ICS, IFS, Indian, IPS, joint venture, NaMo, Narendra modi, Officer, S R Rao, Services, Smuggling, T H Chaudhary, T N Seshan, Unauthrized Construction, VK Singh on June 7, 2015| 10 Comments »
When Narendra Modi won the Assembly Election in 2002, I had written him a letter to be careful of I “X” S officers. IXS officers are executive officers for maintaining Rule of Law. But they are like Packing Cartoons. If the quality of packing material is poor it can undo the product.
Fortunately Narendra Modi set these IXS officer right to great extent in Gujarat. He suspended a lot IAS officers who were involved in corruption in managing the rehabilitation and settlement of distressed people by 2001 earth quake in Gujarat. Modi had become popular in Gujarat due to this reason and not the riots of 2002. Leave this point apart.
Most departmental litigation coming to the court of law are due to the willfully and prejudicially made bad interpretation of the service rule by the IXS officers.
I. ‘X’. S. OFFICERS
Here “X” is a variable, the facial value is simply zero or even negative. But these IXS officers are highly paid and well protected. They perform nearly no duty. They like to depend upon their subordinate to pass blame on them if they are asked to explain.
What is the purpose of putting “X” instead of the real character? It is simply because, they are required to be put on the same line, same level and same category.
You put X=A (Administrative). X=P (Police and also Postal), X=T (telegraph, then telecommunication), X= F (Foreign and also Finance and also Forest),
The full form is Indian “X” Services. They are not Ex Service men. They are not worthy for that, though they are supposed to fight with internal enemies. They even cannot fight with themselves to improve their morale standard.
Yes. It was suggested by Sardar Patel to continue officers like Indian Civil Service (ICS), in view of their judicious approach on every matter and to remain committed to the aims of the Government for right poicy. But this observation was for the pre-independence period.
Sardar Patel unfortunately died early, He could not correct his decision. He might have thought the intellectual and moral level of the forthcoming officers of the similar services would remain the same and the morals of Nehru would not go down to deteriorate the governance.
HOW WERE THE ICS OFFICERS?
A D Gorwala was an ICS officer, who resigned from the services, simply because he did not agree to a suggestion to make changes to the then prevailing, Government’s Food Grain Distribution System. Please note, A D Gorwala had not voluntarily retired. He had resigned. Had he been voluntarily retired, he was to get pension. He kicked the pension. This was his moral sincerity to stick to the original policy and he was not agreeable to the policy, the policy that could bring a failure, though it has been proposed by the minister.
An ICS officer is supposed to have a foresight and wisdom as a part of his qualification. This quality is supposed to be prevaied through out his service. The same is supposed to be the culture of all the I. ‘X’. S. officers.
Nehru had made this cadre a fun. There are so many funny episodes on our IXS officers’ knowledge and behavior.
IAS, IFS, IPS and all such officers who were appointed after independence, had generally possessed low morale, and they were crooked too. Nehru allowed them to flourish through unauthorized channels. Somehow, the bad effect of low morale values and low skill of these officers, could not become prominent in nineteen fifties, barring some fields of governance becasue of the god number of ICS officers and good team with Nehru.
Thereafter the new product of post independence government was so much low, you put your fingure anywhere, and catch them guilty.
All the IXS officers are supposed to be responsible if anything happens wrong or worse in any field, including decisions taken related to staff matters. They are supposed to be expert in service rules with judicious mind.
AN OASIS IN A DESERT
How many names of the IXS officers with outstandingly performance one can give, out of several tens of thousands of IXS officers appointed so far in India?
T N Seshan: He who implemented the guiding laws of conducting fair elections in their true spirit and sense.
S R Rao a Municipal Commissioner of Surat converted the dirtiest city of India into the cleanest city of India.
There may be few more such officers. In total it is like an oasis in a deserted India.
INDIAN FOREIGN SERVICES OFFICERS.
In foreign Indian embassies, you can have glimpses of Indian governance.
A French educational institute wanted to play “Shaakuntala of Kalidasa (शाकुन्तल)” in Paris, in nineteen fifties. The institution approached the Indian Embassy in Paris. Embassy failed to provide any information about the dresses of the Gupta period. Embassy even failed to collect such information from India. That is, it did not have a thought to be helpful. The Institution applied its own mind and the characters of Shakuntal wore the dresses of the period of Mogul. King “Dushyant” dressed and looked like Akbar, and Shakuntala dressed and looked like Noor Jehan.
INDIAN TELECOM SERVICES OFFICERS:
I can give thousand cases of the ITS officers served in my Telecommunication department. Most funny was the computerization system adopted in Commercial section where the system was not competent to arrange waiting list geographically in 1990s. Those who are simply familiar with computer, know very well that even this facilities can be availed through any damn database program. But the officers of even ITS level was unaware of this. God knows what type of program had they purchased and installed in the net work system. I think all the ITS officers should have been dismissed. You can go through this website for other blogs.
I found only one or two ITS officers who were to the mark. One was T H Chaudhary Ahmedabad (1971-1974), who revolutionized the governance wherever he went. He was the funder of VSNL. The other was P D Garg Ahmedabad(1975-1980), who was strict but foresighted. But both these officers were departmental Outsider in ITS. i.e. Earlier they were in the department in lower cadre and passed out the Union Public Service Examination. It is just like G R Khairnar of Mumbai Municipal Corporation who came up from lower level to upper level.
One can write a voluminous book on blunders and corruption of ITS officers.
INDIAN POSTAL SERVICES
The postal staff is heavily loaded. E.g. the work load of Shastrinagar Post Office is increased 20 folds, but the post office staff is having the same area and same number of employees. There is no adiquate space for the customers to stand in a queue. The condition of Bodakdev post office is still worst. You have stand under the hot Sun in a queue. The IPS officers are not capable to solve the difficulty of the staff and the customers. This is not a stray case. Most post offices are facing same and similar problems. Though for certain dealing with post office there is computerization, but the “page set” would not tally with “print” on given size of the paper or book.
I. P. S. AND I. A. S. OFFICERS IN JOINT VENTURE
How the police officers can keep Anderson un-arrested and can allowed him to run away smoothly from India? Keep aside the defective deed executed by Indira Government with the Union Carbide.
How can land mafia, bootleggers and smugglers can flourish without the assistance of IPS officers?
How can Daud run away to Pakistan? How four accused involved in blazing of S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express in 2002, can run away to Pakistan?
How unauthorized constructions can flourished everywhere without the consent of Municipal Commissioner?
How the builders can collect black money in every deadl of sale, from the purchasers, unless vigilance officer, police and IT Commissioner keep their eyes closed?
Who is responsible for rent act and thereby death of a lot human beings in every big cities due to collapse of old houses?
Why the defense secretaries did not resign when Nehru allowed LOC to remain insecure? This tempted China to infiltrate and attack? China had a cake walk victory in 1962.
Why the defense secretary did not resign when the military was illequipped in nineteen fifties?
Why the home secretaries did not resign when the non-Bengali speaking Muslim infiltrators started coming in large scale in India in 1968-1970 and thereafter too?
Why the home secretary did not resigned when Indira Signed the Simla Pact with Bhutto and resultantly converted the great victory into total defeat? The sacrifice of the soldiers went in vain.
Why the Home secretaries of the Union, Home secretary of the state and IPS officers failed to act when Hindus were being murdered in 1990 in Kashmir?
Why the Police Commissioners and Home Secretaries of Union and state failed to secure the human rights of Kashmiri Hindus for decades together?
Did they suppose to wait for government instructions to protect the human rights of Hindus of Kashmir? No. Not at all.
Who is responsible where a lot Bangladeshi Muslims have purchased and occupied the land of the people of North East?
Everywhere you will find the willful failure of high level bureaucrats.
WHO WILL HANG THEM?
Similar is the case when OROP is left with the bureaucrats. However if the Ex-Service men pressurize Narendra Modi through VK Singh, the resolution of the issue is not that difficult, because Narendra Modi would trust VK Singh and not the bureaucrats.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Indian, Administrative, Services, Officer, IAS, IPS, IFS, ICS, Bureaucrats, Narendra Modi, NaMo, VK Singh, T H Chaudhary, T N Seshan, A D Gorwala, S R Rao, G R Khairnar, Unauthrized Construction, Black Money, Smuggling, Joint Venture
DO NOT FORGET “ENEMIES ARE NEVER SMALL”
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged Anti-Modi gangs, bjp, blunder, indira, lies, Narendra modi, Negative atmosphere, Nehru, Nehruvian Cong, pseudo secular gangs, Rajiv, Scam, SIT, Sonia on March 28, 2015| 4 Comments »
I have received an email from one of my learned friends, on some points which are generally being used to pass blame on BJP and Narendra Modi by many as a failure of BJP government.
MY RESPONSE TO THE POINTS IS AS UNDER:
1 why no difference appears because of Modi whom we feel connected with the soil of India whereas all formers were Muslim/Communists or Christian/Communists anti nationals ?
(1)What I feel that all the problems and issues arise out of negligence, ignorance and thereby failure of Government in the fields of education and employment.
The Nehruvian Congress has no vision right from Nehru. Its ideas on management of land and productions are not worth to debate. I have watched the making of Modi in Gujarat. He was quite an unknown person to the people of Gujarat till he was made a CM of Gujarat in 2001.
A very well established leader viz. Keshubhai Patel was The CM. He was a failure to the public expectation. BJP was losing ground in Gujarat. Ahmedabad Corp election was lost by the BJP. There was a severe earth quake in Gujarat on 26-01-2001. BJP CM was a failure. Media was making fun of Keshubhai.
Some how, by the grace of God, Narendra Modi was appointed as CM by Bajpai.
Narendra took hold of bureaucracy. He suspended several senior officers and set Gujarat to normalcy.
There was a lot of internal fights within BJP. Most leaders of BJP inclusive of Keshubhai where against Modi. They were trying to let him down. But Modi had achieved mass popularity. Media was also against Modi. Modi had discontinued the special treatment to media. A very senior writer of Gujarati literature, published an advertisement asking people to submit their opinion whether Modi should continue as CM or not. People had to use the advertised form to cast their opinion and to forward the opinion with their own postage charges. Modi got 87% votes in favor. However Keshubhai and others continued their fights. They were failed. Modi also won Ahmedabad Corp.
Then it was 2002 riot case. He handled it successfully despite of all odds. He defeated all his rivals without breaking BJP. How? Simply by encouraging education, cottage productions and infrastructure developments. Development brings employment. Infrastructure development brings developments in other fields. If there is a good governance then all these can happen if one has a will.
The changes would become visible by the time of next election. Because infrastructure projects are in pipe line. During Nehruvian Cong rule a tender used to take 3 years to get finalized. It is not the case with the BJP.
2 Indians have given Modi all supper powers still he has no media which speaks good about him expect Sudarshan who is not much known . NDTV is dead antinational . Others are owned by foreign powers . Why Modi failed to rescue our media ?
(2) Modi has no super power as per constitution. BJP has no absolute majority in LS, and no majority in RS.
Nehruvian Congress knows how to misguide people and how to degrade those who oppose them. Nehruvian Congress has become expert in dividing people by religion, caste and language.
In 1956 Nehru himself had said that if Maharashtra would get Mumbai, he would be happy. By telling this, he gave a message to Marathi people that Gujaratis are the obstructions for Marathi people in getting Mumbai. In fact Gujarati and Marathi lived together for centuries. Narendra Modi has generated a parallel media of print and TV. This is social media. Hence those who love India have to be active on social media to defeat this paid media.
3 If Modi has power to change constitution why he has not put a ban on cow slaughter and free not guilty saints from prison ? . Now he has lost supports from Sadhus community .
(3) BJP has no absolute majority and has no power to change constitution. Modi might be not in favor to take risk.
If Asharam is falling under Sadhu, then most Sadhus must not fall under that category. Shri Shri Ravishankar, Ramdev, and many others are true Sadhus. They do favor Modi. Rest too, would extend favor when they would generate a sense of proportion and sense of priority.
BJP ruled states are doing progress on the ban on cow slaughter.
4 Modi had promised to get black money back in 100 days and every body will be much better . now when he could not do it was not his responsibility to explain poor Indians who are still eagerly waiting . Now they feel cheated .
(4) We have to think with sense of proportion. Nehruvian Congress willfully failed to constitute SIT, despite of the order of SC for 3 years.
Narendra Modi constituted SIT within 3 days. SIT is headed by SC judge. We should have faith in SC and SIT.
Since BJP has no absolute majority it cannot make drastic changes. If ordinance is issued, it can be challenged in SC. Modi does not want to take a risk to give a chance to the media. Media belongs to the pseudo secular gang. It is always ready to abuse Modi by twisting the matters.
Nehruvian Congress and its allies want to create controversy on every matter. Nehruvian Congress has avoided black money issue for six decades, despite of this, Anti-Modi gangs have become able to confuse the learned people on black money issue. They have become successful to create negative image for Narendra Modi and BJP to some extent. Most learned people have lost the sense of proportion. Should we become a part of it?
Please go through my blog “क्या आप भारतके होतैषी है? और फिर भी क्या आप इनमेंसे कोई एक वर्गमें भी आते हैं?” at https://treenetram.wordpress.com/2015/01/04/%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE-%E0%A4%86%E0%A4%AA-%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%87-%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%88%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%80-%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%88-%E0%A4%94/
5 Because of these blunders Modi will lose in next election. It is not a blunder at all.
(5) To term it a blunder and to create a negative atmosphere for BJP, is the strategy and trap made by Nehruvian Congress and Anti-Modi (BJP) gangs.
How to tackle this strategy, the way out to it, depends upon us and our sense of proportion to understand and to realize the same.
The pseudo secular gangs are no way better than BJP and Narendra Modi.
We have to remember that Nehruvian Congress has ruled for six decades with majority period of absolute majority.
BJP has never ruled with an absolute majority. Now also, it is ruling with normal majority that too in LS only.
6 So , how India will save herself from wicked Congies and Muslim/Christian powers to hijack our country ?
(6) As and when Hindus are attacked intellectually, Hindus have to hit them back.
Hindus have good weapons to fight. It is easy for Hindus to hit them back as these Muslim and Christian leaders have basic falsehood and cunningness in their philosophy and actions respectively.
When they attack on us physically, we should take legal action and to expose them, to give wide publicity. We must make such events as international issue. There is no shortage of weapon to fight intellectually against Nehruvian Congress, pseudo secular, Christian priests and decisive forces of Muslims.
The nationalists should always hit them back repeatedly on their culture, character and their evil actions. They have no defense at all.
e.g. Nehruvian Congress:
Nehru’s Blunders on policy with China, Kashmir, Pakistan, Tibet, Burma, Ceylon etc… no end, including telling lies before parliament.
Indira’s blunders, scams, cunningness for power, negligence on the issue of sending back the Bangadeshi infiltrators, Introduction of Vote bank politics, telling lies before court of law, Simla pact, Union Carbide deal, Emergency, antisocial activities, generating cross border terrorism and what not?
Rajiv Gandhi’s inaction and improper handling of Bhopal gas hazard, making smooth pass for Anderson.
Sonia’s anti-national activities, giving smooth path to Daud to run away, allowing his gang to do all the anti-social activities, unconstitutional actions and a lot scams executed openly. Besides this, her party’s willful failure of reinstatement of Kashmiri Hindus. Denial of natural rights, Human rights and constitutional rights of Hindus, her negligence on securities of Hindus’ rights everywhere.
Pseudo secular and media: Spreading rumors against Hindus, neglecting Kashmiri Hindus for 25+ years. This is a grave offence of keeping mum on massacre of 3000+ Kashmiri Hindus and keeping them in exile from their own state and houses. They are living in tents from 1990, till date. Hindus should make continuous, wide spread and big noise on this criminal negligence. All the leaders like Nehruvians, Kashmiri leaders like Omar, Farukh, Mufti, separatist leaders IAS officers etc… should be arrested on unbailable warrant, put to jail and convicted for willful negligence of human rights.
Christian priests: An investigation team should be constituted in each state to see as to how the Hindus were converted to Christianity.
Muslim separatists and caste politics: Most Nehruvian Congi leaders and whosoever have played or encouraged vote bank politics to divide India on the basis of caste, religion, so called race and language, should be prosecuted.
E.g. Akabaruddin, Azamkhan, Mamata, Nitish, Laloo, Karuna, MMS, Sonia … Even without creating any controversy the Nationalist lot of India can hit these virtually anti-nationals, very hard and continuously.
As and when any of the above leaders speaks against BJP government and otherwise also, they should be bombarded by us through print media and social media. Media should be flooded with our attack.
At this stage, when the anti-national elements are alive and making efforts to derogate BJP to create a negative atmosphere, the people who think themselves nationalists, should not touch any non-issues like as to who was responsible for partition or like that…
We must also know that an enemy is never a small. National enemy can never be pardoned.
BJP has to follow Kautilya. BJP has not to follow Prithviraj Chauhan.
Kautilya has said wisely that it is better to have an intelligent enemy than to have a foolish friend.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Nehruvian Cong, Nehru, Indira, Rajiv, Sonia, blunder, scam, lies, SIT, BJP, Narendra Modi, Negative atmosphere, Anti-Modi gangs, pseudo secular gangs
Nehruvian Congress is a GONE CASE
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged anti, Bharatiya Janata Party, bjp, Congress, Delhi, deny, Effect, failure, Gujarat, hide, highlight, incumbency, India, Modi, Modi-Effect, Narendra modi, nehruvian, Rajasthan, success on December 9, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Nehruvian Congress is a GONE CASE
PRIME MINISTERIAL CANDIDATE
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has projected Narendra Modi as the Prime Ministerial candidate of the party. Narendra Modi was otherwise also very much active. After his selection as the Prime Ministerial candidate, he has become very much active and he has floated several issue base questions before ruling parties at center and at the relevant states associated with Nehruvian Congress.
The land side success and victory of Narendra Modi and BJP in all the Hindi speaking four states, has wiped out Nehruvian Congress.
What is the present mindset of Nehruvian Congress leaders and its allies?
MODI-EFFECT
The allies of Nehruvian Congress were not much in the picture significantly but they too are wiped out and most of them have lost their deposit. They have not received any coverage due to their insignificance in the fight. They have kept mum on the efforts and success of Narendra Modi.
But the all level failure in all the fields has posed before the Nehruvian Congress a big problem.
However look at the excuses of its leaders. Somehow they are not ready to accept the Modi-Effect in the election. They are still trying to negate Modi-Effect.
Why Nehruvian Congress is not worried for its failure in performance?
This is because:
Still money plays a big role in winning elections,
Still caste, religion, language and can play a role in dividing voters,
Media too can play a big role to mislead common mass and learned people.
This is because poor mass is looking for short term and immediate attention of its problems of starving. Let it be a short term effect.
Media and learned persons are purchasable. They can use philosophical meaningless language for hiding the failure of Nehruvian Congress to misguide the mass. It can also prevent mass by hiding the facts, related with failures, scams and frauds of Anti-BJP parties.
Why the media and Nehruvian Congress leaders are concentrating on rejection Modi-Effect?
Modi is becoming popular all over India in a big way. Thereby Nehruvian Congress is more interested in nullifying Modi-Effect. At moment, media is not helping Nehruvian Congress much, because of the recent success of Modi-Effect in the four State Assembly elections. This is because media does not want to be unauthentic and untrustworthy. It cannot hide the reflection of people’s voice immediately. But media cannot hide its inherent culture. Media has already shown some symptoms of its hidden and likely approach of its future trend.
Nehruvian Congress can hide its failures very easily.
This is because; it has a very long experience of 60+ years as to how to win elections. There is no scope for opposition to beat the Congress in his game.
E.g. Nehruvian Congress had miserably failed in its Central Intelligence. It failed to prevent terrorists attack in Mumbai. Its failure caused several terrorist blasts in 2008 just before elections of 2009. But Nehruvian Congress was able to just generalized the issue with the blessing of media, learned people and Bollywood celebrities. It is said that the activities of Bollywood is controlled by Daud. Daud has close links with Nehruvian Congress and some of its allies. Nehruvian Congress also tackles the issue of its corruptions, scandals and scams in similar way.
Media can dilute the success stories of BJP in performance of development by not giving any coverage. Media can highlight the so-called good performance of Nehruvian Congress by providing repeated coverage.
TO NULLIFY THE MODI-EFFECT IS A NEW FACTOR
Nehruvian Congress has been clean bawled and wiped out in recent four assembly elections by Modi-Effect.
What could be the “would be approach” of Nehruvian Congress and its allies on Modi-Effect.
Deny the Modi-Effect.
There is No Modi Effect in India at all.
1 The development, that Modi carried out in Gujarat is false. This has now been proved.
2 Gujarat was a developed state from the very beginning.
3 Modi is a liar on his claims of achievements about development. This has been also proved by the several independent reports.
4 Modi’s Modal of development cannot be applied all over India because geography is not the same in India.
5 Modi is communal and not acceptable to minorities. Nobody can forget and forgive him on his 2002 communal riots.
6 There was no Modi-Effect in any elections.
7 Had there been any Modi-Effect, how had he been a failure in Karnatak state assembly elections in last year?
8 There was no Modi-Effect in recent four state assembly elections
9 In MP State, Congress lost because we have not made adequate efforts at grass root level.
10 Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong.
11 In Rajasthan State, we lost power and could get only few seats due to the factor of anti-incumbency in the state and in the center. In fact we could not take our message of our success story and programs to grassroots level. Here also Modi-Effect was nil. Because Modi had organized his shows at so many places where the BJP candidates were otherwise also strong.
12 Defeat in Delhi, the reason is also the same. (Repeat whatsoever said for Rajasthan State).
13 As for the question “But how has been your party ranked third in Delhi State Assembly elections? How have been gone below the newly formed party AaP? The answer is “We had under estimated AaP. AaP had approached mass at grass root level. But our defeat was not due to Modi-Effect. Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong. We are defeated due to anti-incumbency effect.
14 As for Zarkhand state, how could you not get the benefit of anti-incumbency effect of BJP? Reply of Nehruvian Congress; “We have improved our position. We have won two more seats in the assembly. Here also there was no Modi-Effect. Narendra Modi had organized shows at so many places, where the BJP candidates were otherwise also very strong.
15 Question: What would you do in forthcoming Parliamentarians Elections due in 2014?
Reply by Nehruvian Congress. “The issues of state assembly elections and parliamentarian elections are quite different. In 2008 we had lost assembly elections in some states. But we had won parliament elections.
“Our leaders, are now determined to go to grass root level, as directly by Rahul (the Nehruvian progeny). He is a person of determination. He has decided to change the program and system of canvassing. We are going to plan a revised program. You know Rahul is now Vice President of our party. Earlier in 2008 assembly elections he was not given a big role. In view of his great influence on mass, we had given him a big role of Vice President in our party. Off course we agree that in these recent elections we could not take sufficient advantage of his influence. But now Rahul has decided to change the plan of Election Champaign. We are firm on our success in forthcoming elections. We totally deny the Modi-Effect.
Modi is uncultured. Modi uses abusive language. Modi does not know how to talk respectfully to opponents. Modi is shameless. Modi is a rat. Modi is a worm. Modi is a liar. Modi is a cockroach. Modi is monkey. Modi is vulgar. Modi is illiterate. Modi does not know history and geography. Modi is communal. Modi is killer.
Can you expect that Nehruvian Congress can correct and improve its approach? Not at all. It is next to impossible. What JL Nehru could not do, what Indira Gandhi could not do, what Rajiv Could not do, how can one expect from these cunning people who are interested only in making money through Coalgate scam, 2G Frequency scam, Common Wealth Game bundle of scams, Adarsh Scam, Fake currency printing scam, Oil and gold smuggling and what not? Leave aside scams and scandals of their predecessors related with terrorism.
Minorities have adopted attitude and set their mind to join mainstream. But to expect Nehruvians and their allies to embrace morals is next to impossible.
Let them die as per the Hindu Law of Karma.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Nehruvian, Congress, failure, hide, highlight, success, anti, incumbency, deny, Modi, Effect
Hypocrite Spineless Nehruvian Congress derogates Narendra Modi
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged Action, coward, denial, Diplomat, failure, Foreign policy, government, inefficient, minister, Narendra modi, Nehruvian Congress, reactive, report, spineless, US, US VISA, wikileaks on May 13, 2013| 7 Comments »
Hypocrite Spineless Nehruvian Congress derogates Narendra Modi
Very recently when Narendra Modi pointed out the failure of foreign policy of Nehruvian Congress, Kapil Sibbal miserably failed to reply Narendra Modi. Kapil Sibbal had once again exposed his party’s low level culture. Kapil Sibbal has no logical material to defend the allegation made on foreign policy of Nehruvians and its Congress till date. To hide his government’s folly and self-centeredness of Nehruvian Congress, he diverted the point of discussion to some irrelevant episode related with Narendra Modi. In fact in Narendra Modi’s case also, actually Nehruvian Congress itself is at fault. That case too, exhibits the failure of foreign policy of Nehruvian Congress.
This is about the statement Kapil Sibbal where he himself is a part and parcel of Nehruvian Congress and the government led by its own party.
Kapil Sibbal asked Narendra Modi to first obtain US VISA, before telling about the failure of his party’s foreign policy.
It was the responsibility of Nehruvian Congress
Who is responsible for the denial of the US Administration on issue of US VISA to Narendra Modi?
It is Nehruvian Congress who is absolutely responsible for this failure.
One must know that the US administration is always working in the interest of its Nation. It could be a short term also. As a part of its policy it opted to balance the Muslim Lobby against the hatred prevailing against Muslims in the USA. The US administration picked up an opportunity when the Nehruvian Congress lead government of India applied for the VISA for Narendra Modi.
The US diplomacy knows very well that Nehruvian Congress party is spineless and self centered too.
The US administration knows very well that the Nehruvian Congress will get pleased instead of protesting severely for showing disrespect of Indian Constitution and Indian judiciary. The US administration knows very well that Nehruvian Congress will never react against the denial of the VISA. Instead of this, it would try to take political mileage. The US administration proved correct in its assumption, as the Nehruvian Congress and its allies shamelessly are trying to derogate Narendra Modi on this episode. Nehruvian Congress leaders miserably failed to understand that the US Administration is not bothered on democratic values when matter is related with other countries irrespective the other country is a democratic one or autocrat. Pakistan which was generally remained under martial law, was favored out of way by the USA against India. All the US Military aids had been utilized by Pakistan against India and the USA had kept mum.
What should be the stand of Nehruvian Congress Government?
Before the ground of denial of VISA is accepted by Nehruvian Congress leaders, they are supposed to know the inherent assumptions of the US administration about India. This can be logically derived by our government.
1 What are the comments of Nehruvian Congress leaders, on the points which could be raised, consequent to the denial of VISA? Had they any comment at all?
2 Whether the election of Narendra Modi had been challenged in any court of law of India?
3 Whether the post held by Narendra Modi was constitutional or not?
4 Does this Nehruvian Congress want to protect the dignity of Indian Constitution or not?
5 Whether the Nehruvian Congress believes that the constitution of India is authentic or not?
6 Whether the parliament that had passed the constitution of India was lawful or not?
7 Whether the Indian Constitution is democratic or not?
8 Whether India is a republic or not?
9 Whether all the governments elected by people of India were constitutionally authentic or not?
10 Whether the election commission of India is a constitutional authority or not?
11 Whether the judiciary of India is constitutional authority of India or not?
12 Whether any FIR has been lodged against Narendra Modi or not?
13 Whether the Nehruvian Congress lead Government had applied for the US VISA for Narendra Modi or not?
14 Whether the election of Narendra Modi had been challenged in any court of law of India?
15 Whether the Nehruvian Congress has submitted any protest against the US administration that distrusted the Indian constitution and insulted the nation and its constitutional authenticity?
16 Whether the Nehruvian Congress has taken any type of diplomatic action to maintain the dignity of people of India or not?
Any reply of Nehruvian Congress leaders would prove their hypocrisy. Nehruvian Congress from the very initial stage, has not only avoided democratic values but it has also avoided national interest and dignity, for achieving personal benefits.
Look at the failures of Nehruvian Congress
Nehru under his folly of 1950 to 1962, allowed China to have a cake walk victory to occupy Indian land of 92000 square miles, though Sardar Patel had warned Nehru in 1950.
We would never know the truth kept hidden by the Nehruvians on the demise of LB Shastri.
Nehruvian have executed defective contract deeds irrespective of trade, production or diplomatic.
Punchsheel with China: We are the looser.
This has caused to irreparable harms to India facing till date,
Indira lost all the gains achieved by the military in 1971 war with Pakistan, under Simla pact in 1972.
Indira Gandhi had an uncalled treaty with the USSR before the Indo-Pak war 1971, that both would have mutual consultation on internal and external issues.
What information Indira got on disintegration of USSR?
Was she consulted at all by USSR when the latter was under disintegration? No. Nothing. She was no consulted at all. She was kept in dark in toto.
Union Carbide Deal: Generated Bhopal Gas hazard. Victims got nothing meaningful compensation due to weak deed with Union Carbide.
Safe passage of Anderson, Quatrochie, Daud and what not?
Nehruvian Congress failed to influence
Nehruvian Congress failed miserably to dominate by its influence on neighboring countries as small as even Ceylon and Maldives. Ceylon can ignore India and Tamilians, leave aside domination.
Not only this, but many small neighbors are controlling Indian market and currency through introducing fake currency notes and money laundering.
Indira had designated Bhindaranvale as a saint who had organized terrorists network with the help Pakistan who latter flourished its network in India.
Even Burma which was a part of India in early decade of last century had driven out all Indians from Burma in fifties. Contrary to this, under Nehruvian Congress rule, of the order of 5 crores infiltrators in numbers from terrorist countries entered and settled in India during the period from 1969 to till date. Many of them got Unique Identification Card as Indian Resident.
Indira Government had released 90000 (ninety thousands) POWs (Prisoners of War) of 1971, within in one year, whereas she and her successor Nehruvian Congress failed miserably even to get release of 500 soldiers (POWs with Pakistan) from Pakistan, even after a lapse of 40years.
Nehruvian Congress leaders have no capacity to execute diplomatic reactions.
Very recent example is Nuclear Deal.
Wikileaks had leaked a communication. A Nehruvian Congi Minister had assured an US Diplomat in India that his government had kept several crores of rupees ready to bribe MPs to vote in favor of Nuclear Bill. The Indian further said that he would like to show the money if the US diplomat wanted to convince himself of the arrangement made by Nehruvian Congress. The US Diplomat had communicated this position to the US foreign affairs. This communication was leaked out by wikileaks.
Now there are two possibilities.
Either the US Diplomat told lie to the US foreign affairs or he told the truth.
Nehruvian Congress had said that it was a lie.
If it was a lie, then what action had been taken by the Nehruvian Congress with the US?
If Nehruvian Congress is of the opinion that Wikileaks had lied, then it should tell the people of India as to on what ground it assumed it to be a lie?
If Nehruvian Congress has no ground and otherwise also it should ask the US foreign affairs that they should clarify and confirm that it was a lie.
If the US does not say anything then the Nehruvian Congress should say to the people of India that the US does not reply. It should also initiate diplomatic reaction against the US administration on this issue.
If the US Foreign Affairs says it was on their record as to what the US Diplomat in India had conveyed was a truth, then either Nehruvian Congress should take severe diplomatic reactive action against the US administration as the US Diplomat in India was a responsible person. This is because Nehruvian Congress has already declared it was a lie.
Now if the Nehruvian Congress does not act at all, then it means that it is a spineless government and has no guts to take diplomatic action against the USA.
Thereby under all the circumstances Nehruvian Congress led Government gets proved a spineless, coward and inefficient government with all round failures.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Nehruvian Congress, minister, Foreign policy, US, Diplomat, wikileaks, Narendra Modi, US VISA, denial, report, reactive, action, spineless, coward, inefficient, failure, government
IS IT THAT KAPI SIBBAL IS ILLITERATE?
Posted in માનવીય સમસ્યાઓ, tagged Akash tablet, Delhi, election campaign, false, Fraud, India, indira, Indira Gandhi, Kapi, Kapil, Kashmir, Narendra modi, nehruvian, Nehruvian Congress, Pakistan, promise, Sibbal, Simla pact, Youth on September 30, 2012| 6 Comments »
Is it that Kapi Sibbal is illiterate?
Three years back at the time of general elections campaign, Kapil Sibbal of Nehruvian Congress had announced that he would give “Akash Tablet” to all the youths at the rate of Rs. 3000/-.
Many youths had deposited money for “Akash”.
Nehruvian Congress came to power again in 2009. The days have been passed, the weeks have been passed, moths have been passed and years are passing. Now a time has come that again the general elections have become due (at any time), but no “Akash” had come down to meet the youths on the earth. Narendra Modi pointed out this fraudulent promise of Nehruvian Congress leader in one of his lectures.
Narendra Modi further said that Nehruvian Congress has a habit and culture to give false promises. It gives false promises not to only to common men, but it gives false promises to youths too. Such type of practice, generates bad moral values in youths. This is dangerous for a nation.
In reply to this Kapi Sibbal forwarded one Akash Tablet to Modi, instead of fulfilling the promises given to the youths of Delhi. Kapi Sibbal further abused Narendra Modi, and asked him to be a cultured leader. This means that to point out the false promises of Nehruvians, is a bad culture and to make a false and fraudulent promises is a good culture according to Nehruvian Congress culture.
JL Nehru had taken an oath in 1963 before the Indian parliament that he would not take rest till he would re-capture the land snatched by China during the war in 1962. Now if Narendra Modi would point out this point, the Nehruvian Congress would forward a photo of lost land to Narendra Modi and further it would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.
If Narendra Modi would point out the oath taken by Nehruvian Progeny Indira Gandhi of “I will remove the poverty” in 1969, then Nehruvian Congress leaders would send Rs.60/- (the daily wage of NAREGA) to Narendra Modi, and ask him to be a cultured person.
If Narendra Modi would point out the promise recalled before a foreign news channel by Indira Gandhi in 1970 that all the infiltrators came from Pakistan will be sent back to their country, the Nehruvian Congress leaders would send some Bangladeshi Muslims to Gandhinagar and further the would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and cultured.
Recall the statement of Nehruvian Congress ruling Cabinet made during the pre-India Pak war period of 1971 that “India will not give return the land won by India if any war is imposed on India by Pakistan”, and after winning the war with the great braveness of Indian soldiers, it was announced by the Indira Gandhian Cabinet that Pakistan will have to sign a package deal and will have to meet the demands as under:
What was the PACKAGE DEAL”?
Reimbursement of all the expenses incurred by India due to this war on India imposed by Pakistan,
Return of the land of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, so that the Issue of Kashmir ends up,
Take back the all the infiltrators and refugees came from Pakistan in India,
Settlement of property cases of Hindu refugees came to India from Pakistan in 1947-48,
Deportation of anti-social elements that had committed crimes in India and taken shelter in Pakistan,
All the fishermen and whatsoever Indian prisoners available in Pakistan jails will have to be released,
“No war pact” with India,
No hatred and propaganda against India in Pakistan,
Unless Pakistan signs this pact, then only the Prisoners of War (90000 soldiers who were fed by India with due respect from 1971 to 1972) and the land won by India during the war would be returned to Pakistan.
But what has been happened in Simla pack?
No gain for India,
Indira Gandhi returned all the POW i.e. 90000 soldiers,
Indira Gandhi returned all the land pieces that had won by Indian soldiers,
Indira Gandhi also returned the land piece of POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir) on which India had the claim,
On the other hand Pakistan released no Indian soldier. They are still with Pakistan, in 400+ numbers, in Pakistan Jail.
Now if Narendra Modi points out this fraud of progeny and party viz Nehruvian Congress, Kapi Sibbal or any damn leader would ask Narendra Modi to be educated and to behave with good culture.
It is not a surprise so far Nehruvian Congress leader and their allies are concerned. They have possessed all the evils available in the world. You can write a bigger book than the epic Mahabharat. Nehruvians and their party leaders can abuse any leader howsoever he may be great and popular among learned and common, if he/she opposes a Nehruvian and its party, they will abuse him/her without any logic and sense. They have spared none. They can do any damn thing to hide their evils and divert the mind of common mass by talking irrelevant and baseless.
Shirish Mohanlal Dave
Tags: Narendra Modi, Akash tablet, Kapi, Kapil, Sibbal, Nehruvian, Youth, election campaign, false, fraud, promise, Simla pact, Indira